The species problem: A philosophical analysis

The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-236

  Richards, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925125187     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511762222     Document Type: Book

References (187)

1. Agapow, Paul-Michael, O. R. P. Bininda-Edmunds, K. A. Crandall, J. L. Gittleman, G. M. Mace, J. C. Marshall, and A. Purvis (2004) “The Impact of Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 79, no. 2, 161-179.
2. Amundson, Ron, (1998) “Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology,” Biology and Philosophy, 13:153-177.
3. Aristotle, (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle Vols. I and II, J. Barnes, ed., Princeton University Press.
4. Ashworth, E. J. (2003) “Language and Logic,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, A. S. McGrade, ed., Cambridge University Press, 73-96.
5. Balme, D. M. (1987a) “Aristotle's Biology was not Essentialistic,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 291-312.
6. Balme, D. M. (1987b) “Aristotle's Use of Division and Differentiae,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 69-89.
7. Balme, D. M. (1987c) “The Place of Biology in Aristotle's Philosophy,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 9-20.
8. Barker, Matthew J. (2007) “The Empirical Inadequacy of Species Cohesion by Gene Flow,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 654-665.
9. Barnes, Jonathan (1995) “Life and Work,” The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge University Press, 1-26.
10. Beatty, John (1992) “Speaking of Species: Darwin's Strategy,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 227-245.
11. Bird, Alexander (2000) Thomas Kuhn, Princeton University Press.
12. Bird, Alexander, and Emma Tobin (2008) “Natural Kinds,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edn.), Edward N. Zalta ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/natural-kinds/
13. Blackburn, Simon (2002) “Metaphysics,” The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, N Bunnin and E. P. Tsui-James, eds., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 61-89.
14. Blumenthal, Henry J. (1990) “Neoplatonic Elements in the de AnimaCommentaries,” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 305-324.
15. Blumenthal, Henry J. (1996) Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of De Anima, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. Boler, John F. (1963) “Abailard and the Problem of Universals,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 1:104-126.
17. Bolton, Robert (1987) “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 120-166.
18. Boyd, Richard (1999) “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Robert A. Wilson, ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 141-185.
19. Brigandt, Ingo (2003) “Species Pluralism Does Not lmply Species Eliminativism,” Philosophy of Science, 70:1305-1316.
20. Broberg, Gunnar (1983) “Homo Sapiens: Linnaeus's Classification of Man,” Linnaeus the Man and HisWork, T. Frängsmyr, ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 156-194.
21. Brogaard, Berit (2004) “Species as Individuals,” Biology and Philosophy, 19: 223-243.
22. Brown, Stephen F. (1999) “Realism versus Nominalism,” The Columbia History of Western Philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press, 271-278.
23. Burian, Richard M. (1985) “On Conceptual Change in Biology: The Case of the Gene,” Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science,”D. J. Depew and B. H. Weber, eds., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 21-42.
24. Burkhardt, Frederick and Sydney Smith, eds. (1987) The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. II. Cambridge University Press.
25. Burkhardt, Frederick and Sydney Smith, eds. (1990) The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. VI. Cambridge University Press.
26. Cain, A. J. (1993) Animal Species and Their Evolution, Princeton University Press.
27. Carnap, Rudolf (1966) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, M. Gardner, ed., New York: Basic Books.
28. Claridge, M. F., H. A. Dawah and M. R. Wilson (1997) “Practical Approaches to Species Concepts for Living Organisms,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, M. R. Wilson, eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 1-15.
29. Cracraft, Joel (1992) “Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 93-120.
30. Cracraft, Joel (1997) “Species Concepts in Systematics and Conservation Biology − an Ornithological Viewpoint,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, M. F. Claridge, H.A. Dawah, M. R. Wilson, eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 325-339.
31. Cracraft, Joel (1992) “Species Concepts in Theoretical and Applied Biology: A Systematic Debate with Consequences,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Q. D. Wheeler, Quentin and R. Meier, eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 3-14.
32. Darwin, Charles (1851) The Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online, University of Cambridge, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset7viewtype=text&itemID=F339.1&keywords=cirripedia&pageseq=1.
33. Darwin, Charles(1964) On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. de Queiroz, Kevin (1999) “The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Robert A. Wilson, ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 49-89.
35. de Queiroz, Kevin “Ernst Mayr and the Modern Concept of Species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. CII, suppl. 1, 6600-6607.
36. de Vries, Hugo (1905) Species and Varieties, Their Origin and Mutation, Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
37. Dennett, Daniel (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea, New York: Simon and Schuster.
38. Devitt, Michael (2008) “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 75, no. 3, 344-382.
39. Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.
40. Dupré, John (1993) The Disorder of Things: Philosophical Foundations for the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Dupré, John(1999) “On the Impossibility of a Monistic Account of Species,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Robert A. Wilson, ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 3-19.
42. Ebbesen, Stan (1990a) “Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator,” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 373-391.
43. Ebbesen, Stan (1990b) “Philoponus, Alexander and the Origins of Medieval Logic,” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 445-461.
44. Ebbesen, Stan (1990c) “Porphyry's Legacy to Logic: A Reconstruction,”Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 141-179.
45. Eldredge, Niles (1995) “Species, Selection, and Paterson's Concept of the Specific-Mate Recognition System,” Speciation and the Recognition Concept, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 464-477.
46. Eldredge, Niles, and Joel Cracraft (1980) Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, New York: Columbia University Press.
47. Ereshefsky, Marc (1992) “Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 381-398.
48. Ereshefsky, Marc(2001) The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of biological Taxonomy, Cambridge University Press.
49. Eriksson, Gunnar (1983) “Linnaeus the Botanist,” Linnaeus the Man and His Work, T. Frangsmyr, ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 63-109.
50. Falcon, Andrea (2005) “Commentators on Aristotle,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2005 edn), Edward N. Zalta ed., http://plato.stan-ford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/aristotle-commentators/.
51. Frängsmyr, Tore, ed. (1983) Linnaeus, the Man and His Work, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52. Frede, Dorothea (2009) “Alexander of Aphrodisias,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edn), Edward N. Zalta ed., http://plato.stan-ford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/alexander-aphrodisias/.
53. Frege, Gottlob (1990) “On Sense and Nominatum,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language, A.P. Martinich, ed., Oxford University Press, 190-202.
54. Ghiselin, Michael T. (1969) The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of Chicago Press.
55. Ghiselin, Michael, T. (1989) “Individuality, History and the Laws of Nature in Biology,” What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull, M. Ruse, ed., Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56. Ghiselin, Michael, T. (1989) Metaphysics and the Origin of Species, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
57. Gopnik, Alison, and Andrew N. Meltzoff (1997) Words, Thoughts, and Theories, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
58. Gotthelf, Allan (1987) “First Principles in Aristotle's Parts of Animals,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 167-198.
59. Grene, Marjorie, and David Depew (2004) The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History, Cambridge University Press.
60. Griffiths, Paul (1999) “Squaring the Circle, Natural Kinds with Historical Essences,” Species, New Interdisciplinary Essays, Robert A. Wilson, ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 209-228.
61. Hadot, Pierre (1990) “The Harmony of Plotinus and Aristotle According to Porphyry,” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 125-140.
62. Hankinson, R. J. (1994) “Galen and the Logic of Relations,” Aristotle in Late Antiquity, L. Schrenk, ed., Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 57-75.
63. Hennig, Willi (1977) Phylogenetic Systematics, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
64. Hey, Jody (2001) Genes, Categories and Species: the Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem, Oxford University Press.
65. Hull, David L. (1983) Darwin and His Critics, University of Chicago Press.
66. Hull, David L. (1988) Science as Process: an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press.
67. Hull, David L. (1989) The Metaphysics of Evolution, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
68. Hull, David L. (1992a) “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 199-225.
69. Hull, David L. (1992b) “A Matter of Individuality,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 293-316.
70. Hull, David L. (1997) “The Ideal Species Concept − and Why We Can’t Get It,” in Species: the Units of Biodiversity, M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, M. R. Wilson, eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 357-380.
71. Hull, David L. (1999) “On the Plurality of Species: Questioning the Party Line,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Robert A. Wilson, ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 23-48.
72. Hull, David L. (2001) Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University Press.
73. Huxley, Julian (1940) The New Systematics, London Oxford University Press.
74. Hyman, Arthur and James J. Walsh (1983) Philosophy in the Middle Ages, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
75. Jones, W. T. (1969) The Medieval Mind, San Diego, CA.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
76. Kitcher, Philip (1978) “Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change,” Philosophical Review, 87: 519-547.
77. Kitcher, Philip (1984) “Against the Monism of the Moment,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, no. 4. (December 8), 616-630.
78. Kitcher, Philip (1992) “Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 317-341.
79. Kitcher, Philip (1998) “Explanatory Unification,” Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science, E. D. Klemke, R. Hollinger, D. W. Rudge, eds., Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 278-301.
80. Kitts, David R. and David J. Kitts (1979) “Biological Species as Natural Kinds,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 46, no. 4, 613-622.
81. Klima, Gyula (2003) “Natures: The Problem of Universals,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, A. S. McGrade, ed., Cambridge University Press, 196-207.
82. Kripke, Saul (1972) Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83. Kuhn, Thomas (1977) The Essential Tension, The University of Chicago Press.
84. Kuhn, Thomas(1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn, TheUniversity of Chicago Press.
85. LaPorte, Joseph, (2004) Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change, Cambridge University Press.
86. Larson, James L. (1968) “The Species Concept of Linnaeus,” Isis, vol. 59, no. 3, 291-299.
87. Larson, James L.(1971) Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von Linne, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
88. Lauden, Larry (1984) Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
89. Lennox, James (1980) “Aristotle on Genera, Species and the More and the Less,” Journal of the History of Biology, 13, 321-346.
90. Lennox, James (1987a) “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 90-119.
91. Lennox, James (1987b) “Kinds, Forms of Kinds and the More and Less in Aristotle's Biology,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf and Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 339-359.
92. Lennox, James (2006) “Aristotle's Biology,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 edn), Edward N. Zalta, ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/aristotle-biology/.
93. Lewis, David (1983), “Extrinsic Properties,” Philosophical Studies, 44: 197-200.
94. Lindroth, Sten (1983) “The Two Faces of Linnaeus,” Linnaeus the Man and His Work, T. Frangsmyr, ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1-62.
95. Linnaeus, Carolus (1964) Systema Naturae, Facsimile of the First Edition, M. J. S. Engel-Ledeboer and H. Engel, eds., Nieuwkoop, Netherlands: B. De Graaf. Publ.
96. Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1968) “Buffon and the Problem of Species,” Forerunners of Darwin, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 84-113.
97. Lyell, Charles (1997) Principles of Geology, London Penguin Books.
98. MacLaurin, James and Kim Sterelny (2008) What is Biodiversity?, University of Chicago Press.
99. Madigan, Arthur S. J. (1994) “Alexander on Aristotle's Species and Genera as Principles,” Aristotle in Late Antiquity, L. Schrenk, ed., Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 76-91.
100. Magnello, M. Eileen (1996) “Karl Pearson's Gresham Lectures: W. F. R. Weldon, Speciation and the Origin of Pearsonian Statistics,” British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 29, no. 1 (March), 43-63.
101. Mallet, James (1995) “A Species Definition for the Modern Synthesis,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 10, no. 7, 294-299.
102. Marenbon, John (2005) “Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edn), Edward N. Zalta, ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/boethius/.
103. Margolis, Eric and Stephen Laurence (2006) “Concepts,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 edn), Edward N. Zalta, ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/concepts/.
104. Marrone, Steven P. (2003) “Medieval Philosophy in Context,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, A. S. McGrade, ed., Cambridge University Press, 10-50.
105. Mayden, Richard L. (1997) “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, M. R. Wilson, eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 381-424.
106. Mayden, Richard L. (1999) “Consilience and a Hierarchy of Species Concepts: Advances Toward Closure on the Species Puzzle,” Journal of Nematology, vol. 31, no. 2, 95-116.
107. Mayr, Ernst (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.
108. Mayr, Ernst (1957a) “Difficulties and Importance of the Biological Species,” The Species Problem, Mayr, ed., Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 371-388.
109. Mayr, Ernst (1957b) “Species Concepts and Definitions,” The Species Problem, Mayr, ed., Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1-22.
110. Mayr, Ernst (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press.
111. Mayr, Ernst (1982) “Species Concepts and Their Application,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 15-25.
112. Mayr, Ernst (2000) “The Biological Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Q. D. Wheeler, Quentin and R. Meier, eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 17-29.
113. Mayr, Ernst and Peter D. Ashlock (1991) Principles of Systematic Zoology, New York: McGraw-Hill.
114. Mellor, D. H. (1977) “Natural Kinds,” The British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science, vol. 28, no. 4, 299-312.
115. Mellor, D. H. and Alex Oliver (1997) Properties, Oxford University Press.
116. Mishler, Brent D. and Robert Brandon (1987) “Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept”, Biology and Philosophy, 2: 397-414.
117. Mishler, Brent D. and Michael Donoghue (1992) “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 121-137.
118. Mishler, Brent D., and Edward C. Theriot (2000) “The Phylogenetic Species Concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot): Monophyly, Apomorphy and the Phylogenetic Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Q. D. Wheeler, Quentin and R. Meier, eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 44-54.
119. Mueller, Ian “Aristotle's Doctrine of Abstraction in the Commentators,” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 463-480.
120. Murphy, Gregory L., and Douglas L. Medin (1985) “The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence,” Psychological Review, vol. 92, no. 3 (July 1985), 289-316.
121. National Research Council Committee on Scientific Issues in the Endangered Species Act (1995) Science and the Endangered Species Act, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
122. Newton-Smith, W. H. (1994) The Rationality of Science, London: Routledge Press.
123. Niklas, Karl J. (1997) The Evolutionary Biology of Plants, University of Chicago Press.
124. Ogilvie, Brian W. (2006) The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe, University of Chicago Press.
125. Panchen, Alec L. (1992) Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology, Cambridge University Press.
126. Paterson, Hugh (1992) “The Recognition Concepts of Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 139-158.
127. Paterson, Hugh (1992) Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species, Collected Writings of H. E. H. Paterson, S. F. McEvey, ed., Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
128. Peacocke, Christopher (1992) A Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
129. Pellegrin, Pierre (1987) “Logical Difference and Biological Difference: The Unity of Aristotle's Thought,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Cambridge University Press, 313-338.
130. Peters, F. E. (1967) Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon, New York University Press.
131. Purvis, O. W. (1997) “The Species Concept in Lichens,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, M. F. Claridge, H.A. Dawah, M. R. Wilson, eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 109-134.
132. Putnam, Hilary (1990) “Meaning and Reference,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn, A. Martinich, ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 308-315.
133. Quine, W. V. O. (1976) The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
134. Quine, W. V. O. (1990) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn, A. Martinich, ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 26-39.
135. Ray, John (1735) The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation, 10th edn, London: William Innys and Richard Manby.
136. Reydon, Thomas A. C. (2003) “Discussion: Species Are Individuals − Or Are They?”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 49-56.
137. Richards, Janet Radcliffe (2000) Human Nature after Darwin, London: Routledge.
138. Richards, Richard A. (2002) “Kuhnian Values and Cladistic Parsimony,” Perspectives on Science, vol. 10, no. 1, 1-27.
139. Richards, Richard A. (2003) “Character Individuation in Phylogenetic Inference,” Philosophy of Science, 70, 264-279.
140. Richards, Richard A. (2005) “Evolutionary Naturalism and the Logical Structure of Valuation: The Other Side of Error Theory,” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social, vol. 1, no. 2, 270-294.
141. Richards, Richard A. (2007a) “Solving the Species Problem: Kitcher and Hull on Sets and Individuals,” Philosophy of Biology, Michael Ruse. ed., Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
142. Richards, Richard A. (2007b) “The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis,” The Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, Chichester: John Wiley.
143. Richards, Richard A. (2008) “Species and Taxonomy,” Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press.
144. Ruse, Michael (1987) “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals or What?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 38, no. 2, 225-242.
145. Ruse, Michael (1992) “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?”, The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 343-361.
146. Ruse, Michael (1999) The Darwinian Revolution, University of Chicago Press.
147. Ruse, Michael (1998)Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
148. Sharpies, Robert W. (1990) “The School of Alexander?” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 83-111.
149. Shiel, James (1990) “Boethius’ Commentaries on Aristotle,” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 349-372.
150. Simpson, George Gaylord (1951) “The Species Concept,” Evolution, vol. 5, no. 4, 285-298.
151. Simpson, George Gaylord (1961) Principles of Animal Taxonomy, New York: Columbia University Press.
152. Sloan, Philip R. (1976) “The Buffon-Linnaeus Controversy,” Isis, vol. 67, no. 3, 356-375.
153. Sloan, Philip R. (1979), “Buffon, German Biology, and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species,” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 12, no. 2, 109-153.
154. Sloan, Philip R. (1985), “From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals,” Histoire du Concept d’Espéce dans les Sciences de la Vie, Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac.
155. Sloan, Philip R. (2003) “Reflections on the Species Problem,” The Philosophy of Marjorie Grene, R. Auxier and L. E. Hahn, eds., Chicago, IL.: Open Court.
156. Slobodchikoff, C. N. (1976) Concepts of Species, Stroudsberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
157. Sneath, P. H. A., and Robert R. Sokal (1973) Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
158. Soames, Scott (2005) Reference and Description: The Case against Two-Dimensionalism, Princeton University Press.
159. Sober, Elliott (1980) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 47, no. 3, 350-383.
160. Sober, Elliott (1984) “Sets, Species and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's ‘Species’,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, no. 2, 334-341.
161. Sober, Elliott (1992) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 247-278.
162. Sober, Elliott (2000) Philosophy of Biology, 2nd edn, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
163. Sorabji, Richard (1990) “The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle,” Aristotle Transformed, R. Sorabji, ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1-30.
164. Spade, Paul Vincent (2008) “William of Ockham,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008edn), Edward N. Zalta ed., http://plato.Stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/ockham/.
165. Stafleu, Frans A. (1971) Linnaeus and the Linnaeans, Utrecht, Netherlands: A. Oosthooek's Uitgeversmaatschappij.
166. Stamos, David, (2003) The Species Problem, Lanhan, MD: Lexington Books.
167. Stamos, David, (2003)Darwin and the Nature of Species, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
168. Stauffer, Robert C. (1975) Charles Darwin's Natural Selection, Cambridge University Press.
169. Stott, Rebecca (2003) Darwin and the Barnacle, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
170. Templeton, Alan (1992) “The Meaning of Species and Speciation: A Genetic Perspective,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 159-183.
171. Thompson, Augustine (1995) “The Debate on Universals Before Peter Abelard,” The Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 3, 409-429.
172. Van Valen, Leigh (1992) “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, M. Ereshefsky, ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 69-77.
173. Wheeler, Quentin D. and Norman I. Platnick (2000) “The Phylogenetic Species Concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick),” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Q. D. Wheeler, Quentin and R. Meier eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 55-69.
174. Whewell, William (1984) Selected Writings on the History of Science, University of Chicago Press.
175. Whewell, William (1984) Theory of Scientific Method, R. E. Butts, ed., Indianapolis, IN.: Hackett Publishing.
176. Wiley, E. O. (1981) Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
177. Wiley, E. O., and Richard L. Mayden (2000) “The Evolutionary Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Q. D. Wheeler, Quentin and R. Meier, eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 70-89.
178. Williams, Mary B. (1989) “Evolvers are Individuals: Extension of the Species as Individuals Claim,” What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays dedicated to David Hull, M. Ruse, ed., Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 301-308.
179. Wilson, Edward O. (2000) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
180. Wilson, Leonard G. (1970) Sir Charles Lyell's Scientific Journals on the Species Question, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
181. Wilson, Robert A. (1999) “Realism, Essence, and Kind: Resuscitating Species Essentialism?” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Robert A. Wilson, ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 187-207.
182. Winsor, Mary (2003) “Non-essentialist Methods in Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy,” Biology and Philosophy, 18: 387-400.
183. Winsor, Mary (2006a) “The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 28,149-174.
184. Winsor, Mary (2006b) “Linnaeus's Biology was not Essentialist,” Annuals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 93: 2-7.
185. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1968) Philosophical Investigations, New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
186. Zimmer, Carl (2008) “What Is a Species,” Scientific American (June), 72-79.
187. Zirkle, Conway (1959) “Species Before Dawin,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 103, no. 5, 636-644.