Multilateralizing regionalism: Lessons from the EU experience in relaxing rules of origin

Multilateralizing Regionalism

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 146-181

  Gasiorek, Michael ^a   Augier, Patricia ^b   Lai Tong, Charles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b Ctr d'Economie et de Finances Intl   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924752110     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139162111.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Augier, P., Gasiorek, M. and Lai-Tong, C. (2004) ‘Rules of Origin and the EU-Med Partnership: The Case of Textiles’, The World Economy 27 (9): 1449-73.
2. Augier, P., Gasiorek, M. and Lai-Tong, C. (2005) ‘The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows’, Economic Policy 20 (43): 567-624.
3. Brenton, P. and Manchin, M. (2003) ‘Making EU Trade Agreements Work: The Role of Rules of Origin’, World Economy 26 (5): 755-69.
4. Cadot, O., Estevadeordal, A. and Suwa-Eisenmann, A. (2004) ‘Rules of Origin as Export Subsidies’, paper presented at the IDB-CEPR-DELTA/INRA conference ‘Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements: Conceptual and Empirical Approaches’, Washington DC, February.
5. Dattagupta, R. and Panagariya, A. (2002) ‘Free Trade Areas and Rules of Origin: Economics and Politics’, working paper.
6. Estevadeordal, A. (2000) ‘Negotiating Preferential Market Access: The Case of the North American Free Trade Agreement’, Journal of World Trade 34 (1): 141-61.
7. Estevadeordal, A. and Suominen, K. (2004) ‘Rules of Origin: A World Map and Trade Effects’, paper presented at the IDB-CEPR-DELTA/INRA conference ‘Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements: Conceptual and Empirical Approaches’, Washington DC, February.
8. European Commission (2003) ‘Green Paper: On the Future of Rules of Origin in Preferential Trade Agreements’, Brussels, December.
9. European Commission (2004) ‘Green Paper: The Future of Rules of Origin in Preferential Trade Agreements’, a summary report of the results of the consultation process, Brussels, August.
10. Flatters, F. and Kirk, R. (2004) ‘Rules of Origin as Tools of Development? Some Lessons from SADC’, Southern African Development Community, available at: www.msu.edu/_olsonuk/politicalEconomy/SADCInfo.htm.
11. Gasiorek, M., Augier, P., Evans, D., Holmes, P. and Lai-Tong, C. (2002) ‘Study on the Economic Impact of Extending the Pan-European System of Cumulation of Origin to the Mediterranean Partners’ Part of the Barcelona Process’, report prepared for the European Commission.
12. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1995) ‘The Politics of Free-Trade Agreements’, American Economic Review 85: 667-90.
13. Herin, J. (1986) ‘Rules of Origin and Differences Between Tariff Levels in EFTA and the EC’, EFTA Occasional Paper No. 13.
14. Inama, S. (2003) ‘Trade Preferences for LDCs: An Early Assessment of Benefits and Possible Improvements’, UNCTAD Paper ITCD/TSB/2003.
15. Krishna, K. (2005) ‘Understanding Rules of Origin’, NBER Working Paper No. 11149, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
16. Lloyd, P. J. (1993) ‘A Tariff Substitute for Rules of Origin in Free Trade Areas’, The World Economy 16 (6): 699-712.
17. Mattoo, A., Roy, D. and Subramanian, A. (2002) ‘The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act and its Rules of Origin: Generosity Undermined?’, The World Economy 26 (6): 829-51.
18. Morici, P. (1993) ‘NAFTA Rules of Origin and Automotive Domestic Content’, in S. Globerman (ed.), Assessing NAFTA, Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute.
19. Ramirez, J. A. (2004) ‘Rules of Origin-NAFTA’s Heart but FTAA’s Heartburn’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 29 (2): 617-62.
20. WTO (2007) Committee on Rules of Origin-Draft-Consolidated Text of Non-Preferential Rules of Origin-Harmonization Work Programme-Note by the Secretariat, WTO reference G/RO/W/111.