From potential donor to actual donation: Does socioeconomic position affect living kidney donation? a systematic review of the evidence

Transplantation

Volumn 98, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 918-926

  Bailey, Phillippa ^a   Tomson, Charles ^b   Risdale, Saira ^b   Ben Shlomo, Yoav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Living kidney donation; Socioeconomic position; Transplantation

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ASPECT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INCOME; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; MOTIVATION; NEPHRECTOMY; ORGAN TRAFFICKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; ECONOMICS; ETHNIC GROUP; EUROPE; FEMALE; MALE; POVERTY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL CLASS; TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; ETHNIC GROUPS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEPHRECTOMY; POVERTY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL CLASS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84925019843     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000428     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Karlberg I, Nyberg G. Cost-effectiveness studies of renal transplantation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995; 11: 611.
2. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 235.
3. Cecka J. Living donor transplants. Clin Transplant 1995: 363-77.
4. Roodnat JI, van Riemsdijk IC, Mulder PGH, et al. The superior results of living-donor renal transplantation are not completely caused by selection or short cold ischemia time: a single-center, multivariate analysis. Transplantation 2003; 75: 2014.
5. Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report 2012/13. NHS Blood and Transplant Statistics and Clinical Audit. www.organdonation.nhs.uk/statistics/transplant-activity-report.
6. United Kingdom Guidelines for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation. Compiled by a Joint Working Party of the British Transplantation Society and the Renal Association. May 2011; Third Edition www.bts.org.uk/transplantation/standards-and-guidelines/.
7. Abramowicz D, Cochat P, Claas F, et al. ERBP Guideline on the management and evaluation of the kidney donor and recipient. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28(suppl 2): ii1.
8. Delmonico F. Council of the Transplantation Society A report of the Amsterdam forum on the care of the live kidney donor. Transplantation 2005; 79(Suppl 2):S53.
9. Giessing M. Living donor nephrectomy quantifying the risk for the donor. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 1786.
10. Mjøen G, Hallan S, Hartmann A, et al. Long-term risks for kidney donors. Kidney Int 2013; 86: 162.
11. Muzaale AD, Massie AB, Wang M, et al. Risk of end-stage renal disease following live kidney donation. JAMA 2014; 311: 579.
12. Morgan B, Ibrahim H. Long-term outcomes of kidney donors. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2011; 20: 605.
13. Segev DL, Muzaale AD, Caffo BS, et al. Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA 2010; 303: 959.
14. Garg AX, Prasad GVR, Thiessen-Philbrook HR, et al. Cardiovascular disease and hypertension risk in living kidney donors: an analysis of health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Transplantation 2008; 86: 399.
15. Garg AX, Meirambayeva A, Huang A, et al. Cardiovascular disease in kidney donors: matched cohort study. BMJ 2012; 344: e1203.
16. Johnson E, Anderson J, Jacobs C, et al. Long-term follow-up of living kidney donors: quality of life after donation. Transplantation 1999; 67: 717.
17. Ku J. Health-related quality of life of living kidney donors: review of the short form 36-health questionnaire survey. Tr a n s p l I n t 2005; 18: 1309.
18. Lumsdaine JA, Wray A, Power MJ, et al. Higher quality of life in living donor kidney transplantation: prospective cohort study. Transpl Int 2005; 18: 975.
19. Ibrahim H, Foley R, Tan L, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 459.
20. Garcia MFFM, Andrade LGM, Carvalho MFC. Living kidney donorsVa prospective study of quality of life before and after kidney donation. Clin Transplant 2013; 27: 9.
21. Gross CR, Messersmith EE, Hong BA, et al. Health-related quality of life in kidney donors from the last five decades: results from the RELIVE study. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 2924.
22. Glotzer OS, Singh TP, Gallichio MH, et al. Long-term quality of life after living kidney donation. Transplant Proc 2013; 45: 3225.
23. Drey N, Roderick P, Mullee M, et al. A population-based study of the incidence and outcomes of diagnosed chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: 677.
24. Hossain M, Palmer D, Goyder E, et al. Association of deprivation with worse outcomes in chronic kidney disease: findings from a hospital-based cohort in the United Kingdom. Nephron Clin Pract 2012; 120: 59.
25. Hossain M, Palmer D, Goyder E, et al. Social deprivation and prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the UK: workload implications for primary care. QJM 2012; 105: 167.
26. Fraser SDS, Roderick PJ, Aitken G, et al. Chronic kidney disease, al-buminuria and socioeconomic status in the Health Surveys for England 2009 and 2010. J Public Health (Oxf) 2013.
27. Roderick P, Clements S, Stone N, et al. What determines geographical variation in rates of acceptance onto renal replacement therapy in England? J Health Serv Res Policy 1999; 4: 139.
28. Udayaraj UP, Ben-Shlomo Y, Roderick P, et al. Socio-economic status, ethnicity and geographical variations in acceptance rates for renal replacement therapy in England and Wales: an ecological study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010; 64: 535.
29. Udayaraj U, Ben-Shlomo Y, Roderick P, et al. Social deprivation, ethnicity, and uptake of living kidney donor transplantation in the United Kingdom. Transplantation 2012; 93: 610.
30. Roodnat JI, Laging M, Massey EK, et al. Accumulation of unfavorable clinical and socioeconomic factors precludes living donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2012; 93: 518.
31. Schold JD, Heaphy ELG, Buccini LD, et al. Prominent impact of community risk factors on kidney transplant candidate processes and outcomes. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 2374.
32. Gore JL, Danovitch GM, Litwin MS, et al. Disparities in the utilization of live donor renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 1124.
33. Axelrod DA, Dzebisashvili N, Schnitzler MA, et al. The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 2276.
34. Purnell TS, Xu P, Leca N, et al. Racial differences in determinants of live donor kidney transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 1557.
35. Grace BS, Clayton PA, Cass A, et al. Transplantation rates for living-but not deceased-donor kidneys vary with socioeconomic status in Australia. Kidney Int 2012; 83: 138.
36. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS One 2009; 6.
37. Al-Shammari S. Public attitude and accessibility concerning kidney donation card and living related donation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med1991; 11: 336.
38. Sanner MA. Giving and takingVto whom and from whom? People's attitudes toward transplantation of organs and tissue from different sources. Clin Transplant 1998; 12:530.
39. Boulware L, Ratner L, Sosa J, et al. The general public's concerns about clinical risk in live kidney donation. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 186.
40. Aghanwa HS, Akinsola A, Akinola DO, et al. Attitudes toward kidney donation. J Natl Med Assoc 2003; 95: 725.
41. Conesa C. Socio-personal factors influencing public attitude towards living donation in south-eastern Spain. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 2874.
42. Piccoli GB, Soragna G, Putaggio S, et al. Efficacy of an educational programme for secondary school students on opinions on renal transplantation and organ donation: a randomized controlled trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 499.
43. Zhang L, Li Y, Zhou J, et al. Knowledge and willingness toward living organ donation: a survey of three universities in Changsha, Hunan Province, China. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 1303.
44. Rios A, Martinez-Alarcon L, Sanchez J, et al. Attitude of the population of German origin in the south east of Spain toward living kidney donation. Nephron Clin Pract 2008; 110: c133.
45. Segev D, Powe N, Troll M, et al. Factors influencing willingness of the general population to participate in kidney paired donation. Am J Transplant 2009.
46. Niang A, Leye MM, Dione L, et al. Perception du don de rein au Sénégal et potentiels donneurs. Nephrol Ther 2012; 8: 468.
47. Meng OY, Lim C, Leng CW, et al. Factors influencing living kidney donation in Singapore. Prog Transplant 2012; 22: 95.
48. Purnell TS, Powe NR, Troll MU, et al. Measuring and explaining racial and ethnic differences in willingness to donate live kidneys in the United States. Clin Transplant 2013; 27: 673.
49. Beladi Mousavi S, Alemzadeh Ansari M, Parsi A, et al. Reasons for renal donation among living unrelated renal donors in Khuzestan Province, Southwestern Iran. Int J Organ Transplant Med 2013; 4.
50. Khajedehi P. Living non-related versus related renal transplantationVits relationship to the social status, age and gender of recipients and donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 2621.
51. Malakoutian T, Hakemi MS, Nassiri AA, et al. Socioeconomic status of Iranian living unrelated kidney donors: a multicenter study. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 824.
52. Zargooshi J. Iranian kidney donors: motivations and relations with recipients. J Urol 2001; 165: 386.
53. Ghods AJ, Savaj S. Iranian model of paid and regulated living-unrelated kidney donation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 1136.
54. Moazam F, Moazam Zaman R, Jafarey A. Conversations with kidney vendors in Pakistan: an ethnographic study. Hastings CentRep 2009; 39: 29.
55. Goyal M, Mehta RL, Schneiderman LJ, et al. Economic and health consequences of selling a kidney in India. JAMA 2002; 288: 1589.
56. Awaya T, Siruno L, Toledano S, et al. Failure of informed consent in compensated non-related kidney donation in the Philippines. Asian Bioethics Review 2009; 1: 138.
57. Shimazono Y. The state of the international organ trade: a provisional picture based on integration of available information. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85: 955.
58. Ghods A, Ossareh S, Khosravani P. Comparison of some socioeco-nomic characteristics of donors and recipients in a controlled living unrelated donor renal transplantation program. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 2626.
59. Gill JS, Gill J, Barnieh L, et al. Income of living kidney donors and the income difference between living kidney donors and their recipients in the United States. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 3111.
60. Gore J, Singer J, Brown A, et al. The socioeconomic status of living unrelated renal transplant donors in the US is consistent with altruistic motivation. J Urol 2010; 183(Suppl 4).
61. Gore JL, Singer JS, Brown AF, et al. The socioeconomic status of donors and recipients of living unrelated renal transplants in the United States. J Urol 2012; 187: 1760.
62. Sehgal AR. The net transfer of transplant organs across race, sex, age, and income. Am J Med 2004; 117: 670.
63. Bailey PK, Tomson CRV, Ben-Shlomo Y. Study of living kidney donor-recipient relationships: variation with socioeconomic deprivation in the white population of England. Clin Transplant 2013; 27: E327.
64. Gill J, Dong J, Rose C, et al. The effect of race and income on living kidney donation in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 24: 1872.
65. Zimmerman D, Donnelly S, Miller J, et al. Gender disparity in living renal transplant donation. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 534.
66. Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, et al. Gender discrepancies in living related renal transplant donors and recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 1139.
67. Haberal M, Gulay H, Tokyay R, et al. Living unrelated donor kidney transplantation between spouses. World J Surg 1992; 16: 1183.
68. Lynch R, Mathur A, Cai S, et al. National economic outlook and living donor transplant rates. American Journal of Transplantation Conference abstract Conference: 11th American Transplant Congress, ATC. 2011; 11: 156.
69. Muzaale A, Berger J, Montgomery R, et al. The decline of live kidney donor transplantation in the United States: A multivariate analysis. American Journal of Transplantation Conference abstract Conference: 11th American Transplant Congress, ATC. 2011; 11: 135.
70. Lin MH, Tasi MK, Lin HY, et al. Analysis of the factors influencing living kidney donation: the experience in National Taiwan University Hospital. Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 689.
71. Boulware L, Hill-Briggs F, Kraus E, et al. Identifying and addressing barriers to African American and non-African American families' discussions about preemptive living related kidney transplantation. Prog Transplant 2011; 21.
72. Lavee J, Ashkenazi T, Stoler A, et al. Preliminary marked increase in the national organ donation rate in Israel following implementation of a new organ transplantation law. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 780.
73. Boulware L, Troll M, Plantinga L, et al. The Association of state and national legislation with living kidney donation rates in the United States: a national study. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 1451.
74. Ajzen I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behaviour. Action Control: From Cognition to Behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, eds. Heidelberg: Springer. 1985.
75. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50: 179.
76. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy, locus of control and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Pscyhol 2002; 2: 1.
77. Eisenberg N, Fabes R. Prosocial Development. Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development. New York: Wiley; 1998; 3: 701.
78. Veldhuizen IJ, Doggen CJ, Atsma F, et al. Donor profiles: demographic factors and their influence on the donor career. Vox Sang 2009; 97: 129.
79. Wakefield C, Watts K, Homewood J, et al. Attitudes toward organ donation and donor behavior: a review of the international literature. Prog Transplant 2010; 20: 380.
80. Piff P, Kraus M, Côté S, et al. Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 2010; 99: 771.
81. Stellar JE, Manzo VM, Kraus MW, et al. Class and compassion: socio-economic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion 2012; 12: 449.
82. James R III, Sharpe D. The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2007; 36: 218.
83. UKCRN ID 15716: Deprivation and non-progression of potential living kidney donors. http://publicukcrnorguk/search/StudyDetailaspx? StudyID=15716.
84. Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohrica/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxfordasp.