Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 350-359

  Rose, Robert A ^a   Byler, Dirck ^b   Eastman, J Ron ^c   Fleishman, Erica ^d   Geller, Gary ^e   Goetz, Scott ^f   Guild, Liane ^g   Hamilton, Healy ^h   Hansen, Matt ⁱ   Headley, Rachel ^j,aa   Hewson, Jennifer ^k   Horning, Ned ^l   Kaplin, Beth A ^m   Laporte, Nadine ^f   Leidner, Allison ⁿ   Leimgruber, Peter ^o   Morisette, Jeffrey ^p   Musinsky, John ^q   Pintea, Lilian ^r   Prados, Ana ^s   Radeloff, Volker C ^t   Rowen, Mary ^u   Saatchi, Sassan ^e   Schill, Steve ^v   Tabor, Karyn ^k   Turner, Woody ^w   Vodacek, Anthony ^x   Vogelmann, James ^j   Wegmann, Martin ^y   Wilkie, David ^a   Wilson, Cara ^z   more..

^a WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY   (United States)

^b U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^c CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^f WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^g NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^h NATURESERVE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^j EARTH RESOURCES OBSERVATION AND SCIENCE EROS CENTER   (United States)

^k Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science and Oceans   (United States)

^l DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^m ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^o SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^p U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^q NATIONAL ECOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY NETWORK   (United States)

^r The Jane Goodall Institute   (United States)

^s UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^t UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^u UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^v THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^w Earth Science Division   (United States)

^x ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^y UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^z NOAA SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^aa BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Applied research; Biodiversidad; Biodiversity; Investigaci n aplicada; Marco de prioridad; Priority setting; Remote sensing; Teledetecci n

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPLIANCE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DATA SET; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EOS; PRIORITIZATION; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE MISSION;

ANIMALIA;

BIODIVERSITY; DEVICES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PROCEDURES; REMOTE SENSING;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84924673671     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12397     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alerstam, T., A. Hedenstrom, and S. Akesson . 2003. Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants. Oikos 103:247-260.
2. Asner, G. P., et al. 2010. High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:16738-16742.
3. Baker, A. C., P. W. Glynn, and B. Riegl . 2008. Climate change and coral reef bleaching: an ecological assessment of long-term impacts, recovery trends and future outlook. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 80:435-471.
4. Bohrer, G., D. Brandes, J. T. Mandel, K. L. Bildstein, T. A. Miller, M. Lanzone, T. Katzner, C. Maisonneuve, and J. A. Tremblay . 2012. Estimating updraft velocity components over large spatial scales: contrasting migration strategies of golden eagles and turkey vultures. Ecology Letters 15:96-103.
5. Busch, J., et al. 2013. Designing nature-based mitigation to promote multiple benefits. Carbon Management 4:129-133.
6. Cao, C., X. Xiong, A. Wu, and X. Wu . 2008. Assessing the consistency of AVHRR and MODIS L1B reflectance for generating fundamental climate data records. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 113:DOI: 10.1029/2007jd009363.
7. Chapin, F. S., III, et al. 2010. Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:241-249.
8. Davies, D. K., S. Ilavajhala, M. M. Wong, and C. O. Justice . 2009. Fire information for resource management system: archiving and distributing MODIS active fire data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47:72-79.
9. DeFries, R., K. K. Karanth, and S. Pareeth . 2010. Interactions between protected areas and their surroundings in human-dominated tropical landscapes. Biological Conservation 143:2870-2880.
10. Di Marco, M., G. M. Buchanan, Z. Szantoi, M. Holmgren, G. G. Marasini, D. Gross, S. Tranquilli, L. Boitani, and C. Rondinini . 2014. Drivers of extinction risk in African mammals: the interplay of distribution state, human pressure, conservation response and species biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 369:DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0198.
11. Duan, J., Y. H. Li, and J. Huang . 2013. An assessment of conservation effects in Shilin Karst of South China Karst. Environmental Earth Sciences 68:821-832.
12. Elith, J., and J. R. Leathwick . 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 40:677-697.
13. Entekhabi, D., et al. 2010. The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission. Proceedings of the IEEE 98:704-716.
14. Ferraro, P. J., and S. K. Pattanayak . 2006. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4:482-488.
15. Fleishman, E., et al. 2011. Top 40 priorities for science to inform US conservation and management policy. Bioscience 61:290-300.
16. Foley, J. A., et al. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337-342.
17. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2010. Technical guidelines for responsible fisheries. Number 5, Supplement 4. FAO, Rome.
18. Goetz, S. J., D. Steinberg, M. G. Betts, R. T. Holmes, P. J. Doran, R. Dubayah, and M. Hofton . 2010. Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a Neotropical migrant bird. Ecology 91:1569-1576.
19. Hansen, M. C., et al. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:850-853.
20. Hochberg, E. J. 2011. Remote sensing of coral reef processes. Pages 25-35 in Z. Dubinsky and N. Stambler, editors. Coral reefs: an ecosystem in transition. Springer, Netherlands.
21. Jack, B. K., C. Kousky, and K. R. E. Sims . 2008. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:9465-9470.
22. Jeltsch, F., et al. 2013. Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research-exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics. Movement Ecology 1:DOI: 10.1186/2051-3933-1181-1186.
23. Karnieli, A., Y. Bayarjargal, M. Bayasgalan, B. Mandakh, C. Dugarjav, J. Burgheimer, S. Khudulmur, S. N. Bazha, and P. D. Gunin . 2013. Do vegetation indices provide a reliable indication of vegetation degradation? A case study in the Mongolian pastures. International Journal of Remote Sensing 34:6243-6262.
24. Kasischke, E. S., et al. 2013. Impacts of disturbance on the terrestrial carbon budget of North America. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 118:303-316.
25. Katzner, T. E., D. Brandes, T. Miller, M. Lanzone, C. Maisonneuve, J. A. Tremblay, R. Mulvihill, and G. T. Merovich Jr. 2012. Topography drives migratory flight altitude of golden eagles: implications for on-shore wind energy development. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:1178-1186.
26. Kourti, N., I. Shepherd, H. Greidanus, M. Alvarez, E. Aresu, T. Bauna, J. Chesworth, G. Lemoine, and G. Schwartz . 2005. Integrating remote sensing in fisheries control. Fisheries Management and Ecology 12:295-307.
27. Madritch, M. D., C. C. Kingdon, A. Singh, K. E. Mock, R. L. Lindroth, and P. A. Townsend . 2014. Imaging spectroscopy links aspen genotype with below-ground processes at landscape scales. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 369:DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0194.
28. Mu, Q., M. Zhao, and S. W. Running . 2011. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sensing of Environment 115:1781-1800.
29. Mueller, T., et al. 2011. How landscape dynamics link individual- to population-level movement patterns: a multispecies comparison of ungulate relocation data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20:683-694.
30. Nagendra, H., R. Lucas, J. P. Honrado, R. H. G. Jongman, C. Tarantino, M. Adamo, and P. Mairota . 2013. Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats. Ecological Indicators 33:45-59.
31. National Research Council. 2007. Earth science and applications from space: national imperatives for the next decade and beyond. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
32. Pettorelli, N., W. F. Laurance, T. G. O'Brien, M. Wegmann, H. Nagendra, and W. Turner . 2014. Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Ecology: 51:839-848. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12261.
33. Ramankutty, N., A. T. Evan, C. Monfreda, and J. A. Foley . 2008. Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22:DOI: 10.1029/2007GB002952.
34. Ramankutty, N., and J. A. Foley . 1999. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13:997-1027.
35. Rodrigues, P., C. Aubrecht, A. Gil, T. Longcore, and C. Elvidge . 2012. Remote sensing to map influence of light pollution on Cory's shearwater in Sao Miguel Island, Azores Archipelago. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58:147-155.
36. Sieber, A., T. Kuemmerle, A. V. Prishchepov, K. J. Wendland, M. Baumann, V. C. Radeloff, L. M. Baskin, and P. Hostert . 2013. Landsat-based mapping of post-Soviet land-use change to assess the effectiveness of the Oksky and Mordovsky protected areas in European Russia. Remote Sensing of Environment 133:38-51.
37. Skole, D., and C. Tucker . 1993. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon-satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science 260:1905-1910.
38. Sutherland, W. J., et al. 2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:617-627.
39. Sutherland, W. J., et al. 2009. One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conservation Biology 23:557-567.
40. Townsend, P. A., A. Singh, J. R. Foster, N. J. Rehberg, C. C. Kingdon, K. N. Eshleman, and S. W. Seagle . 2012. A general Landsat model to predict canopy defoliation in broadleaf deciduous forests. Remote Sensing of Environment 119:255-265.
41. Turner, W., S. Spector, N. Gardiner, M. Fladeland, E. Sterling, and M. Steininger . 2003. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:306-314.
42. Urquiza-Haas, T., C. A. Peres, and P. M. Dolman . 2011. Large vertebrate responses to forest cover and hunting pressure in communal landholdings and protected areas of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Animal Conservation 14:271-282.
43. Wegmann, M., L. Santini, B. Leutner, K. Safi, D. Rocchini, M. Bevanda, H. Latifi, S. Dech, and C. Rondinini . 2014. Role of African protected areas in maintaining connectivity for large mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 369:DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0193.
44. Wilcove, D. S., and M. Wikelski . 2008. Going, going, gone: Is animal migration disappearing? PLoS Biology 6:1361-1364.
45. Willetts, E. 2008. Watershed payments for ecosystem services and climate change adaptation case study: Rrugezi Wwetlands, Rwanda. Page 93 in Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
46. Wunder, S., S. Engel, and S. Pagiola . 2008. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65:834-852.