Recommendations for the generalized intelligent framework for tutoring based on the development of the deeptutor tutoring service

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1009, Issue , 2013, Pages 116-127

  Rus, Vasile ^a   Niraula, Nobal ^a   Lintean, Mihai ^a   Banjade, Rajendra ^a   Stefanescu, Dan ^a   Baggett, William ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer based tutors; Dialogue systems; Intelligent tutoring systems

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SPEECH PROCESSING; WEBSITES;

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LEARNING PROGRESSIONS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY MODEL; THREE MODELS;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 84924967607     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., & Jordan, M.I. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993-1022.
2. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F.A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidencebased approach to reform. Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-63. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
3. Duschl, R.A., Schweingruber, H.A., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Graesser, A. C.; Olney, A.; Haynes, B. C.; and Chipman, P. 2005. Autotutor: A cognitive system that simulates a tutor that facilitates learning through mixed-initiative dialogue. In Cognitive Systems: Human Cognitive Models in Systems Design. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
5. Landauer, T.; McNamara, D. S.; Dennis, S.; and Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Freedman, Reva, Yujian Zhou, Jung Hee Kim, Michael Glass, and Martha W. Evens.
7. SGML-Based Markup as a Step toward Improving Knowledge Acquisition for Text Generation AAAI 1998 Spring Symposium: Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing
8. VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems, Educational Psychologist, 46:4, 197-221.
9. Olney, A., D'Mello, A., Person, N., Cade, W., Hays, P., Williams, C., Lehman, B., & Graesser, A. (2012). Guru: A computer tutor that models expert human tutors. In S. Cerri, W. Clancey, G. Papadourakis & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 256-261). Springer-Verlag.
10. Patil, A. S., & Abraham, A. (2010). Intelligent and Interactive Web-Based Tutoring System in Engineering Education: Reviews, Perspectives and Development. In F. Xhafa, S. Caballe, A. Abraham, T. Daradoumis, & A. Juan Perez (Eds.), Computational Intelligence for Technology Enhanced Learning. Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol 273, pp. 79-97). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Rus, V. & Lintean, M. (2012a). A Comparison of Greedy and Optimal Assessment of Natural Language Student Input Using Word-to-Word Similarity Metrics, Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Innovative Use of Natural Language Processing for Building Educational Applications, NAACL-HLT 2012, Montreal, Canada, June 7-8, 2012.
12. Rus, V., Lintean, M., Moldovan, C., Baggett, W., Niraula, N., Morgan, B. (2012b). The SIMILAR Corpus: A Resource to Foster the Qualitative Understanding of Semantic Similarity of Texts, In Semantic Relations II: Enhancing Resources and Applications, The 8th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012), May 23-25, Instanbul, Turkey.
13. Rus, V.; Lintean, M.; Banjade, R.; Niraula, N.; Stefanescu, D. (2013). SEMILAR: The Semantic Similarity Toolkit, The 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, System Demo Paper, August 4-9, 2013, Sofia, Bulgaria.
14. Rus, V., D'Mello, S., Hu, X., and Graesser, A.C. (to appear) .Recent Advances In Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems, AI Magazine.
15. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 3-62.
16. VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems, Educational Psychologist, 46:4, 197-221.