Bayesian inference for low-rank Ising networks

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Marsman, Maarten ^a   Maris, Gunter ^a,b   Bechger, Timo ^a   Glas, Cees ^c  

^a Cito group   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84924917170     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09050     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lee, T. & Yang, C. Statistical theory of equations of state and phase transitions II. Lattice gas and Ising model. Phys. Rev. 87, 410-419 (1952).
2. Besag, J. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 36, 192-236 (1974).
3. Cramer, A., Waldorp, L., van der Maas, H. & Borsboom, D. Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 137-150 (2010).
4. Ising, E. Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus. Zeit. Phys. 31, 253-258 (1925).
5. Jaynes, E. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106, 620-630 (1957).
6. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A.,Waldorp, L., Schmittmann, V. & Borsboom, D. qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1-18 (2012).
7. Jensen, A. The g factor: The science of mental ability (Praeger, Westport, 1998).
8. Deary, I. Looking Down on Human Intelligence: From Psychometrics to the Brain. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).
9. van der Maas, H. et al. A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychol. Rev. 113, 842-861 (2006).
10. Eckart, C. & Young, G. The approximation of onematrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika 1, 211-218 (1936).
11. Besag, J. Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. Statistician 24, 179-195 (1975).
12. Kac, M. Statistical Physics: Phase Transitions and Superuidity, Vol. 1, Brandeis University Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics. [Chretien, M., Gross, E. &Deser, S. (eds.)] [241-305] (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1968).
13. Emch, G. & Knops, H. Pure thermodynamical phases as extremal KMS states. J. Math. Phys. 11, 3008-3018 (1970).
14. Olkin, I. & Tate, R. Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables. Ann. Math. Stat. 32, 448-465 (1961).
15. Lauritzen, S. & Wermuth, N. Graphical models for associations between variables, some of which are qualitative and some quantitative. Ann. Stat. 17, 31-57 (1989).
16. McCullagh, P. Exponential mixtures and quadratic exponential families. Biometrika 81, 721-729 (1994).
17. Anderson, C. & Yu, H. Log-multiplicative association models as item response models. Psychometrika 72, 5-23 (2007).
18. Anderson, C., Li, Z. & Vermunt, J. Estimation of models in a Rasch family of polytomous items and multiple latent variables. J. Stat. Softw. 20 (2007).
19. Reckase, M. Multidimensional item response theory (Springer, 2009).
20. Geman, S. & Geman, D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6, 721-741 (1984).
21. Ackerman, T. Developments in multidimensional item response theory. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 20, 309-310 (1996).
22. Makransky, G., Mortensen, E. & Glas, C. Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computerized adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment 20, 3-13 (2013).
23. Nikolaus, S. et al. Items and dimensions for the construction of a multidimensional computerized adaptive test to measure fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66, 1175-1183 (2013).
24. Rasch, G. Probabilistic Models for some Intelligence and Attainment Tests (The Danish Institute of Educational Research, Copenhagen, 1960).
25. Potts, R. Some generalized order-disorder transformations. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 48, 106-109 (1952).
26. van Borkulo, C. et al. A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Sci. Rep. 4 (2014).
27. Patz, R. & Junker, B. A straightforward approach to Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for item response models. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 24, 146-178 (1999).
28. Patz, R. & Junker, B. Applications and extensions of MCMC in IRT: Multiple item types, missing data, and rated responses. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 24, 342-366 (1999).
29. Albert, J. Bayesian estimation of Normal Ogive item response curves using Gibbs sampling. J. Educ. Stat. 17, 251-269 (1992).
30. Béguin, A. & Glas, C. MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models. Psychometrika 66, 541-562 (2001).
31. Maris, G. & Maris, E. A MCMC-method for models with continuous latent responses. Psychometrika 67, 335-350 (2002).
32. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Rosenbluth, M. & Teller, A. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087-1092 (1953).
33. Hastings, W. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57, 97-109 (1970).
34. Tierney, L. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Ann. Stat. 22, 1701-1762 (1994).