Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy in Retroperitoneal Sarcomas Does Not Influence Local Recurrence or Overall Survival

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 853-858

  Wilkinson, M J ^a   Martin, J L ^a   Khan, A A ^a   Hayes, A J ^a   Thomas, J M ^a   Strauss, D C ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES; LIPOSARCOMA; LOCAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE HEMATOMA; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; RETROPERITONEAL SARCOMA; ADOLESCENT; CANCER GRADING; CANCER STAGING; LARGE CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROPERITONEAL NEOPLASMS; SARCOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROPERITONEAL NEOPLASMS; SARCOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924975522     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4059-x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Strauss DC, Qureshi YA, Hayes AJ, Thway K, Fisher C, Thomas JM. The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected soft tissue tumours. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(5):523–9.
2. Robertson EG, Baxter G. Tumour seeding following percutaneous needle biopsy: the real story! Clin Radiol. 2011;66(11):1007–14.
3. Davies NM, Livesley PJ, Cannon SR. Recurrence of an osteosarcoma in a needle biopsy track. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(6):977–8.
4. Schwartz HS, Spengler DM. Needle tract recurrences after closed biopsy for sarcoma: three cases and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(3):228–36.
5. Clark MA, Thomas JM. Portsite recurrence after laparoscopy for staging of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13(4):290–1.
6. Liu PT, Valadez SD, Chivers FS, Roberts CC, Beauchamp CP. Anatomically based guidelines for core needle biopsy of bone tumors: implications for limb-sparing surgery. Radiographics. 2007;27(1):189–205.
7. Anderson MW, Temple HT, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA. Compartmental anatomy: relevance to staging and biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(6):1663–71.
8. Heslin MJ, Lewis JJ, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Core needle biopsy for diagnosis of extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(5):425–31.
9. Chew C, Reid R, O’Dwyer PJ. Value of biopsy in the assessment of a retroperitoneal mass. Surgeon. 2006;4(2):79–81.
10. Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer. 1984;33(1):37–42.
11. Clark MA, Fisher C, Judson I, Thomas JM. Soft-tissue sarcomas in adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(7):701–11.
12. Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Retroperitoneal tumours: review of management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(4):275–80.
13. Shiraev T, Pasricha SS, Choong P, et al. Retroperitoneal sarcomas: a review of disease spectrum, radiological features, characterisation and management. J Med Imag Radiat Oncol. 2013;57(6):687–700.
14. Swallow CJ, Catton CN. Improving outcomes for retroperitoneal sarcomas: a work in progress. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(2):317–31.
15. Mussi C, Collini P, Miceli R, et al. The prognostic impact of dedifferentiation in retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a series of surgically treated patients at a single institution. Cancer. 2008;113(7):1657–65.
16. Kudo T, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, et al. Three cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-FNA. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(29):3459–64.
17. Strauss DC, Qureshi YA, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Management of benign retroperitoneal schwannomas: a single-center experience. Am J Surg. 2011;202(2):194–8.
18. Bonvalot S, Desai A, Coppola S, et al. The treatment of desmoid tumors: a stepwise clinical approach. Ann Oncol. 2012;23 Suppl 10:x158–66.
19. Wilkinson MJ, Fitzgerald JE, Thomas JM, Hayes AJ, Strauss DC. Surgical resection for non-familial adenomatous polyposis-related intra-abdominal fibromatosis. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):706–13.
20. Gronchi A, Colombo C, Le Pechoux C, et al. Sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a stepwise approach to a non-metastasising neoplasm—a position paper from the Italian and the French Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):578–83.
21. Bonvalot S, Raut CP, Pollock RE, et al. Technical considerations in surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas: position paper from E-Surge, a master class in sarcoma surgery, and EORTC-STBSG. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(9):2981–91.
22. Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thway K, Moskovic EC, Fisher C, Thomas JM. Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Br J Surg. 2010;97(5):698–706.
23. Heslin MJ, Lewis JJ, Nadler E, et al. Prognostic factors associated with long-term survival for retroperitoneal sarcoma: implications for management. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(8):2832–9.
24. Gronchi A, Miceli R, Shurell E, et al. Outcome prediction in primary resected retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific overall survival and disease-free survival nomograms built on major sarcoma center data sets. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):1649–55.
25. Lewis JJ, Leung D, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: analysis of 500 patients treated and followed at a single institution. Ann Surg. 1998;228(3):355–65.
26. Stoeckle E, Coindre JM, Bonvalot S, et al. Prognostic factors in retroperitoneal sarcoma: a multivariate analysis of a series of 165 patients of the French Cancer Center Federation Sarcoma Group. Cancer. 2001;92(2):359–68.