Fading away: Dilution and user behaviour

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1033, Issue , 2013, Pages 3-6

  Thomas, Paul ^a   Scholer, Falk ^b   Moffat, Alistair ^c  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Retrieval experiment; System measurement

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

COMPLETE SEARCH; DEGRADED SYSTEM; EVALUATION; QUERY REFORMULATION; SEARCH SYSTEM; SYSTEM MEASUREMENT; USER BEHAVIOUR;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84924759095     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, S. Dumais, and R. Ragno. Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 3-10, Seattle, WA, 2006.
2. P. Borlund. Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 56(1):71-90, 2000.
3. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 154-161, Salvador, Brazil, 2005.
4. C. Smith and P. Kantor. User adaptation: good results from poor systems. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 147-154, Singapore, 2008.
5. P. Thomas, T. Jones, and D. Hawking. What deliberately degrading search quality tells us about discount functions. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 1107-1108, Beijing, China, 2011.
6. A. Turpin and F. Scholer. User performance versus precision measures for simple web search tasks. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 11-18, Seattle, WA, 2006.
7. W.-C. Wu, D. Kelly, A. Edwards, and J. Arguello. Grannies, tanning beds, tattoos and NASCAR: Evaluation of search tasks with varying levels of cognitive complexity. In Proc. 4th Information Interaction in Context Symp., pages 254-257, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2012.