Bundling and unbundling in new technology markets: Seven easy pieces: The ideal is the enemy of the efficient

Competition Policy and Patent Law under Uncertainty: Regulating Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 77-119

  Liebowitz, Stan J ^a   Margolis, Stephen E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924715550     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511974984.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Jefferson Parrish Hospital District v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984).
2. Kobayashi, Bruce H. 2006. “Two Tales of Bundling: Implications for the Application of Antitrust Law to Bundled Discounts.” In Antitrust Policy and Vertical Restraint. Edited by Robert Hahn, pp. 10-37.
3. Evans, David S. and Michael Salinger. 2005. “Why do Firms Bundle and Tie? Evidence form Competitive Markets and Implications for Tying Law.” Yale Journal on Regulation 22, no. 4.
4. Carlton, Denis W. and Michael Waldman. 2006.“Why Tie an Essential Good?” In Antitrust Policy and Vertical Restraint. Edited by Robert Hahn, pp. 10-37.
5. Stigler, G. J. (1963).United States v. Loew’s, Inc.: A note on block-booking. Supreme Court Review, 1963, 152
6. Liebowitz, Stan. 1983. “Tie-in Sales, Risk Reduction and Price Discrimination,” Economic Inquiry, pp. 387-399
7. Hazlett, Thomas W. 2006. “Shedding Tiers for A-La-Carte? An Economic Analysis of Cable TV Pricing.” George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series.
8. Nahata, Babu, Krzysztof Ostaszewski, and Prasanna Sahoo. 1999. “Buffet Pricing.” Journal of Business, 72, p. 2.
9. Jefferson Parrish Hospital District v.Hyde, 466U.S. 2, 16 (1984).
10. Whinston, Michael D. 1990. “Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion.” American Economic Review 80, no. 4, pp. 837-859
11. Carlton, DenisW, And Michael, Waldman. 2006. “Why Tie an Essential Good?” In Antitrust Policy and Vertical Restraint. Edited by Robert Hahn, pp. 10-37.
12. Posner, Richard. 1976. Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Liebowitz, Stan. 1983. “Tie-in Sales, Risk Reduction and Price Discrimination,” Economic Inquiry, pp. 387-399.
14. Stigler, George J. 1963. “U.S. v. Lowes Inc.: A Note on Block Booking.” Supreme Court Review, pp. 152-157.
15. Bakos, Yanis and Eric Brynjolfsson. 1999. “Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits, and Efficiency.” Management Science 45, no. 12, pp. 1613-1630
16. Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” The Journal of Political Economy, 64, No. 5: 416-424.
17. Bittlingmayer, George. 1988. “Property Rights, Progress and the Aircraft Patent Agreement.” Journal of Law and Economics 31, pp. 227-48.
18. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962) “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in the Rate and Direction of Resources for Invention.” Journal of Law and Economics.
19. Demsetz, Harold. (1969) “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint.” Journal of Law and Economics. 12, no. 1: 1-22.
20. Cooper, Mark and Gene Kimmelman “Reply Comments of Consumers Union and The Consumer Federation Of America” August 13, 2004 Before the Federal Communications Commission.
21. Hazlett, ThomasW. 2006. “Shedding Tiers for A-La-Carte? An Economic Analysis of Cable TV Pricing.” George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series.
22. “FCCMay Endorse Cable a la Carte In a Policy Shift,” Amy Schatz in Washington and Joe Flint in New York, The Wall Street Journal, November 29, 2005.
23. Sharer, F.M. and David Ross, 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 567-68.
24. Greer, Douglas F., 1992, Industrial Organization and Public Policy, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, p. 569.