Evidentiary privileges: Best practice standards versus/and arbitral discretion

Arbitration International

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 501-520

  Berger, Klaus Peter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925067001     PISSN: 09570411     EISSN: 18758398     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/arbitration/22.4.501     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. F. von Schlabrendorff and A. Sheppard, 'Conflict of Legal Privileges in International Arbitration: An Attempt to Find a Holistic Solution' in Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (2005), pp. 743, 763
2. J.H. Rubinstein and B.B. Guerrina, 'The Attorney-Client Privilege and International Arbitration' in (2001) 18 J. Int'lArb. 587
3. N. Voser, 'Harmonization by Promulgating Rules of Best International Practice in International Arbitration' in (2005) eitschrijijur Schiedsverfahren (German Arbitration Journal) 113 at p. 118
4. R.M. Mosk and T. Ginsburg, 'Evidentiary Privileges in International Arbitration' in (2001) 50 ICLQ_345
5. N. Gallagher, 'Legal Privileges in International Arbitration' in (2003) 6 Int'l Arb. L Rev. 45 at p. 48
6. M. Sindler and T. Wiistemann, 'Privilege across Borders in Arbitration: Multi-jurisdictional Nightmare or a Storm in a Teacup' in (2005) 23 ASA Bulletin 610 at p
7. D.W. Rivkin, '21st Century Arbitration Worthy of Its Name' in Liber Amicorum Karl-Heinz Bbckstiegel (2001), pp. 661
8. www.ali.org
9. UNIDROIT (www.unidroit.org)
10. www.legallanguage.com/Hague/haguetx20e.html
11. R. Mullerat, 'The Code of Conduct of European Union Lawyers in International Arbitration' in ICC Court of Art. Bull., May 1997, pp. 41, 45
12. E. Gaillard and J. Savage (eds), Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman On International Commercial Arbitration (1999), para. 1266
13. Lex Mundi, In-House Counsel and the Attorney-Client Privilege (2004), www.lexmundi
14. A. Stevens, 'An Analysis of the Troubling Issues Surrounding In-house Counsel and the Attorney-Client Privilege' in (1998) 23 Hamline L Rev. 289
15. PH. Burkard, 'Attorney-Client Privilege in the EEC: The Perspective of Multinational Corporate Counsel' in (1986) 20 Int'l Lawyer 677 at p. 684
16. C. Seitz, 'Unternehmensjuristen und das Anwaltsprivileg im europaischen Wettbewerbsverfahren-Wandel in der europaischen Rechtsprechung?' in (2004) Europaische Zfitschrift fir Wirtschaftsrecht 231 at p. 233
17. C. Roxin, 'Das Zeugnisverweigerungsrecht des Syndikusanwalts' in (1992) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1129 at p. 1135
18. M. Kleine-Cosack 'Neuordnung des anwaltlichen Berufsrechts' in (1994) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2249 at p. 2254
19. F.H. Eichler and W. Peukert, 'Vertraulichkeit der Rechtsberatung durch Syndikusanwalte und EMRK' in (2002) Anwaltsblatt 189 at p. 191
20. K. Redeker, 'Der Syndikusanwalt als Rechtsanwalt' in (2004) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 889 at p. 890
21. H. Printing and M. Henssler, Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung (2nd edn, 2004), p. 46
22. www.adr.org/sp.asp?id=21890
23. K.P. Berger, International Economic Arbitration (1993), p. 855
24. M. Henssler, 'Der Europaische Rechtsanwalt-Zwischen Rechtspflege und Diensdeistung' in (2002) 115 Zeitschriftjur Zjdlproztfi 321 at p. 349
25. HJ. Hellwig, 'Contradictory Professional Duties: a Catch 22 Situation for the International Lawyer!' in (2002) 2 MitteilungsBlatt DAV Internationaler Rechtsverkehr 26
26. O. Sandrock, 'Welches Kollisionsrecht hat ein Internationales Schiedsgericht anzuwenden?' in (1992) Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 785 at p. 789
27. E. Rabel, 'Das Problem der Qualifikation' in (1931) 5 Rabels Zeitschrift 241
28. K. Lionnet and A. Lionnet, Handbuch der internationalen und nationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (2001), p. 160
29. K.P Berger, ' "Sitz des Schiedsgerichts" oder "Sitz des Schiedsverfahrens"?' in (1993) Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 8 at p. 10
30. M. Reimann, 'Savigny's Triumph? Choice of Law in Contracts Cases at the Close of the Twentieth Century' in (1999) 39 Virg.J Int'l L571 at p. 592
31. S. Felleman, 'Ethical Dilemmas and the Multistate Lawyer: A Proposed Amendment to the Choice-of-Law Rule in the Model Rules of Professional Conduct' in (1995) 95 Colum. L Rev. 1500 at p. 1525 et seq
32. P.Y Gunter, in A.V Schlaepfer, P. Pinsolle and L. Degos (eds), Towards a Uniform International Arbitration Law? (2005), pp. 129, 133
33. G. Kaufmann-Kohler and P. Bartsch, 'Discovery in International Arbitration: How Much is Too Much' in (2004) Zeitschriftjur Schiedsverfahren (German Arbitration Journal) 13 at p. 19
34. D.F. Vagts, 'The International Legal Profession: A Need for More Governance?' in (1996) 90 Am. J Int'l L 250 at 253
35. Code of Conduct for European Lawyers (CCBE) issued by the Council of Bars and Law Societies of the European Union available at www.ccbe.org/doc/En/code2002_en.pdf
36. L.S. Terry, 'An Introduction to the European Community's Legal Ethics Code Part I: An Analysis of the CCBE Code of Conduct' in (1993) 7 Georgia J Legal Ethics 1
37. DIS Mediation/Conciliation Rules (available at www.dis-arb.de)
38. CEDR Code of Conduct for Mediators and Other Third Party Neutrals (available at www.cedrsolve.com)
39. www.uncitral.org
40. S.A. Baker and M.D. Davis, The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in Practice (1992), p. 114
41. J.D.M. Lew, L. A. Mistelis and S.M. Kroll, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (2003), para. 5-69
42. JJ. Arnaldez, Y Derains and D. Hascher (eds), Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards 1996-2000 (2003), pp. 119, 121
43. A. Redfern and M. Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (4th edn, 2004), para. 6-64