Wide-field imaging and OCT vs clinical evaluation of patients referred from diabetic retinopathy screening

Eye (Basingstoke)

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 416-423

  Manjunath, V ^a   Papastavrou, V ^a   Steel, Dhw ^b   Menon, G ^c   Taylor, R ^d   Peto, T ^e   Talks, J ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c FRIMLEY PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL VESSELS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84924858768     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2014.320     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arun CS, Ngugi N, Lovelock L, Taylor R. Effectiveness of screening in preventing blindness due to diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Med 2003; 20(3): 186-190.
2. Arun CS, Al-Bermani A, Stannard K, Taylor R. Long-term impact of retinal screening on significant diabetes-related visual impairment in the working age population. Diabet Med 2009; 26(5): 488-492.
3. Scanlon PH, Carter S, Foy C, Ratiram D, Harney B. An evaluation of the change in activity and workload arising from diabetic ophthalmology referrals following the introduction of a community based digital retinal photographic screening programme. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89(8): 971-975.
4. Gonzalez E, Johansson S. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of diabetes in the UK: 1996-2005. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009; 63(4): 332-336.
5. Taylor R, Lovelock L, Tunbridge WMG, Alberti KGMM, Brackenridge RG, Stephenson P et al. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ 1990; 301(6763): 1243-1247.
6. Taylor R. Practical community screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: report of a 12 centre study. British Diabetic Association Mobile Retinal Screening Group. Diabetic Med 1996; 13(11): 946-952.
7. Taylor R, Broadbent DM, Greenwood R, Hepburn D, Owens DR, Simpson H. Mobile retinal screening in Britain. Diabetic Med 1998; 15(4): 344-347.
8. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(5): 1047-1053.
9. Sallam A, Scanlon PH, Stratton IM, Jones V, Martin CN, Brelen M et al. Agreement and reasons for disagreement between photographic and hospital biomicroscopy grading of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Med 2011; 28(6): 741-746.
10. Scanlon PH, Malhotra R, Greenwood RH, Aldington SJ, Foy C, Flatman M et al. Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(10): 1258-1263.
11. Virgili G, Menchini F, Dimastrogiovanni AF, Rapizzi E, Menchini U, Bandello F et al. Optical coherence tomography versus stereoscopic fundus photography or biomicroscopy for diagnosing diabetic macular edema: A systematic review. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48(11): 4963-4973.
12. Prescott G, Sharp P, Goatman K, Scotland G, Fleming A, Philip S et al. Improving the cost-effectiveness of photographic screening for diabetic macular oedema: a prospective, multicentre, UK study. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98(8): 1042-1049.
13. Liew G, Michaelides M, Bunce C. A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16-64 years), 1999-2000 with 2009-2010. BMJ Open 2014; 4(2): e004015.
14. Neubauer AS, Kernt M, Haritoglou C, Priglinger SG, Kampik A, Ulbig MW. Nonmydriatic screening for diabetic retinopathy by ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap). Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246(2): 229-235.
15. Wilson PJ, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Ellingford A, Talbot J, Leese GP. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmologica 2010; 224(4): 251-257.
16. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP et al. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 154: 549-559.
17. Sharp PF, Olson J, Strachan F, Hipwell J, Ludbrook A, O'Donnell M et al. The value of digital imaging in diabetic retinopathy. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7(30): 1-119.
18. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103(12): 1796-1806.
19. Kinyoun J, Barton F, Fisher M, Hubbard L, Aiello L, Ferris III, F. Detection of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmoscopy versus photography-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 5. The ETDRS Research Group. Ophthalmology 1989; 96(6): 746-750; discussion 50-1.
20. Browning DJ, McOwen MD, Bowen Jr., RM, O'Marah TL. Comparison of the clinical diagnosis of diabetic macular edema with diagnosis by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2004; 111(4): 712-715.
21. Gaucher D, Tadayoni R, Erginay A, Haouchine B, Gaudric A, Massin P. Optical coherence tomography assessment of the vitreoretinal relationship in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139(5): 807-813.