PART I OF II: DEVELOPMENT OF MERESS MODEL – DEVELOPING SYSTEM MODELS OF STATIONARY COMBINED HEAT AND POWER (CHP) FUEL CELL SYSTEMS (FCS) FOR REDUCED COSTS AND GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS

ASME 2008 6th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, FUELCELL 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 541-562

  Colella, Whitney G ^a   Schneider, Stephen H ^b   Kammen, Daniel M ^c   Jhunjhunwala, Aditya ^b   Teo, Nigel ^b  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions; cogeneration; combined heat and power (CHP); cost; distributed energy systems; electricity load following (ELF); fixed heat to power ratio (FHP); fuel cell system (FCS); greenhouse gas emissions (GHG); heat load following (HLF); heat recovery; low voltage electricity distribution networks; Maximizing Emission Reductions and Economic Savings Simulator (MERESS) optimization tool; networked (NW); networks; no load following (NLF); operating strategy; optimization; profitability; stand alone (SA); thermal distribution networks; variable heat to power ratio (VHP)

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COST REDUCTION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRIC LOADS; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; EMISSION CONTROL; FUEL CELLS; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; WASTE HEAT;

CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) EMISSION; COGENERATION; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; COMBINED-HEAT AND POWER; DISTRIBUTED ENERGY SYSTEMS; ECONOMIC SAVINGS; ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; ELECTRICITY LOAD; ELECTRICITY LOAD FOLLOWING; EMISSION REDUCTION; FIXED HEAT-TO-POWER RATIO; FUEL CELL SYSTEM; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; HEAT LOAD FOLLOWING; LOAD FOLLOWING; LOW VOLTAGES; LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORK; MAXIMIZING EMISSION REDUCTION AND ECONOMIC SAVING SIMULATOR OPTIMIZATION TOOL; NETWORK; NETWORKED; NO LOAD; NO LOAD FOLLOWING; OPERATING STRATEGY; OPTIMISATIONS; OPTIMIZATION TOOLS; POWER RATIO; STAND -ALONE; STAND ALONE; THERMAL DISTRIBUTION NETWORK; THERMAL DISTRIBUTIONS; VARIABLE HEAT-TO-POWER RATIO;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84924876916     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/FuelCell2008-65112     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. Advantica Ltd. 2003. (formerly BG Technology plc.) Source data for residential electricity demand, Ashby Rd, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE 11 3GR, United Kingdom, www.lattice-group.com.
2. Arthur D. Little. 1995. Fuel Cells for Building CHP Applications – Cost/Performance Requirements and Markets, for the U.S. D.O.E. Office of Building Technologies by Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, MA, Reference No. 42526, Jan.
3. Atkinson, A.A., Kaplan, R.S., Matsumura, E.M., and Young, S.M. 2006. Management Accounting, (New York, NY: Prentice Hall).
4. Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
5. Behling, Klaus-Jochen. 1999. Regional Manager, Europe, Nafion®, Fluoroproducts, E.I. du Pont Nemours & Co. Inc., Perflourionomeric Membrane Materials For PEM Fuel Cells: Commercial Manufacturing Perspectives from One Supplier of One Critical Raw Material. PEM Fuel Cell Technology Conference (Frankfurt, Germany: IQPC Ltd.). Citation to a Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicle (PNGV) goal, U.S. DOE.
6. th, 2006.
7. Brealey, Richard A., Myers, Stewart C., and Allen, Franklin. 2007. Principles of Corporate Finance, (New York, NY: McGraw Hill).
8. Colella, Whitney G. 2002 (a). “Implications of Electricity Liberalization for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Fuel Cell Systems (FCSs): a Case Study of the United Kingdom,” Journal of Power Sources, 106, 397-404.
9. Colella, Whitney G. 2002 (b). “Design Options for Achieving a Rapidly Variable Heat-to-Power Ratio in a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) FCS,” Journal of Power Sources, 106, 388-96.
10. Colella, W.G. 2003 (a). “Design Considerations for Effective Control of an Afterburner Sub-System in a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Fuel Cell System (FCS),” Journal of Power Sources, 118, 118-28.
11. Colella, W.G. 2003 (b). “Modelling Results for the Thermal Management Sub-System of a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Fuel Cell System (FCS),” Journal of Power Sources, 118, 129-49.
12. Colella, W.G., Jacobson, M.Z., Golden, D.M. 2005 (a). “Switching to a U.S. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Fleet: The Resultant Change in Energy Use, Emissions, and Greenhouse Gases,” Journal of Power Sources.
13. Colella, W.G., Niemoth, C., Lim, C., Hein, A. 2005 (b). “Evaluation of the Financial and Environmental Feasibility of a Network of Distributed 200 kWe Cogenerative Fuel Cell Systems on the Stanford University Campus,” Fuel Cells – From Fundamentals to Systems, 1, 148-166.
14. Colella et. al. 2008 (a). “Part II of II: Deployment of MERESS Model - Designing, Controlling, and Installing Stationary Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Fuel Cell Systems (FCS) to Reduce Costs and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions,” ASME Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology.
15. Colella, W. G., S. H. Schneider, and D. M. Kammen (Stanford University and University of California, Berkeley). 2008 (b). Optimization of Novel Distributed Energy Networks to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Program.
16. Coletto, V.J. 2007. Oral and Email Communications with W. Colella, General Manager, Northern California, National Accounts Manager, UTC-Power Corporation, 9624 E. Sheena Drive, Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260.
17. th, 2003.
18. Da Rosa, A.V. 2003, Lecture 3, Fundamentals of Energy Processes EE293A, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Oct. 1.
19. th edition, International Thomson Publishing Company.
20. Tomashefsky, Scott and Marks, Mignon. 2002. Distributed Generation Strategic Plan. California Energy Commission (CEC), 1516 Ninth Street, MS-29, Sacramento, CA, 95814-5512, USA, P700-02-002.
21. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2002. National Emissions Inventory, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2002inventory.html.
22. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2004. Combined Heat and Power Partnership, 2004. http://www.epa.gov/chp/about_chp.htm.
23. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2007. EPA Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule, Dynamometer Drive Schedule Quick View, Testing and Measuring Emissions, U.S. EPA Website: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/emisslab/methods/quickdds.htm.
24. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2006. U.S. Department of Energy, EIA data series for natural gas price by U.S. state, data for California, average industrial gas price for 2006. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_SCA_a.htm .
25. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 1997. Annual Energy Review 1996, U.S. Department of Energy, (EIA data series showing 70% of available fuel energy going into electricity is wasted) (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington DC, 1997).
26. Ghezel-Ayagh, H., Leo, A. J., Maru, H., and Farooque, M (FuelCell Energy). 2003. “Overview of Direct Carbonate Fuel Cell Technology and Products Development,” ASME First International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Energy and Technology, Rochester, NY, April 21-23, p. 11.
27. Gray, P. Solid Polymer Fuel Cell Prototype System for MicroCHP Phase 1: Market, Technical and Economic Study (London, UK: Department of Trade and Industry, 1999).
28. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. James, B., Lomax, F., Thomas, S. and Colella, W., 1997. PEM Fuel Cell Power System Cost Estimates: Sulfur-Free Gasoline Partial Oxidation and Compressed Direct Hydrogen, report for the U.S. Department of Energy.
30. Kaiper, Gina V. 2003. California Energy Flow - 1999, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-18991-99, p. 8.
31. Kreutz, Thomas G. and Ogden, Joan M. 2000. Assessment of Hydrogen-Fueled Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells for Distributed Generation and CHP, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Center for Energy and Environmental Studies), U.S. D.O.E. Hydrogen R&D Program, Contract No. DE-FG01-99EE351000.
32. Kuhn, I., Thomas, S., Lomax, F., James, B. and Colella, W., 1997. Fuel Processing Systems for Fuel Cell Vehicles, report for the U.S. Department of Energy.
33. Lamont, Alan. 2001. Modeling Renewable Penetration Using a Network Economic Model, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-142082.
34. Lamont, Alan. 1997. User’s Guide to the META-Net Economic Modeling System Version 1.6.8, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
35. th, 2003.
36. Murray, Dean. 2006 & 2007. Oral and Email Communications with W. Colella, Steam Systems Manager in Facilities Operations – Utilities, Stanford University, 327 Bonair Siding, Stanford, California, 94305-7272.
37. MTU, 2004. MTU Presentation, Grove Fuel Cells Science and Technology Conference, Munich, Germany.
38. National Research Council (NRC). 2004. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
39. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 2004. HOMER: The Micropower Optimization Model, NREL/FS-710-35406, March.
40. O’Hare, R., Cha, S.W., Colella, W.G., and Prinz, F.B. 2006. Fuel Cell Fundamentals, (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons), p.280.
41. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) Company. 2008, Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP), P.O. Box 770000, Mail Code B27P, San Francisco, CA 94177, http://www.pge.com/selfgen/.
42. Peszko, M. 2007. Aftermarket Services Department, Oral and Email Communications with W. Colella, UTC Power, United Technologies Inc.
43. Plug Power Inc. 2000. “Plug Power Opens Manufacturing Facility,” Press Release, February 14, 968 Albany-Shaker Road, Latham, NY 12110 U.S.A.
44. Porteous, Andrew. 2000. Memorandum to the Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs, United Kingdom Parliament, (London, UK: British Parliament), Table 3.
45. Ross, Stephen A., Westerfield, Randolph W. and Jaffe, Jeffrey. 2007. Corporate Finance. (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.)
46. Sexsmith, Mike. 2004. Personal interview with W. Colella in Munich Germany, Manager, Unit Cell Engineering, Ballard Power Systems Inc., 4343 North Fraser Way, Burnaby, BC, V5j 5J9, Canada. Oct. 6th, 2004.
47. Seymour, Clive. 1998. Commercial Acceptability of Solid Polymer Fuel Cell Systems in the Role of Combined Heat and Power Packages, (London, UK: Department of Trade and Industry), p.141.
48. Stanford University Utilities Department. 2007. Facility Operations Rates: FY08 Electricity Price, FY08 Steam Price; website: http://facilities.stanford.edu/sections/recharge.html.
49. th
50. Thomas, C.E., J.P. Barbour, B.D. James, and F.D. Lomax. 2000. “Analysis of Utility Hydrogen Systems and Hydrogen Airport Ground Support Equipment,” Proceedings of the 1999 U.S. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, NREL/CP-570-26938.
51. Thomas, C.E., Barbour, Jason P., James, Brian D., and Lomax, Franklin D. 1999. Cost Analysis of Stationary Fuel Cell Systems Including Hydrogen CHP, for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Subcontract No. ACG-8-18012-01, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. D.O.E.).
52. U.S. Department of the Treasury. 2007. Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20220.
53. UTC Fuel Cells. 2003. 200 kW On-Site Fuel Cell Power Plant PC25TM Model C Installation Manual, FCR-13258C, (South Windsor, Connecticut: UTC Fuel Cells), p. 1-2.
54. UTC Fuel Cells. 2001. PC 25TM Model C Fuel Cell Power Plant Design and Application Guide, Revision B, November 2001, FCR-15389B.
55. Working Group III Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Working Group III Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change, Summary for Policy Makers, Bangkok, Thailand, 20th April-4th of May, 2007, Table SPM1, Table
56. SPM2, p.12; Figure SPM 5B, p. 13; website: http://www.mnp.nl/ipcc/docs/FAR/ApprovedSPM0405rev4b.p df.