Predicting Performance on the Columbia Card Task: Effects of Personality Characteristics, Mood, and Executive Functions

Assessment

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 178-187

  Buelow, Melissa T ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; Columbia Card Task; decision making; executive functions; personality; state mood

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; DECISION MAKING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPULSIVENESS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; DECISION MAKING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TESTS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924869200     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: 15523489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073191114539383     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baena E.,Allen P. A.,Kaut K. P.,Hall R. J.On age differences in prefrontal function: The importance of emotional/cognitive integration.Neuropsychologia. 2010;48:319-333
2. Barry D.,Petry N. M.Predictors of decision-making on the Iowa gambling task: Independent effects of lifetime history of substance use disorders and performance on the Trail Making Test.Brain and Cognition. 2008;66:243-252
3. Baumann J.,DeSteno D.Context explains divergent effects of anger on risk taking.Emotion. 2012;12:1196-1199
4. Bechara A.Iowa Gambling Task professional manual. Lutz, PL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2008:
5. Bechara A.,Damasio A. R.,Damasio H.,Anderson S. W.Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.Cognition. 1994;50:7-15
6. Bechara A.,Damasio H.,Tranel D.,Anderson S. W.Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex.Journal of Neuroscience. 1998;18:428-437
7. Bechara A.,Damasio H.,Tranel D.,Damasio A. R.Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy.Science. 1997;275:1293-1295
8. Bechara A.,Martin E. M.Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions.Neuropsychology. 2004;18:152-162
9. Bhanji J. P.,Beer J. S.,Bunge S. A.Taking a gamble or playing by the rules: Dissociable prefrontal systems implicated in probabilistic versus deterministic rule-based decisions.NeuroImage. 2010;49:1810-1819
10. Bogg T.,Fukunaga R.,Finn P. R.,Brown J. W.Cognitive control links alcohol use, trait disinhibition, and reduced cognitive capacity: Evidence for medial prefrontal cortex dysregulation during reward-seeking behavior.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012;122:112-118
11. Bornovalova M. A.,Cashman-Rolls A.,O’Donnell J. M.,Ettinger K.,Richards J. B.,Dewit H.,Lejuez C. W.Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking.Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior. 2009;93:258-262
12. Brand M.,Fujiwara E.,Borsutzky S.,Kalbe E.,Kessler J.,Markowitsch H. J.Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions.Neuropsychology. 2005;19:267-277
13. Brand M.,Grabenhorst F.,Starcke K.,Vandekerckhove M. M. P.,Markowitsch H. J.Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease.Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:1305-1317
14. Brand M.,Recknor E. C.,Grabenhorst F.,Bechara A.Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2007;29:86-99
15. Buelow M. T.,Okdie B. M.,Blaine A. L.Seeing the forest through the trees: Improving decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task by shifting focus from short- to long-term outcomes.Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience. 2013;4:773
16. Buelow M. T.,Suhr J. A.Personality characteristics and state mood influence individual deck selections on the Iowa Gambling Task.Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;54:593-597
17. Carver C. S.,White T. L.Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;67:319-333
18. Chamberlain S. R.,Fineberg N. A.,Menzies L. A.,Blackwell A. D.,Bullmore E. T.,Robbin T. W.,Sahakian B. J.Impaired cognitive flexibility and motor inhibition in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.American Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;164:335-338
19. Damasio A. R.Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putnam; 1994:
20. Davis C.,Patte K.,Tweed S.,Curtis C.Personality traits associated with decision-making deficits.Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;42:279-290
21. de Vries M.,Holland R. W.,Witteman C. L. M.In the winning mood: Affect in the Iowa gambling task.Judgment and Decision Making. 2008;3:42-50
22. Duckworth A. L.,Kern M. L.A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures.Journal of Research in Personality. 2011;45:259-268
23. Emslie H. C.,Wilson F. C.,Burden V.,Nimmo-Smith I.,Wilson B. A.Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome in children (BADS-C). Bury St. Edmunds, England: Thames Valley Test Co; 2003:
24. Eysenck S. B. G.,Pearson P. R.,Easting G.,Allsopp F. J.Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults.Personality and Individual Differences. 1985;6:613-619
25. Fernie G.,Cole J. C.,Goudie A. J.,Field M.Risk-taking but not response inhibition or delay discounting predict alcohol consumption in social drinkers.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2010;112:54-61
26. Figner B.,Mackinlay R. J.,Wilkening F.,Weber E. U.Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia card task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2009a;35:709-730
27. Figner B.,Mackinlay R. J.,Wilkening F.,Weber E. U..Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development; 2009bDenver, CO; 2009b.
28. Figner B.,Voelki N.Risky decision making in a computer card game: An information integration experiment.Polish Psychological Bulletin. 2004;35:135-139
29. Figner B.,Weber E. U.Who takes risks when and why? Determinants of risk taking.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011;20:211-216
30. Franken I. H. A.,Muris P.Individual differences in decision-making.Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39:991-998
31. Franken I. H. A.,van Strien J. W.,Nijs L.,Muris P.Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits.Psychiatry Research. 2008;158:155-163
32. Heaton R. K.,Chelune G. J.,Talley J. L.,Kay G. G.,Curtiss G.Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2005:
33. Heilman R. M.,Crisan L. G.,Houser D.,Miclea M.,Miu A. C.Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty.Emotion. 2010;10:257-265
34. Hopko D. R.,Lejuez C. W.,Daughters S. B.,Aklin W. M.,Osborne A.,Simmons B. L.,Strong D. R.Construct validity of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART): Relationship with MDMA use by inner-city drug users in residential treatment.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2006;28:95-101
35. Huang Y.,Wood S.,Berger D.,Hanoch Y.Risky choice in younger versus older adults: Affective context matters.Judgment and Decision Making. 2013;8:179-187
36. Hunt M. K.,Hopko D. R.,Bare R.,Lejuez C. W.,Robinson E. V.Construct validity of the balloon analog risk task (BART): Associations with psychopathy and impulsivity.Assessment. 2005;12:416-428
37. Lejuez C. W.,Aklin W. M.,Bornovalova M. A.,Moolchan E. T.Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner-city adolescent ever- and never-smokers.Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005;7:71-79
38. Lejuez C. W.,Read J. P.,Kahler C. W.,Richards J. B.,Ramsey S. E.,Brown R. A.Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2002;8:75-84
39. Lezak M. D.,Howieson D. B.,Loring D. W.Neuropsychological assessment. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2004:
40. Must A.,Szabo Z.,Bodi N.,Szasz A.,Janka Z.,Keri S.Sensitivity to reward and punishment and the prefrontal cortex in major depression.Journal of Affective Disorders. 2006;90:209-215
41. Overman W. H.,Frassrand K.,Ansel S.,Trawalter S.,Bies B.,Redmond A.Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults.Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:1838-1851
42. Panno A.,Lauriola M.,Figner B.Emotion regulation and risk taking: Predicting risky choice in deliberative decision making.Cognition and Emotion. 2013;27:326-334
43. Penolazzi B.,Gremigni P.,Russo P. M.Impulsivity and reward sensitivity differentially influence affective and deliberative risky decision making.Personality and Individual Differences. 2012;53:655-659
44. Perales J. C.,Verdejo-Garcia A.,Moya M.,Lozano O.,Peres-Garcia M.Bright and dark sides of impulsivity: Performance of women with high and low trait impulsivity on neuropsychological tasks.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2009;31:927-944
45. Rogers R. D.,Everitt B. J.,Baldacchino A.,Blackshaw A. J.,Swainson R.,Wynne K.,..Robbins T. W.Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: Evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms.Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;20:322-339
46. Seguin J. R.,Arseneault L.,Tremblay R. E.The contribution of “cool” and “hot” components of decision-making in adolescence: Implications for developmental psychopathology. 2007;22:530-543
47. Shafir E.,Simonson I.,Tversky A.Reason-based choice. 1993;49:11-36
48. Sharma L.,Kohl K.,Morgan T. A.,Clark L. A.“Impulsivity”: Relations between self-report and behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013;104:559-575
49. Sharma L.,Markon K. E.,Clark L. A.Toward a theory of distinct types of “impulsive” behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures.Psychological Bulletin. 2014;140:374-408
50. Smoski M. J.,Lynch T. R.,Rosenthal M. Z.,Cheavens J. S.,Chapman A. L.,Krishnan R. R.Decision-making and risk aversion among depressive adults.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2008;39:567-576
51. Suhr J. A.,Tsanadis J.Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task.Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;43:27-36
52. Toplak M. E.,Sorge G. B.,Benoit A.,West R. F.,Stanovich K. E.Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence.Clinical Psychology Review. 2010;30:562-581
53. Upton D. J.,Bishara A. J.,Ahn W.-Y.,Stout J. C.Propensity for risk taking and trait impulsivity in the Iowa Gambling Task.Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;50:492-495
54. van Honk J.,Hermans E. J.,Putman P.,Montagne B.,Schulter D. J.Defective somatic markers in subclinical psychopathy.NeuroReport. 2002;13:1025-1027
55. Watson D.,Clark L. A.,Tellegen A.Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;54:1063-1070
56. Wechsler D.Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–third edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1991:
57. Wechsler D.Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–fourth edition: Professional manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson PsychCorp; 2008:
58. Zermatten A.,van der Linden M.,d’Acremont M.,Jermann F.,Bechara A.Impulsivity and decision making.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders. 2005;193:647-650
59. Zuckerman M.Behavioural expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1994:
60. Zuckerman M.,Kuhlman D. M.,Joireman J.,Teta P.,Kraft M.A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five and the alternative five.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;65:757-768