Unified model of hyperthermia via hysteresis heating in systems of interacting magnetic nanoparticles

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Ruta, S ^a   Chantrell, R ^a   Hovorka, O ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924787560     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09090     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pankhurst, Q. A., Connolly, J., Jones, S. K. & Dobson, J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36, R167-R181 (2003).
2. Laurent, S. et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev. 108 2064-110 (2008).
3. Colombo, M. et al. Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 4306-34 (2012).
4. Martinez-Boubeta, C. et al. Learning from nature to improve the heat generation of iron-oxide nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia applications. Sci. Rep. 3, 1652 (2013).
5. Hergt, R., Dutz, S. & Röder, M. Effects of size distribution on hysteresis losses of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 385214 (2008).
6. Mamiya, H. & Jeyadevan, B. Hyperthermic effects of dissipative structures of magnetic nanoparticles in large alternatingmagnetic fields. Sci. Rep. 1, 157 (2011).
7. Branquinho, L. C. et al. Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating efficiency: implications for cancer hyperthermia. Sci. Rep. 3, 2887 (2013).
8. Suto, M. et al.Heat dissipation mechanism of magnetite nanoparticles in magnetic fluid hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 1493-1496 (2009).
9. Verde, E. L., Landi, G. T., Gomes, J. A., Sousa, M. H. & Bakuzis, A. F. Magnetic hyperthermia investigation of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles: Comparison between experiment, linear response theory, and dynamic hysteresis simulations. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 123902 (2012).
10. Mayergoyz, I. D. Mathematical Models of Hysteresis, (Springer, New York, 1991).
11. Cullity, B. D. & Graham, C. D. Introduction to Magnetic Materials, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2008).
12. Zwanzig, R. Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, (Oxford University Press, 2001).
13. Rosensweig, R. Heating magnetic fluid with alternating magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 252, 370-374 (2002).
14. Vallejo-Fernandez, G. & O'Grady, K. Effect of the distribution of anisotropy constants on hysteresis losses for magnetic hyperthermia applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 142417 (2013).
15. Hergt, R., Dutz, S., Müller, R. & Zeisberger, M. Magnetic particle hyperthermia: nanoparticle magnetism and materials development for cancer therapy. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, S2919-S2934 (2006).
16. Martinez-Boubeta, C. et al. Adjustable Hyperthermia Response of Self-Assembled Ferromagnetic Fe-MgO Core-Shell Nanoparticles by Tuning Dipole-Dipole Interactions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 3737-3744 (2012).
17. Sohn, H. & Victora, R. H. Optimization of magnetic anisotropy and applied fields for hyperthermia applications. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 09B312 (2010).
18. Mehdaoui, B. et al. Optimal Size of Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 4573-4581 (2011).
19. Serantes, D. Influence of dipolar interactions on hyperthermia properties of ferromagnetic particles. J. Appl. Phys. 108, 073918 (2010).
20. Reeves, D. B. & Weaver, J. B. Nonlinear simulations to optimize magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 102403 (2014).
21. Serantes, D. et al.Multiplying Magnetic Hyperthermia Response by Nanoparticle Assembling. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 5927-5934 (2014).
22. Landi, G. T. Role of dipolar interaction in magnetic hyperthermia. Phys. Rev. B 89, 014403 (2014).
23. Haase, C. & Nowak, U. Role of dipole-dipole interactions for hyperthermia heating of magnetic nanoparticle ensembles. Phys. Rev. B 85(4), 045435 (Jan. 2012).
24. Carrey, J., Mehdaoui, B. & Respaud, M. Simple models of dynamic hystereis loop calculations of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles: Application to magnetic hyperthermia optimization. J. Appl. Phys 109, 083921 (2011).
25. Tan, R. P., Carrey, J. & Respaud, M. Magnetic hyperthermia properties of nanoparticles inside lysosomes using kinetic Monte Carlo simulations: Influence of key parameters and dipolar interactions, and evidence for strong spatial variation of heating power. Phys. Rev. B 90, 214421 (2014).
26. Chantrell, R., Walmsley, N., Gore, J. & Maylin, M. Calculations of the susceptibility of interacting superparamagnetic particles. Phys. Rev. B 63, 024410 (2000).
27. Nowak, U., Chantrell, R. & Kennedy, E. Monte Carlo simulation with time step quantification in terms of Langevin dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 163-166 (2000).
28. It is worthwhile pointing out that the M(H) behavior in the dynamical response theory regime resembles a hysteresis loop. However, this kind of hysteresis is of dynamical character and essentially associated with 'inertial' phase lag between M and H, and is fundamentally different from the type of hysteresis associated with metastability.
29. Hovorka, O., Barker, J., Friedman, G. & Chantrell, R. Role of geometrical symmetry in thermally activated processes in clusters of interacting dipolar moments. Phys. Rev. B 89, 9 (2014).
30. Hergt, R. & Dutz, S. Magnetic particle hyperthermiabiophysical limitations of a visionary tumour therapy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 311, 187-192 (2007).
31. Verdes, C. Ruiz-Diaz, B., Thompson, S., Chantrell, R. &Stancu, A. Computational model of the magnetic and transport properties of interacting fine particles. Phys. Rev. B 65, 174417 (2002).
32. Nél, L. Theórie du traînage magnétique des ferromagné tiques en grains fins avec applications aux terres cuites. Ann. geóphys (1949).