Word-Formation in the world’s languages: A typological survey

Word-Formation In The World's Languages A Typological Survey

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-366

  Stekauer, Pavol ^a   Valera, Salvador ^b   Körtvélyessy, Lívia ^a  

^a P J AFÁRIK UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925039303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511895005     Document Type: Book

References (303)

1. Aarts, B., Denison, D., Keizer, E. and Popova, G. (eds.) 2004. Fuzzy Grammar. A Reader. Oxford University Press.
2. Abraham, W. 2005. ‘Intensity and diminution triggered by reduplicating morphology: Janusfaced iconicity’, in Hurch, B. (ed.) Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 547–68.
3. Adams, V. 1973. An Introduction to Modern English Word Formation. London: Longman.
4. Adams, V. 2001. Complex Words in English. Harlow: Longman.
5. Agrell, S. 1908. Aspektänderung und Aktionsartbildung beim polnischen Zeitworte: ein Beitrag zum Studium der indogermanischen Präverbia und ihrer Bedeutungsfunktionen. Lund: Håkan Ohlssons Buchdruckerei.
6. Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2007. ‘Typological distinctions in word-formation’, in Shopen, T. (ed.), 1–65.
7. Anderson, S. R. 1982. ‘Where’s morphology?’, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.
8. Anderson, S. R. 1985. ‘Typological distinctions in word formation’, in Shopen, T. (ed.), 4–56.
9. Anderson, S. R. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Aronoff, M. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Asher, R. E. and Kumari, T. C. 1997. Malayalam. London and New York: Routledge.
12. Baerman, M. and Corbett, G. G. 2007. ‘Linguistic typology: morphology’, Linguistic Typology 1: 115–18.
13. Bakema, P. and Geeraerts, D. 2000. ‘Diminution and augmentation’, in Booij, G. E., Lehmann, Ch. and Mugdan, J. (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Infl ection and Word Formation. Vol. I. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1045–52.
14. Baker, M. 1985. ‘The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation’, Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–416.
15. Baker, M. 1988. ‘Morphology and syntax: an interlocking independence’, in Everaert, M., Evers, A., Huybregts, R. and Trommelen, M. (eds.) Morphology and Modularity: in Honor of Henk Schultink. Dordrecht: Foris, 9–32.
16. Baker, M. and Fasola, C. A. 2009. ‘Compounding in Mapudungun’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 594–608.
17. Bakker, D. and Parkvall, M. 2005. ‘Reduplication in pidgins and creoles’, in Hurch, B. (ed.) Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 511–32.
18. Barz, I. 2005. ‘Die Wortbildung’, in Duden. Die Grammatik. Seventh edition. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 641–772.
19. Bauer, L. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Bauer, L. 1988. ‘A descriptive gap in morphology’, Yearbook of Morphology 1988: 17–27.
21. Bauer, L. 1990. ‘Be-heading the word’, Journal of Linguistics 26: 1–31.
22. Bauer, L. 1996. ‘No phonetic iconicity in evaluative morphology’, Studia Linguistica 50/2: 189–206.
23. Bauer, L. 1997. ‘Evaluative morphology: in search of universals’, Studies in Language 21/3: 533–75.
24. Bauer, L. 1998. ‘When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English?’, English Language and Linguistics 2/1: 65–86.
25. Bauer, L. 2000. ‘What you can do with derivational morphology’, in Bendjaballah, S., Dressler, W. U., Pfeiff er, O. E. and Voeikova, M. D. (eds.) Morphology. Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting. Vienna, 24–28 February 2000. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 37–48.
26. Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Bauer, L. 2005. ‘Conversion and the notion of lexical category’, in Bauer, L. and Valera, S. (eds.), Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation. Munster: Waxmann, 19–30.
28. Bauer, L. 2006. ‘Compound’, in Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 718–26.
29. Bauer, L. 2008. ‘Dvandva’, Word Structure 1: 1–20.
30. Bauer, L. 2009a. ‘IE, Germanic: Danish’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 400–16.
31. Bauer, L. 2009b. ‘Typology of compounds’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 343–56.
32. Bauer, L. and Renouf, A. 2001. ‘A corpus-based study of compounding in English’, Journal of English Linguistics 29: 101–23.
33. Bauer, L. and Valera, S. 2005. ‘Conversion or zero-derivation: an introduction’, in Bauer, L. and Valera, S. (eds.) Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation. Munster: Waxmann, 7–17.
34. Bauer, W. 1997. The Reed Reference Grammar of Maori. Auckland: Reed.
35. Beard, R. E. 1981. The Indo-European Lexicon: a Full Synchronic Theory. Amsterdam: North- Holland.
36. Beard, R. E. 1982. ‘The plural as a lexical derivation’, Glossa. An International Journal of Linguistics 16/2: 133–48.
37. Beard, R. E. 1995. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. A General Theory of Infl ection and Word Formation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
38. Beck, D. 2004. Upper Necaxa Totonac. Munich: Lincom Europa.
39. Becker, T. 1992. ‘Compounding in German’, Rivista di Linguistica 4: 5–36.
40. Belimov, E. I. 1991. Ketskij sintaksis: situacija, propozicija, predloženie. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo Novosibirskogo Universiteta.
41. Bickel, B. 2007. ‘Typology in the 21st century: major current developments’, Linguistic Typology 11/1: 239–51.
42. Biese, Y. M. 1941. ‘Origin and development of conversions in English’, Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B 45/2: 1–495.
43. Biggs, B. 1969. Let’s Learn Maori: a Guide to the Study of the Maori Language. Wellington: A. H. & A. W. Reed.
44. Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.
45. Boas, F. 1911. ‘Introduction’, in Boas, F. (ed.) Handbook of American Indian Languages 1. Washington: Government Printing Offi ce, 5–83.
46. Boas, F. 1947. ‘Kwakiutl grammar with a glossary of the suffi xes’, in Boas Yampolsky, H. and Harris, Z. S. (eds.) Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 37/3: 201–377.
47. Boogaart, R. 2000. ‘Aspect and Aktionsart’, in Booij, G. E., Lehmann, Ch. and Mugdan, J. (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Infl ection and Word Formation. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1165–80.
48. Booij, G. E. 1986. ‘Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch “agent nouns”, Linguistics 24: 503–17.
49. Booij, G. E. 1994. ‘Against split morphology’, Yearbook of Morphology 1993: 27–49.
50. Booij, G. E. 1995. ‘The phonology–morphology interface’, GLOT International 1/5: 3–7.
51. Booij, G. E. 2006. ‘Infl ection and derivation’, in Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 654–61.
52. Booij, G. E. 2009. ‘Phrasal names: a constructionist analysis’, Word Structure 2: 219–240.
53. Bowden, J. 2001. Taba: Description of a South Halmahera Language. Canberra, ACT: Pacifi c Linguistics, Australian National University.
54. Brainard, S. 1994. The Phonology of Karao, The Philippines. Canberra, ACT: Pacifi c Linguistics, Australian National University.
55. Bril, I. 2004. ‘Coordination strategies and inclusory constructions in New Caledonian and other Oceanic languages’, in Haspelmath, M. (ed.) Coordinating Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 499–534.
56. Bril, I. 2005. ‘Semantic and functional diversifi cation of reciprocal and middle prefi xes in New Caledonian and other Austronesian languages’, Linguistic Typology 9/1: 25–76.
57. Brown, L. and Dryer, M. S. (unpublished manuscript). ‘Diminutive as an infl ectional category in Walman’, available at http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/BrownDryerWalmanDimin.pdf (last accessed 3 September 2011).
58. Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
59. Campbell, L. 1985. The Pipil Language of El Salvador. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton.
60. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 2006. ‘Affi xation’, in Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 83–8.
61. Ceccagno, A. and Basciano, B. 2009. ‘Compounding in Chinese’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 478–90.
62. Cetnarowska, B. 1993. The Syntax, Semantics and Derivation of Bare Nominalisations in English. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Polskiego.
63. Cherchi, M. 1999. Georgian. Munich: Lincom Europa.
64. Chung, K. S. 1994. ‘Verb + noun function-describing compounds’, Revised version of paper originally published in Bulletin of the College of Liberal Arts, National Taiwan University, 41: 181–221. URL: http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/˜karchung/pubs/vncomp_rev.pdf (last accessed 15 July 2010).
65. Chung, K. S. 2006. Mandarin Compound Verbs. Taipei: Crane.
66. Clark, E. V. and Clark, H. H. 1979. ‘When nouns surface as verbs’, Language 55/4: 767–811.
67. Comrie, B. 1985. ‘Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology’, in Shopen, T. (ed.), 309–48.
68. Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. University of Chicago Press.
69. Comrie, B. and Thompson, S. A. 1985. ‘Lexical nominalization’, in Shopen, T. (ed.), 349–98.
70. Cowan, M. M. 1969. Tzotzil Grammar. Norman, OK: Summer School of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.
71. Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Croft, W. 2003. Typology and Universals. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Cruse, A. D. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
74. Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. A. and Gilligan, G. 1985. ‘The suffi xing preference: a processing explanation’, Linguistics 23: 723–58.
75. Daniel, M. 2007. ‘Representative sampling and typological explanation: a phenomenological lament’, Linguistic Typology 11/1: 69–78.
76. de Haas, W. and Trommelen, M. 1993. Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands: een overzicht van de woordvorming. The Hague: SDU.
77. de Reuse, W. J. 1994. ‘Noun incorporation in Lakota (Siouan)’, International Journal of American Linguistics 60/3: 199–260.
78. Di Sciullo, A.-M. and Williams, E. 1987. On the Defi nition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.) 2002. Word. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge University Press.
80. Dokulil, M. 1962. Tvorení slov v ceštine 1. Teorie odvozování slov. Prague: Nakladatelství Ceskoslovenské Akademie Ved.
81. Dokulil, M. 1968. ‘Zur Frage der Konversion und verwandter Wortbildungsvorgänge und -beziehungen’, in Isacenko A. V. (ed.) Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 3. Prague: Academia, 215–39.
82. Dokulil, M. 1982. ‘K otázce slovnedruhových prevodu a prechodu, zvl. transpozice’, Slovo a slovesnost 43: 257–71.
83. Dokulil, M. 1997. ‘The Prague School’s theoretical and methodological contribution to “word-formation” (derivology)’, in Panevová, J. and Skoumalová, Z. (eds.) Obsah – výraz – význam. Miloši Dokulilovi k 85. narozeninám. Prague: Filozofi cká Fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, 179–210.
84. Don, J. 2009. ‘Compounding in Dutch’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 370–85.
85. Donalies, E. 2004. ‘Hochzeitstorte, laskaparasol, elmas küpe, cow’s milk, casa de campo, cigarette- fi ltre, ricasdueñas… Was ist eigentlich ein Kompositum?’, Deutsche Sprache 1/03: 76–93.
86. Dressler, W. U. 1968. Studien zur Verbalen Pluralität. Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen. Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus.
87. Dressler, W. U. 1981. ‘On word formation in natural morphology’, Wiener Linguistische Gazette 26: 3–33.
88. Dressler, W. U. 1982. ‘Zur semiotischen Begründung einer natürlichen Wortbildungslehre’, Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 8: 72–87.
89. Dressler, W. U. 1985. ‘On the predictiveness of natural morphology’, Linguistics 21: 321–37.
90. Dressler, W. U. 1987. ‘Word-formation as a part of natural morphology’, in Dressler et al. (eds.), 99–126.
91. Dressler, W. U. 1988. ‘Preferences vs. strict universals in morphology’, in Hammond, M. and Noonan, M. (eds.) Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 143–54.
92. Dressler, W. U. 1989. ‘Prototypical diff erences between infl ection and derivation’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10.
93. Dressler, W. U. 1997. ‘Universals, typology and modularity in natural morphology’, in Hickey, R. and Puppel, S. (eds.) Language History and Linguistic Modellings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1399–423.
94. Dressler, W. U. 2000. ‘Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology’, in Doleschal, U. and Thornton, A. (eds.) Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology. Munich: Lincom Europa, 1–10.
95. Dressler, W. U. 2005. ‘Word-formation in natural morphology’, in Štekauer, P. and Lieber, R. (eds.) Handbook of Word-formation. Springer: Dordrecht, 267–84.
96. Dressler, W. U. and Karpf, A. 1995. ‘The theoretical relevance of pre- and proto-morphology in language acquisition’, Yearbook of Morphology 1994: 99–122.
97. Dressler, W. U., Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O. and Wurzel, W. U. (eds.) 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
98. Dryer, M. S. 1997. ‘Are grammatical relations universal?’, in Bybee, J. L., Haiman, J. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.) Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115–43.
99. Fabb, N. 1998. ‘Compounding’, in Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.) Handbook of Morphology. Oxford and Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell, 66–83.
100. Farrell, P. 2001. ‘Functional shift as category underspecifi cation’, English Language and Linguistics 5/1: 109–30.
101. Fernández-Domínguez, J. 2009. Productivity in English Word-formation. An Approach to N+N Compounding. Bern: Peter Lang.
102. Filipec, J. and Cermák, F. 1985. Ceská lexikologie. Prague: Academia.
103. Fortescue, M. 1980 ‘Affi x-ordering in West Greenlandic derivational processes’, International Journal of American Linguistics 46/4: 259–78.
104. Fortescue, M. 1984. West Greenlandic. London, Sydney and Dover: Croom Helm.
105. Furdík, J. 2004. Slovenská slovotvorba. Prešov: Náuka.
106. Gaeta, L. 2005. ‘Word-formation and typology: which language universals?’, in Booij, G. E., Guevara, E., Ralli, A., Sgroi, S. and Scalise, S. (eds.) Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003. University of Bologna, 157–70.
107. Gerdts, D. B. 1998. ‘Incorporation’, in Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford and Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell, 84–99.
108. Giegerich, H. J. 1999. Lexical Strata in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109. Giegerich, H. J. 2004. ‘Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion’, English Language and Linguistics 8: 1–24.
110. Giegerich, H. J. 2009. ‘The English compound stress myth’, Word Structure 2: 1–17.
111. Glinert, L. 1989. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Grandi, N. and Montermini, F. 2005. ‘Prefi x-suffi x neutrality in evaluative morphology’, in Booij, G. E., Guevara, E., Ralli, A., Sgroi, S. and Scalise, S. (eds.) Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003. University of Bologna, 143–56.
113. Greenberg, J. H. 1963. ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in Greenberg, J. H. (ed.) Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 58–90.
114. Greenberg, J. H. 1966. ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in Greenberg, J. H. (ed.) Universals of Language. Second edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73–113.
115. Greenberg, J. H. (ed.) 1978. Universals of Human Language. Vol. 3. Word Structure. Stanford University Press.
116. Guerssel, M. 1983. ‘A lexical approach to word formation in English’, Linguistic Analysis 12: 183–243.
117. Hall, C. J. 2000. ‘Prefi xation, suffi xation and circumfi xation’, in Booij, G. E., Lehmann, Ch. and Mugdan, J. (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Infl ection and Word Formation. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 535–45.
118. Halle, M. 1973. ‘Prolegomena to a theory of word formation’, Linguistic Inquiry 4/1: 3–16.
119. Halliday, M. A. K. 1966. ‘Lexis as a linguistic level’, in Bazell, C. E., Catford, J. C., Halliday, M. A. K. and Robins, R. H. (eds.) In Memory of J.R. Firth. London: Longman, 148–62.
120. Hardman, M. J. 2000. Jaqaru. Munich: Lincom Europa.
121. Harrison, S. P. 1973. ‘Reduplication in Micronesian languages’, Oceanic Linguistics 12: 407–54.
122. Haspelmath, M. 1996. ‘Word-class changing infl ection and morphological theory’, Yearbook of Morphology 1995: 43–66.
123. Harrison, S. P. 2007. ‘Pre-established categories don’t exist: consequences for language description and typology’, Linguistic Typology 11: 119–32.
124. Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. and Comrie, B. (eds.) 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.
125. Haviland, J. B. 1980. Sk’op Sotz’leb: the Tzotzil of Zinacantán. An On-line Tzotzil Grammar. URL: www.zapata.org/Tzotzil/(last accessed 15 July 2010).
126. Hawkins, J. A. 1988. ‘Explaining language universals’, in Hawkins, J. A. (ed.) Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 3–28.
127. Hawkins, J. A. and Gilligan, G. 1988. ‘Prefi xing and suffi xing universals in relation to basic word order’, in Hawkins, J. A. and Holmback, H. K. (eds.) Papers in Universal Grammar: Generative and Typological Approaches. Lingua Special Issue 74, 219–59.
128. Hillery, P. J. 1996–2006. The Georgian Language. An Outline Grammatical Summary. URL: http://www.armazi.demon.co.uk/georgian/(last accessed 15 July 2010).
129. Himmelmann, N. P. 2005. ‘The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: typological characteristics’, in Adelaar, K. A. and Himmelmann, N. P. (eds.) The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London and New York: Routledge, 110–81.
130. Hockett, C. F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
131. Hohenhaus, P. 2004. ‘Identical constituent compounding – a corpus-based study’, Folia Linguistica 38/3–4: 297–332.
132. Horecký, J., Buzássyová, K. and Bosák, J. 1989. Dynamika slovnej zásoby súcasnej slovenciny. Bratislava: Veda.
133. Hudson, R. A. 1980. ‘Constituency and dependency’, Linguistics 18: 179–98.
134. Inkelas, S. 2006. ‘Reduplication’, in Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 417–19.
135. Inkelas, S. and Zoll, C. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136. Jackendoff, R. S. 2009. ‘Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 105–28.
137. Josefsson, G. 1997. On the Principles of Word Formation in Swedish. Lund University Press.
138. Julien, M. 2006. ‘Word’, in Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 617–24.
139. Jurafsky, D. 1993. ‘Universals in the semantics of the diminutive’, in Guenter, J. S., Kaiser, B. A. and Zoll, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Parasession on Semantic Typology and Semantic Universals. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 423–36.
140. Kachru, Y. 2006. Hindi. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
141. Kageyama, T. 1982. ‘Word formation in Japanese’, Lingua 57: 215–58.
142. Kageyama, T. 2009. ‘Isolate: Japanese’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 512–26.
143. Kastovsky, D. 1969. ‘Wortbildung und Nullmorphem’, Linguistische Berichte 2: 1–13.
144. Kastovsky, D. 1982. Wortbildung und Semantik. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag-Schwann-Bagel.
145. Kastovsky, D. 1986. ‘Diachronic word-formation in a functional perspective’, in Kastovsky, D. and Szwedek, A. (eds.) Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries. In Honour of Jacek Fisiak on the Occasion of his Fiftieth Birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 409–21.
146. Kastovsky, D. 1994. ‘Verbal derivation in English: a historical survey or Much Ado About Nothing’, in Britton, D. (ed.) English Historical Linguistics 1994. Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8. ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 September 1994). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 93–117.
147. Kastovsky, D. 1995. ‘Wortbildung’, in Ahrens, R., Bald, W.-D. and Hüllen, W. (eds.) Handbuch Englisch als Fremdsprache. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 104–9.
148. Kastovsky, D. 2000. ‘Words and word-formation: morphology in OED’, in Mugglestone, L. (ed.) Lexicography and the OED. Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. New York: Oxford University Press, 110–25.
149. Kastovsky, D. 2009. ‘Diachronic perspectives’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 323–42.
150. Katamba, F. 1993. Morphology. London: Macmillan.
151. Kavka, S. 2003. ‘English compounds (revisited) as idiomatic expressions and continua’, Linguistica Praguensia 13/1: 13–33.
152. Kavka, S. 2009. ‘Compounding and idiomatology’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 19–33.
153. Kimenyi, A. 2008. ‘The Bantu–Japanese connection: iconicity of reduplication in Japanese and Kinyarwanda’. URL: www.kimenyi.com/reduplication-in-japanese.php (last accessed 15 July 2010).
154. Kiparsky, P. 1982a. ‘Lexical morphology and phonology’, in Yang, I. S. (ed.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Selected Papers from SICOL-1981. Seoul: Hanshin, 3–91.
155. Kiparsky, P. 1982b. ‘From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology’, in van der Hulst, H. and Smith, N. (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part I. Dordrecht: Foris, 131–75.
156. Kiyomi, S. 1995. ‘A new approach to reduplication: a semantic study of noun and verb reduplication in the Malayo-Polynesian languages’, Linguistics 33: 1145–67.
157. Klamer, M. 1998. A Grammar of Kambera. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
158. Kouwenberg, S. and LaCharité, D. 2005. ‘Less is more: evidence from diminutive reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages’, in Hurch, B. (ed.) Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 533–46.
159. Kroeber, A. L. 1910. ‘Noun incorporation in American languages’, in Heger, F. (ed.) Verhandlungen des XVI. Internationalen Amerikanisten-Kongress. Vienna and Leipzig: A. Hartleben, 569–76.
160. Krupa, V. and Genzor, J. 1996. Jazyky sveta v priestore a case. Bratislava: Veda.
161. Kryk-Kastovsky, B. 2000. ‘Diminutives: an interface of word-formation, semantics and pragmatics’, in Dalton-Puff er, C. and Ritt, N. (eds.) Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 165–74.
162. Laca, B. 2001. ‘Derivation’, in Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W. and Raible, W. (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1214–27.
163. Lazard, G. 1992. ‘Y a-t-il des catégories interlangagières?’, in Anschütz, S. (ed.) Texte, Sätze, Wörter, und Moneme: Festschrift für Klaus Heger. Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orient-Verlag, 427–34.
164. Lees, R. B. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
165. Lees, R. B. 1970. ‘Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds’, in Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph, K. E. (eds.) Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 174–86.
166. Levi, J. N. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York Academic Press.
167. Leza, I. J. L. 2001. ‘Incorporation’, in Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W. and Raible, W. (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 714–25.
168. Libben, G. 2006. ‘Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues’, in Libben, G. and Jarema, G. (eds.) The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. Oxford University Press, 1–22.
169. Lieber, R. 1981. On the Organization of the Lexicon. PhD thesis, MIT, Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Linguistics Club. [Published 1990 in the series Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland].
170. Lieber, R. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. University of Chicago Press.
171. Lieber, R. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
172. Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.) 2009. Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford University Press.
173. Lüdtke, J. 1996. ‘Gemeinromanische Tendenzen IV. Wortbildungslehre’, in Holtus, G., Metzeltin, M. and Schmitt, Ch. (eds.) Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik (LRL), Bd. II,1: Lateinisch und Romanisch. Historisch-Vergleichende Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 235–72.
174. Macaulay, M. 1996. A Grammar of Chalcatongo Mixtec. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
175. Malkiel, Y. 1978. ‘Derivational categories’, in Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), 127–49.
176. Malouf, R. 1999. ‘West Greenlandic noun incorporation in a monohierarchical theory of grammar’, in Webelhuth, G., Kathol, K. and Koenig, J.-P. (ed.) Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, 47–62.
177. Marantz, A. 1982. ‘Re reduplication’, Linguistic Inquiry 13/3: 435–82.
178. Marchand, H. 1960. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
179. Marchand, H. 1965a. ‘The analysis of verbal nexus substantives’, Indogermanische Forschungen 70: 57–71.
180. Marchand, H. 1965b. ‘On the analysis of substantive compounds and suffi xal derivatives not containing a verbal element’, Indogermanische Forschungen 70: 117–45.
181. Marchand, H. 1967. ‘Expansion, transposition and derivation’, La Linguistique 1: 13–26.
182. Marchand, H. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. Second revised edition. Munich: Carl H. Beck.
183. Marchand, H. 1974. Studies in Syntax and Word-formation. Edited by D. Kastovsky. Internationale Bibliothek für Algemeine Linguistik, Bd. 18. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
184. Mardirussian, G. 1975. ‘Noun incorporation in Universal Grammar’, in Grossman, R. E., San, L. J. and Vance T. J. (eds.) Papers from the 11th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 383–9.
185. Maslova, E. 2000. ‘A dynamic approach to the verifi cation of distributional universals’, Linguistic Typology 4: 307–33.
186. Mathesius, V. 1975. A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis. The Hague: Mouton.
187. Mau, T. 2002. Form und Funktion sprachlicher Wiederholungen. Frankfurt am Main and Oxford: Peter Lang.
188. Mayerthaler, W. 1988. Morphological Naturalness. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
189. McCarthy, J. J. and Prince, A. 1994. ‘Prosodic morphology’, in Goldsmith, J. (ed.) A Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 318–66.
190. Merlini Barbaresi, L. 2003. ‘Diminutives’, in Frawley, W. F. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 438–9.
191. Mithun, M. 1984. ‘The evolution of noun incorporation’, Language 60: 847–94.
192. Mithun, M. 1986. ‘On the nature of noun incorporation’, Language 62: 32–7.
193. Mithun, M. 2009. ‘Compounding in Mohawk’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 564–83.
194. Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
195. Mojdl, L. 2006. Malajština. Prague: Academia.
196. Montler, T. 1989. ‘Infi xation, reduplication and metathesis in the Saanich actual aspect’, Southwest Journal of Linguistics 9: 92–107.
197. Moravcsik, E. A. 1978. ‘Reduplicative constructions’, in Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), 297–334.
198. Moravcsik, E. A. 2000. ‘Infi xation’, in Booij, G. E., Lehmann, Ch. and Mugdan, J. (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 545–52.
199. Moravcsik, E. A. 2007. ‘What is universal about typology?’, Linguistic Typology 11/1: 27–42.
200. Mukai, M. 2008. ‘Recursive compounds’, Word Structure 1: 178–98.
201. Mutaka, N. and Hyman, L. 1990. ‘Syllables and morpheme integrity in Kinande reduplication’, Phonology 7: 73–119.
202. Myers, S. 1984. ‘Zero-derivation and infl ection’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 53–69.
203. Neef, M. 2009. ‘Compounding in German’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 386–99.
204. Newman, P. 2000. The Hausa Language: an Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
205. Newmeyer, F. J. 2007. ‘Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories’, Linguistic Typology 11/1: 133–57.
206. Nichols, J. 1971. ‘Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America’, Language 47: 826–48.
207. Nichols, L. 2007. ‘Methodology and the empirical base of typology’, Linguistic Typology 11: 259–64.
208. Nikolaeva, I. and Tolskaya, M. 2001. A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
209. Pennanen, E. V. 1966. Contributions to the Study of Back-formation in English. Tampere: Acta Academiae Socialis.
210. Pennanen, E. V. 1975. ‘What happens in back-formation?’, in Hovdhaugen, E. (ed.) Papers from the Second Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Lysebu, April 19–20, 1975. University of Oslo, 216–29.
211. Perlmutter, D. M. 1988. ‘The split morphology hypothesis: evidence from Yiddish’, in Hammond, M. and Noonan, M. (eds.) Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 79–100.
212. Plank, F. 1994. ‘Infl ection and derivation’, in Asher, R. E. (ed.) The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3. Oxford: Pergamon, 1671–8.
213. Plank, F. 2007. ‘Extent and limits of linguistic diversity as the remit of typology – but through constraints on what is diversity limited?’, Linguistic Typology 11/1: 43–68.
214. Plank, F. 2010. ‘Variable direction in zero-derivation and the unity of polysemous lexical items’, Word Structure 3: 82–97.
215. Plank, F. and Filimonova, E. 2000. The Universals Archive. URL: http://typo.uni-konstanz.de/archive/intro/(last accessed: 15 July 2010).
216. Porízka, V. 1972. Hindština – Hindi Language Course. Prague: Státní Pedagogickeé Nakladatelství.
217. Rainer, F. 1993. Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
218. Rainer, F. 2005. ‘Typology, diachrony and universals of semantic change in word formation: a Romanist’s look at the polysemy of agent nouns’, in Booij, G. E., Guevara, E., Ralli, A., Sgroi, S. and Scalise, S. (eds.) Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003. University of Bologna, 21–34.
219. Ralli, A. 2009. ‘Modern Greek V V dvandva compounds: a linguistic innovation in the history of the Indo-European languages’, Word Structure 2: 48–68.
220. Regier, T. 1994. A Preliminary Study of the Semantics of Reduplication. Report TR-94-019. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.
221. Rice, K. 2009. ‘Compounds in Slavey’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 542–63.
222. Rijkhoff, J. and Bakker, D. 1998. ‘Language sampling’, Linguistic Typology 2: 263–314.
223. Roberts, J. R. 1987. Amele. London, New York and Sydney: Croom Helm.
224. Roberts, J. R. 1991. ‘Reduplication in Amele’, in Dutton, T. (ed.) Papers in Papuan Linguistics 1. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Australian National University, 115–46.
225. Roeper, T. and Siegel, M. E. A. 1978. ‘A lexical transformation for verbal compounds’, Linguistic Inquiry 9: 199–260.
226. Rose, S. 2003. ‘Triple take: Tigre and the case of internal reduplication’, San Diego Linguistic Papers 1: 109–28.
227. Rosen, S. T. 1989. ‘Two types of noun incorporation: a lexical analysis’, Language 65: 294–317.
228. Rubino, C. 2005a. ‘Reduplication’, in Haspelmath et al. (eds.), 114–15.
229. Rubino, C. 2005b. ‘Iloko’, in Adelaar, K. A. and Himmelmann, N. P. (eds.) The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Curzon Press, 326–49.
230. Rubino, C. 2005c. ‘Reduplication: form, function and distribution’, in Hurch, B. (ed.) Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 11–30.
231. Sadock, J. M. 1980. ‘Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: a case of syntactic word-formation’, Language 57: 300–19.
232. Sadock, J. M. 1985. ‘Autolexical syntax: a theory of noun incorporation and similar phenomena’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 379–441.
233. Sadock, J. M. 1986. ‘Some notes on noun incorporation’, Language 62: 19–31.
234. Sadock, J. M. 2006. ‘Incorporation’, in Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 584–7.
235. Sánchez-Mendes, L. and Müller, A. 2007. ‘The meaning of pluractionality in Karitiana’, in Deal, A. R. (ed.) UMOP 35: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on the Semantics of Under- Represented Languages in the Americas. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Students Association, 247–57.
236. Sapir, D. J. 1965. A Grammar of Diola-Fogny. A Language Spoken in the Basse-Casamance Region of Senegal. Cambridge University Press.
237. Sapir, E. 1921. Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
238. Scalise, S. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
239. Scalise, S. 1988. ‘Infl ection and derivation’, Linguistics 26: 561–81.
240. Scalise, S. and Bisetto, A. 2009. ‘The classifi cation of compounds’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 34–53.
241. Schäfer, M. 2009. ‘A+N constructions in Mandarin and the “compound vs. phrase” debate’, Word Structure 2: 272–93.
242. Schiff man, H. F. 1996. A Grammar of Spoken Tamil. URL: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/plc/tamilweb/book.html (last accessed: 15 July 2010).
243. Schlegel, F. 1808. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Alterthumskunde. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.
244. Schwarzwald, O. 2001. Modern Hebrew. Munich: Lincom Europa.
245. Selkirk, E. O. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
246. Shopen, T. (ed.) 1985. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
247. Shopen, T. (ed.) 2007. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
248. Siegel, D. 1979. Topics in English Morphology. New York: Garland.
249. Smirnickij, A. I. 1953. ‘Tak nazyvajemaja konversija i ceredovanije zvukov v anglijskom jazyke’, Inostrannyje Jazyky v Škole 5: 21–31.
250. Smirnickij, A. I. 1954. ‘Po povodu konversiji v anglijskom jazyke’, Inostrannyje Jazyky v Škole 3: 12–24.
251. Smirnickij, A. I. 1956. Lexikologija anglijskogo jazyka. Moscow.
252. Smirnickij, A. I. and Achmanova, O. S. 1952. ‘Obrazovanija tipa stone wall, speech sound v anglijskom jazyke’, Doklady i Soobšcenija AN SSSR 2: 97–116.
253. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Third edition. New York: W. H. Freeman.
254. Sokolová, M., Moško, G., Šimon, F. and Benko, V. 1999. Morfematický slovník slovenciny. Prešov: Náuka.
255. Song, J. J. 2007. ‘What or where can we do better? Some personal refl ections on (the tenth anniversary of) linguistic typology’, Linguistic Typology 11/1: 5–22.
256. Spencer, A. 1995. ‘Incorporation in Chukchi’, Language 64: 663–82.
257. Spencer, A. 2000. ‘Morphology and syntax’, in Booij, G. E., Lehmann, Ch. and Mugdan, J. (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Infl ection and Word Formation. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 312–35.
258. Spencer, A. 2004. ‘Towards a typology of “mixed categories”’, in Orgun, C. O. and Sells, P. (eds.) Morphology and the Web of Grammar. Essays in Memory of Steven G. Lapointe. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, 1–46.
259. Spencer, A. 2005. ‘Word-formation and syntax’, in Štekauer, P. and Lieber, R. (eds.) Handbook of Wordformation. Springer: Dordrecht, 73–97.
260. Stassen, L. 1985. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
261. StatSoft, Inc. 2001. STATISTICA for Windows. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft, Inc.
262. Stein, G. 1977. ‘The place of word-formation in linguistic description’, in Brekle, H. E. and Kastovsky, D. (eds.) Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung. Beiträge zum Wuppertaler Wortbildungskolloquium vom 9.–10. Juli 1976. Anläßlich des 70. Geburtstages von Hans Marchand am 1. Oktober 1977. Bonn: Bouvier, 219–35.
263. Štekauer, P. 1996. A Theory of Conversion in English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
264. Štekauer, P. 1998. An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-formation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
265. Štekauer, P. 2000. English Word-formation. A History of Research (1960–1995). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
266. Štekauer, P. 2001. ‘Beheading the word? Please, stop the execution’, Folia Linguistica 34/3–4: 333–55.
267. Štekauer, P. 2005. ‘Onomasiological approach to word-formation’, in Štekauer, P. and Lieber, R. (eds.) Handbook of Word-formation. Springer: Dordrecht, 207–32.
268. Štekauer, P. 2006. ‘On the meaning predictability of novel context-free converted naming units’, Linguistics 44/3: 489–539.
269. Štekauer, P. 2009. ‘Meaning predictability of novel context-free compounds’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 272–97.
270. Štekauer, P., Chapman, D., Tomašcíková, S. and Franko, Š. 2005. ‘Word-formation as creativity within productivity constraints. Sociolinguistic evidence’, Onomasiology Online 6: 1–55.
271. Štekauer, P., Franko, Š., Slancová, D., Liptáková, L. and Sutherland-Smith, J. 2001. ‘A comparative research into the transfer of animal names to human beings’, VIEWS 10/2: 69–75.
272. Strauss, S. L. 1982. Lexicalist Phonology of English and German. Dordrecht: Foris.
273. Stump, G. T. 1993. ‘How peculiar is evaluative morphology?’, Journal of Linguistics 29: 1–36.
274. Stump, G. T. 2005. ‘Word-formation and infl ectional morphology’, in Štekauer, P. and Lieber, R. (eds.) Handbook of Word-formation. Springer: Dordrecht, 49–71.
275. Szymanek, B. 2005. ‘The latest trends in English word-formation’, in Štekauer, P. and Lieber, R. (eds.) Handbook of Word-formation. Springer: Dordrecht, 429–48.
276. Szymanek, B. 2009. ‘Polish’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 464–77.
277. Ten Hacken, P. 2000. ‘Derivation and compounding’, in Booij, G. E., Lehmann, Ch. and Mugdan, J. (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Infl ection and Word Formation. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 349–60.
278. Thompson, C. 1996. ‘The Na-Dene middle voice: an impersonal source of the D-Element’, International Journal of American Linguistics 62/4: 351–78.
279. Thompson, L. C. 1967. A Vietnamese Grammar. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
280. Tournier, J. 1985. Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l’anglais contemporain. Paris and Genève: Champion-Slatkine.
281. Ultan, R. 1975. ‘Infi xes and their origins’, in Seiler, H. (ed.) Linguistic Workshop III. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 157–205.
282. Ultan, R. 1978. ‘Size-sound symbolism’, in Greenberg, J. (ed.) Universals of Human Language Vol. 2. Stanford University Press, 525–68.
283. Urbanczyk, S. C. 2001. Patterns of Reduplication in Lushootseed. New York and London: Garland.
284. Vajda, E. 2004. Ket. Munich: Lincom Europa.
285. van Goethem, K. 2009. ‘Choosing between A+N compounds and lexicalized A+N phrases: the position of French in comparison to Germanic languages’, Word Structure 2/2: 241–53.
286. van Marle, J. 1995. ‘The unity of morphology: on the interwovenness of the derivational and inflectional dimension of the word’, Yearbook of Morphology 1995: 67–82.
287. Vogel, P. M. 1996. Wortarten und Wortartenwechsel. Zu Konversion und verwandten Erscheinungen im Deutschen und in anderen Sprachen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
288. Wälchli, B. 2005. Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
289. Wegener, H. 2003. ‘Entstehung und Funktion der Fugenelemente im Deutschen, oder: Warum wir keine Autosbahn haben’, Linguistische Berichte 196: 425–57.
290. Werner, H. 1998. Probleme der Wortbildung in den Jenissej-Sprachen. Munich: Lincom Europa.
291. Werner, H. 2004. Die Diathese in den Jenissef-Sprachen aus typologischer Sicht. Harrassowitz: Wiesbaden.
292. Whaley, L. J. 1997. Introduction to Typology: the Unity and Diversity of Language. Thousand Oaks and London: Sage Publications.
293. Wierzbicka, A. 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: the Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
294. Williams, E. 1981. ‘On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”’, Linguistic Inquiry 12/2: 245–74.
295. Wiltshire, C. and Marantz, A. 2000. ‘Reduplication’, in Booij, G. E., Lehmann, Ch. and Mugdan, J. (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 557–67.
296. Yu, A. C. L. 2007. A Natural History of Infi xation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
297. Yuan, L., Zhang, S. and Chen, H. (eds.) 2002. The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (Chinese– English edition). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
298. Zamponi, R. 2003. Maipure. Munich: Lincom Europa.
299. Zamponi, R. 2009. ‘Compounding in Maipure-Yavitero’, in Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), 584–93.
300. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
301. Zhang, Z.-S. 1987. ‘Reduplication as a type of operation’, in Bosh, A., Need, B. and Schiller, E. (eds.) Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 376–88.
302. Zwicky, A. M. 1977. On Clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
303. Zwicky, A. M. 1985. ‘Heads’, Journal of Linguistics 21: 1–29.