Effects of food restriction across stages of juvenile and early adult development on body weight, survival and adult life history

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2420-2430

  Wong, J W Y ^a   Kolliker M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Clutch size; Constraint; European earwig; Food availability; Offspring number; Reproductive success; Sex difference; Silver spoon; Trade off

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY SIZE; CLUTCH SIZE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FOOD LIMITATION; INSECT; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; ONTOGENY; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SURVIVAL;

EUROPE;

FORFICULA AURICULARIA;

ADAPTATION; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY WEIGHT; CLUTCH SIZE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FOOD DEPRIVATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INSECT; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; LONGEVITY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BODY WEIGHT; CLUTCH SIZE; FEMALE; FOOD DEPRIVATION; INSECTS; LIFE CYCLE STAGES; LONGEVITY; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 84925114728     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12484     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adler, M.I. & Bonduriansky, R. 2012. Paternal effects on offspring fitness reflect father's social environment. Evol. Biol. 40: 288-292.
2. Appleby, B.M., Petty, S.J., Blakey, J.K., Rainey, P. & MacDonald, D.W. 1997. Does variation of sex ratio enhance reproductive success of offspring in tawny owls (Strix aluco). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1111-1116.
3. Bauerfeind, S.S. & Fischer, K. 2005. Effects of food stress and density in different life stages on reproduction in a butterfly. Oikos 111: 514-524.
4. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B (Methodological) 57: 289-300.
5. Bergland, A.O. 2011. Mechanisms of nutrient-dependent reproduction in dipteran insects. In: Mechanisms of Life History Evolution (T. Flatt & A. Heyland, eds), pp. 127-136. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Candolin, U. 1998. Reproduction under predation risk and the trade-off between current and future reproduction in the threespine stickleback. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1171-1175.
7. Carey, J.R., Liedo, P., Harshman, L., Zhang, Y., Müller, H.G., Partridge, L. et al. 2002. Life history response of Mediterranean fruit flies to dietary restriction. Aging Cell 1: 140-148.
8. Cohet, Y. & David, J. 1978. Control of the adult reproductive potential by preimaginal thermal conditions. Oecologia 36: 295-306.
9. David, J., Cohet, Y. & Fouillet, P. 1975. The variability between individuals as a measure of senescence: a study of the number of eggs laid and the percentage of hatched eggs in the case of Drosophila melanogaster. Exp. Gerontol. 10: 17-25.
10. Desouhant, E., Driessen, G., Amat, I. & Bernstein, C. 2005. Host and food searching in a parasitic wasp Venturia canescens: a trade-off between current and future reproduction? Anim. Behav. 70: 145-152.
11. Flatt, T. & Heyland, A. 2011. Mechanisms of Life History Evolution: The Genetics and Physiology of Life History Traits and Trade-Offs. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Grafen, A. 1988. On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. In: Reproductive Success (T.H. Clutton-Brock, ed.), pp. 454-471. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
13. Hehar, G., Gries, R. & Gries, G. 2008. Re-analysis of pheromone-mediated aggregation behaviour of European earwigs. Can. Entomol. 140: 674-681.
14. Hodin, J. & Riddiford, L.M. 2000. Different mechanisms underlie phenotypic plasticity and interspecific variation for a reproductive character in drosophilids (Insecta: Diptera). Evolution 54: 1638-1653.
15. Holmes, D.J. & Lavine, L.C. 2009. Roaches, apoptosis and the ovarian clock: use it or lose it. Heredity 103: 192-193.
16. Honěk, A. 1993. Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66: 483-492.
17. Hopwood, P.E., Moore, A.J. & Royle, N.J. 2013. Nutrition during sexual maturation affects competitive ability but not reproductive productivity in burying beetles. Funct. Ecol. 27: 1350-1357.
18. Hopwood, P.E., Moore, A.J. & Royle, N.J. 2014. Effects of resource variation during early life and adult social environment on contest outcomes in burying beetles: a context-dependent silver spoon strategy? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 281: 20133102.
19. Koch, L.K. & Meunier, J. 2014. Mother and offspring fitness in an insect with maternal care: phenotypic trade-offs between egg number, egg mass and egg care. BMC Evol. Biol. 14: 125.
20. Kölliker, M. 2007. Benefits and costs of earwig (Forficula auricularia) family life. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1489-1497.
21. Kotrschal, A., Szidat, S. & Taborsky, B. 2014. Developmental plasticity of growth and digestive efficiency in dependence of early-life food availability. Funct. Ecol. 28: 878-885.
22. Lindström, J. 1999. Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 343-348.
23. Marshall, K.E. & Sinclair, B.J. 2010. Repeated stress exposure results in a survival-reproduction trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277: 963-969.
24. Mas, F. & Kölliker, M. 2011. An offspring signal of quality affects the timing of future parental reproduction. Biol. Lett. 7: 352-354.
25. Metcalfe, N.B. & Monaghan, P. 2001. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 254-260.
26. Meunier, J. & Kölliker, M. 2012a. Parental antagonism and parent-offspring co-adaptation interact to shape family life. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279: 3981-3988.
27. Meunier, J. & Kölliker, M. 2012b. When it is costly to have a caring mother: food limitation erases the benefits of parental care in earwigs. Biol. Lett. 8: 547-550.
28. Meunier, J., Wong, J.W.Y., Gomez, Y., Kuttler, S., Röllin, L., Stucki, D. et al. 2012. One clutch or two clutches? Fitness correlates of coexisting alternative female life-histories in the European earwig. Evol. Ecol. 26: 669-682.
29. Monaghan, P. 2008. Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363: 1635-1645.
30. Moore, P.J. & Moore, A.J. 2001. Reproductive aging and mating: the ticking of the biological clock in female cockroaches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9171-9176.
31. Moya Laraño, J. 2002. Senescence and food limitation in a slowly ageing spider. Funct. Ecol. 16: 734-741.
32. Richner, H. & Tripet, F. 1999. Ectoparasitism and the trade-off between current and future reproduction. Oikos 86: 535-538.
33. Royle, N.J., Smiseth, P.T. & Kölliker, M. 2012. The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Sauphanor, B. & Sureau, F. 1993. Aggregation behaviour and interspecific relationships in Dermaptera. Oecologia 96: 360-364.
35. Schmidt, K.L., Moore, S.D., MacDougall-Shackleton, E.A. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S.A. 2013. Early-life stress affects song complexity, song learning and volume of the brain nucleus RA in adult male song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 86: 25-35.
36. Smith, J.N. 1981. Does high fecundity reduce survival in song sparrows? Evolution 35: 1142-1148.
37. Snell, T.W. & King, C.E. 1977. Lifespan and fecundity patterns in rotifers: the cost of reproduction. Evolution 31: 882-890.
38. Stearns, S.C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Stearns, S.C. & Sage, R.D. 1980. Maladaptation in a marginal population of the mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis. Evolution 34: 65-75.
40. Sterck, F.J., Poorter, L. & Schieving, F. 2006. Leaf traits determine the growth-survival trade-off across rain forest tree species. Am. Nat. 167: 758-765.
41. Taborsky, B. 2006. Mothers determine offspring size in response to own juvenile growth conditions. Biol. Lett. 2: 225-228.
42. Tallamy, D.W. & Denno, R.F. 1982. Life history trade-offs in Gargaphia solani (Hemiptera: Tingidae): the cost of reproduction. Ecology 63: 616-620.
43. Tremmel, M. & Müller, C. 2013. Insect personality depends on environmental conditions. Behav. Ecol. 24: 386-392.
44. Tu, M.-P. & Tatar, M. 2003. Juvenile diet restriction and the aging and reproduction of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell 2: 327-333.
45. Warner, R.R. 1984. Deferred reproduction as a response to sexual selection in a coral reef fish: a test of the life historical consequences. Evolution 38: 148-162.
46. Werner, E.E. & Anholt, B.R. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am. Nat. 142: 242-272.
47. Wong, J.W.Y. & Kölliker, M. 2012. The effect of female condition on maternal care in the European earwig. Ethology 118: 450-459.
48. Wong, J.W.Y. & Kölliker, M. 2013. The more the merrier? Condition-dependent brood mixing in earwigs. Anim. Behav. 86: 845-850.
49. Zambrano, E., Bautista, C.J., Deas, M., Martinez-Samayoa, P.M., Gonzalez-Zamorano, M., Ledesma, H. et al. 2006. A low maternal protein diet during pregnancy and lactation has sex- and window of exposure-specific effects on offspring growth and food intake, glucose metabolism and serum leptin in the rat. J. Physiol. 571: 221-230.