Evaluation of the International Association of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group New Criteria: Gestational Diabetes Project

Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 128-132

  Kong, Jason M ^a   Lim, Ken ^a   Thompson, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gestational diabetes; New diagnostic criteria

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTEPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; ARTICLE; BIRTH INJURY; BIRTH WEIGHT; CANADA; CARPENTER AND COUSTAN CRITERIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION DIABETES PREGNANCY STUDY GROUP CRITERIA; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LABOR INDUCTION; LACERATION; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MATERNAL OUTCOME; MECONIUM; NEONATAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; NEWBORN DISEASE; PARAMETERS CONCERNING THE FETUS, NEWBORN AND PREGNANCY; PERINEAL LACERATION; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREMATURITY; PUERPERIUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRITISH COLUMBIA; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925146034     PISSN: 14992671     EISSN: 23523840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. O'Sullivan J., Mahan C.M. Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes 1964, 13:278-285.
2. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010, 33:676-682.
3. The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. NEngl J Med 2008, 358:1991-2002.
4. Canada Census 2006. Accessed August 11, 2013. http://www.statscan.gc.ca.
5. Crowther C., Hiller J., Moss J., et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. NEngl J Med 2005, 352:2477-2486.
6. Landon M., Spong C., Thom E., et al. Amulticenter, randomized trial for mild gestational diabetes. NEngl J Med 2009, 361:1339-1348.
7. Hartling E., Dryden D., Guthrie A., et al. Benefits and harm of treating gestational diabetes: A systemic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Ann Internal Med 2013, 159:123-129.
8. Yapa M., Simmons D. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in a multiethnic population in New Zealand. Diab Res Clin Pract 2000, 48:217-223.
9. Dabelea D., Snell-Bergeon J.K., Harsfield C.L., et al. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes over time and by birth cohort: Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM Screening Program. Diabetes Care 2005, 28:579-584.
10. Sacks D.A., Hadden D.R., Maresh M., et al. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Diabetes Care 2012, 35:526-528.
11. Kong J., Cleve R., Thompson D., et al. Rates of gestational diabetes with the new IADPSG criteria. Poster presentation, 12th annual meeting of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of North America April 2011.
12. British Columbia Vital Statistics Agency, Ministry of Health and BC Stats. Accessed August 11, 2013. http://www.vs.gov.bc.ca.
13. Bodmer-Roy M., Morin L., Cousineau J., Rey E. Pregnancy outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria. Obstet Gynecol 2012, 120:746-752.
14. O'Sullivan E.P., Avalos G., O'Reilly M., et al. Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy Coordinators. The prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria. Diabetologia 2011, 54:169-175.
15. Duran A., Saenz S., Torrejon M.J., et al. Introduction of IADPSG criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus results in improved pregnancy outcomes at a lower cost in a large cohort of pregnant women: The St. Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2014, 37(9):2442-2450.
16. Oriot P., Selvais P., Radikov J., et al. Assessing the incidence of gestational diabetes and neonatal outcomes using the IADPSG guidelines in comparison with the Carpenter and Coustan criteria in a Belgian general hospital. Acta Clin Belg 2014, 69:8-11.
17. Benhalima K., Hannsens M., Devlieger R., et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes using the IADPSG criteria compared with the Carpenter and Coustan criteria in an area with low prevalence of gestational diabetes. Int J Endocrinol 2013, 2013:248121. Epub Jan 10. 10.1155/2013/248121.
18. Mission J.F., Ohno M.S., Cheng Y.W., Caughey A. Gestational diabetes screening with the new IADPSG guidelines: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012, 207(325):e1-e9.
19. Werner E., Pettker C.M., Zuckerwise L., et al. Screening for gestational diabetes: Are the criteria proposed by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy study groups cost-effective?. Diabetes Care 2012, 35:529-539.