Innovating for 'active ageing' in a public-private innovation partnership: Creating doable problems and alignment

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 93, Issue , 2015, Pages 10-18

  Lassen, Aske Juul ^a   Bønnelycke, Julie ^a   Otto, Lene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Active ageing; Alignment; Elderly users; Ethnography; Health technologies; User driven innovation

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; HEALTH;

ACTIVE AGEING; ELDERLY USERS; ETHNOGRAPHY; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY; USER-DRIVEN INNOVATION;

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

EID: 84924851737     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Walker A. Active ageing in employment: its meaning and potential. Asia Pac. Rev. 2006, 13(1):78-93.
2. McCreadie C. Technology and Older People. The Sage Handbook of Social Gerontology 2010, 607-617. SAGE Publications Ltd, London. D. Dannefer, C. Philipson (Eds.).
3. Pols J. Telecare: What Patients Care About. Care Pract. 2010, Transcript Publishers, Bielefeld, Germany. A. Mol, I. Moser, J. Pols (Eds.).
4. Pinch T., Oudshoorn N. How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., and London.
5. Fujimura J. Constructing 'do-able' problems in cancer research: articulating alignment. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1987, 17(2):257-293.
6. Akrich M. The Description of technical objects. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change 1992, 205-224. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London. W.E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.).
7. M. Strathern, Hope, uncertainty and the research proposal. A tale from the UK, unpublished paper from the lecture series "Organizing Uncertainty" Copenhagen Business School, Sept. 2009.
8. Hyysalo S. Representations of use and practice-bound imaginaries in automating the safety of the elderly. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2006, 36(4):599-626.
9. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty 2001, Polity Press, Cambridge.
10. Nowotny H. The Potential of Transdisciplinarity (first published at interdisciplines.org). http://test.worldfishcenter.org/sites/default/files/The%20potential%20for%20transdisciplinarity.pdf.
11. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. New Production of Knowledge: Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies 1994, SAGE Publications Ltd., London.
12. Rudman D.L. Shaping the active, autonomous and responsible modern retiree: an analysis of discursive technologies and their links with neo-liberal political rationality. Ageing Soc. 2006, 26:181-201.
13. Tulle-Winton E. Growing old and resistance towards a new cultural economy of old age?. Ageing Soc. 1999, 19:281-299.
14. Katz S. Busy bodies: activity, aging and the management of everyday life. J. Aging Stud. 2000, 14(2):135-152.
15. Bason C. Leading Public Sector Innovation. Co-creating for a Better Society 2012, The Polity Press, London.
16. Mol A. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice 2008, (London and New York, Routledge).
17. Holstein M., Minkler M. Self, society and the 'new gerontology'. The Gerontologist 2003, 43(6):787-796.
18. Hart R. Children's Participation: The Theory and Practice of Involving Young Citizens in Community Development and Environmental Care 1997, Unicef, New York.
19. Jæger B. User-Driven Innovation in the Public Service Delivery. Working Paper No. 4 2011, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
20. Barrett P., Hale B., Gauld R. Social inclusion through ageing-in-place with care?. Ageing Soc. 2012, 32:361-378.
21. Birren J. Theories of ageing: a personal perspective. Handbook of Theories of Ageing 1999, 459-471. Springer, New York. J. Birren (Ed.).
22. Boltanski L. Pragmatisk sociologi 2010, Hans Reitzels Forlag, København.
23. Kotro T. Product development and the passion for sports 2005, (Doctoral Dissertation), National Consumer Research Centre and University of Art and Design, Helsinki.