Fidelity of implementation to a care team redesign and improved outcomes of diabetes care

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 60-66

  Grace, Sherry M ^a   Rich, Jeremy ^b   Chin, William ^c   Rodriguez, Hector P ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HealthCare Partners Institute for Applied Research and Education   (United States)

^c HealthCare Partners Medical Group   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes care; Fidelity of implementation; Patient outcomes; Practice redesign; Primary care teams

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; FIDELITY OF IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTERED NURSE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; CHOLESTEROL, LDL; COMMUNICATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; LOS ANGELES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924599071     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu088     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:263-300.
2. Markova T, Mateo M, Roth LM. Implementing teams in a patient-centered medical home residency practice: lessons learned. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:224-31.
3. Green LV, Savin S, Lu Y. Primary care physician shortages could be eliminated through use of teams, nonphysicians, and electronic communication. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2013;32:11-9.
4. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 2000;320:569-72.
5. Chen EH, Thom DH, Hessler DM et al. Using the Teamlet model to improve chronic care in an academic primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25 (Suppl. 4):S610-4.
6. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1821-33.
7. Roblin DW, Vogt TM, Fireman B. Primary health care teams. Opportunities and challenges in evaluation of service delivery innovations. J Ambul Care Manage 2003;26:22-35; discussion 6-8.
8. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA 2004;291:1246-51.
9. Mickan SM, Rodger SA. Effective health care teams: a model of six characteristics developed from shared perceptions. J Interprof Care 2005;19:358-70.
10. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S et al. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Sci 2007;2:40.
11. Keith RE, Hopp FP, Subramanian U et al. Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure. Implementation Sci 2010;5:99.
12. Castro F, Barrera M Jr, Martinez C Jr. The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prev Sci 2004; 5:41-5.
13. Hasson H. Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Sci 2010;5:67.
14. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P et al. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:119-27.
15. Hoff T, Weller W, Depuccio M. The patient-centered medical home:a review of recent research. Med Care Res Rev 2012;69:619-44.
16. Wagner EH, Coleman K, Reid RJ et al. The changes involved in patient-centered medical home transformation. Prim Care 2012;39:241-59.
17. Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL et al. Primary care practice transformation is hard work: insights from a 15-year developmental program of research. Med Care 2011;49 (Suppl):S28-35.
18. Fixsen DL, Blase KA, Naoom SF et al. Core implementation components. Res Soc Work Pract 2009;19:531-40.
19. Grace SM, Rich J, Chin W et al. Flexible implementation and integration of new team members to support patient-centered care. Healthcare 2014;2:145-51.
20. Hasson H, Blomberg S, Duner A. Fidelity and moderating factors in complex interventions: a case study of a continuum of care program for frail elderly people in health and social care. Implementation Sci 2012;7:23.
21. Palinkas L, Aarons G, Horwitz S et al. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 2011;38:44-53.
22. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd edn. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
23. Wise CG, Alexander JA, Green LA et al. Journey toward a patient-centered medical home: readiness for change in primary care practices. Milbank Q 2011;89:399-424.
24. Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T et al. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage 2008;34:410-76.
25. Assurance NCfQ. Disease Management: Technical Specification. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2011.
26. Dedoose Version 5.0.11, web application for managing, analyzing, presenting qualitative and mixed method research data, 2014. Los Angeles, CA:SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC (www.dedoose.com).
27. Martino SC, Weinick RM, Kanouse DE et al. Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS data by race/ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res 2013;48 (2 Pt 1):417-34.
28. Nesto RW. LDL cholesterol lowering in type 2 diabetes: what is the optimum approach? Clin Diabetes 2008;26:8-13.
29. Ansell BJ, Watson KE, Fogelman AM. An evidence-based assessment of the ncep adult treatment panel ii guidelines. JAMA 1999;282:2051-7.
30. Zaslavsky AM, Hochheimer JN, Schneider EC et al. Impact of sociodemographic case mix on the HEDIS measures of health plan quality. Med Care 2000;38:981-92.