The effect of direct and indirect monitoring on generosity among preschoolers

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Fujii, Takayuki ^a   Takagishi, Haruto ^a   Koizumi, Michiko ^b   Okada, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a TAMAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FUKUI   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84924565513     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09025     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fehr, E. Human behaviour: don't lose your reputation. Nature 432, 449-450 (2004).
2. Izuma, K., Saito, D. N. & Sadato, N. Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 621-631 (2010).
3. Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B. & Kerekes, Z. Public charity offer as a proximate factor of evolved reputation-building strategy: an experimental analysis of a real-life situation. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 277-284 (2007).
4. Bateson,M., Nettle, D. & Roberts, G. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol. Lett. 2, 412-414 (2006).
5. Haley, K. J. & Fessler, D. M. T. Nobody's watching? subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 245-256 (2005).
6. Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H. & Yamagishi, T. Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31, 109-117 (2010).
7. Oda, R., Niwa, Y., Honma, A. & Hiraishi, K. An eye-like painting enhances the expectation of a good reputation. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32, 166-171 (2011).
8. Nettle, D. et al. The watching eyes effect in the dictator game: it's not how much you give, it's being seen to give something. Evol. Hum. Behav. 34, 35-40 (2013).
9. Rigdon, M., Ishii, K., Watabe, M. & Kitayama, S. Minimal social cues in the dictator game. J. Econ. Psychol. 30, 358-367 (2009).
10. Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E. & Tomasello, M. Five-year olds, but not chimpanzees, attempt to manage their reputations. PLoS One 7, e48433 (2012).
11. Engelmann, J. M., Over, H., Herrmann, E. & Tomasello, M. Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Dev. Sci. 16, 952-958 (2013).
12. Houser, D., Montinari, N. & Piovesan, M. Private and public decisions in social dilemmas: evidence from children's behavior. PLoS One 7, e41568 (2012).
13. Leimgruber, K. L., Shaw, A., Santos, L. R. & Olson, K. R. Young children are more generous when others are aware of their actions. PLoS One 7, e48292 (2012).
14. Amodio, D. M. & Frith, C. D. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268-277 (2006).
15. Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. The self and its reputation in autism. Neuron 57, 331-332 (2008).
16. Banerjee, R. Audience effects on self-presentation in childhood. Soc. Dev. 11, 487-507 (2002).
17. Perner, J. & Wimmer, H. "John thinks that Mary thinks that..." attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 39, 437-471 (1985).
18. Sullivan, K., Aitchik, D. & Tager-Flusberg, H. Preschoolers can attribute secondorder beliefs. Dev. Psychol. 30, 395-402 (1994).
19. Coull, G. J., Leekam, S. R. & Bennett, M. Simplifying second-order belief attribution: what facilitates children's performance on measures of conceptual understanding? Soc. Dev. 15, 548-563 (2006).
20. Takagishi, H., Kameshima, S., Schug, J., Koizumi, M. & Yamagishi, T. Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 105, 130-137 (2010).
21. Takagishi, H. et al. The role of cognitive and emotional perspective taking in economic decision making in the ultimatum game. PLoS One 9, e108462 (2014).
22. Fehr, E. & Schneider, F. Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity? Proc. Biol. Sci. 277, 1315-1323 (2010).
23. Ekström, M. Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment. Exp Econ 15, 530-546 (2012).
24. Raihani, N. J. & Bshary, R. A positive effect of flowers rather than eye images in a large-scale, cross-cultural dictator game. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 3556-3564 (2012).
25. Carbon, C.-C. & Hesslinger, V. M. Bateson et al.'s (2006) cues-of-being-watched paradigm revisited. Swiss. J. Psychol. 70, 203-210 (2011).
26. Sparks, A. & Barclay, P. Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: the limited effect of a false cue. Evol. Hum. Behav. 34, 317-322 (2013).
27. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. & Frith, U. Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition 21, 37-46 (1985).