Evaluation of the current state of distributed watershed nutrient water quality modeling

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 3278-3290

  Wellen, Christopher ^a,b   Kamran Disfani, Ahmad Reza ^a   Arhonditsis, George B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; NUTRIENTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS; NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION; NONPARAMETRIC MANN WHITNEY TEST; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS; SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED MODELING; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; TRANSPORTATION PROCESS; WATER QUALITY MODELING;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; EVALUATION STUDY; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE; LATITUDE; LONGITUDE; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION; PROCESS MODEL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SEDIMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WATER FLOW; WATER QUALITY; WATER TABLE; WATERSHED; ANALYSIS; BIOASSAY; CALIBRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER POLLUTION;

CALIBRATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; HYDROLOGY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84924968877     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es5049557     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Rode, M.; Arhonditsis, G.; Balin, D.; Kebede, T.; Krysanova, V.; van Griensven, A.; van der Zee, S.E.A.T.M. New challenges in integrated water quality modeling Hydrol. Process. 2010, 24, 3447-3461 10.1002/hyp.7766
2. Borah, D. K.; Bera, M. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases Trans. ASAE 2003, 46, 1553-1566
3. Oreskes, N.; Shrader-Frechette, K.; Belitz, K. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences Science 1994, 263 (5147) 641-646
4. Beven, K. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis J. Hydrol. 2006, 320 (1-2) 18-36 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
5. Seibert, J.; McDonnell, J. J. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38 (11) 1241 10.1029/2001WR000978
6. Kirchner, J. W. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42, W03S04 10.1029/2005WR004362
7. Wade, A. J.; Durand, P.; Beaujouan, V.; Wessel, W. W.; Raat, K. J.; Whitehead, P. G.; Butterfield, D.; Rankinen, K.; Lepisto, A. A nitrogen model for European catchments: INCA, new model structure and equations Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2002, 6 (3) 559-582 10.5194/hess-6-559-2002
8. Wade, A. J.; Whitehead, P. G.; Butterfield, D. The Integrated Catchments model of phosphorus dynamics (INCA-P), a new approach for multiple source assessment in heterogenous river systems: Model structure and equations Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2002, 6 (3) 583-606
9. Michalak, A. M.; Anderson, E. J.; Beletsky, D.; Boland, S.; Bosch, N. S.; Bridgeman, T. B.; Chaffin, J. D.; Cho, K.; Confesor, R.; Daloglu, I.; DePinto, J. V.; Evans, M. A.; Fahnenstiel, G. L.; He, L.; Ho, J. C.; Jenkins, L.; Johengen, T. H.; Kuo, K. C.; LaPorte, E.; Liu, X.; McWilliams, M. R.; Moore, M. R.; Posselt, D. J.; Richards, R. P.; Scavia, D.; Steiner, A. L.; Verhamme, E.; Wright, D. M.; Zagorski, M. A. Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110 (16) 6448-6452 2013. 10.1073/pnas.1216006110
10. Moriasi, D. N.; Arnold, J. G.; Van Liew, M. W.; Bingner, R. L.; Harmel, R. D.; Veith, T. L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations Trans. ASABE 2007, 50 (3) 885-900
11. Gassman, P.; Reyes, M.; Green, C.; Arnold, J. The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions Trans. ASABE 2007, 50 (4) 1211-1250
12. Beven, K.; Binley, A. The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction Hydrol. Process. 1992, 6 (3) 279-298
13. Nash, J. E.; Sutcliff, J. V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1-A discussion of principles J. Hydrol. 1970, 10 (1970) 282-290
14. GHCN Global Climate; EarthInfo: Huntington Beach, California, 2011.
15. Strauch, M.; Bernhofer, C.; Koide, S.; Volk, M.; Lorz, C.; Makeschin, F. Using precipitation data ensemble for uncertainty analysis in SWAT streamflow simulation J. Hydrol. 2012, 414-415, 413-424 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.014
16. Rossman, L. Storm Water Management Model Users Manual, Version 5.0., 2010. http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100ERK4.pdf (accessed August 19, 2014).
17. Arhonditsis, G. B.; Brett, M. T. Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 2004, 271, 13-26
18. Robson, B. State of the art in modeling of phosphorus in aqutic systems: Review, criticisms, and commentary. Environ. Model. & Softw., in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.012.
19. Chapra, S. C. Surface Water Quality Modeling; Waveland Press, 1997.
20. Pappenberger, F.; Beven, K. J. Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42, W05302 10.1029/2005wr004820
21. Wagener, T.; Gupta, H. V. Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty Stochem. Environ. Res. and Risk Assess. 2005, 19, 378-387 10.1007/s00477-005-0006-5
22. Ajami, N. K.; Duan, Q. Y.; Sorooshian, S. An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43 (1) W01403 10.1029/2005wr004745
23. Arhonditsis, G. B.; Papantou, D.; Zhang, W.; Perhar, G.; Massos, E.; Shi, M. Bayesian calibration of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models and benefits for environmental management J. Mar. Syst. 2008, 73, 8-30 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.07.004
24. Arhonditsis, G. B.; Perhar, G.; Zhang, W.; Massos, E.; Shi, M.; Das, A. Addressing equifinality and uncertainty in eutrophication models Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44, W01420 10.1029/2007WR005862
25. Engeland, K.; Gottschalk, L. Bayesian estimation of parameters in a regional hydrological model HESS 2002, 6 (5) 883-898
26. Huard, D.; Mailhot, A. A Bayesian perspective on input uncertainty in model calibration: Application to hydrological model "abc" Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42 (7) W07416 10.1029/2005WR004661
27. Liu, Y.; Gupta, H. V. Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43 (7) W07401 10.1029/2006wr005756
28. Rykiel, E. J. Testing ecological models: The meaning of validation Ecol. Model. 1996, 90 (3) 229-244
29. Power, M., The predictive validation of ecological and environmental models. Ecol. Model. 199368, 33-50.
30. Hu, X.; McIsaac, G. F.; David, M. B.; Louwers, C. A. L. Modeling riverine nitrate export from and East-Central Illinois watershed using SWAT J. Environ. Qual. 2007, 36, 996-1005
31. Donner, S. D.; Kucharic, C. Evaluating the impacts of land management and climate variability on crop production and nitrate export across the Upper Mississippi Basin Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2003, 17 (3) 1085
32. Bastrup-Birk, A.; Gundersen, P. Water quality improvements from afforestation in an agricultural catchment in Denmark illustrated with the INCA model HESS 2004, 8 (4) 764-777
33. Green, M. B.; Wang, D. Watershed flow paths and stream water nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratios under simulated precipitation regimes Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44, W12414 10.1029/2007WR006139
34. Lindström, G.; Pers, C.; Rosberg, J.; Strömqvist, J.; Arheimer, B. Development of the HYPE (Hydrological Predictions for the Environment) water quality model for different spatial scales Hydrol. Res. 2010, 41, 295
35. Easton, Z. M.; Fuka, D. R.; Walter, M. T.; Cowan, D. M.; Schneiderman, E. M.; Steenhuis, T. S. Re-conceptualizing the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model to predict runoff from variable source areas J. Hydrol. 2008, 348 (3) 279-291
36. Duan, Q. Global Optimization for Watershed Model Calibration, in Calibration of Watershed Models; Duan, Q.; Gupta, H. V.; Sorooshian, S.; Rousseau, A. N.; Turcotte, R., Eds.; American Geophysical Union: Washington, D.C., 2013; DOI: 10.1002/9781118665671.ch6.
37. Arhonditsis, G. B.; Adams-VanHarn, B. A.; Nielsen, L.; Stow, C. A.; Reckhow, K. H. Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling: Citation analysis and future perspectives Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 6547-6554
38. Neitsch, S. L.; Arnold, J. G.; Kiniry, J. R.; Williams, J. R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2009; Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406. Texas A&M University System: College Station, TX, 2011; http://twri.tamu.edu/reports/2011/tr406.pdf (accessed January 17, 2013).
39. Binger, R. L.; Theurer, F. D.; Yuan, Y. AnnAGNPS Technical Processes. Version 5.2, 2011. http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/docs.htm?docid=5222 (accessed August 20, 2014).
40. Bicknell, B. R.; Imhoff, J. C.; Kittle, Jr., J. L.; Donigian, Jr., A. S.; Johanson, R. C. Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF): Users Manual for Release 11; U.S. EPA Environmental Research Lab: Athens, GA, 1996.
41. Andersson, L.; Rosberg, J.; Pers, B. C.; Olsson, J.; Arheimer, B. Estimating catchment nutrient flow with the HBV-NP model: Sensitivity to input data Ambio 2005, 34, 521-532
42. McClain, M. E.; Boyer, E. W.; Dent, C. L.; Gergel, S. E.; Grimm, N. B.; Groffman, P. M.; Hart, S. C.; Harvey, J. W.; Johnston, C. A.; Mayorga, E.; McDowell, W. H.; Pinay, G. Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems Ecosystems 2003, 6 (4) 301-312
43. Oswald, C. J.; Richardson, M. C.; Branfireun, B. A. Water storage dynamics and runoff response of a boreal Shield headwater catchment Hydrol. Process. 2011, 25, 3042-3060 10.1002/hyp.803
44. Collick, A. S.; Fuka, D. R.; Kleinman, P. J. A.; Buda, A. R.; Weld, J. L.; White, M. J.; Veith, L.; Bryant, R. B.; Bolster, C. H.; Easton, Z. M. Predicting phosphorus dynamics in complex terrains using a variable source area hydrology model Hydrol. Process. 2015, 29, 588-601 10.1002/hyp.10178
45. Arnold, J. G.; Allen, P. M.; Volk, M.; Williams, J. R.; Bosch, D. D. Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance Trans. ASABE 2010, 53 (5) 1433-1443
46. Bosch, D. D.; Arnonld, J. G.; Volk, M.; Allen, P. M. Simulation of a low-gradient Coastal Plain watershed using the SWAT landscape model Trans. ASABE 2010, 53 (5) 1445-1456
47. Bonuma, N.; Rossi, C.; Arnold, J.; Reichert, J.; Minella, J.; Allen, P.; Volk, M. Simulating landscape sediment transport capacity by using a modified SWAT model J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43 (1) 55-66
48. Dunne, T.; Black, R. D. Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed Water Resour. Res. 1970, 6 (5) 1296-1311
49. Vaze, J.; Chiew, F. H. Study of pollutant washoff from small impervious experimental plots Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39 (6) 1160
50. Bagnold, R. A. Bedload transport in natural rivers Water Resour. Res. 1977, 13 (2) 303-312
51. Davis, C.; Fox, J. Sediment fingerprinting: Review of the method and future improvements for allocating nonpoint source pollution J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135 (7) 490-504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:7(490)
52. Giltrap, D. L.; Li, C. and Saggar, S. DNDC: A process-based model of greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 136, 292-230
53. Carlyle, G. C.; Hill, A. R. Groundwater phosphate dynamics in a river riparian zone: Effects of hydrologic flowpaths, lithology, and redox chemistry J. Hydrol. 2001, 247, 151-168
54. Nierdermer, A.; Robinson, J. S. Hydrological controls on soil redox dynamics in a peat-based, restored wetland Geoderma 2007, 137, 318-326
55. Jiang, S.; Jomaa, S.; Rode, M. Modeling inorganic nitrogen leaching in nested mesoscale catchments in central Germany Ecohydrology 2014, 10.1002/eco.1462
56. Pettersson, a; Arheimer, B.; Johansson, B. Nitrogen concentrations simulated with HBV-N: New response function and calibration strategy Nord. Hydrol. 2001, 32, 227-248
57. Zhang, W.; Arhonditsis, G. B. A Bayesian hierarchical framework for calibrating aquatic biogeochemical models Ecol. Model. 2009, 220, 2142-2161
58. Santhi, C.; Arnold, J. G.; Williams, J. R.; Dugas, W. A.; Srinivasan, R.; Hauck, L. M. Validation of the swat model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37, 1169-1188 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.x
59. Bergstrom, S.; Lindstrom, G.; Pettersson, A. Multi-variable parameter estimation to increase confidence in hydrological modeling Hydrol. Process. 2002, 16, 413-421
60. Stadnyk, T. A.; Delavau, C.; Kouwen, N.; Edwards, T. W. D. Towards hydrological model calibration and validation: Simulation of stable water isotopes using the isoWATFLOOD model Hydrol. Process. 2013, 27, 3791-3810 10.1002/hyp.9695
61. Burns, D.; McDonnell, J.; Hooper, R.; Peters, N.; Freer, J.; Kendall, C.; Beven, K. Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end-member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA) Hydrol. Process. 2001, 15, 1903-1924 10.1002/hyp.246
62. McLaughlin, K.; Kendall, C.; Silva, S.; Young, M.; Paytan, A. Phosphate oxygen isotope ratios as a tracer for sources and cycling of phosphate in North San Francisco Bay, California J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, G03003 10.1029/2005JG000079
63. Csillery, K.; Blum, M.; Gaggiotti, O.; Francois, O. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice Trend. Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25 (7) 410-418 10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.001
64. Yen, H.; Bailey, R.; Arabi, M.; Ahmadi, M.; White, M.; Arnold, J. The role of interior watershed processes in improving parameter estimation and performance of watershed models J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43, 1601-1613
65. Vrugt, J. A.; Sadegh, M. Toward diagnostic model calibration and evaluation: Approximate Bayesian computation Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 4335-4345 10.1002/wrcr.20354
66. Liu, Y.; Freer, J.; Beven, K. J.; Matgen, P. Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: Extending observation error J. Hydrol. 2009, 367 (1-2) 93-103
67. Blazkova, S.; Beven, K. A limits of acceptability approach to model evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45, W00B16 10.1029/2007WR006726
68. Beven, K. Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: The Primer, 2 nd ed.; Wiley-Blackwell, 2012; ISBN: 978-0-470-71459-1.
69. Jorgensen, S. E. Fundamentals of Ecological Modeling; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1994.
70. Cibin, R.; Sudheer, K. P.; Chaubey, I. Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model Hydrol. Process. 2010, 24, 1133-1148 10.1002/hyp.7568
71. Wu, Y.; Liu, S. Automating calibration, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models using the R package Flexible Modeling Environment (FME): SWAT as an example Environ. Modell. Softw. 2012, 31, 99-109 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.013
72. 3-N loads predictions J. Hydrol. 2005, 312, 207-222
73. Chaplot, V.; Saleh, A.; Jaynes, D. B. Effect of the accuracy of spatial rainfall information on the modeling of water, sediment, and NO3-N loads at the watershed level J. Hydrol. 2005, 312, 223-234
74. van Griensven, A.; Meixner, T.; Grunwald, S.; Bishop, T.; Diluzio, M.; Srinivasan, R. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models J. Hydrol 2006, 324 (1-4) 10-23 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008
75. Nossent, J.; Bauwens, W. Multi-variable sensitivity and identifiability analysis for a complex environmental model in view of integrated water quantity and water quality modeling Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 65.3, 539-549 10.2166/wst.2012.884
76. Yang, J.; Reichert, P.; Abbaspour, K. C.; Xia, J.; Yang, H. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China J. Hydrol. 2008, 358, 1-23 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.012
77. Yen, H.; Wang, X.; Fontane, D.; Harmel, D.; Arabi, M. A framework for propagation of uncertainty contributed by parameterization, input data, model structure, and calibration/validation data in watershed modeling J. Environ. Modell. Software 2014, 54, 211-221
78. Wellen, C. C.; Arhonditsis, G. B.; Long, T.; Boyd, D. Accommodating environmental thresholds and extreme events in hydrological models: A Bayesian approach J. Great Lakes Res. 2014, 10.1016/j.jglr.2014.04.002
79. Wellen, C. C.; Arhonditsis, G. B.; Long, T.; Boyd, D. Quantifying the uncertainty of nonpoint source attribution in distributed water quality models: A Bayesian assessment of SWATs sediment export predictions J. Hydrol. 2014, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.007