Towards a simplified dynamic wake model using POD analysis

Energies

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 895-920

  Bastine, David ^a   Witha, Björn ^a   Wächter, Matthias ^a   Peinke, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actuator disk; Dynamic wake; Large eddy simulations (LES); Loads; Meandering; Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD); Reduced order model; Wake; Wake model

Indexed keywords

ACTUATOR DISKS; ACTUATORS; ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER; BOUNDARY LAYERS; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; DECOMPOSITION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); LOADING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; WAKES; WIND TURBINES;

MEANDERING; MODAL DECOMPOSITION; OPTIMAL CHOICE; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITIONS; REDUCED ORDER MODELS; SPECIFIC PROPERTIES; WAKE MODEL; WIND TURBINE WAKES;

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

EID: 84924515283     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19961073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/en8020895     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barthelmie, R.J.; Pryor, S.C.; Frandsen, S.T.; Hansen, K.S.; Schepers, J.G.; Rados, K.; Schlez, W.; Neubert, A.; Jensen, L.E.; Neckelmann, S. Quantifying the impact of wind turbine wakes on power output at offshore wind farms. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2010, 27, 1302-1317.
2. Goit, J.P.; Meyers, J. Analysis of turbulent flow properties and energy fluxes in optimally controlled wind-farm boundary layers. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 524, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012178.
3. Storey, R.C.; Norris, S.E.; Cater, J.E. Modelling turbine loads during an extreme coherent gust using large eddy simulation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 524, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012177.
4. Medici, D. Experimental Studies of Wind Turbine Wakes: Power Optimisation and Meandering. Ph.D. Thesis, KTH Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.
5. Jimenez, A.; Crespo, A.; Migoya, E. Application of a LES technique to characterize the wake deflection of a wind turbine in yaw. Wind Energy 2010, 13, 559-572.
6. Fleming, P.A.; Gebraad, P.M.O.; Lee, S.; van Wingerden, J.W.; Johnson, K.; Churchfield, M.; Michalakes, J.; Spalart, P.; Moriarty, P. Evaluating techniques for redirecting turbine wakes using SOWFA. Renew. Energy 2014, 70, 211-218.
7. Pope, S.B. Turbulent Flows; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000.
8. Jimenez, A.; Crespo, A.; Migoya, E.; Garcia, J. Advances in large-eddy simulation of a wind turbine wake. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2007, 75, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012041.
9. Calaf, M.; Meneveau, C.; Meyers, J. Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 2010, 22, doi:10.1063/1.3291077.
10. Porté-Agel, F.; Wu, Y.T.; Lu, H.; Conzemius, R.J. Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flow through wind turbines and wind farms. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2011, 99, 154-168.
11. Witha, B.; Steinfeld, G.; Heinemann, D. High-resolution offshore wake simulations with the LES model PALM. In Wind Energy-Impact of Turbulence; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 175-181.
12. Jensen, N.O. A Note on Wind Generator Interaction; Risø-M-2411; Riso National Laboratory: Roskilde, Denmark, 1983.
13. Ainslie, J.F. Calculating the flowfield in the wake of wind turbines. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1988, 27, 213-224.
14. Larsen, G.C. A Simple Wake Calculation Procedure; Riso National Laboratory: Roskilde, Denmark, 1988.
15. Frandsen, S. Turbulence and Turbulence Generated Fatigue in Wind Turbine Clusters; Riso Report R-1188; Riso National Laboratory: Roskilde, Denmark, 2003.
16. Frandsen, S.; Barthelmie, R.; Pryor, S.; Rathmann, O.; Larsen, S.; Hojstrup, J.; Thogersen, M. Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 2006, 9, 39-53.
17. Schmidt, J.; Stoevesandt, B. Wind farm layout optimisation using wakes from computational fluid dynamics simulations. In Proceedings of the EWEA Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 10-13 March 2014.
18. Larsen, G.C.; Madsen Aagaard, H.; Bingöl, F.; Mann, J.; Ott, S.; Sørensen, J.N.; Okulov, V.; Troldborg, N.; Nielsen, N.M.; Thomsen, K. Dynamic Wake Meandering Modeling; Riso National Laboratory: Roskilde, Denmark, 2007.
19. Larsen, G.C.; Madsen, H.A.; Thomsen, K.; Larsen, T.J. Wake meandering: A pragmatic approach. Wind Energy 2008, 11, 377-395.
20. Trujillo, J.J.; Bingol, F.; Larsen, G.C.; Mann, J.; Kuehn, M. Light detection and ranging measurements of wake dynamics. Part II: Two-dimensional scanning. Wind Energy 2011, 14, 61-75.
21. España, G.; Aubrun, S.; Loyer, S.; Devinant, P. Wind tunnel study of the wake meandering downstream of a modelled wind turbine as an effect of large scale turbulent eddies. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2012, 101, 24-33.
22. Thomsen, K.; Madsen, H.A. A new simulation method for turbines in wake-Applied to extreme response during operation. Wind Energy 2005, 8, 35-47.
23. Thomsen, K.; Madsen, H.A.; Larsen, G.C.; Larsen, T.J. Comparison of methods for load simulation for wind turbines operating in wake. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2007, 75, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012072.
24. Andersen, S.J.; Sorensen, J.N.; Mikkelsen, R. Simulation of the inherent turbulence and wake interaction inside an infinitely long row of wind turbines. J. Turbul. 2013, 14, 1-24.
25. Berkooz, G.; Holmes, P.; Lumley, J.L. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1993, 25, 539-575.
26. Citriniti, J.; George, W. Reconstruction of the global velocity field in the axisymmetric mixing layer utilizing the proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 2000, 418, 137-166.
27. Jung, D.; Gamard, S.; George, W.K. Downstream evolution of the most energetic modes in a turbulent axisymmetric jet at high Reynolds number. Part 1. The near-field region. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 514, 173-204.
28. Iqbal, M.O.; Thomas, F.O. Coherent structure in a turbulent jet via a vector implementation of the proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 2007, 571, 281-326.
29. Tutkun, M.; Johansson, P.V.; George, W.K. Three-component vectorial proper orthogonal decomposition of axisymmetric wake behind a disk. AIAA J. 2008, 46, 1118-1134.
30. Delville, J.; Ukeiley, L.; Cordier, L.; Bonnet, J.P.; Glauser, M. Examination of large-scale structures in a turbulent plane mixing layer. Part 1. Proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 1999, 391, 91-122.
31. Bergmann, M.; Cordier, L.; Brancher, J.P. Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model. Phys. Fluids 2005, 17, doi:10.1063/1.2033624.
32. Cordier, L.; Noack, B.R.; Tissot, G.; Lehnasch, G.; Delville, J.; Balajewicz, M.; Daviller, G.; Niven, R.K. Identification strategies for model-based control. Exp. Fluids 2013, 54, 1-21.
33. Andersen, S.J.; Sørensen, J.N.; Mikkelsen, R. Reduced order model of the inherent turbulent flow of wind turbine wakes inside an infinitely long row of turbines. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 555, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012005.
34. Kantz, H.; Schreiber, T. Nonlinear Time Series Analysis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004; Volume 7.
35. Argyris, J.H.; Faust, G.; Friedrich, R.; Haase, M. An Exploration of Dynamical Systems and Chaos; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015.
36. Kleinhans, D.; Friedrich, R. Quantitative estimation of drift and diffusion functions from time series data. In Wind Energy; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 129-133.
37. Friedrich, R.; Peinke, J.; Sahimi, M.; Reza Rahimi Tabar, M. Approaching complexity by stochastic methods: From biological systems to turbulence. Phys. Rep. 2011, 506, 87-162.
38. Milan, P.; Wächter, M.; Peinke, J. Stochastic modeling and performance monitoring of wind farm power production. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2014, 6, doi:10.1063/1.4880235.
39. Bastine, D.; Witha, B.; Wächter, M.; Peinke, J. POD analysis of a wind turbine wake in a turbulent atmospheric boundary layer. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 524, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012153.
40. Saranyasoontorn, K.; Manuel, L. Low-dimensional representations of inflow turbulence and wind turbine response using proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005, 127, 553-562.
41. Saranyasoontorn, K.; Manuel, L. Symmetry considerations when using proper orthogonal decomposition for predicting wind turbine yaw loads. J. Sol. Energy Eng.-Trans. ASME 2006, 128, 574-579.
42. Raasch, S.; Schröter, M. PALM-A large-eddy simulation model performing on massively parallel computers. Meteorol. Z. 2001, 10, 363-372.
43. Maronga, B.; Gryschka, M.; Heinze, R.; Hoffmann, F.; Kanani-Sühring, F.; Keck, M.; Ketelsen, K.; Letzel, M.O.; Sühring, M.; Raasch, S. The Parallelized Large-Eddy Simulation Model (PALM) version 4.0 for atmospheric and oceanic flows: Model formulation, recent developments and future perspectives. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 2014, submitted.
44. Deardorff, J. Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 1980, 18, 495-527.
45. Wu, Y.T.; Porté-Agel, F. Large-Eddy simulation of wind-turbine wakes: Evaluation of turbine parametrisations. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2011, 138, 345-366.
46. Kataoka, H.; Mizuno, M. Numerical flow computation around aeroelastic 3 D square cylinder using inflow turbulence. Wind Struct. Int. J. 2002, 5, 379-392.
47. Witha, B.; Steinfeld, G.; Dörenkämper, M.; Heinemann, D. Large-eddy simulation of multiple wakes in offshore wind farms. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 555, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012108.
48. Moeng, C.H.; Sullivan, P.P. A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. J. Atmos. Sci. 1994, 51, 999-1022.
49. España, G.; Aubrun, S.; Loyer, S.; Devinant, P. Spatial study of the wake meandering using modelled wind turbines in a wind tunnel. Wind Energy 2011, 14, 923-937.
50. Mann, J. Wind field simulation. Probab. Eng. Mech. 1998, 13, 269-282.
51. Muller, Y.A.; Aubrun, S.; Loyer, S.; Masson, C.; Orléans, F. Time resolved tracking of the far wake meandering of a wind turbine model in wind tunnel conditions. In Proceedings of the EWEA Conference, Vienna, Austria, 4-7 February 2013.