The autonomy of morality

The Autonomy of Morality

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-277

  Larmore, Charles ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925143605     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511816611     Document Type: Book

References (272)

1. Skinner S, Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
2. Pettit P, Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government (1st ed. published in 1997; 2nd ed. with Postscript; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
3. Viroli V, Republicanism (Italian original 1999; New York: Hill and Wang, 2002), and Spitz, La liberté politique (Paris: PUF, 1995).
4. Sidney S, Discourses concerning Government (first published 1698; ed. by T.G. West, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1996), p. 17.
5. Rousseau R, Lettres écrites de la montagne (1764), in Rousseau, Oeuvres completes (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), vol. 3, p. 841
6. Berlin B, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 118-172.
7. “What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty?” in his Philosophical Papers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), vol. II, pp. 211-229.
8. Of Laws in General (ed. H. L. A. Hart, London: Athlone, 1970), p. 253.
9. Gray G, Isaiah Berlin (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 15-21.
10. Machiavelli M, Istorie fiorentine, IV. 1.
11. Hobbes H, Leviathan, Part II, ch. 21, para. 8.
12. Harrington H, The Commonwealth of Oceana (1656) and A System of Politics, ed. J. G. A. Pocock (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 20.
13. “Reworking Sandel’s Republicanism,” The Journal of Philosophy (vol. XCV, no. 2, February 1998), pp. 73-96.
14. “civic humanism” and “classical republicanism” (Rawls, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996, pp. 205-206).
15. Pocock P, Virtue, Commerce, and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 39.
16. A. C. Houston, Algernon Sidney and the Republican Heritage in England and America(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).
17. Knud Haakonssen, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 326-327.
18. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 246ff.
19. “Reworking Sandel’s Republicanism,” pp. 81, 87-89.
20. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 301-302.
21. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple,” Political Theory 30 (3), June 2002 pp. 39-356, 342. 347.
22. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 26, 76, 94.
23. Pettit P, Republicanism, p. 302, and “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple,” pp. 346.
24. Viroli V, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the Well-ordered Society’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 150.
25. Spitz S, La liberté politique.
26. Rousseau R, Du contrat social 1.8.
27. R. Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), Chapter 3.
28. Berlin B in “Do Liberal Values Conflict?” in R. Dworkin et al. (eds.), The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin (New York: New York Review Books, 2001), pp. 73-90.
29. B. Williams, In the Beginning Was the Deed, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005, Chapter 7.
30. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 8-9.
31. Pettit P, Republicanism pp. 80-81.
32. Spitz S, La liberté politique, pp. 50.
33. Pettit P, Republicanism, p. 40, and “Reworking Sandel’s Republicanism,” pp. 84-85.
34. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 18, 27, 50;
35. Berlin, B Four Essays on Liberty, pp. xlvi, 124.
36. Alain Boyer, “De l’actualite des anciens republicains,” in Cahiers de philosophie de l’Université de Caen 34 (2000), pp. 37-58.
37. “De la liberte des Anciens comparée a celle des Modernes,” in De la liberté chez les modernes (Paris: Pluriel, 1980), pp. 494-495.
38. Biancamaria Fontana’s translation in Constant, Political Writings Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 310
39. Locke L, Second Treatise §57 and Essay concerning Human Understanding II.xxi.27.
40. Rawls R, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), pp. 244, 302;
41. Pettit P, Republicanism, p. 50.
42. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 2001), pp. 44-45.
43. Rawls R, A Theory of Justice, p. 202.
44. Pettit P, Republicanism, p. 52.
45. Gerald Gaus, “Backwards into the Future: Neorepublicanism as a Postsocialist Critique of Market Society,” Social Philosophy & Policy, 20 (1) [2003, pp. 59-91, 69-73.
46. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 55, 287.
47. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 56- 63.
48. Pettit P, Republicanism., pp. 131.
49. “Respect for Persons,” The Hedgehog Review, vol. 7, no. 2 (summer 2005), pp. 66-76.
50. Pettit P, Republicanism, pp. 9-63.
51. Berlin B, Four Essays on Liberty
52. Mill M, On Liberty, Chapter 1, paragraph 13, and Chapter 5, paragraph 4.
53. John Rawls, Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 574.
54. JusticeasFairness: A Restatement Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
55. Joshua Cohen, “Democracy and Liberty,” in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 185-231.
56. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978), Chapter 6.
57. “Justice and Rights,” originally published 1973.
58. Rawls R, “Justice as Fairness,” CP, p. 59
59. A Theory of Justice (TJ, pp. 580-581).
60. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited” (1997), CP, p. 594.
61. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical” (1985), CP, p. 390.
62. The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), Chapter 7.
63. Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson, Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 34-49.
64. Charles Taylor, as in “The Politics of Recognition,” pp. 242-248.
65. Philosophical Arguments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
66. Kant K, Political Writings, ed. H. Reiss, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977, p. 55
67. Michael Sandel in his review of Political Liberalism originally published in the Harvard Law Review, vol. 107
68. Public Philosophy Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.
69. Wolterstorff W and Robert Audi, Religion in the Public Square (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997), pp, 67-120.
70. Jeremy Waldron, “Religious Contributions in Public Deliberation,” San Diego Law Review, vol. 30, no. 4 (fall 1993), pp. 817-848.
71. Democracy’s Discontent (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 21-23.
72. Rawls pointed out the unfoundedness of this charge in “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited” (CP, pp. 609-610).
73. “judicial minimalism” of Cass Sunstein, One Case at a Time Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999
74. Kent Greenawalt, Religious Convictions and Political Choice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).
75. Private Consciences and Public Reasons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).
76. Jeremy Waldron, Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
77. Nietzsche N, The Gay Science (Die frohliche Wissenschaft), 344.
78. Nietzsche N, Werke in drei Banden (Munich: Hanser, 1966).
79. Walter Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale (NewYork: Vintage, 1967).
80. Maudemarie Clark and Alan J. Swensen (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998).
81. Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations Oxford: Blackwell.
82. C. S. Peirce, “How to Make Our Ideas Clear” (1878), in Peirce, Selected Writings, ed. P. Wiener (New York: Dover, 1958), p. 121.
83. G. E. Moore, “A Reply to My Critics,” in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1942), p. 541.
84. Donne, d. Satires III (“Kind pity chokes my spleen”), 72-73.
85. Bernard Williams, “Deciding to Believe,” in his Problems of the Self(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp. 136-151.
86. Truth and Truthfulness, pp. 79-83.
87. Belief’s Own Ethics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).
88. Nietzsche, N. Werke, ed. K. Schlechta, vol. 3, p. 903
89. The Gay Science, preface to the second edition (1887), 4.
90. Paul de Man, Allegories of Reading (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), pp. 110-118.
91. Maudemarie Clark, Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
92. Brian Leiter, Nietzsche on Morality (London: Routledge, 2002), Chapters 1 and 8.
93. Nietzsche, N. Werke, vol. 3, p. 763
94. Nietzsche, N. Also sprach Zarathustra, Erster Teil, “Von tausend und einem Ziele.”
95. Marcel Proust, Albertine disparue (Paris: Gallimard/Folio, 1992), p. 83.
96. Wilfrid Sellars, Science, Perception, and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963), p. 1
97. George Eliot, Daniel Deronda.
98. Rawls, R. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 423.
99. Samuel Johnson, Rasselas, Chapter 16.
100. This is the theme of Martha Nussbaum’s magnificent book, The Fragility of Goodness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
101. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice. Plato, Apology, 38
102. Plato, P. Republic 352.
103. Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), pp. 4, 19.
104. Plato, P. Republic 618.
105. Aristotle, A. Eudemian Ethics 1.2 (12147-13).
106. John M. Cooper, Reason and Human Good in Aristotle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975), p. 125.
107. John Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), pp. 129-130.
108. Josiah Royce, The Philosophy of Loyalty, (New York: Macmillan, 1908), p. 168.
109. Rawls, R. A Theory of Justice, p. 408, 421-424.
110. Rawls, R. A Theory of Justice p. 413.
111. Rawls, R. A Theory of Justice p. 408.
112. Rawls, R. A Theory of Justice pp. 416-417.
113. Michael Slote, in Goods and Virtues (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), Chapters 1.
114. Cf. Robert Nozick’s reflections on the “narrative direction” of the happy life, in The Examined Life (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989), pp. 100-102.
115. Martin Seel, Versuch über die Form des Glücks (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 102-113.
116. Bernard Williams, Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 35.
117. The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), particularly Chapter
118. Williams, W. Making Sense of Humanity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 170; see also his Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, pp. 67-69.
119. Williams, W. Moral Luck, pp. 33-36.
120. Rawls, R. A Theory of Justice, p. 399.
121. Rawls, R. A Theory of Justice p. 407.
122. Arthur, Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, Erganzungen, §38.
123. Thomas, S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970; orig. ed., 1960), pp. 136ff.
124. For some details, see my essay, “Descartes and Scepticism,” in S. Gaukroger (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005).
125. Kuhn, k.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 171, and The Road since Structure (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), p. 95.
126. Jean-Franc¸ois Lyotard, La condition post-moderne (Paris: Editions du Minuit, 1979).
127. Rorty, R.Truth and Progress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 5, 39.
128. Rorty, R.Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 6-7.
129. John Searle, “Rationality and Realism,” Dædalus 122 (4) (Fall 1993), pp. 55-83.
130. Rorty, R.Philosophy and Social Hope (London: Penguin, 1999), and “Solidarity or Objectivity?” in Rorty, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 21-34.
131. John Dupre´, The Disorder of Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
132. Dudley Shapere, Reason and the Search for Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984), p. 233.
133. I. Berlin, “The Pursuit of the Ideal,” in The Crooked Timber of Humanity (New York: Knopf, 1991), pp. 1-19.
134. Ameriks, A. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2000), p. 2. Gesammelte, Schriften (Berlin: Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1900-), vol. 4,67. 371.
135. Manfred Frank, Unendliche Anna¨herung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1997), pp. 221, 287.
136. Kant K, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, pp. 447-448 in his Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 4. J. H. Schulz’s., Anleitung zur Sittenlehre furalle Menschen (1783)
137. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003)
138. Dieter Henrich, Der Grund im Bewußtsein (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1992), pp. 113-126.
139. Frank, F. Unendliche Anna¨herung, pp. 424-431, 512ff.
140. The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)
141. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques, pp. 263-274, particularly pp. 268-269.
142. J. B. Schneewind, The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
143. Ameriks, A. “On Larmore and Self-Legislation in Kant,” pp. 274-282
144. Sebastian, Ro dl, in his book Self-Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).
145. John, McDowell, Mind and World, 2nd edition, with a new Introduction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).
146. V. Carraud and J. -L. Marion (eds.), Montaigne: Scepticisme, Me´taphysique, The´ologie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2004), pp. 15-31.
147. Thomas, Nagel, Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), p. xii.
148. C. I. Lewis, Mind and the World Order (New York: Scribner’s, 1929).
149. Donald Davidson, “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge” (1983), quoted by McDowell on p. 14 of Mind and World.
150. “Knowledge and the Internal,” pp. 395-413 in McDowell, Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).
151. Richard, Gaskin, Experience and the World’s Own Language. A Critique of John McDowell’s Empiricism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 14
152. Richard Rorty “The Very Idea of Human Answerability to the World: John McDowell’s Version of Empiricism,” pp. 138-152.
153. Jurgen Habermas (Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1999, p. 43).
154. McDowell has replied as follows, in his response to the original version of this essay Reading.
155. McDowell, ed. Nicholas Smith, Routledge: London, 2002, p. 295.
156. T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).
157. Williams, M.“Internal and External Reasons,” in Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 101-113.
158. Donald Davidson, “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” (1963), reprinted in his collection, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), pp. 3-19.
159. McDowell, M, Mind and World, p. 80 (fn 13), and also his essay “Two Sorts of Naturalism” in Mind, Value, and Reality, pp. 167-197.
160. McDowell, M,“Values and Secondary Qualities” (1985), p. 143.
161. McDowell, M, “Projection and Truth in Ethics,” p. 162.
162. “Some Issues in Aristotle’s Moral Psychology,” p. 37
163. McDowell, M, “Two Sorts of Naturalism,” p. 187
164. McDowell, M, “Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind,” inM. De Caro and D. Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004), pp. 91-105.
165. McDowell’s, “Scheme-Content Dualism and Empiricism,” pp. 87-104.
166. Lewis Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1999).
167. Oddly, O, he writes in “Two Sorts of Naturalism” pp. 186-187.
168. R. Ogien (ed.), Le re´alisme moral, Paris: PUF, 1999, pp. 382-419.
169. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy (ed. Barbara Herman, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).
170. Heidegger, H, Einfu¨hrung in die Metaphysik (Tubingen: Mohr, 1953), p. 152.
171. Rawls, R, Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 286-302.
172. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).
173. The New Republic of 27 February 2008, pp. 43-47 (“Behind the Veil”).
174. Rawls, R, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 305.
175. Rawls, R, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971) Political Liberalism, p. 19. Political Liberalism, p. 19.
176. Rawls, R, Political Liberalism, pp. 51ff.
177. Rawls, R, A Theory of Justice, pp. 27, 29.
178. A Theory of Justice, reprinted in his Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978)
179. Rawls, R, A Theory of Justice, 40.
180. Rawls, R, Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, pp. 1-8.
181. The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
182. Rawls, R, Lectures, p. 11.
183. Hume, Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 456.
184. Rawls, Lectures, pp. 37, 50, 69, 84. For the two quoted passages from Hume, see A Treatise of Human Nature, pp. 415.
185. Rawls, R, Lectures, p. 69.
186. “heautois eisin nomos” in St. Paul, Letter to the Romans 2.14.
187. Rawls, R, Lectures, p. 226.
188. Rawls, R, Lectures, p. 237.
189. Rawls, Lectures, p. 240, and Political Liberalism, p. 51.
190. Rawls, R, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, p. 112.
191. Rawls, R, Political Liberalism, pp. 93, 98, and 217.
192. Socie´te´ philosophique du Que´bec in May 1997 and published in Philosophiques 24 (2), 1997, pp. 313-328.
193. Larmore, L, Patterns of Moral Complexity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).
194. Prichard, P, Moral Obligation, ed. J. O. Urmson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 1-17.
195. Christine Korsgaard (The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 38f., 42f.)
196. Robert, Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984).
197. Ken, Binmore, Natural Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
198. David, Gauthier, Morals by Agreement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
199. John, Dunn, The Political Thought of John Locke (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969), pp. 218-219.
200. Gauthier, G, Morals by Agreement, pp. 268-269; see also pp. 17-18.
201. Gauthier, G, “Why Contractarianism?” pp. 15-30.
202. P, Vallentyne (ed.), Contractarianism and Rational Choice, pp. 181-195 and 196-228.
203. Hume H, An Inquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, Conclusion, Part II.
204. Gauthier G, “Why Contractarianism?” pp. 18-19.
205. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Oeuvres comple`tes (Paris: Gallimard, 1969), vol. IV, p. 600.
206. Kant K, Gesammelte Schriften, Akademie-Ausgabe (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902-), vol. XX, p. 44.
207. Kant K, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. IV, pp. 446-453.
208. Faktum der Vernunft (in Henrich et al. [ed.], Die Gegenwart der Griechen im neueren Denken, Tu¨bingen: Mohr, 1960, pp. 77-115).
209. Kant, K, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. V, p. 31.
210. Kant, K, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, p. 4.
211. Robert Derathe´, Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps (Paris: Vrin, 2nd ed., 1979), pp. 151-171.
212. The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
213. J. L. Mackie’s famous words (Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin: Harmondsworth, 1977, p. 40).
214. Korsgaard, K, The Sources of Normativity, p. 5.
215. Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
216. Korsgaard, K, The Sources of Normativity, p. 39.
217. Kant, K, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, p. 87.
218. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. VI, pp. 417-418.
219. Korsgaard, K, The Sources of Normativity, p. 125.
220. Forst’s F “Moralische Autonomie und Autonomie der Moral,” Deutsche Zeitschrift fu¨r Philosophie, vol. 52 (2004), no. 4, pp. 179-197.
221. Korsgaard, K, The Sources of Normativity, pp. 103-104, 122.
222. Korsgaard, K, The Sources of Normativity, pp. 93, 96.
223. Bernard, Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), pp. 60-63.
224. Korsgaard, K, The Sources of Normativity, p. 134.
225. Rudiger, Bittner, in Doing Things for Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
226. Donald, Davidson, “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” (1963), reprinted in his collection, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), pp. 3-19.
227. Samuel, Pufendorf, De jure naturae et gentium (1688),1.1.iv.
228. Simon, Blackburn, as in his book Ruling Passions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), pp. 51-59.
229. Gibbard, G, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, pp. 164-166.
230. T. M., Scanlon, presents in What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).
231. T. M. Scanlon, “Metaphysics and Morals,” in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 77 (2), November 2003, pp. 7-22.
232. Derek Parfit, “Reasons and Motivation” (Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 71 [1997], pp. 99-130).
233. David Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000, pp. 99-122.
234. C.S. Peirce, “How to Make Our Ideas Clear” (1878).
235. Joseph Raz, “When We Are Ourselves,” in Engaging Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 5-21.
236. Wilfrid Sellars, Science, Perception, and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963), p. 169.
237. Robert Brandom, Making It Explicit (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).
238. Robert Brandom, The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
239. Korsgaard K, “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy,” in Robert Audi (ed.), Philosophy in America at the Turn of the Century (APA Centennial Supplement, Journal of Philosophical Research, 2003), pp. 99-122.
240. Jurgen Habermas, “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’ Political Liberalism,” pp. 109-131.
241. John Rawls, “Reply to Habermas,” pp. 132-180, in The Journal of Philosophy (March 1995).
242. John Rawls, “Political Liberalism,” in The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), Chapter 6.
243. John Rawls, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press: New York, 1993), p. 12.
244. George Crowder, Liberalism and Value Pluralism (London: Continuum, 2002).
245. William Galston, Liberal Pluralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
246. William Galston, Morals of Modernity, pp. 141-144.
247. Remarque A, “Pierre Bayle,” in M. Canto-Sperber (ed.), Dictionnaire d’ e´thique et de philosophie morale (Paris: PUF, 1996), pp. 133-137.
248. T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).
249. Williams W, In the Beginning Was the Deed, Princeton: PrincetonUniversity Press, 2005, p. 77.
250. Max Weber, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Tu¨bingen:Mohr, 1972), I.1.17 (p. 29).
251. Ronald Dworkin, “Justice and Rights,” in his Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).
252. Harry Frankfurt, “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of the Person,” in his book, The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 11-25.
253. Harry Frankfurt, Les pratiques du moi (Paris: PUF, 2004), pp. 135-137.
254. William Galston, Liberal Purposes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, p. 109.
255. Rawls, A, Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 586.
256. Rawls, A., “Reply to Habermas,” pp. 162-163.
257. Gerald Gaus, Justificatory Liberalism, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 3-5, 131-136.
258. Ju¨rgen Habermas, Faktizitat und Geltung: Beitra¨ge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt, 1992), p. 13.
259. Ju¨rgen Habermas, William Rehg: Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), p. xlii.
260. Ju¨rgen Habermas, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1996), p. 298.
261. B. Constant, “De la liberte´ des modernes compare´e a` celle des anciens,” in De la liberte´ chez les modernes (Paris: Livre de Poche, 1980), pp. 493-515.
262. Habermas, A., Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2005), pp. 85-86.
263. Habermas, A., Nachmetaphysisches Denken (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988).
264. L. Wingert, DieO¨ ffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft derO¨ ffentlichkeit. Festschrift fu¨r Ju¨rgen Habermas (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2001), pp. 106-125.
265. Habermas, A., Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, pp. 299-301.
266. Carl Schmitt, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985), p. 28.
267. Habermas, A. Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, pp. 58-59.
268. Rainer Forst, Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2007).
269. Rainer Forst, “Die Wurzeln radikaler Demokratie,” Deutsche Zeitschrift fu¨r Philosophie 41 (1993), pp. 321-7.
270. Jeremy Waldron proceeds in Liberal Rights (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1993), pp. 56-57, 163-168.
271. John Gray, Two Faces of Liberalism, New York: New Press, 2000.
272. Jeremy Waldron, Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 107-114.