The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive

Environmental Sciences Europe

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-11

  Wernersson, Ann Sofie ^a   Carere, Mario ^b   Maggi, Chiara ^c   Tusil, Petr ^d   Soldan, Premysl ^d   James, Alice ^e   Sanchez, Wilfried ^e   Dulio, Valeria ^e   Broeg, Katja ^f   Reifferscheid, Georg ^g   Buchinger, Sebastian ^g   Maas, Hannie ^h   Van Der Grinten, Esther ⁱ   O’Toole, Simon ^j   Ausili, Antonella ^c   Manfra, Loredana ^c   Marziali, Laura ^k   Polesello, Stefano ^k   Lacchetti, Ines ^b   Mancini, Laura ^b   Lilja, Karl ^l   Linderoth, Maria ^l   Lundeberg, Tove ^l   Fjällborg, Bengt ^a   Porsbring, Tobias ^a   Larsson, D G Joakim ^m   Bengtsson Palme, Johan ^m   Förlin, Lars ^m   Kienle, Cornelia ⁿ   Kunz, Petra ⁿ   Vermeirssen, Etienne ⁿ   Werner, Inge ⁿ   Robinson, Craig D ^o   Lyons, Brett ^p   Katsiadaki, Ioanna ^p   Whalley, Caroline ^q   den Haan, Klaas ^r   Messiaen, Marlies ^s   Clayton, Helen ^t   Lettieri, Teresa ^u   Carvalho, Raquel Negrão ^u   Gawlik, Bernd Manfred ^u   Hollert, Henner ^v   Di Paolo, Carolina ^v   Brack, Werner ^w   Kammann, Ulrike ^x   Kase, Robert ⁿ   more..

^a Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM)   (Sweden)

^b ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^c INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND RESEARCH ISPRA   (Italy)

^d T G MASARYK WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

^e INSTITUT NATIONAL DE L ENVIRONNEMENT INDUSTRIEL ET DES RISQUES INERIS   (France)

^f STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^g FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY   (Germany)

^h RIJKSWATERSTAAT   (Netherlands)

ⁱ NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^j EPA   (Ireland)

^k WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^l SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (Sweden)

^m UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

ⁿ SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^o MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^p CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^q DEFRA   (United Kingdom)

^r CONCAWE ^*  (Belgium)

^s Eurometaux   (Belgium)

^t EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

^u JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^v RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^w HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^x INSTITUT FÜR SEEFISCHEREI   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

Aquatic ecosystems; Bioassays; Biomarkers; Chemical pollution; Effect based tools; Priority substances; Water Framework Directive

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIOASSAY; BIOMARKER; CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; SURFACE WATER; WATER QUALITY;

ITALY; SWEDEN;

EID: 84924801186     PISSN: 21904707     EISSN: 21904715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12302-015-0039-4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. European Union. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Union. 2000;L327:1–73.
2. European Union. 2013. Off J Eur Union. 2013;L 226:1–17.
3. European Union: communication from the commission to the council. The combination effects of chemicals. COM/2012/0252 final, 31/05/2012, pp. 1–10.
4. Silva E, Rajapakse N, Kortenkamp A. Something from “nothing” - eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;2002(36):1751–6.
5. Quevauviller P, Carere M, Polesello S. Chemical monitoring activity for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Trends Anal Chem. 2012;36:1–184.
6. Wernersson AS, Maggi C, Carere M. Technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools. Technical Report 2014–077. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2014.
7. Hallare AV, Seiler TB, Hollert H. The versatile, changing, and advancing roles of fish in sediment toxicity assessment-a review. J Soils Sedim. 2011;11:141–73.
8. Green N, Schøyen M, Øxnevad S, Ruus A, Høgåsen T, Beylich B, Håvardstun J, Rogne Å, Tveiten L. Hazardous substances in fjords and coastal waters - 2010. Levels, trends and effects. Long-term monitoring of environmental quality in Norwegian coastal waters. Norwegian State Pollution Monitoring Programme Report no. 1111/2011. TA-no. 2862/2011. 252, 2011.
9. Chapman D, Jackson J (1996): Biological monitoring. In Water Quality Monitoring - A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes. Edited by Jamie Bartram and Richard Balance Published on behalf of United Nations Environment Programme and the World Health Organization. ISBN 0 419 22320 7. (Hbk) 0419217304 (PBK).
10. Connon RE, Geist J, Werner I. Effect-based tools for monitoring and predicting the ecotoxicological effects of chemicals in the aquatic environments. Sensors. 2012;12:12741–71.
11. Leusch FL, De Jager C, Levi Y, Lim R, Puijker L, Sacher F, et al. Comparison of five in vitro bioassays to measure estrogenic activity in environmental waters. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:3853–60.
12. Wernersson AS: Swedish monitoring of hazardous substances in the aquatic environment-current vs required monitoring and potential developments. Länsstyrelsen I Västra Götalands län. Rapport 2012:23.
13. Piva F, Ciaprini F, Onorati F, Benedetti M, Fattorini D, Ausili A, et al. Assessing sediment hazard through a weight of evidence approach with bioindicator organisms: a practical model to elaborate data from sediment chemistry, bioavailability, biomarkers and ecotoxicological bioassays. Chemosphere. 2011;2011(83):475–85.
14. Ahlf W, Heise S. Sediment toxicity assessment: rationale for effect classes. J Soils Sedim. 2005;5:16–20.
15. Sanchez W, Porcher JM. Fish biomarkers for environmental monitoring within the water framework directive. Trends Anal Chem. 2009;28:150–8.
16. Usseglio-Polatera P, Bournaud M, Richoux P, Tachet H. Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Freshwater Biol. 2000;43:175–205.
17. Van den Brink PJ, Alexander AC, Desrosiers M, Goedkoop W, Goethals PLM, Liess M, et al. Traits-based approaches in bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Integr Environ Assess Managem. 2011;7:198–208.
18. Schäfer R, Vd Ohe P, Rasmussen J, Kefford B, Beketov M, Schulz R, et al. Thresholds for the effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities and leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:5134–42.
19. Blanck H, Wängberg S-Å. Induced community tolerance in marine periphyton established under arsenate stress. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1988;45:1816–9.
20. Pesce S, Lissalde S, Lavieille D, Margoum C, Mazzella N, Roubeix V, et al. Evaluation of single and joint toxic effects of diuron and its main metabolites on natural phototrophic biofilms using a pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) approach. Aquat Toxicol. 2010;99:492–9.
21. Burgess RM, Ho KT, Brack W, Lamoree M. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) (2013): complementary but different approaches for diagnosing causes of environmental toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013;32:1935–45.
22. Brack W. Effect-directed analysis: a promising tool for the identification of organic toxicants in complex mixtures (2003). Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003;377:397–407.
23. Gunnarsson L, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ (2012): Environmental comparative pharmacology: theory and application. In B.W. Brooks and D.B. Huggett (eds.), Human Pharmaceuticals in the Environment:Current and Future Perspectives, Emerging Topics in Ecotoxicology 4, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3473-3_5, Springer Science + Business Media.
24. Kosmehl T, Otte JC, Yang L, Legradi J, Bluhm K, Zinsmeister C, et al. A combined DNA-microarray and mechanism-specific toxicity approach with zebrafish embryos to investigate the pollution of river sediments. Reprod Toxicol. 2012;33:245–53.
25. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:57–63.
26. Riesenfeld CS, Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:525–52.
27. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words. Electrophoresis. 1998;19:1853–61.
28. Samuelsson LM, Förlin L, Karlsson G, Adolfsson-Erici M, Larsson JDG. Using NMR metabolomics to identify responses of an environmental estrogen in blood plasma of fish. Aquat Toxicol. 2006;78(4):341–9.
29. Kase R, Clayton H, Martini F: Science-Policy Interface (SPI) activity on prioritisation of research needs, knowledge availability and dissemination for the Working Group E (Chemical Aspects) 2010–2012. Open available at CIRCABC at: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/5bf63ff3-b24b-4365-8a57-38e4d56b941.