Genotype by environment interaction in the southern Swedish breeding population of Picea abies using new climatic indices

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 112-121

  Berlin, Mats ^a   Jansson, Gunnar ^a   Högberg, Karl Anders ^a  

^a THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

G E; late spring frost; Norway spruce; site site genetic correlations

Indexed keywords

FROST EFFECTS; LINEAR REGRESSION; PLANTS (BOTANY); SPRINGS (COMPONENTS);

BREEDING POPULATIONS; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENOTYPE-BY-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; LATE SPRING FROST; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; NORWAY SPRUCE; PICEA ABIES (L.) KARST;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

PICEA ABIES;

EID: 84924612487     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2014.978889     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Almqvist C, Karlsson B, Wennström U. 2010. Improved forest regeneration material 2010–2050. Supply and needs, and measures to minimize shortage and maximize genetic gain [Förädlat skogsodlingsmaterial 2010–2050. Tillgång och behov samt förslag på åtgärder för att minimera brist och maximera genetisk vinst]. Skogforsk Redogörelse nr 3. Uppsala: Skogforsk. Swedish with English summary.
2. Ångström A. 1974. Sveriges klimat [The Swedish climate]. Stockholm: Generalstabens litografiska anstalts förlag.
3. Bentzer BG, Foster GS, Hellberg AR, Podzorski AC. 1988. Genotype × environment interaction in Norway spruce involving three levels of genetic control: seed source, clone mixture, and clone. Can J For Res. 18:1172–1181. 10.1139/x88-180
4. Beuker E. 1994. Adaptation to climatic changes of the timing of bud burst in populations of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. Tree Physiol. 14:961–970. 10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.961
5. Danell Ö. 1993. Breeding programmes in Sweden. Corrected reprint from: Lee SJ, editor. Progeny testing and breeding strategies, Proceedings of the Nordic group of tree breeding, October1993, 184 pp. Uppsala: Skogforsk, Edinburgh Forestry Commission; p. 1–25.
6. Dietrichson J. 1977. Proveniensforsøk med Gran i Danmark, Finland, Sverige och Norge [Norway spruce provenance trials in Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway]. Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning, Avd. for planteforedling. Ås: Norge; 24 p. Norwegian.
7. EURO4M. 2013. European reanalysis and observations for monitoring; [cited 2013 Dec 16]. Available from: http://www.euro4m.eu/
8. Falconer DS. 1952. The problem on environment and selection. Am Nat. 86:293–298. 10.1086/281736
9. Fries M. 1948. Limes norrlandicus-studier. En växtgeografisk gränsfråga historisk belyst och exemplifierad [Studies of Limes norrlandicus. A growth-geographic issue illustrated and examplified]. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 42:51–69. Swedish.
10. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R. 2009. ASReml user guide. 3rd ed. Hemel Hempstead: VSN.
11. Hannerz M. 1994. Predicting the risk of frost occurrence after budburst of Norway spruce. Silva Fenn. 28:243–249. 10.14214/sf.a9175
12. Hannerz M. 1999. Evaluation of temperature models for predicting bud burst in Norway spruce. Can J For Res. 29:9–19. 10.1139/x98-175
13. Hannerz M, Sonesson J, Ekberg I. 1999. Genetic correlations between growth and growth rythm observed in a short-term test and performance in long-term field trials of Norway spruce. Can J For Res. 29:768–778. 10.1139/x99-056
14. Hannrup B, Jansson G, Danell Ö. 2008. Genotype by environment interaction in Pinus Sylvestris L. in Southern Sweden. Silvae Genetica. 57:306–311.
15. Henderson CR. 1984. Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Guelph: University of Guelph.
16. Hodge GR, White TL. 1992. Genetic parameter estimates for growth traits at different ages in slash pine and some implications for breeding. Silvae Genetica. 41:252–262.
17. Högberg K-A, Dutkowski GW. 2010. Genetic correlations among field trials of Norway spruce clones representing different propagations cycles. Silvae Genetica. 59:182–189
18. Jönsson AM, Bärring L. 2004. Climate change and the effect of temperature backlashes causing frost damage in Picea abies. Glob Planet Change. 44:195–207.
19. Jönsson AM, Bärring L. 2011. Ensemble analysis of frost damage on vegetation caused by spring backlashes in a warmer Europe. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci. 11:401–411.
20. Karlsson B, Högberg KA. 1998. Genotypic parameters and clone × site interaction in clone tests of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). For Genet. 47:208–214.
21. Karlsson B, Rosvall O. 1993. Norway spruce. Corrected reprint from: Lee SJ, editor. Breeding programmes in Sweden. Progeny testing and breeding strategies, Proceedings of the Nordic group of tree breeding, October1993, 184 pp. Uppsala: Skogforsk, Edinburgh Forestry Commission; p. 1–25.
22. Karlsson B, Wellendorf H, Roulund H, Werner M. 2001. Genotype × trial interaction and stability across sites in combined provenance and clone experiments with Picea abies in Denmark and Sweden. Can J For Res. 31:1826–1836. 10.1139/cjfr-31-10-1826
23. Kroon J, Ericsson T, Jansson G, Andersson B. 2011. Patterns of genetic parameters for height in field genetic tests of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden. Tree Genet Genomes. 7:1099–1111. 10.1007/s11295-011-0398-y
24. Kroon J, Rosvall O. 2004. Optimal produktion vid nordförflyttning av gran i norra Sverige [Optimal production for northward transfer of Norway spruce in northern Sweden]. Redogörelse nr 5. Uppsala: Skogforsk; 24 p. Swedish.
25. Langvall O. 2011. Impact of climate change, seedling type and provenance on the risk of damage to Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings in Sweden due to early summer frosts. Scand J For Res. 26:56–63. 10.1080/02827581.2011.564399
26. Morén AS, Perttu KL. 1994. Regional temperature and radiation indices and their adjustment to horizontal and inclined forest land. Stud For Suec. 194:19.
27. Mulder HA, Veerkamp RF, Ducro BJ, van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P. 2006. Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for different environments with genotype by environment interaction. J Dairy Sci. 89:1740–1752. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72242-1
28. Pachauri RK, Reisinger A. 2007. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.
29. Persson A, Persson B. 1992. Survival, growth and quality of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) provenances at the three Swedish sites of the IUFRO 1964/68 provenance experiment. Report 29. Garpenberg: Department of Forest Yield Research. The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 67 p.
30. Prescher F. 1982. Growth rhythm and growth ability in Norway spruce provenances. Report No. 10. Garpenberg: Department of Forest Yield Research, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 58 p. Swedish with English summary.
31. Raymond CA. 2011. Genotype by environment interactions for Pinus radiata in New South Wales, Australia. Tree Genet Genomes. 7:819–833. 10.1007/s11295-011-0376-4
32. Rosvall O. 2003. Zon- och ägarvisa plantagearealer för tredje omgången fröplantager i Sverige [Third round of seed orchards in Sweden divided by seed zones and owners]. Arbetsrapport Nr 549. Uppsala: Skogforsk; 42 p. Swedish.
33. Rosvall O, Ericsson T. 1981. Förflyttningseffekter i norrländska granproveniensförsök. [Transfer effects of Picea abies in northern Sweden]. Föreningen skogsträdsförädling, Institutet för skogsförbättring. Uppsala: Årsbok; p. 85–117. Swedish with English summary.
34. SAS Institute Inc. 2011. SAS/STAT user's guide 9.3. Cary (NC): SAS Institute.
35. Shelbourne CJA. 1972. Genotype-environment interaction: its study and its implications in forest tree improvement. Proc IUFRO Genet SABARAO Joint Symp Tokyo. B-1:1–28.
36. Skrøppa T. 1984. A critical evaluation of methods available to estimate the genotype × environment interaction. In proceedings from a conference on genotype × environment interaction, 23–27 August 1982, Uppsala, Sweden. Stud For Suec. 166:3–14.
37. Werner M, Karlsson B. 1982. Resultat från 1969 års granproveniensserie i Syd- och Mellansverige [Results from a series of Norway spruce provenance trials within southern and central Sweden, established in 1969]. Föreningen skogsträdsförädling, Institutet för skogsförbättring. Uppsala: Årsbok; p. 90–158. Swedish with English summary.