Socratic epistemology: Explorations of knowledge-seeking by questioning

Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-239

  Hintikka, Jaakko ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925167127     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511619298     Document Type: Book

References (312)

1. Halonen, Ilpo, and Jaakko Hintikka, 2005, “Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation,” Synthese, vol. 143, pp. 5–61
2. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
3. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1996, “On the Development of Aristotle’s Ideas of Scientific Method and the Structure of Science,” in William Wians, editor, Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 83–104.
4. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1993, “The Concept of Induction in the Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry,” in John Earman, editor, Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 23–43.
5. Kleiner, S. A., 1993, The Logic of Discovery: A Theory of the Rationality of Scientific Research, Synthese Library, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
6. Sacks, Oliver, 1985, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales, HarperCollins, New York.
7. Austin, John, 1961 (1946), “Other Minds,” in Philosophical Papers, Clarendon Press, Oxford, especially pp. 67–68.
8. Austin, John, 1961, “Per formative Utterances,” in Philosophical Papers, Clarendon Press, Oxford, ch. 10, especially p. 220.
9. Bonjour, Laurence, 2002, Epistemology: Classical Problems and Contemporary Responses, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.
10. Cohen, L. Jonathan, 1992, Essay on Belief and Acceptance, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
11. Cohen, Stewart, 1998, “Contextual Solutions to Epistemological Problems,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 76, pp. 289–306.
12. Collingwood, R. G., 1940, An Essay on Metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, especially ch. I, sec. 5.
13. Davidson, Donald, 1996, “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 93, pp. 263–278.
14. DeRose, Keith, 1995, “Solving the Skeptical Problem,” Philosophical Review, vol. 104, pp. 1–52.
15. Earman, John, 1992, Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge.
16. Frege, Gottlob,1984, “Thoughts,” in Collected Papers, Basil Black-well, Oxford.
17. Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1975 (original 1960), Truth and Method, Continuum, New York, especially the section “Logic of Questions and Answers,” pp. 333–341.
18. Hintikka, Jaakko, forthcoming, “Wittgenstein on knowledge and skepticism.”
19. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2004, “A fallacious fallacy?” Synthese vol. 140, pp. 25–35. And as Chapter 9 in this volume.
20. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2003 “A Distinction Too Few or Too Many: A Vindication of the Analytic vs. Synthetic Distinction,” in Constructivism and Practice: Toward a Historical Epistemology, Carol C. Gould, editor, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 47–74.
21. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2003, “A Second-Generation Epistemic Logic and Its General Significance,” in Vincent F. Hendricks et al., editors, Knowledge Contributors, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 33–56. And as Chapter 3 in this volume.
22. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2002, “Post-Tarskian Truth,” Synthese, vol. 126, pp. 17–36.
23. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry: Logic of Scientific Discovery, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
24. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1998, “What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology,” Transactions of the Charles Peirce Society, vol. 34, pp. 503–533. A revised version, “Abduction—Inference, Conjecture, or an Answer to a Question,” appears as Chapter 2 in this volume.
25. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1974, Knowledge and the Known, Reidel, Dordrecht.
26. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Ilpo Halonen, 1995, “Semantics and Pragmatics for Why-Questions,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, pp. 636–657.
27. Husserl, Edmund, 1983, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology. First Book, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
28. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. T versky, 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Kant, Immanuel, 1787, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, second edition (see preface, p. 13).
30. McCarthy, John 1990, “Circumscription—a Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 27–39 and 171–172.
31. Montague, Richard, 1974, Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven.
32. Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo, 1994, Inevitable Illusions, John Wiley & Sons, NewYork.
33. Plato, 1924, Meno, Plato: with an English Translation, Loeb Classical Library, vol. IV, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
34. Ramsey, Frank, 1978, “Knowledge,” in Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics, and Economics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 126–127.
35. Safire, William, 1995, The Sleeper Spy, Random House, New York.
36. Shope, Robert K., 1983, The Analysis of Knowing: A Decade of Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
37. Tarski, Alfred, 1956, “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” in Logic, Semantics, Meta mathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 152–278.
38. Williams, Michael, 2001, Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Collingwood, R. G., 1946, The Idea of History, Oxford University Press. Oxford.
40. Edwards, A. W. F., 1992, Likelihood (expanded edition), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
41. Fölsing, Albrecht, 1997, Albert Einstein: A Biography, Viking, New York.
42. Freeman, Eugene, 1983, The Relevance of Charles Peirce, The Hegeler Institute, La Salle, Illinois.
43. Gadamer, Hans Georg, 1975, Truth and Method, Continuum Publishing, New York.
44. Harman, G., 1968, “Enumerative Induction As Inference to the Best Explanation,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 65, pp. 529–533.
45. Harman, G., 1965, “Inference to the Best Explanation,” Philosophical Review, vol. 74, pp. 88–95.
46. Hilpinen, Risto, 1983, “On C. S. Peirce’s Theory of the Proposition,” in Freeman, editor (1983), pp. 264–270.
47. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2003, “A Second Generation Epistemic Logic and Its General Significance,” in Knowledge Contributors, Syntheses Library, 322, Vincent F. Hendricks, Klaus Frovin Jørgensen, and Stig Andur Pedersen, editors, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 33–56.
48. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1993, “The Concept of Induction in the Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry,” in John Earman, editor, Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 23–43. Reprinted in Hintikka, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 161–181.
49. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1993, “On Proper (Popper?) and Improper Uses of Information in Epistemology,” Theoria, vol. 59, pp. 158–165.
50. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1988, “On the Development of the Model-Theoretical Viewpoint in Logical Theory,” Syntheses, vol. 77, pp. 1–36.
51. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Ilpo Halonen, 1995, “Semantics and Pragmatics for Why-Questions,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, pp. 636–657. Reprinted in Hintikka, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 183–204.
52. Hintikka, Jaakko, Ilpo Halonen, and Arto Mutanen, 1998, “Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning,” in R. Johnson and J. Woods, editors, Handbook of Applied Logic, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. Reprinted in Hintikka, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 47–90.
53. Holton, Gerald, 1969, “Einstein, Michelson and the ‘Crucial’ Experiment,” Isis, vol. 60, pp. 133–197.
54. Houser, Nathan, Don D. Roberts, and James Van Evra, 1997, Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
55. Josephson, John R., and Susan G. Josephson, 1994, Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology, Cambridge University Press, New York.
56. Kapitan, Tomis, 1997, “Peirce and the Structure of Abductive Inference,” in Houser et al. (1997), pp. 477–496.
57. Levi, Isaac, 1991, The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing, Cambridge University Press, New York.
58. Sloane, Paul, and Des Mac Hale, 1996, The Lateral Logician, Quality Paperback Book Club, New York.
59. Tursman, Richard, 1987, Peirce’s Theory of Scientific Discovery, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
60. von Neumann, John, 1928, “Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 100, pp. 295–320.
61. von Neumann John, and O. Morgenstern, 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
62. Aristotle, 1994, Posterior Analytics, second edition, translated with a commentary by Jonathan Barnes, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
63. Böer, Stephen E., and William, G. Lycan, 1986, KnowingWho, MIT Press, Cambridge.
64. Boh, Ivan, 1993, Epistemic Logic in the Later Middle Ages, Routledge, London.
65. Bühler, Axel, 1983, Die Logik kognitiver Sätze, Duncker and Humboldt, Berlin.
66. Engdahl, Elisabet, 1986, Constituent Questions: The Syntax and Semantics of Questions with Special Reference to Swedish, Reidel, Dordrecht.
67. Fagin, R., J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Y. Vardi, 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge.
68. Gabbay, Dov, and John Woods, 2003, Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Logic, North Holland (Elsevier), Amsterdam.
69. Gochet, Paul and P. Gribomont., 2002, “Epistemic Logic,” in Gabbay and Woods, editors (2003).
70. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1990, “Cartesian Cogito, Epistemic Logic, and Neuroscience,” Synthese, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 133–157.
71. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1976, The Semantics of Questions and the Questions of Semantics: Case Studies in the Interrelations of Logic, Semantics, and Syntax: Act a Philosophica Fennica, vol. 28, no. 4, Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki.
72. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1975, The Intentions of Intentionality, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
73. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1962, Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of Two Notions, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
74. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Ilpo Halonen., 1995, “Semantics and Pragmatics for Why Questions,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, pp. 636–657.
75. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Jack Kulas, 1985, Anaphora and Definite Descriptions. D.Reidel, Dordrecht.
76. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Gabriel Sandu, 1995, “The Fallacies of the “New Theory of Reference,” Syntheses, vol. 104, pp. 245–283.
77. Hintikka, Jaakko, and John Symons, 2003, “Systems of Visual Identification in Neuroscience: Lessons from Epistemic Logic,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 70, pp. 89–104. And as Chapter 6 in this volume.
78. Knuuttila, Simo, 1993, Modalities in Medieval Philosophy, Routledge, London.
79. Kripke, Saul A., 1972, “Naming and Necessity,” in D. Davidson and G. Harman, editors, Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 253–355.
80. Laux, Armin, and Heinrich Wansing, 1995, Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.
81. Lenzen Wolfgang, 1978, Recent Work in Epistemic Logic, Act a Philosophica Fennica, vol. 30, no. 1, Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki.
82. Lenzen, Wolfgang, 1979, Epistemologische Betrachtungen zu (S4, S5), Erkenntnis, vol. 14, pp. 33–56.
83. Lenzen, Wolfgang, 1980, Glauben, Wissen, und Wahrscheinlickkeit: Systeme der epis-temische Logik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
84. Lepage, Franc¸ois and Serge Lapierre, 2000, Logique partielle et savoir: Essai de philosophie formelle, Bellarmin Vrin, Montreal/Paris.
85. Meyer, J.-J.Ch., and W. van der Hoek, 1995, Epistemic Logic for AI and Computer Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
86. Stelzner, Werner, 1984, Epistemische Logik, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.
87. van der Hoek, Wiebe, 1993, “Systems for Knowledge and Belief,” Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 3, pp. 173–195.
88. von Wright, G. H., 1951, An Essay in Modal Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam.
89. Williamson, Timothy, 2000, Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
90. Benson, Hugh H., 1992, Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates, Oxford University Press, New York.
91. Benson, Hugh H., 1992, “Misunderstanding the ‘What-is-F-ness” question,” in Benson, 1992(a), pp. 123–136.
92. Beth, E. W., 1955, “Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability,” Mededlingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Leterkund. N. R. vol. 18, no. 13, Amsterdam, pp. 309–342.
93. Chomsky, Noam, 1959, “Review of Skinner: Verbal Behavior,” Language, vol. 35, pp. 26–58.
94. Collingwood, R. G., 1940, An Essay on Metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
95. Collingwood, R. G., 1993, The Idea of History, revised edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
96. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2003, “A. Second-Generation Epistemic Logic and its Theoretical Significance,” in Vincent Hendricksetal., editors, Knowledge Contributors, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 33–55.
97. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
98. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1998, “What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology,” Proceedings of the Charles S. Peirce Society, vol. 34, pp. 503–533. A revised version entitled “Abduction—Inference, Conjecture, or an Answer to a Question” appears as Chapter 3 in this volume.
99. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1996, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge University Press, New York.
100. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1989, “The Role of Logic in Argumentation,” The Monist, vol. 72, pp. 3–24.
101. Hintikka, Jaakko, Ilpo Halonen, and Arto Mutanen, 1998, “Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Inquiry,” in Hintikka, 1999, pp. 47–90.
102. Kuhn, Thomas, 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
103. Robinson, Richard, 1971, “Begging the Question 1971,” Analysis, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 113–117.
104. Robinson, Richard, 1953, Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
105. Ryle, Gilbert, 1971, Collected Papers I-II, Hutchinson, London.
106. Sentas, Gerasimos Xenophon, 1979, Socrates, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
107. Smullyan, Raymond, 1997, The Riddle of Scheherazade, Harcourt Brace, New York.
108. Vlastos, Gregory, 1971, “The Paradox of Socrates”, in Vlastos, editor, The Philosophy of Socrates:A Collection of Critical Essays, University of Nortre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 1–21.
109. Adam, Charles, and Tannery, Paul, 1910, Oeuvres de René Descartes, published under the auspices of the Ministry of Public Instruction, L. Cerf, Paris.
110. Arikawa, S., and K. Furukawa, 2000, Discovery Science (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Springer-Verlag, New York.
111. Becker, Oskar, 1959, Die Grösse und Grenze der mathematischen Denkweise, Karl Alber, Freiburg.
112. Boër, Stephen and William G. Lycan, 1986, Knowing Who, MIT Press, Cambridge.
113. Burgess, John P., and Gideon Rosen, 1997, A Subject with No Object, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
114. Cassirer, Ernst, 1944, “Galileo’s Platonism,” in M. F. Ashley Montague, editor, Studies and Essays in the History of Science and Learning Offered in Homage to George Sarton, Henry Schuman, New York, pp. 277–297.
115. Cassirer, Ernst, 1910, Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff: Untersuchungenüber die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Translated asSubstance and Function, Chicago: Open Court, 1923.
116. Colyvan, Mark, 2001, The Indispensability of Mathematics, Oxford University Press, New York.
117. Field, Hartry, 1980, Science without Numbers, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
118. Friedman, Michael, 1999, Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge University Press, New York.
119. Hermann, Armin, 1971, The Genesis of Quantum Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge.
120. Hilpinen, Risto, 1995, “Peirce on Language and Reference,” in Kenneth L. Ketner, editor, Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries, Fordham University Press, New York, pp. 272–303.
121. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2006, “Ta Meta Ta Meta physika: The Argumentative Structure of Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” in Vesa Hirvonen, Toivo J. Holopainen, and Miira Tuominen, editors, Studies in the History of Philosophy in Honour of Simo Knu-uttila, Brill, Leiden, pp. 41–53.
122. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2003, “A Second-Generation Epistemic Logic and Its General Significance,” in Vincent Hendricksetal., editors, Knowledge Contributors, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 33–56. And as Chapter 3 in this volume.
123. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2002(a), “A Distinction Too Few or Too Many? A Vindication of the Analytic vs. Synthetic Distinction,” in Carol C. Gould, editor, Constructivism and Practice: Toward a Historical Epistemology, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 47–74.
124. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2002, “Intuitionistic Logic as Epistemic Logic,” Syntheses, vol. 127, pp. 7–19.
125. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2000, “Knowledge of Functions in the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge,” in E. Grosholz and H. Breger, editors, The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 1–15.
126. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, Selected Papers 5, 47–90, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
127. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1998, “Ramsey Sentences and the Meaning of Quantifiers,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 65, pp. 289–305.
128. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1997, “Three Dogmas of Quine’s Empiricism,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 51, pp. 457–477.
129. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1996, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge University Press, New York.
130. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1996, “Knowledge Acknowledged,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 56, pp. 251–275.
131. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1993, “The Concept of Induction in Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry,” in John Earman, editor, Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp 23–43. Reprinted in Hintikka 1999, pp. 161–181.
132. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1992, “Independence-Friendly Logic as a Medium of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning about Knowledge,” in S. Ohsuga et al., editors, Information Modeling and Databases, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 258–265.
133. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1992, “Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning,” in J. Dancy and E. Sosa, editors, A Companion to Epistemology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 241– 244.
134. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1989,“CartesianCogito, Epistemic Logic, and Neuro science: Some Surprising Interrelations,” in Jaakko Hintikka and Merrill B. Hintikka, The Logic of Epistemology and the Epistemology of Logic, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 111–136.
135. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1980, “Aristotelian Induction,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 34, pp. 133–144.
136. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Ilpo Halonen, 1992, “Semantics and Pragmatics for Why-Questions,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, pp. 636–657. Reprinted in Hintikka 1999.
137. Hintikka, Jaakko, Ilpo Halonen, and Arto Mutanen, 1999, “Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning,” in Jaakko Hintikka, 1999.
138. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Unto Remes, 1974, The Method of Analysis, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
139. Jevons, W. Stanley, 1877, The Principles of Science, second edition, London and Oxford. Reprinted, Dover Publications, New York, 1958.
140. Kripke, Saul, 1972, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
141. Kuhn, Thomas, 1978, Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
142. Langley, Pat, Herbert A. Simon, Gary L. Bradshaw, and Jan R. Zytkow, 1987, Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Process, MIT Press, Cambridge.
143. Laugwitz, Detlef, 1996, Bernhard Riemann, 1820–1866, Birkhäuser, Basel and Boston.
144. Mach, Ernst, 1960, The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois. Original 1883, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig.
145. Peirce, Charles S., 1935, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
146. Pour-El, Marian B., and Jonathan I. Richards, 1989, Computability in Analysis and Physics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg and New York.
147. Quine, W. V., 1981, Theories and Things, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
148. Quine, W. V., 1981, “Success and Limits of Mathematization,” in Quine 1981 (a), pp. 148–155.
149. Steiner, Mark, 1998, The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
150. Wigner, Eugene, 1960, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in Natural Science,” Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, pp. 1–14. (Reprinted in Eugene Wigner: Symmetries and Reflections, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1967, pp. 222–237).
151. Youschkevich, A. P., 1977, “The Concept of Function up to the Middle of the 19th Century,” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences, vol.16, pp. 37–85.
152. Zytkow, Jan, 1997, Machine Discovery, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. Reprinted from Foundations of Science, vol. 1, no. 2, 1996.
153. Bechtel, William, and Jennifer Mundale, 1999, “Multiple Realizability Revisited: Linking Cognitive and Neural States,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp 175–207.
154. Bickle, John, 2001, “Understanding Neural Complexity: A Role for Reduction,” Minds and Machines, vol. 11, pp. 467–481
155. Dretske, Fred, 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge.
156. De Yoe Edgar, and David Van Essen, 1988, “Concurrent Processing Streams in Monkey Visual Cortex,” Trends in Neuroscience, vol.11, pp. 219–226.
157. Fodor, Jerry, 1983, The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.
158. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1975, “On the Logic of Perception,” in Jaakko Hintikka, Models for Modalities, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 151–184.
159. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1972, “Individuation by Acquaintance,” in David Pears, editor, Bertrand Russell: Critical Essays, Doubleday, Garden City, New York, pp. 52–79.
160. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
161. Holmes, Gordon Morgan, 1919, “Disturbances of Visual Space Perception,” British Medical Journal, vol. 2, pp. 230–233.
162. Kosslyn, Stephen, and Richard Andersen, 1992, Frontiers in Cognitive Neuroscience, MIT Press, Cambridge.
163. Livingstone, Margaret S., and David H. Hubel, 1987, “Psychophysical Evidence for Separate Channels for the Perception of Form, Color, Movement, and Depth,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 7, pp. 3416–3468.
164. Marr, David, 1982, Vision, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
165. Maunsell, John, 1987, “Physiological Evidence for Two Visual Subsystems,” in Lucia Vaina, editor, Matters of Intelligence: Conceptual Structures in Cognitive Neuro-science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 59–87.
166. Milner, A. D., and Goodale, M. A., 1995, “The Visual Brain in Action,” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
167. Mishkin, Mortimer, Leslie Ungeleider, and Kathleen Macko, 1983, “Object Vision and Spatial Vision: Two Cortical Pathways,” Trends in Neuroscience, vol. 6, pp. 414–417.
168. Mountcastle, Vernon, 1980, Medical Physiology, 14th edition, C. V. Mosby, St. Louis.
169. Palmer, S. E., 1999, Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology, Cambridge, MIT Press.
170. Pears, David, 1972, Bertrand Russell: Critical Essays, Doubleday, Garden City, New York.
171. Sacks, Oliver, 1985, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, Summit Books, New York.
172. Sayre, Kenneth, 1976, Cybernetics and the Philosophy of Mind, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
173. Schneider, Gerald, 1969, “Two Visual Systems: Brain Mechanisms for Localization and Discrimination Are Dissociated by Tectal and Cortical Lesions,” Science, vol. 163, pp. 895–902.
174. Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W., 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
175. Shepherd, Gordon, 1994, Neurobiology, third edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
176. Shipp, Stewart, and Semir Zeki, 1989, “The Organization of Connections between Areas V5 and V1 in Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex,” European Journal of Neu-roscience, vol. 1, pp. 309–332.
177. Trevarthen, Colwyn, 1968, “Two Mechanisms of Vision in Primates,” Psychologische Forschung, vol. 31, pp. 299–337.
178. Ungeleider, Leslie, and Mortimer Mishkin, 1982, “Two Cortical Visual Systems,” in D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, and R. J. W. Mansfield, editors, Analysis of Visual Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 549–586.
179. Vaina, Lucia, 1990, “‘What” and “Where” in the Human Visual System: Two Hierarchies of Visual Modules,” Synthese, vol. 83, pp. 49–91.
180. Van Essen David, 1985, “Functional Organization of Primate Visual Cortex,” in E. Jones, editor, Cerebral Cortex, vol. 3, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 259–329.
181. Van Essen David, and John Maunsell, 1983,“Hierarchical Organization and Functional Streams in the Visual Cortex,” Trends in Neuroscience, vol. 6, pp. 370–375.
182. Wade, Nicholas, and Michael Swanston, 1991, Visual Perception: An Introduction, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
183. Zeki, Semir, 1993, A Vision of the Brain, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
184. Zeki, Semir, and Stewart Shipp, 1988, “The Functional Logic of Cortical Connections,” Nature, vol. 335, pp. 311–317.
185. Beth, E. W., 1955, “Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability,” Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandske Akademie van Weterschappen, Afd. Letter kunde, N. R. vol. 18, no 13, pp. 309–342.
186. Craig, William, 1957, “Three Uses of the Herbrand Gentzen Theorem in Relating Model Theory and Proof Theory,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 22, pp. 269–285.
187. Dray, William, 1957, Laws and Explanation in History, Oxford University Press, New York.
188. Halonen, Ilpo, 2001, “Interrogative Model of Explanation and Covering Laws” (dissertation), Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki.
189. Halonen, Ilpo, and Jaakko Hintikka, 1999, “Interpolation as Explanation,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 414–423.
190. Hempel, C. G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays, Free Press, New York.
191. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1999, Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery (Selected Papers, vol. 5), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
192. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1983, “C. S. Peirce’s ‘First Real Discovery’ and Its Contemporary Significance,” in E. Freeman, editor, The Relevance of Charles Peirce, The Hegeler Institute, La Salle, Illinois, pp. 107–118.
193. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1970, “Surface Information and Depth Information,” in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes, editors, Information and Inference, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 263–297.
194. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Ilpo Halonen, 2005, “Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation,” Syntheses, vol. 143, pp 5–61.
195. Lifschitz, Vladimir, 1994, “Circumscription,” in Dov Gabbay, C. Hogger, and J. Robinson, editors, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 3, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 297–352.
196. McCarthy, John, 1980, “Circumscription—a New Form of No monotonic Reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 27–39.
197. Salmon, Wesley C., 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
198. Salmon, Wesley C., 1989, “Four Decades of Scientific Explanation,” in P. Kitcher and W. C. Salmon, editors, Scientific Explanation: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 13, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3–219.
199. Schurz, Gerhard, 1995, “Scientific Explanation: A Critical Survey,” Foundations of Science, vol. 3, pp. 429–465.
200. Snow, C. P., 1954, The New Men, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.
201. von Wright, G. H., 1971, Explanation and Understanding, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
202. Attneave, Fred, 1959, Applications of Information Theory to Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
203. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1964, Language and Information: Selected Essays on Their Theory and Application, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, and Jerusalem Academic Press, Jerusalem.
204. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1955, “An Examination of Information Theory,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 22, pp. 86–105. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964), ch. 16.
205. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1952, “Semantic Information and Its Measures,” Transactions of the Tenth Conference on Cybernetics, Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, New York, pp. 33–48. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964), ch. 17.
206. Bennett, Charles H., 1982, “The Thermodynamics of Computation – A Review,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 12, pp. 905–940.
207. Boolos, George S., and Richard C. Jeffrey, 1989, Computability and Logic, third edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
208. Brillouin, Leon, 1956, Science and Information Theory, Academic Press, New York.
209. Calude, Christian, 1994, Information and Randomness, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
210. Carnap, Rudolf, 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
211. Carnap, Rudolf and Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, 1952, “An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information.” Technical Report No. 247, M.I.T. Research Laboratory in Electronics. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964), ch. 15.
212. Chaitin, Gregory J., 1987, Algorithmic Information Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
213. Chaitin, Gregory J., 1982, “Algorithmic Information Theory,” Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol. 1, John Wiley, New York, pp. 38–41.
214. Chaitin, Gregory J., 1982, “Gödel’s Theorem and Information,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 22, pp. 941–954.
215. Chaitin, Gregory J., 1974, “Information-Theoretic Limitations of Formal Systems,” Journal of the ACM, vol. 21, pp. 403–424.
216. Cherry, Colin, 1957, On Human Communication, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.
217. Cherry, Colin, 1952, “The Communication of Information,” American Scientist, vol. 40, pp. 640–664.
218. Cover, Thomas M., Peter Gacs and Robert Gray, 1989, “Kolmogorov’s Contributions to Information Theory and Algorithmic Complexity,” The Annals of Probability, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 840–865.
219. Davis, Martin, 1965, The Undecidable, Raven Press, New York.
220. Davis, Martin, 1973, “Hilbert’s Tenth Problem Is Unsolvable,” The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 233–269.
221. Davis, Martin, 1978, “What Is a Computation?” in L. A. Stern, editor, Mathematics Today, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 241–267.
222. Dreben, Burton, and Juliet Floyd, 1991, “Tautology: How Not to Use the Word,” Syntheses, vol. 87, pp. 23–49.
223. Dretske, Fred, 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Blackwell, Oxford.
224. Feinstein, A., 1958, Foundations of Information Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
225. Ford, Joseph, 1989, “What Is Chaos and Should We Be Mindful of It?” in The New Physics, P. Davies, editor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 348–371.
226. Gödel, Kurt, 1931, “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I,” Monatshefte für Mathematik Physik, vol. 38, pp. 173–198. Reprinted in English translation in K. Gödel: Collected Works, vol. I: Publications 1929–1936, edited by S. Feferman et al., Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp. 144–195.
227. Hartley, R. V. L., 1928, “Transmission of Information,” Bell Technical Journal, vol. 7, pp. 535–563.
228. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2004, “A Fallacious Fallacy?” Syntheses, vol. 140, pp. 25–35. And as Chapter 9 in this volume.
229. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2002, “A Distinction Too Few or Too Many: A Vindication of the Analytic vs. Synthetic Distinction,” in Constructivism and Practice: Toward a Historical Epistemology, Carol C. Gould, editor, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 47–74.
230. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1999, “The Emperor’s New Intuitions,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 96, pp. 127–147.
231. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1993, “On Proper (Popper?) and Improper Uses of Information in Epistemology,” Theoria, vol. 59, pp. 158–165.
232. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1970, “On Semantic Information,” in Information and Inference, Jaakko Hintikka and Patrick Suppes, editors, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–27.
233. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1970, “Surface Information and Depth Information,” in Information and Inference, Jaakko Hintikka and Patrick Suppes, editors, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 263–297.
234. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1968, “The Varieties of Information and Scientific Explanation,” in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science III, B. van Rootselaar and J. F. Staal, editors, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 311–331.
235. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1965, “Distributive Normal Forms in First-Order Logic,” in Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, J. N. Crossley and Michael Dummett, editors, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 47–90.
236. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1953, Distributive Normal Forms in the Calculus of Predicates (Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 6) Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki.
237. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Ilpo Halonen, 2005, “Toward a Theory ofthe Process of Explanation,” Synthese, vol. 143, pp. 5–61.
238. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Ilkka Niiniluoto, 1980, “An Axiomatic Foundation for the Logic of Inductive Generalization,” in Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. 2, Richard C. Jeffrey, editor, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 157–181.
239. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Patrick Suppes, 1970, Information and Inference, Reidel, Dordrecht.
240. Hintikka, Jaakko, and Patrick Suppes, 1966, Aspects of Inductive Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
241. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
242. Köhler, Eckehart, 2001, “Why von Neumann Rejected Carnap’s Dualism of Information Concepts,” in John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics, Miklós Redei and Michael Stöltzner, editors, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2001, pp. 97–134.
243. Kolmogorov, Andrei N., 1983, “Combinatorial Foundations of Information Theory and the Calculus of Probabilities,” Russian Mathematical Surveys, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 29–40. (Text written in 1970.)
244. Kolmogorov, Andrei N., 1968, “Logical Basis for Information Theory and Probability Theory,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-14, pp. 662–664.
245. Kolmogorov, Andrei N., 1965, “Three Approaches for Defining the Concept of Information Quantity,” Problems of Information Transmission, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 1–7.
246. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1982, Nouveaux essays sur l’entendement huma in: New Essays on Human Understanding translated and edited by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett, Cambridge University Press, New York.
247. Li, Ming, and Paul Vitányi, 1993, An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
248. Loewer, Barry, 1987,“FromInformationtoIntentionality,”Synthese, vol.70, pp.287–317.
249. Loewer, Barry, 1982, “Review of Dretske,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 49, pp. 297–300.
250. Majer, Ulrich, 2001, “The Axiomatic Method and the Foundations of Science: Historical Roots of Mathematical Physics in Göttingen (1900–1930), in John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics, Miklós Redei and Michael Stölzner, editors, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2001, pp. 11–33.
251. Matiyasevich, Yuri V., 1993, Hilbert’s Tenth Problem, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
252. Moser, P. K., 1990, Rationality in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
253. Nauta, Doede, Jr., 1972, The Meaning of Information, Mouton, The Hague.
254. Odifreddi, P., 1987, Classical Recursion Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
255. Paris, Jeff and Leo Harrington, 1977, “A Mathematical Incompleteness in Peano Arithmetic,” in J. Barwise, editor, Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1133–1142.
256. Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo, 1994, Inevitable Illusions, John Wiley, New York.
257. Quine, W. V., 1987, “Gödel’s Theorem,” in W. V. Quine: Quiddities, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, ch. 19, pp. 376–388.
258. Quine, W. V., 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
259. Raatikainen, Panu, 1998, Complexity, Information, and Incompleteness: Reports from the Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki.
260. Raatikainen, Panu, 1998, “On Interpreting Chaitin’s Incompleteness Theorem,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 27, pp. 569–586.
261. Raatikainen, Panu, 1998, “Algorithmic Information Theory and Undecidability,” Human and Artificial Information Processing – Proceedings of SteP’98, Publications of the Finnish Artificial Intelligence Society, Jyvä skylä, 1998, pp. 1–10.
262. Raatikainen, Panu, 1997, “The Problem of the Simplest Diophantine Representation,” Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, pp. 47–54.
263. Redei, Miklós, and Michael Stöltzner, 2001, John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
264. Rogers, Hartley, Jr., 1958, “Gödel Numbering of Partial Recursive Functions,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 23, pp. 331–341.
265. Rogers, Hartley, Jr., 1967, Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability, McGraw-Hill, New York.
266. Savage, L. J., 1972, The Foundations of Statistics, second edition, Dover, New York.
267. Savage, L. J., 1967, “Difficulties in the Theory of Personal Probability,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 34, pp. 305–310.
268. Savage, L. J., et al., 1962, The Foundations of Statistical Inference, Methuen, London.
269. Schumacher, J. M., 1993, “Information and Entropy,” CWI Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 97–120.
270. Shannon, Claude, 1948, “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379–423 623–656.
271. Shannon, Claude, and Warren Weaver, 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
272. Shuster, H. G., 1988, Deterministic Chaos: An Introduction, second revised edition, VCH Publishers, New York.
273. Solomonoff, Ray J., 1964, “A formal theory of inductive inference,” Information and Control, vol. 7, pp. 1–22, 224–254.
274. Svozil, Karl, 1993, Randomness and Undecidability in Physics, World Scientific, Singapore.
275. Turing, Alan M. (1937), “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungs problem,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (2), vol. 42, pp. 230–265.
276. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, 1983, “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunctive Fallacy in Probability Judgment,” Psychological Review, vol. 90, pp. 293–315.
277. Vänänen, Jouko, 2002, “On the Semantics of Information and Independence,” Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 10, pp. 337–350.
278. van Lambalgen Michiel, 1987, “Random Sequences,” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
279. Walk, Kurt, 1966, “Simplicity, Entropy, and Inductive Logic,” in Aspects of Inductive Logic, Jaakko Hintikka and Patrick Suppes, editors, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1966, pp. 66–80.
280. Wicken, Jeffrey S., 1987, “Entropy and Information: Suggestions for Common Language,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 54, pp. 176–193.
281. Zurek, W. H., 1990, Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. VIII, Addison-Wesley.
282. Zvonkin, A. K., and L. A. Levin, 1970, “The Complexity of Finite Objects and the Development of the Concepts of Information and Randomness by Means of the Theory of Algorithms,” Russian Mathematical Surveys, vol. 25, pp. 83–124.
283. Aristotle, 1991, On Rhetoric, newly translated by George A. Kennedy, Oxford University Press, New York.
284. Bell, D. E., H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky, 1988, Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
285. Carnap, Rudolf, 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
286. Gigerenzer, Gerd, 1991, ‘How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristic Biases,”’ in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone, editors, European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 2, John Wiley, New York, pp. 83–115.
287. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2000, “The Theory-Ladenness of Intuitions,” in F. Beets and E. Gillet, editors, Logique en Perspective, Ouisia, Bruxelles, pp. 259–287.
288. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1995, “On Proper (Popper?) and Improper Uses of Information in Epistemology,” Theoria, vol. 59, pp. 158–165 (for 1993, appeared 1995).
289. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1993, “Socratic Questioning, Logic, and Rhetoric,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 47, pp. 5–30.
290. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1992, “The Concept of Induction in the Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry,” in John Earman, editor, Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 23–43.
291. Hintikka, Jaakko, I. Halonen, and A. Mutanen, 1999, “Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning,” in R. Johnson and J. Woods, editors, Handbook of Applied Logic, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 295–337.
292. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
293. Moser, P. K., 1990, Rationality in Action: Contemporary Approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
294. Newton, Isaac, 1952, Opticks, Dover, New York.
295. Piatelli-Palmerini, Massimo, 1994, Inevitable Illusions, John Wiley, New York.
296. Savage, L. J., et al., 1962, The Foundations of Statistical Inference, John Wiley, New York.
297. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, 1983, “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment,” Psychological Review, vol. 90, pp. 293–315.
298. Aristotle, 1991, On Rhetoric, newly translated by George A. Kennedy, Oxford University Press, New York.
299. Bell, D. E., H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky, 1988, Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
300. Carnap, Rudolf, 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
301. Gigerenzer, Gerd, 1991, ‘How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristic Biases,”’ in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone, editors, European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 2, John Wiley, New York, pp. 83–115.
302. Hintikka, Jaakko, 2000, “The Theory-Ladenness of Intuitions,” in F. Beets and E. Gillet, editors, Logique en Perspective, Ouisia, Bruxelles, pp. 259–287.
303. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1995, “On Proper (Popper?) and Improper Uses of Information in Epistemology,” Theoria, vol. 59, pp. 158–165 (for 1993, appeared 1995).
304. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1993, “Socratic Questioning, Logic, and Rhetoric,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 47, pp. 5–30.
305. Hintikka, Jaakko, 1992, “The Concept of Induction in the Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry,” in John Earman, editor, Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 23–43.
306. Hintikka, Jaakko, I. Halonen, and A. Mutanen, 1999, “Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning,” in R. Johnson and J. Woods, editors, Handbook of Applied Logic, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 295–337.
307. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
308. Moser, P. K., 1990, Rationality in Action: Contemporary Approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
309. Newton, Isaac, 1952, Opticks, Dover, New York.
310. Piatelli-Palmerini, Massimo, 1994, Inevitable Illusions, John Wiley, New York.
311. Savage, L. J., et al., 1962, The Foundations of Statistical Inference, John Wiley, New York.
312. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, 1983, “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment,” Psychological Review, vol. 90, pp. 293–315.