Evaluation of personal health record systems through the lenses of EC research projects

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 59, Issue , 2015, Pages 175-185

  Genitsaridi, Irini ^a   Kondylakis, Haridimos ^a   Koumakis, Lefteris ^a   Marias, Kostas ^a   Tsiknakis, Manolis ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

^b TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Evaluation study; Functional analysis; Functional model; Personal health record; Personal health record system; Personal health record systems requirements

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS;

EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECT; EVALUATION STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MODEL; HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD; REAL-WORLD IMPLEMENTATION; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION; SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS;

HEALTH;

HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84924851143     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Griskewicz M. HIMSS SIG Develops Proposed e-Health Definition 2002, vol. 13. HIMSS News, Chicago, p. 12.
2. Eysenbach G., et al. The role of e-health and consumer health informatics for evidence-based patient choice in the 21st century. Clin. Dermatol. 2001, 19:11-17.
3. Tang P.C., et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2006, 13:121-126.
4. Personal Health Records and Personal Health Record Systems: A Report Recommendation from the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, 2006.
5. Dogac A. Interoperability in eHealth Systems. VLDB 2012, 5:2026-2027.
6. Carrion I., et al. Assessing the HIPAA standard in practice: PHR privacy policies. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC) 2011, 2380-2383.
7. Stavroula M., et al. A feasibility study for the provision of electronic healthcare tools and services in areas of Greece, Cyprus and Italy. Biomed. Eng. Online 2011, 10(1):1-17.
8. West D. Enabling Personalized Medicine Through Health Information Technology: Advancing the Integration of Information 2011, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
9. Kaelber D.C., et al. A research agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs). J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2008, 15:729-736.
10. Haggstrom D.A., et al. Lessons learned from usability testing of the VA's personal health record. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2011, 13-17.
11. L.S. Liu, G.R. Hayes. Evaluating the usefulness and usability of collaborative personal health record systems, in: CSCW 2010, Workshop on Research in Healthcare: Past, Present, and Future. Savannah, GA, 2010.
12. Segall N., et al. Usability evaluation of a personal health record. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2011, 1233-1242.
13. Peters K., et al. Usability Guidance for Improving the User Interface and Adoption of Online Personal Health Records User Centric, Inc. 2009, Oakbrook Terrace, IL.
14. Halamka J.D., et al. Early experiences with personal health records. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2008, 15:1-7.
15. L. S. Liu, et al., Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems, in: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, 2011, pp. 363-370.
16. Raisinghani M.S., Young E. Personal health records: key adoption issues and implications for management. Int. J. Electron. Healthcare 2008, 4:67-77.
17. Kahn J.S., et al. What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Aff. 2009, 369-376.
18. Kim M.I., Johnson K.B. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2002, 9:171-180.
19. A. Sunyaev, et al., Evaluation framework for personal health records: Microsoft HealthVault vs. Google Health, in: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2010, pp. 1-10.
20. Mykkänen J., et al. Analysis Model for Personal eHealth Solutions and Services, in: Proceedings of the EFMI Special Topic Conference in Iceland, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 155 2010, 205-211. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
21. Archer N., et al. Personal health records: a scoping review. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2011.
22. Luciano J.S., et al. The translational medicine ontology and knowledge base: driving personalized medicine by bridging the gap between bench and bedside. J. Biomed. Semantics 2011, 2.
23. H. Kondylakis, et al., IEmS: a collaborative environment for patient empowerment, in: Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering (BIBE), Larnaca, Cyprus, 2012, pp. 535-540.
24. H. Kondylakis, et al., Smart recommendation services in support of patient empowerment and personalized medicine, in: Multimedia Services in Intelligent Environments Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 25, 2013, Springer-Verlag, in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00375-7_4.
25. Jones D.A., et al. Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2010, 98(3):243-249.
26. Health Level Seven, Inc., Health Level Seven's Personal Health Record Functional Model Approved as a Draft Standard for Trial use, 2007.
27. Istepanian R.H., et al. MHealth: Emerging Mobile Health Systems 2006, Springer, New York.
28. Kyriacou E., et al. m-Health e-emergency systems: current status and future directions [wireless corner]. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2007, 49:216-231.
29. ISO/IEC 25000, Software Engineering - Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Guide to SQuaRE, 2005.
30. Detmer D., et al. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med. Inf. Decision Making 2008, 8:45.
31. Steele R., et al. Personal health record architectures: technology infrastructure implications and dependencies. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2012, 63:1079-1091.
32. M. Merrill, Integrated PHRs are the way to go, Healthcare IT News, Boston (Online newspaper).