Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport

Journal of Sports Sciences

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 641-653

  Filho, Edson ^a,b   Tenenbaum, Gershon ^b   Yang, Yanyun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cohesion; collective efficacy; nomological network; team dynamics; team mental models

Indexed keywords

ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCCER;

ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOCCER; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84924664773     PISSN: 02640414     EISSN: 1466447X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2014.957714     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arrow, H., Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73–105.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: WH Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt.
3. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1992). The nature of group goals in sport teams: A phenomenological analysis. The Sport Psychologist, 6, 323–333.
4. Cannon-Bowers, J., & Bowers, C. (2006). Applying work team results to sports teams: Opportunities and cautions. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 447–462.
5. Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71–88.
6. Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). Measurement of cohesion in sport and exercise. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
7. Carron, A. V., & Eys, M. A. (2012). Group dynamics in sport (4th ed.). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
8. Carron, A. V., & Hausenblas, H. A. (1998). Group dynamics in sport (2nd ed.). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
9. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266.
10. Chelladurai, P. (2007). Leadership in sports. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 113–135). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Coleman, J. (2011). A functional model of team leadership for sport (ProQuest dissertations and theses). The Florida State University, 136.
12. Cooke, N. J., Kiekel, P. A., Salas, E., Stout, R., Bowers, C., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2003). Measuring team knowledge: A window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 179–199.
13. Eccles, D. (2010). The coordination of labour in sports teams. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 154–170.
14. Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2007). A social-cognitive perspective on team functioning in sport. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 264–283). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Edmonds, W. A., Tenenbaum, G., Kamata, A., & Johnson, M. B. (2009). The role of collective efficacy in adventure racing teams. Small Group Research, 40, 163–180.
16. Eys, M. A., Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., & Brawley, L. R. (2007). Item wording and internal consistency of a measure of cohesion: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 395–402.
17. Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
18. Filho, E., Gershgoren, L., Basevitch, I., Schinke, R., & Tenenbaum, G. (2014). Peer leadership and shared mental models in a college volleyball team: A season long case study. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 8, 184–203.
19. Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., Cuevas, H. M., & Bowers, C. A. (2003). Distributed coordination space: Toward a theory of distributed team process and performance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4, 340–364.
20. Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20, 733–743.
21. Hershberger, S. L. (2006). The problem of equivalent structural models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 13–41). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
22. Heuzé, J., Sarrazin, P., Masiero, M., Raimbault, N., & Thomas, J. (2006). The relationships of perceived motivational climate to cohesion and collective efficacy in elite female teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 201–218.
23. Johnson, T. E., Lee, Y., Lee, M., O’Connor, D. L., Khalil, M. K., & Huang, X. (2007). Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: Design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Human Resource Development International, 10, 437–454.
24. Kamata, A., Tenenbaum, G., & Hanin, Y. L. (2002). Individual zone of optimal functioning (IZOF): A probabilistic estimation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 189–208.
25. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403–437.
26. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
27. Lausic, D., Tennebaum, G., Eccles, D., Jeong, A., & Johnson, T. (2009). Intrateam communication and performance in doubles tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 281–290.
28. Lirgg, C. D. (1991). Gender differences in self-confidence in physical activity: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 13, 294–310. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/618084666?accountid=4840
29. Little, B. L., & Madigan, R. M. (1997). The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517–534.
30. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.
31. Martens, R. (2004). Successful coaching (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
32. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283.
33. Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910.
34. Myers, N. D., Paiement, C. A., & Feltz, D. L. (2007). Regressing team performance on collective efficacy: Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 11, 1–24.
35. Myers, N. D., Payment, C. A., & Feltz, D. L. (2004). Reciprocal relationships between collective efficacy and team performance in women’s ice hockey. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 182–195.
36. Peterson, E., Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., & Burr, R. (2000). Collective efficacy and aspects of shared mental models as predictors of performance over time in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 296–316.
37. Salas, E., & Klein, G. (2001). Expertise and naturalistic decision making: An overview. In E. Salas & G. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 3–8). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555–599.
39. Schutz, R. W., Eom, H. J., Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (1994). Examination of the factorial validity of the group environment questionnaire. Research Quarterly For Exercise & Sport, 65, 226–236.
40. Short, S. E., Sullivan, P., & Feltz, D. L. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9, 181–202.
41. Stapleton, L. M. (2006). Using multilevel structural equation modeling techniques with complex sample data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 345–383). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
42. Stumpf, S. A., Doh, J. P., Tymon, W., Budhwar, P., & Varma, A. (2010). The strength of HR practices in India and their effects on employee career success, performance, and potential. Human Resource Management, 49, 353–375.
43. Tenenbaum, G., Eklund, R., & Kamata, A. (2012). Measurement in sport and exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
44. Ward, P., & Eccles, D. W. (2006). A commentary on “team cognition and expert teams: Emerging insights into performance for exceptional teams”. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 463–483.
45. Watkins, M. J. (1984). Models as toothbrushes. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 7, 86.
46. Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 305–328). New York, NY: Plenum.