Integrating the social into CEPAL’s neo-structuralist discourse

Global Social Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3-22

  Mahon, Rianne ^a,b  

^a BALSILLIE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

International organisations; Latin America; neo structuralism; social development; travelling ideas

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIALIZATION; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; NEOLIBERALISM; SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL POLICY; STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT;

CARIBBEAN ISLANDS; LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 84924870672     PISSN: 14680181     EISSN: 17412803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468018114536644     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ban C.Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism: New paradigm or edited orthodoxy?.Review of International Political Economy. 2013;20 (2): 298-331
2. Barnett M,Finnemore MRules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press; 2004:
3. Berg JRegulating for Decent Work: New Directions in Labour Market Regulation. Lee SMcCann D, ed. Geneva Basingstoke: ILO Palgrave Macmillan; 2011:123-150.
4. Barnett MN,Finnemore M.The politics, power and pathologies of International Organizations.International Organizaion. 1999;54:699-732
5. Best JGoverning Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014:
6. Bielschowsky R.Sixty years of ECLAC: Structuralism and neo-structuralism.CEPAL Review. 2009;97:171-192
7. Calderón G,Hopenhayn M,Ottone E.A cultural view of the ECLAC proposals.CEPAL Review. 1994;52:189-203
8. Cardoso F.The originality of a copy: CEPAL and the idea of development.CEPAL Review. 1977;4:7-40
9. Carroll E,Palme JInclusion of the European Nordic Model in the Debate Concerning Social Protection Reform: The Long-Term Development of Nordic Welfare Systems (1890–2005) and Their Transferability to Latin America in the 21st Century. Santiago, Chile: Executive Secretary’s Office, CEPAL; 2006:
10. Cecchini S,Mártinez RInclusive social protection in Latin America: A comprehensive, rights-based approach. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 2012:
11. Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 1990:
12. The Fiscal Covenant: Strengths, weaknesses, challenges. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 1998:
13. Social Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 1999–2000. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 2000a:
14. The equity gap: A 2nd assessment.Second regional conference in follow-up to the World Summit for Social Development; 2000bSantiago, Chile; 2000b.
15. Equity, development and citizenship. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 2001:
16. Productive development in open economies. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 2004a:
17. Social Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean: A decade of social development in Latin America 1990–1999. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 2004b:
18. Shaping the future of social protection: Access, financing and solidarity. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 2006:
19. Social Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: UN, ECLAC; 2009:
20. Prepared for the 33rd Session of ECLAC. Brazil Santiago, Chile: Brasilia UN, ECLAC; 2010:
21. Deacon BGlobal Social Policy and Governance. London: Sage; 2007:
22. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Djelic M-LSahlin-Andersson K, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:
23. Dosman EThe Life and Times of Raúl Prebisch 1901–1986. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2010:
24. Dostal JM.Campaigning on expertise: How the OECD framed EU welfare and labour market policies – And why success could trigger failure.Journal of European Public Policy. 2004;11 (3): 440-460
25. Fajnzylber FLa industrialización trunca de América Latina. Centro Editor de América México; 1983:
26. Frank AGCapitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: historial studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press; 1967:
27. Filgueira FWelfare and Democracy in Latin America: The Development, Crises and Aftermath of Universal, Dual and Exclusionary Social States. Geneva: UNRISD; 2005:
28. Freeman R.Reverb: Policy making in wave form.Environment and Planning A. 2012;44:13-20
29. Gabay RE.Revistando a Raúl Prebisch al paper de la cepal en las ciencas socials de América Latine.Iconos. 2008;31:103-113
30. Heclo HModern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1974:
31. Hopenhayn M.Old and new forms of citizenship.CEPAL Review. 2001;73:115-126
32. Hopenhayn MCohesión Social en América Latina y el Caribe: una revisión perentoria de algunas dimensiones. Sojo AUthoff A, ed. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL; 2007:35-36.
33. Huber E,Stephens JDDemocracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2012:
34. Jacobsson BTransnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Djelic M-LSahlin-Andersson K, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp; 2006:205-224.
35. Jenson J.Diffusing ideas after neoliberalism: The social investment perspective in Europe and Latin America.Global Social Policy. 2010;10 (1): 59-84
36. Jolly R.Adjustment with a human face: A UNICEF record and perspective on the 1980s.World Development. 1991;19 (12): 1807-1821
37. Korpi W,Palme J.The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality and poverty in the Western countries.American Sociological Review. 1998;63 (5): 661-687
38. Leiva FILatin American NeoStructuralism: The Contradictions of Post-Neoliberal Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2008:
39. Mahon R.The jobs strategy: From neo to inclusive liberalism?.Review of International Political Economy. 2010;18 (5): 570-591
40. Mahon R,McBride SThe OECD and Transnational Governance. Mahon RMcBride S, ed. Vancouver, BC, Canada and Toronto, ON, Canada: UBC Press; 2008:3-24.
41. Morais L,Saad-Filho A.Neo-developmentalism and the challenge of economic policy making under Dilma Rouseff.Critical Sociology. 2012;38 (6): 789-798
42. Noel A.The new global politics of poverty.Global Social Policy. 2006;6 (3): 304-333
43. Ozkan U.Comparing formal unemployment compensation systems in 15 OECD countries.Journal of Social Policy and Administration. 2014;48 (1): 44-66
44. Perez C.Technical change and opportunities for development as a moving target.CEPAL Review. 2001;75:109-130
45. Pollock D,Kerner D,Love JL.Raúl Prebisch on ECLAC’s achievements and deficiencies: An unpublished interview.CEPAL Review. 2001;75:9-22
46. Rodrik DOne Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:
47. Sanchez O.Fighting tax evasion in Latin America: Contrasting strategies of Chile and Argentina.Third World Quarterly. 2011;32 (6): 1107-1125
48. Sikkink KIdeas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1991: