Method for automatic adjustment of an insulin bolus calculator: In silico robustness evaluation under intra-day variability

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-8

  Herrero, Pau ^a   Pesl, Peter ^a   Bondia, Jorge ^b   Reddy, Monika ^c   Oliver, Nick ^c   Georgiou, Pantelis ^a   Toumazou, Christofer ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support; Diabetes management; Glycaemic control; Insulin dosing

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INSULIN; MATHEMATICAL INSTRUMENTS; STATISTICS;

AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING; DECISION SUPPORT SOFTWARE; DIABETES MANAGEMENT; ROBUSTNESS EVALUATION; STANDARD DEVIATION; TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS;

GLUCOSE;

GLUCOSE; INSULIN; ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; COMPUTER MODEL; DRUG DOSE CALCULATOR; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN BOLUS CALCULATOR; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE INDEX; METABOLIC PARAMETERS; PERCENTAGE TIME IN HYPERGLYCEMIA; PERCENTAGE TIME IN HYPOGLYCEMIA; RISK INDEX; VIRTUAL REALITY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOLOGY; BLOOD; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; EVALUATION STUDY; INSULIN INFUSION; POSTPRANDIAL STATE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INSULIN; INSULIN INFUSION SYSTEMS; POSTPRANDIAL PERIOD; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84924550819     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Schiffrin A., Belmonte M. Multiple daily self-glucose monitoring: its essential role in long-term glucose control in insulin-dependent diabetic patients treated with pump and multiple subcutaneous injections. Diabetes Care 1982, 5(5):479-484.
2. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 329:977-986.
3. Holt R.I., Cockram C., Flyvbjerg A., Goldstein B.J. Textbook of Diabetes 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, East Sussex, UK.
4. Klonoff D.C. The current status of bolus calculator decision-support software. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6(5):990.
5. Schmidt S., Nørgaard K. Bolus calculators. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014, 1035-1041. (ahead of print).
6. Zisser H., Wagner R., Pleus S., Haug C., Jendrike N., Parkin C., Schweitzer M., Freckmann G. Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparison. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2010, 12(12):955-961.
7. Sussman A., Taylor E.J., Patel M., Ward J., Alva S., Lawrence A., Ng R. Performance of a glucose meter with a built-in automated bolus calculator versus manual bolus calculation in insulin-using subjects. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6(2):339-344.
8. Garg S.K., Bookout T.R., McFann K.K., Kelly W.C., Beatson C., Ellis S.L., Gutin R.S., Gottlieb P.A. Improved glycemic control in intensively treated adult subjects with Type 1 diabetes using insulin guidance software. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2008, 10(5):369-375.
9. IVoluntis Voluntis Insulin Therapy Manager Receives CE Mark 2013, (online; accessed 22.09.14). http://www.voluntis.com/en/news/275-voluntisinsulin-therapy-manager-receives-ce-mark.html.
10. Gross T.M., Kayne D., King A., Rother C., Juth S. A bolus calculator is an effective means of controlling postprandial glycemia in patients on insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2003, 5(3):365-369.
11. Shashaj B., Busetto E., Sulli N. Benefits of a bolus calculator in pre- and postprandial glycaemic control and meal flexibility of paediatric patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Diabet. Med. 2008, 25(9):1036-1042.
12. Lepore G., Dodesini A.R., Nosari I., Scaranna C., Corsi A., Trevisan R. Bolus calculator improves long-term metabolic control and reduces glucose variability in pump-treated patients with Type 1 diabetes. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovas. Dis. 2012, 22(8):e15-e16.
13. Barnard K., Parkin C., Young A., Ashraf M. Use of an automated bolus calculator reduces fear of hypoglycemia and improves confidence in dosage accuracy in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with multiple daily insulin injections. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6(1):144-149.
14. Palerm C.C., Zisser H., Bevier W.C., Jovanovič L., Doyle F.J. Prandial insulin dosing using run-to-run control application of clinical data and medical expertise to define a suitable performance metric. Diabetes Care 2007, 30(5):1131-1136.
15. Bondia J., Dassau E., Zisser H., Calm R., Vehí Josep, Jovanovič L., Doyle F.J. Coordinated basal-bolus infusion for tighter postprandial glucose control in insulin pump therapy. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2009, 3(1):89-97.
16. Bergenstal R.M., Bashan E., McShane M., Johnson M., Hodish I. Can a tool that automates insulin titration be a key to diabetes management?. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2012, 14(8):675-682.
17. Liu S.W., Huang H.P., Lin C.H., Chien I.L. Fuzzy-logic-based supervisor of insulin bolus delivery for patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52(4):1678-1690.
18. Schwartz F.L., Marling C.R. Use of automated bolus calculators for diabetes management. Eur. Endocrinol. 2013, 9(2).
19. Langendam M., Luijf Y.M., Hooft L., DeVries J.H., Mudde A.H., Scholten R.J. Continuous glucose monitoring systems for Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 1.
20. Zisser H., Robinson L., Bevier W., Dassau E., Ellingsen C., Doyle F.J., Jovanovič L. Bolus calculator: a review of four 'smart' insulin pumps. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2008, 10(6):441-444.
21. Herrero P., Pesl P., Reddy M., Oliver N., Georgiou P., Toumazou C. Advanced insulin bolus advisor based on run-to-run control and case-based reasoning. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 2014, (ahead of print).
22. Walsh J., Roberts R., Bailey T. Guidelines for optimal bolus calculator settings in adults. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2011, 5(1):129-135.
23. Kovatchev B.P., Breton M., Dalla-Man C., Cobelli C. In silico preclinical trials: a proof of concept in closed-loop control of Type 1 diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2009, 3(1):44-55.
24. Brazeau A.S., Mircescu H., Desjardins K., Leroux C., Strychar I., Ekoé J.M., Rabasa-Lhoret R. Carbohydrate counting accuracy and blood glucose variability in adults with Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2013, 99(1):19-23.
25. Scheiner G., Boyer Bret A. Characteristics of basal insulin requirements by age and gender in type-1 diabetes patients using insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2005, 69(1):14-21.
26. Magni L., Forgione M., Toffanin C., Dalla-Man C., Kovatchev B., De-Nicolao G., Cobelli C. Run-to-run tuning of model predictive control for Type 1 diabetes subjects: in silico trial. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2009, 3(5):1091-1098.
27. Dalla-Man C., Rizza R.A., Cobelli C. Meal simulation model of the glucose-insulin system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 54(10):1740-1749.
28. Russell S.J., El-Khatib F.H., Sinha M., Magyar K.L., McKeon K., Goergen L.G., Balliro C., Hillard M.A., David M., Nathan E.R., Damiano Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in Type 1 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371(4):313-325.
29. Haidar A., Elleri D., Kumareswaran K., Leelarathna L., Allen J.M., Caldwell K., Murphy H.R., Wilinska M.E., Acerini C.L., Evans M.L., et al. Pharmacokinetics of insulin as part in pump-treated subjects with Type 1 diabetes: reproducibility and effect of age, weight, and duration of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013, 36(10):e173-e174.
30. Freckmann G., Baumstark C., Schmid A., Pleus S., Link M., Haug C. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2014, 16(2):113-122.
31. Kowalski A.J. Can we really close the loop and how soon? accelerating the availability of an artificial pancreas: a roadmap to better diabetes outcomes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2009, 11(S1):S-113.
32. Barnard K.D., Hood K.K., Weissberg-Benchell J., Aldred C., Oliver N., Laffel L. Psychosocial assessment of artificial pancreas (ap): Commentary and review of existing measures and their applicability in AP research. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2014, (Epub ahead of print).