Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research - Part 2: Report of the ISPOR dynamic simulation modeling emerging good practices task force

Value in Health

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 147-160

  Marshall, Deborah A ^a   Burgos Liz, Lina ^a   Ijzerman, Maarten J ^b   Crown, William ^c   Padula, William V ^d   Wong, Peter K ^e   Pasupathy, Kalyan S ^f   Higashi, Mitchell K ^g   Osgood, Nathaniel D ^h,i  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c OPTUM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^e Hospital Sisters Health System Medical Group   (United States)

^f MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^g GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

decision making; dynamic simulation modeling; health care delivery; methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; DECISION TREE; DYNAMIC SIMULATION MODELING; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MACHINE LEARNING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH PRIORITY; SIMULATION; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRENDS;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESEARCH REPORT;

EID: 84924856841     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. D. Laney 3-D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume Velocity and Variety, META Group Original Research Note 2001
2. D.M. Berwick What 'patient-centered' should mean: confessions of an extremist Health Aff (Millwood) 28 2009 w555 w565
3. D.A. Marshall, L. Burgos-Liz, and M.J. IJzerman Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research - the SIMULATE Checklist: report of the ISPOR Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force Value Health 18 2015 5 16
4. J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics 1961 Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
5. J. Forrester Urban Dynamics 1969 Pegasus Communications Walthum, MA
6. J. Forrester World Dynamics 1971 Pegasus Communications Walthum, MA
7. J.D. Sterman Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World 2000 McGraw-Hill New York
8. G. Richardson, A. Pugh, and III. Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling 1981 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
9. E.B. Roberts System dynamics - an introduction E.B. Roberts, Managerial Applications of System Dynamics. Cambridge, MA 1978 MIT Press
10. J. Forrester Principles of Systems 1968 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
11. J.D. Sterman Learning from evidence in a complex world Am J Public Health 96 2006 505 514
12. B. Richmond Systems thinking: critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond System Dyn Rev 9 1993 113 133
13. B. Milstein, J. Homer, and P. Briss Why behavioral and environmental interventions are needed to improve health at lower cost Health Aff 30 2011 823 832
14. P.M. Senge Mental models Strategy Leadersh 20 1992 4 44
15. P.O. Siebers, C.M. Macal, and J. Garnett Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! J Simul 4 2010 204 210
16. J. Karnon, J. Stahl, and A. Brennan Modeling using discrete event simulation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-4 Med Decis Making 32 2012 701 711
17. P.M. Troy, and L. Rosenberg Using simulation to determine the need for ICU beds for surgery patients Surgery 146 2009 608 617
18. M.M. Gunal A guide for building hospital simulation models Health Systems 1 2012 17 25
19. Borshchev A, Filippov A. From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. Presented at: 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Oxford, England, July 25-29, 2004.
20. IPLER. Information Products Lab for Emergency Response (IPLER). 2008. Available from: http://ipler.cis.rit.edu/node/1?-sm-au-=iVV0HQk2ZV57r4kR. [Accessed January 10, 2014].
21. Kruzikas DT, Higashi MK, Edgar M, et al. Using agent-based modeling to inform regional health care system investment and planning. Presented at: Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 2014 International Conference. Las Vegas, NV, March 10-13, 2014.
22. C.M. Macal, M.J. North, and N. Collier Modeling the transmission of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a dynamic agent-based simulation J Transl Med 12 2014 124
23. B. Sobolev, D. Harel, C. Vasilakis, and A. Levy Using the Statecharts paradigm for simulation of patient flow in surgical care Health Care Manag Sci 11 2008 79 86
24. M. Roberts, L.B. Russell, and A.D. Paltiel ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force. Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2 Med Decis Making 32 2012 678 689
25. S. Brailsford, and N. Hilton A comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling health care systems J. Riley, Planning for the Future: Health Service Quality and Emergency Accessibility. Operational Research Applied to Health Services (ORAHS). 2001 Caledonian University Glasgo
26. Behdani B. Evaluation of paradigms for modeling supply chains as complex socio-technical systems. Presented at: 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Simulation Conference IEEE. Berlin, Germany, 9-12, 2012.
27. Schieritz N, Milling PM. Modeling the forest or modeling the trees. Presented at: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. New York, NY, July 20-24, 2003.
28. G.T. Jun, Z. Morris, and T. Eldabi Development of modelling method selection tool for health services management: from problem structuring methods to modelling and simulation methods. BMC Health Serv Res 11 2011 108
29. Gao A, Osgood ND, An W et al. A tripartite hybrid model architecture for investigating health and cost impacts and intervention tradeoffs for diabetic end-stage renal disease. Presented at: 2014 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Savannah, GA, December 7-10, 2014.
30. Osgood N. Using traditional and agent based toolsets for system dynamics: present tradeoffs and future evolution. Presented at: 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 50th Anniversary Celebration. Boston, MA, July 29-August 2, 2007.
31. Osgood N. Representing heterogeneity in complex feedback system modeling: computational resource and error scaling. Presented at: 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Oxford, England, July 25-29, 2004.
32. Osgood N. Representing progression and interactions of comorbidities in aggregate and individual-based systems models. Presented at: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Albuquerque, New Mexico, July 26-30, 2009.
33. Osgood N, Liu J. Towards closed loop modeling: evaluating the prospects for creating recurrently regrounded aggregate simulation models. Presented at: 2014 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Savannah, GA, December 7-10, 2014.
34. Lorenz T, Jost A. Towards an orientation framework in multi-paradigm modeling. Presented at: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Nijmegen, The Netherlands, July 23-27, 2006.
35. R. Dyck, N. Osgood, A. Gao, and M.R. Stang The epidemiology of diabetes mellitus among First Nations and non-First Nations children in Saskatchewan Can J Diabetes 36 2012 19 24
36. I. Vendrov, C. Dutchyn, and N.D. Osgood Frabjous A declarative domain-specific language for agent-based modeling Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction 2014 Springer Washington, DC
37. S.C. Brailsford, P.R. Harper, B. Patel, and M. Pitt An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care J Sim 3 2009 130 140
38. J.J. Caro, A.H. Briggs, U. Siebert, and K.M. Kuntz ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force. Modeling good research practices - overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1 Med Decis Making 32 2012 667 677
39. D. Husereau, M. Drummond, and S. Petrou ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines-CHEERS Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) - explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force Value Health 16 2013 231 250
40. Vennix JAM. Group model-building: tackling messy problems. System Dyn Rev 1999;40:379-401.
41. K.S. Pasupathy Transforming healthcare: leveraging the complementarities of health informatics and systems engineering Int J Healthcare Deliv Ref Initiatives 2 2010 35 55
42. G.D. Brown, T.B. Patrick, and K.S. Pasupathy Health Informatics: A Systems Perspective 2013 Health Administration Press Chicago, IL
43. R.M. Axelrod The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration 1997 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
44. Osgood N, Tian Y. 15 things system dynamics can learn from software development. Available from: http://systemsmodelbook.org/viewmodel.aspx?id=3a2b3049-db06-49d3-95a4-31cb4832dec6. [Accessed February 25, 2015]
45. P.M. Duvall, S. Matyas, and A. Glover Continuous Integration: Improving Software Quality and Reducing Risk 2007 Pearson Education Crawfordsville, IN
46. J.W. Forrester, and P.M. Senge Tests for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models 1978 System Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge
47. Law AM. How to build valid and credible simulation models. Presented at: 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Simulation Conference IEEE. Austin, TX, December 13-16, 2009.
48. D.M. Eddy, W. Hollingworth, and J.J. Caro ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force. Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 Med Decis Making 32 2012 733 743
49. Y. Barlas Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics Syst Dyn Rev 12 1996 183 210
50. S. McConnell, and D. Johannis Code Complete Vol. 2 2004 Microsoft Press Redmond
51. A. Dasso, and A. Funes Verification, Validation and Testing in Software Engineering Hershey, PA: IGI Global 2007
52. K. Beck Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change 2000 Addison-Wesley Professional Boston, MA
53. R.D. Craig, and S.P. Jaskiel Systematic Software Testing 2002 Artech House Norwood, ME
54. G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, and Mendhekar Aspect-Oriented Programming 1997 Springer
55. Fowler M. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Presented at: 11th European Conference. Jyväskylä, Finland, June 9-13, 1997
56. Kleijnen JP. Banks J ed. Experimental Design for Sensitivity Analysis, Optimization, and Validation of Simulation Models, in Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.
57. Kleijnen JP. Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments. Vol. 111. New York, NY: Springer, 2007.
58. T. Szirtes Applied Dimensional Analysis and Modeling 2007 Butterworth-Heinemann Burlington, MA
59. Xue Y, Osgood N, Gutwin C. SILVERVIZ: extending SILVER for coordination in distributed collaborative modeling. Presented at: The 29th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Washington, DC, July 24-28, 2011.
60. Osgood N. Silver: software in support of the system dynamics modeling process. Presented at: The 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Albuquerque, NM, July 26-30, 2009.
61. M. Fowler UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language 2004 Addison-Wesley Professional Boston, MA
62. H. Rahmandad, and J.D. Sterman Reporting guidelines for simulation-based research in social sciences System Dyn Rev 28 2012 396 411
63. B. Müller, F. Bohn, and G. Dreßler Describing human decisions in agent-based models-ODD+ D, an extension of the ODD protocol Environ Model Software 48 2013 37 48
64. V. Grimm, U. Berger, and F. Bastiansen A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models Ecolog Model 198 2006 115 126
65. V. Grimm, U. Berger, and D.L. DeAngelis The ODD protocol: a review and first update Ecolog Model 221 2010 2760 2768
66. Pilato CM, Collins-Sussman B, Fitzpatrick BW. Version Control with Subversion. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2008.
67. J. Loeliger, and M. McCullough Version Control with Git: Powerful Tools and Techniques for Collaborative Software Development 2012 O'Reilly Media, Inc. Sebastopol, CA
68. Forrester J. System dynamics - a personal view of the first fifty years. Syst Dynam Rev 2007;23:345-58.
69. Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and Complex Systems: What Would Successful Reform of Medicare Look Like. Discussion paper number 8. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, 2002.
70. B. Milstein, J. Homer, and G. Hirsch Analyzing national health reform strategies with a dynamic simulation model Am J Public Health 100 2010 811 819
71. Viana J, Rossiter S, Channon A, et al. A multi-paradigm, whole system view of health and social care for age-related macular degeneration. Presented at: 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Berlin, Germany, December 9-12, 2012.
72. Chahal K, Eldabi T. Applicability of hybrid simulation to different modes of governance in UK healthcare. Presented at: Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Miami, FL, December 7-10, 2008.
73. Brailsford SC, Desai SM, Viana J. Towards the holy grail: combining system dynamics and discrete-event simulation in healthcare. Presented at: 2010 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Baltimore, MD, December 5-8, 2010.
74. L.H. Curtis, J. Brown, and R. Platt Four health data networks illustrate the potential for a shared national multipurpose big-data network Health Aff (Millwood) 33 2014 1178 1186
75. P.J. Wallace, N.D. Shah, and T. Dennen Optum Labs: building a novel node in the learning health care system Health Aff (Millwood) 33 2014 1187 1194
76. Diamond D. iPhone 6: Apple and Mayo Clinic partnership could be smart medicine. 2014. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/dandiamond/2014/09/09/iphone-6-apple-and-mayo-clinic-partnership-could-be-smart-medicine-2/. [Accessed January 20, 2015].
77. T. Hastie The Elements of Statistical Learning Vol. 2 2009 Springer
78. W. Crown Potential application of machine learning in health outcomes research and some statistical cautions Value Health 18 2015 137 140
79. I. Dorigatti, S. Cauchemez, A. Pugliese, and N.M. Ferguson A new approach to characterising infectious disease transmission dynamics from sentinel surveillance: application to the Italian 2009-2010 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic Epidemics 4 2012 9 21
80. N. Osgood, and J. Liu An introduction to using Markov chain Monte Carlo approaches with dynamic models. In: Analytical Handbook for Dynamic Modelers. 2015 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
81. J.B. Ong, M.I. Chen, and A.R. Cook Real-time epidemic monitoring and forecasting of H1N1-2009 using influenza-like illness from general practice and family doctor clinics in Singapore PloS One 5 2010 e10036
82. J. Zhang, B.T. Denton, and H. Balasubramanian Optimization of prostate biopsy referral decisions Man Serv Operations Manag 14 2012 529 547