Human misidentification in Turing tests

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 123-135

  Warwick, Kevin ^a   Shah, Huma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

chatbots; confederate effect; imitation game; intelligence; philosophy of mind; practical Turing tests

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

CHATBOTS; CONFEDERATE EFFECT; IMITATION GAMES; INTELLIGENCE; PHILOSOPHY OF MIND; TURING TESTS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84924768141     PISSN: 0952813X     EISSN: 13623079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952813X.2014.921734     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Block, N. (1981). Psychologism and behaviorism. In S. Shieber (Ed.), The Turing test: Verbal behavior as the hallmark of intelligence (pp. 229-266). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Chomsky, N. (2008). Turing on the imitation game. In R. Epstein, G. Roberts, & G. Beber (Eds.), Parsing the Turing test: Philosophocial and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer (pp. 103-106). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
3. Copeland, B. J. (2004). The essential Turing - The ideas that gave birth to the computer age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Demchenko, E., & Veselov, V. (2008). Who fools whom? The great mystification, or methodological issues on making fools of human beings. In R. Epstein, G. Roberts, & G. Beber (Eds.), Parsing the Turing test: Philosophical and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
5. Fowler, H., & Fowler, F. (Eds.). (1995). The concise Oxford dictionary of current English (9th ed., p. 486). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. French, R. M. (2000). The Turing test: The first 50 years. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 115-122.
7. Harnad, S. (1992). The Turing test is not a trick: Turing indistinguishability is a scientific criterion. ACM SIGART Bulletin, 3, 9-10.
8. Hayes, P., & Ford, K. (1995). Turing test considered harmful. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Montreal (Vol. 1, pp. 972-977). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
9. Hodges, A. (1992). Alan Turing: The enigma. New York, NY: Vintage Press.
10. Levesque, H. J. (2009, July 11-17). Is it enough to get the behavior right? In Proceedings of the twenty-first international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Pasadena, USA (pp. 1439-1444). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Moor, J. H. (1976). An analysis of the Turing test. Philosophical Studies, 30, 249-257.
12. Moor (Ed.), The Turing test - The Elusive standard of artificial intelligence (2003) (pp. 197-214). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13. Purtill, R. L. (1971). Beating the imitation game. Mind, 80, 290-294.
14. Rickman, P. (1999). The philosopher as joker. Philosophy Now, 25, 10-11.
15. Searle, J. (1997). The mystery of consciousness. New York: New York Review of Books.
16. Shah, H. (2011). Turing's misunderstood imitation game and IBM Watson's success. In Proceedings of the 2nd towards a comprehensive intelligence test (TCIT) - Reconsidering the Turing test for the 21st century, symposium in AISB 2011 convention. York University, UK (pp. 1-5). London: AISB.
17. Shah, H., & Henry, O. (2005, May 11-14). The confederate effect in human-machine interaction. In Proceedings of 5th WSEAS international conference on Information Science, Communications and Applications (WSEAS ISCA). Cancun, Mexico (pp. 109-114). Athens, Greece: WSEAS. ISBN: 960- 8457-22-X.
18. Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010a, March 29-April 1). From the buzzing in Turing's head to machine intelligence contests. In Proceedings of symposium for 1st towards a comprehensive intelligence test. AISB Convention, De Montfort, UK. London: AISB.
19. Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010b). Hidden interlocutor misidentification in practical Turing tests. Minds and Machines, 20, 441-454.
20. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing, machinery and intelligence. Mind, LIX, 433-460.
21. Warwick, K. (2011). Artificial intelligence: The basics. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
22. Warwick, K. (2012). Not another look at the Turing test? In M. Bielikova, G. Friedrich, G. Gottlob, S. Katzenbeisser, & G. Turan (Eds.), In Proceedings of the SOFSEM 2012. Vol. 7147: Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 130-140). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
23. Warwick, K., & Shah, H. (2013). Good machine performance in Turing's imitation game. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, doi:10.1109/TCIAIG.2283538
24. Warwick, K., Shah, H., & Moor, J. H. (2013). Some implications of a sample of practical Turing tests. Minds and Machines, 23, 163-177.
25. Wheeler, M. (2010). Plastic machines: Behavioural diversity and the Turing test. Kybernetes, 39, 466-480.
26. Whitby, B. (1996). The Turing test: AI's biggest blind Alley? In P. J. R. Millican & A. Clark (Eds.), Machine and thought: The legacy of Alan Turing (Vol. 1, pp. 53-62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.