Governance approaches in the regeneration of immigrant communities: Potential roles of planning support systems (PSS)

Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Volumn 0, Issue , 2013, Pages 433-449

  Lin, Yanliu ^a   Geertman, Stan ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; PLANNING SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84925107893     PISSN: 18632246     EISSN: 18632351     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Cai XX, Hu HD (2012) Design research on social housing for non-registered migrants in the urban fringe area with fast urbanization background (taking the southern suburban urban villages of Beijing as instance). Master thesis, Architecture, Urban Design and Regional Planning Department, K. U. Leuven
2. Chung H (2009) The planning of “villages in the city” in Shenzhen, china: the significance of the new state-led approach. Int Plann Stud 14(3):253-273
3. Conde LP, Magalhaes S (2004) Favela-Bairro: rewriting the history of Rio. ViverCidades, Rio de Janeiro
4. Douglass M, Friedmann J (1998) Cities for citizens. Wiley, New York
5. Driessen PJP, Dieperink C, Van Laerhoven F, Runhaar HAC, Vermeulen WJV (2012) Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance-experiences from the Netherlands. Environ Policy Governance 22:143-160
6. Fiori J, Riley L, Ramirez R (2000) Urban poverty alleviation through environmental upgrading in Rio de Janeiro: Favela Bairro. Research report for the UK department for international development (DFID)
7. Geertman S (2002) Participatory planning and GIS: a PSS to bridge the gap. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 29:21-35
8. Geertman S (2012) Planning support systems as research instruments. J Urban Des Plan (accepted)
9. Hao P, Sliuzas R, Geertman S (2011) The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat Int 35(2):214-224
10. Harris B, Batty M (1993) Locational models geographic information and planning support systems. J Plan Educ Res 12:184-198
11. Healey P (2006) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Palgrave Macmillan
12. Huang PCC (1993) Public sphere/civil society in China? The third realm between state and society. Mod China 19(2):216-240
13. Kahila M, Kyttä M (2009) SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 389-412
14. Kesteloot C (2003) Urban social-spatial configurations and the future of European cities. Paper prepared for the Eurex online seminar 2003
15. Lieske SN, Mullen S, Hamerlinck JD (2009) Enhancing comprehensive planning with public engagement and planning support integration. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 295-316
16. Lin YL, De Meulder B (2012) A conceptual framework for the strategic urban project approach for the sustainable redevelopment of ‘villages in the city’ in Guangzhou. Habitat Int 36:380-387
17. Lin YL, De Meulder B, Wang SF (2011) Understanding the “village in the city” in Guangzhou: economic integration and development issue and their implications for the urban migrant. Urban Stud 48(16):3575-3590
18. Loeckx A (2009) Project and design, amending the project mode. In: Loeckx A (ed) Framing urban renewal in Flanders. SUN, Amsterdam
19. ODPM (2002) Development of a migration model, report prepared by the university of Newcastle upon Tyne, the university of Leeds, and the greater London authority/London research centre. ODPM, London
20. Pettit C, Wyatt R (2009) A planning support system toolkit approach for formulating and evaluating land use change scenarios. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 69-92
21. Santosa H (2000) Environmental management Surabaya with reference to national agenda 21 and the social safety programme. Environ Urbanization 12(2):175-184
22. Silas J (1984) The kampung improvement programme of Indonesia: a comparative case study of Jakarta and Surabaya. In: Payne GK (ed) Low-income housing in the developing world. Wiley Ltd
23. Silas J (1992) The Kampung improvement program, Surabaya. www.Mukinits.com
24. Silas J (2010) KIP (kampung improvement program) in Surabaya. In: d’Auria V, De Meulder B, Shannon K (eds) Human settlements: formulations and (re)calibrations. SUN Architecture Publishers, San Francisco
25. Smolka M, Iracheta A (2000) Mobilizing land value increments to provide service land for the poor. Colegio Mexiquense, Mexico city
26. Souto de Oliveira J (2003) Rethinking informal economy in Rio de Janeiro. http://mospi.nic.in/informal_paper_2003_06.htm
27. Soutter M, Repetti A (2009) Land management with the SMURF planning support system. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 369-388
28. UN-Habitat (2003) The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London
29. Van Delden H, Hagen-Zanker A (2009) New ways of supporting decision making: linking qualitative storylines with quantitative modelling. In: Geertman G, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 295-316
30. Vescina L (2007) Experiences from the South: a critical appropriation of the urban project: some cases in Brazil and Argentina, ISOCARP Review 03
31. White G, Howell J, Shang X (1996) In search of civil society in China. Clarendon press, Oxford
32. Zhang L (2005) Migrant enclaves and impact of redevelopment policy in Chinese cities. In: Ma LJC, Wu FL (eds) Restructuring the Chinese city: changing society, economy and space. Routledge, London