French: A linguistic introduction

French: A Linguistic Introduction

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-337

  Fagyal, Zsuzsanna ^a   Kibbee, Douglas ^a   Jenkins, Fred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924455168     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511791185     Document Type: Book

References (335)

1. Academie Francaise (1704) Observations de l‘Academie Frangoise sur les remarques de M. de Vaugelas, Paris: Jean-Baptiste Coignard.
2. Aebischer, Paul (ed.) (1965) Le Voyage de Charlemagne a Jerusalem et a Constantinople, Geneve: Droz.
3. Agren, John (1973) Etude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le frangais de la conversation radiophonique: Frequences etfacteurs, Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.
4. Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard A., Farmer, Ann K., and Harnish, Robert M. (1997) ‘Pragmatics: The Study of Language Use and Communication’, in Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. London, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, pp. 343-393.
5. Alaoui, Khalid (2003) ‘Petite histoire de la neologie: Approche conceptuelle et ideologique (XVIe-XIXe siecle)’, in Jean-Francois Sablayrolles (ed.) L'innovation lexicale, Paris: Honore Champion, pp. 149-180.
6. Aleong, S. (1984) ‘Naissance et diffusion du suffixe (o)thon dans le lexique quebecois’, Cahiers de Lexicologie 45: Pp. 130-138.
7. Anzorge, Isabelle (1995) ‘La variante topolectale. Problemes poses dans le cadre exolingue du Togo’, in Michel Francard and Daniele Latin (eds.), Le regionalisme lexical, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, pp. 101-109.
8. Armstrong, Nigel (2001) Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Armstrong, Nigel and Jamin, Michael (2002) ‘Le francais des banlieues: Uniformity and discontinuity in the French of the Hexagon’, in K. Salhi (ed.), French in and out of France: Language Policies, Intercultural Antagonisms and Dialogues, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 107-136.
10. Armstrong, Nigel and Smith, Alan (2002) ‘The Influence of Linguistic and Social Factors on the Recent Decline of French ne’, Journal of French Language Studies 12(1): Pp. 23-41.
11. Ashby, William J. (1981) ‘The Loss of the Negative Particle ne in French: A Syntactic Change in Progress’, Language 57: pp. 674-687.
12. Ashby, William J. (1991) ‘When Does Variation Indicate Linguistic Change in Progress?’, Journal of French Language Studies 1(1): Pp. 1-19.
13. Ashby, William J. (1992) ‘The Variable Use of on versus tu/vous for Indefinite Reference in Spoken French’, Journal of French Language Studies, 2(2): Pp. 135-157.
14. Ashby, William J. (2001) ‘Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en francais parie tourangeau: S‘agit-il d'un changement en cours?’, Journal of French Language Studies 11(1): pp. 1-22.
15. ATILF: ‘Analyse et Traitment Informatique de la Langue Francaise’, on-line dictionary at http://atilf.atilf.fr/tlf.htm
16. Austin, John L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Ayres-Bennett, Wendy (2004) Sociolinguistic Variation in Seventeenth-Century France. Methodology and Case Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Azra, Jean-Luc and Cheneau, Veronique (1994) ‘Language Games and Phonological Theory: Verlan and the Syllabic Structure of French’, Journal of French Language Studies, 4(2): Pp. 147-170.
19. Bach, Kent and Harnish, Robert M. (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
20. Bakos, Ferenc (1955) ‘Contributions a l‘etude des formules de politesse en ancien francais’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 5: Pp. 296-367.
21. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1954) ‘Indexical Expressions’, Mind 63: Pp. 359-379.
22. Baudino, Claudie (2001) Politique de la langue et difference sexuelle. Lapolitisation du genre des noms de metier, Paris: L'Harmattan.
23. Bauer, Brigitte L. M. (2003) ‘The Adverbial Formation in-mente in Vulgar and Late Latin. A Problem in Grammaticalization’, in Heikki Solin, Martti Leiwo, and Hilla Halla-aho (eds.) Latin vulgaire-Latin TardifVI. Actes du VIe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Hildesheim, Zurich, New York: Olms-Weidmann, pp. 439-457.
24. Bauer, Laurie (2001) Morphological Productivity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Beard, Robert (1995) Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory oflnflec-tion and Word Formation, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
26. Beeching, Kate (2002) Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Benguerel, A.-P. and Cowan, Helen A. (1974) ‘Coarticulation of Upper Lip Protrusion in French’, Phonetica 30: Pp. 41-55.
28. Benveniste, Emile (1966) Problemes de linguistique generale, vol. 1, Paris: Gallimard.
29. Berger, Roger and Brasseur, Annette (eds.) (2004) Les sequences de Sainte Eulalie, Geneve: Droz.
30. Blampain, Daniel (ed.) (1997) Le francais en Belgique: Une langue, une communaute, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.
31. Blanche-Benveniste, Claire and Jeanjean, Colette (1987) Le francais parle: Transcription et edition, Paris: Didier erudition.
32. Blanchet, Philippe (1995) La Pragmatique: D'Austin a Goffman, Paris: Bertrand-Lacoste.
33. Blondeau, Helene (2001) ‘Real-Time Changes in the Paradigm of Personal Pronouns in Montreal French’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4): Pp. 453-474.
34. Blondin, Jean-Noel (1823) Manuel de la purete du langage, Paris: Chez l‘auteur.
35. Boe, Louis-Jean, Heim, Jean-Louis, Honda, Kiyoshi, and Maeda, Shinji (2002) ‘The Potential Neanderthal Vowel Space was as Large as that of Modern Humans’ Jour-nal ofPhonetics 30: Pp. 465-484.
36. Bothorel, Andre, Simon, P., Wioland, F., and Zerling, J.-P. (1986) Cineradiographie des voyelles et consonnes du francais, Strasbourg: Institut de Phonetique de Strasbourg.
37. Bourciez, E. J. and Bourciez, Jean (1978) Phonetique Francaise, etude historique, Paris: Klincksieck.
38. Boysson-Bardies, Benedicte de (1999) How Language Comes to Children: From Birth to Two Years, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
39. Brault, Gregoire (2004) ‘Pour une typologie des emplois de Id-bas’, Lingvisticw Inves-tigations, 27(1): Pp. 25-45.
40. Browman, P. Catherine and Goldstein, Louis (1986) ‘Towards an Articulatory Phonol-ogy’, Phonology Yearbook 3: Pp. 219-252.
41. Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. (1986) Politeness: Some Universals in Lan-guage Use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Brown, Rebecca and Jun, Sun-Ah (2002) ‘Intonational Phonology and the Domain of French Liaison’, Paper presented at the First Joint Meeting of the ASA and IFA, Cancun (Mexico): Mexican Institute of Acoustics, manuscript.
43. Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert (1960) ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’, in Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, Cambridge, (MA): MIT Press, pp. 253-276.
44. Brunet, Etienne (2003) http://www.eduscol.education.fr/DO102/liste-mots-frequents. htm
45. Brunot, Ferdinand (1891) La doctrine de Malherbe d'apres son commentaire sur Desportes, Paris: G. Masson.
46. Brunot, Ferdinand (1966) Histoire de la langue francaise, Paris: Armand Colin.
47. Bryan, Anne-Marie (1972) ‘Le “tu” etle “vous’”, The French Review 45: Pp. 1007-1010.
48. Bustin-Lekeu, Francine (1973) ‘Tutoiement et vouvoiement chez les lyceens francais’, The French Review 46: Pp. 773-782.
49. Bybee, Joan (2001) Phonology and Language Use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Byrne, Catherine and Foulkes, Paul (2004) ‘The “Mobile Phone” Effect on Vowel Formants’ The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(1): Pp. 83-102.
51. CALLIOPE (1989) La parole et son traitement automatique, Paris: Masson.
52. Carroll, Raymonde (1987) Cultural Misunderstandings: The French-American Experience, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
53. Carton, Fernand (1995) ‘La prononciation du francais’, in Gerald Antoine and Robert Martin (eds.) Histoire de la langue francaise 1914-1945, Paris: CNRS-Editions, pp. 27-59.
54. Carton, Fernand (1999) ‘L‘epithese vocalique en francais contemporain: Etude phonetique’, Faits de langue 13: pp. 35-45.
55. Casagrande, Jean (1984) The Sound System of French, Washington D. C: Georgetown University Press.
56. Catach, Nina (2001) Histoire de l‘orthographe francaise, Paris: Slatkine-Honore Champion.
57. Cervoni, Jean (1992) L‘enonciation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
58. Chansou, Michel (2003) L‘amenagement lexical en France pendant la periode contem-poraine (1950-1994). Etude de sociolexicologie, Paris: Honore Champion.
59. Charette, Monik (1991) Conditions on Phonological Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Clark, Eve V. (1986) The Acquisition of Romance with Special Reference to French, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
61. Clark, Herbert H. and Carlson, T. B. (1982) ‘Hearers and Speech Acts’, Language 58: Pp. 332-373.
62. Cohn, Abigail (1990) ‘Phonetic and Phonological Rules of Nasalization’, Ph.D. disser-tation, UCLA.
63. Commission generale de terminologie et de neologie (2000) Repertoire terminologique, Paris: Editions des journaux officiels.
64. Coquillon, A., Di Cristo, A., and Piterman, M. (2000) ‘Marseillais et Toulousains gerent-ils differemment leurs pieds? Caracteristiques prosodiques du schwa dans les par-lers meridionaux’, Actes des XIIiemes Journees d'Etudes sur la Parole, Aussois, pp. 89-92.
65. Corbin, Danielle (1987) Morphologie derivationnelle et structuration du lexique, Tubingen: Max Neimeyer.
66. Corneau, Caroline (2000) ‘An EPG Study of Palatalization in French: Cross-dialect and Inter-subject Variation’, Language Variation and Change 12(1): Pp. 25-49.
67. Coveney, Aidan (1996) Variability in Spoken French. A Sociological Study of Interro-gation and Negation, Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
68. Coveney, Aidan (1998) ‘Awareness of Linguistic Constraints on Variable ne Omission’, Journal ofFrench Language Studies 8(2): Pp. 159-187.
69. Coveney, Aidan (2001) The Sounds of Contemporary French. Articulation andDiversity, Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
70. Coveney, Aidan (2003) ‘Anything you Can Do, tu Can Do Better: Tu and vous as Sub-stitutes for Indefinite on in French’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: pp. 164-191.
71. Coveney, Aidan (2004) ‘The Alternation Between l‘on and on in Spoken French’, Journal of French Language Studies 14(2): Pp. 91-112.
72. Cruse, D. Alan (1986) Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Crysmann, Berthold (2003) ‘Clitic Climbing Revisited’, in Y.-B. Kim and S. Wechsler (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG, Stanford: CSLI, pp. 67-89.
74. Culioli, Antoine (1995) Cognition and Representation in Linguistic Theory. Texts selected, edited, and introduced by Michel Liddle; translated with the assistance of John T. Stonham, Current issues in linguistic theory, 112, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
75. Dal, Georgette (ed.) (2003) ‘La productivite morphologique en questions et en experimentations’, Langue Francaise 140.
76. Dean-Laporte (1975) Les contes manceaux. Recits et monologues en patois du Maine, Le Mans: Editions de la Societe Litteraire du Maine.
77. De Cat, Cecile (2000) ‘Towards a Unified Analysis of French Floating Quantifiers’, Journal of French Language Studies 10(1): Pp. 1-25.
78. Dees, Anthonij (1980) Atlas des formes et des constructions des chartes francaises du 13e siecle, Tubingen: Niemeyer.
79. Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth (2000) ‘Vers une nouvelle approche de la structure prosodique’, Langue Francaise 126: Pp. 92-112.
80. Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth (2001) ‘Prosodie des clitiques en francais’, in Claude Muller, Paulo de Carvalho, L. Labrune, F. Lambert, and K. Ploog (eds.) Clitiques et cliticisation, Actes du colloque de Bordeaux, octobre 1998, Paris: Honore Champion, pp. 227-249.
81. Delegation generale a la langue francaise (1994) Dictionnaire des termes officiels, Paris: Direction des journaux officiels.
82. Dell, Francois (1973) Les regies et les sons: Introduction a la phonologie generative, Paris: Hermann.
83. Demolin, Didier (2001) ‘Some Phonetic and Phonological Observations Concerning /R/in Belgian French’, Etudes and Travaux, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 4: Pp. 63-73.
84. Deshaies, Denise (1985) ‘References personnelles et types de discours en situation d'entrevue’, in P. R. Leon and P. Perron. (eds.), Le Dialogue, Ottawa: Didier, pp. 77-91.
85. Dickey, Elizabeth (2002) Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Di Cristo, Albert (1999) ‘Vers une modelisation de l‘accentuation du francais: Premiere partie’, Journal of French Language Studies 9(2): pp. 143-179.
87. Di Cristo, Albert (2000) ‘Vers une modelisation de l‘accentuation du francais: Deuxieme partie’, Journal of French Language Studies 10(1): pp. 27-44.
88. Di Cristo, Albert and Hirst, Daniel (1998) Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Dionne, Narcisse-Eutrope (1912) Une dispute grammaticale en 1842. Le G.-V Demers vs. le G.-V. Maguire, Quebec: Laflamme and Proulx.
90. Di Vito, Nadine (1997) Patterns Across Spoken and Written French, Boston-New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
91. Dostie, Gaetane (2002) ‘L‘exemplarite de “par exemple”. Un cas de pragmaticalisation en francais quebecois’, Journal of French Language Studies 12: Pp. 149-167.
92. Dubois, Jacques [Sylvius] (1531) In linguam gallicam IsagQge, Paris: Robert Estienne.
93. Dubois, Jean (1962) Etude surla derivation suffixale en francais moderne et contempo-rain, Paris: Larousse.
94. Dubois, Jean (1971) Dictionnaire du francais contemporain, Paris: Larousse.
95. Dubois, Jean and Dubois-Charlier, Francoise (1999) La derivation suffixale en francais, Paris: Nathan.
96. Ducrot, Oswald (1980) Les mots du discours, Paris: Les editions du Minuit.
97. Dupleix, Scipion (1651) Liberte de la langue francoise dans se purete, Paris: Denys Becnet.
98. Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1998) ‘Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender and Power All Live’, in J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 448-494.
99. Eelen, Gino (2001) Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester: St Jerome's Press.
100. Encreve, Pierre (1988) La Liaison avec et sans enchamement, Paris: Editions du Seuil.
101. Espinal, Teresa M. (1991) ‘The Representation of Disjunct Constituents’, Language 67(4): Pp. 726-762.
102. Estienne, Henri (1565) Traicte de la conformite du langagefrancois avec legrec, Geneve: H. Estienne.
103. Etiemble, Rene (1964) Parlez-vous franglais? Paris: Gallimard.
104. Ewert, Alfred (1933) The French Language, London: Faber and Faber.
105. Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (1998) ‘Le retour du e final en francais parisien: Changement phonetiqueconditionneparlaprosodie’, in A. Englebert, M. Pierrard, L. Rosier, and D. Van Raemdonck (eds.) (2000) Vivacite et diversite de la variation linguistique, Vol. III, Tubigen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 151-160.
106. Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2002) ‘Prosodic Boundaries in the Vicinity of Utterance-medial Parentheticals in French, Probus 14(1): Pp. 93-111.
107. Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2004) ‘Action des medias et interactions entre jeunes dans une banlieue ouvriere de Paris: Remarques sur l‘innovation lexicale’, in Thierry Bulot (ed.) Les Parleys jeunes, le parler des jeunes, Paris: L‘Harmattan, pp. 41-60.
108. Fagyal, Zsuzsanna and Moisset, Christine (1999) ‘Sound Change and Articulatory Release: Where and Why are High Vowels Devoiced in Parisian French?’, Pro-ceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Science, San Francisco, vol. 1, pp. 309-312.
109. Fagyal, Zsuzsanna, Nguyen, Noel, and Boula de Mareiiil, Philippe (2002) ‘From dilation to Coarticulation: Is There Vowel Harmony in French?’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 32(1): Pp. 1-21.
110. Falkin, April (1988) ‘Dialogue Analysis Beyond the Sentence Unit: A Comparison of Huis Clos and Spontaneous Conversation’, Language and Style 21(2): Pp. 203-255.
111. Faral, Edmond (1951) ‘Quelques remarques sur le Miracle de Theophile de Rutebeuf’, Romania 52: Pp. 191-192.
112. Fay, Percival B. (1920) The Use of tu and vous in Moliere, Berkeley: University of California Press.
113. Fennell, T. G. (1975) La morphologie dufutur en moyenfrancais, Geneve: Droz.
114. Feraud, Jean-Francois (1787) Dictionnaire critique de la langue francaise, Marseille: Jean Mossy.
115. Flaitz, Jeffra (1988) The Ideology of English: French Perceptions of English as a World Language, Berlin, NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.
116. Fonagy, Ivan (1989) ‘Le francais change de visage’, Revue Romane 24(2): Pp. 225-254.
117. Fougeron, Cecile andDelais-Roussarie, Elisabeth (2004) ’“Fais.en aFez.en avril”: Etude comparative de la liaison et de l‘enchainement’, XXVe Journees d'Etude sur la Parole, Fes (Maroc), pp. 221-224.
118. Foulet, Lucien (1919 [1968]) Petite syntaxe de l‘ancien francais, Paris: Champion.
119. Fournier, Nathalie (1998) Grammaire du francais classique, Paris: Belin.
120. Fuchs, Catherine (ed.) (1997) La place du sujet en francais contemporain, Louvain: Duculot.
121. Gadet, Francoise(1992) Le francais populaire, Deuxieme edition corrigee, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
122. Gadet, Francoise (1997) Le francais ordinaire, Paris: Armand Colin.
123. Gardner, Rosalyn and Greene, Marion A. (1958) A Brief Description of Middle French Syntax, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
124. Gardner-Chloros, Penelope (1991) ‘Ni tu ni vous: Principes et paradoxes dans l‘emploi des pronoms d'allocution en francais contemporain’, Journal of French Language Studies, 1(2): pp. 139-155.
125. Garmadi, Juliette (1981) La sociolinguistique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
126. Gillieron, Jules and Edmont, Edouard (1902-1920) Atlas: Linguistique de la France, Paris: Honore Champion.
127. Girard, Gabriel (1736) Synonymes franpois, leurs significations et le choix quil enfaut faire pour parler avec justesse, Paris: Laurent d'Houry.
128. Goffman, Erving (1967) Interaction Ritual, Pantheon: New York.
129. Gordon, Mathew (2003) ‘Collecting Phonetic Data on Endangered Languages’, Pro-ceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp. 207-210.
130. Goudailler, Jean-Pierre (1997) Comment tu tchatches! Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.
131. Grammont, Maurice (1939) Traite de phonetique, Paris: Delagrave.
132. Green, Georgia (1996) Pragmatics andNatural Language Understanding, Philadelphia: Laurence Erlbaum.
133. Grevisse, Maurice (1968) Precis de grammairefrancaise, Gembloux: Duculot.
134. Grevisse, Maurice (1969) Le bon usage. Grammairefrancaise avec des remarques sur la langue francaise d'aujourd'hui, 9th ed., Gembloux: Duculot.
135. Grevisse, Maurice (1980) Le bon usage, 11th ed., Gembloux: Duculot.
136. Grice, Paul, H. (1957) ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review 66: Pp. 667-688.
137. Grice, Paul, H. (1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’, in Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Speech Acts, Vol. III, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
138. Grimes, Barbara F. and Pittman, Richard S. (ed.) (1996) Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 13th edition, Dallas (TX): Summer Institute of Linguistics.
139. Halle, P. A., de Boysson-Bardies, B. and Vihman, Marylin M. (1991) ‘Beginnings of Prosodic Organization: Intonation and Duration Patterns of Disyllables Produced by Japanese and French Infants’, Language and Speech 34(4): Pp. 299-318.
140. Hambye, Philippe and Michel Francard (2004). ‘Le francais dans la Communaute Wallonie-Bruxelles. Une variete en voie d'autonomisation?’, Journal of French Language Studies 14(1): Pp. 41-59.
141. Hansen, Anita (1994) ‘Etude du E caduc-stabilisation en cours et variations lexicales’ Journal ofFrench Language Studies 4(1): Pp. 25-54.
142. Hansen, Anita (2001) ‘Lexical Diffusion as a Factor of Phonetic Change: The Case of Modern French Nasal Vowels’, Language Variation and Change 13(2): Pp. 209-252.
143. Hansen, Anita and Mosegaard, H. Maj-Britt (2003) ‘Leschwaprepausaletl‘interaction’, in Anita Hansen andH. M.-B. Mosegaard (eds.), Structures linguistiques etinterac-tionnelles dans le francais parle, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, pp. 89-109.
144. Harris, Martin and Vincent, Nigel (1988) The Romance Languages, New York: Oxford University Press.
145. Hauber, Rose Marie (Sister) (1938) The Late Latin Vocabulary of the Moralia of Saint Gregory the Great: A Morphological and Semasiological Study, Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press.
146. Haverling, Gerd (1998) ‘On the ‘illogical’ vos in Late Latin Epistolography’, in Louis Callebat (ed.) Latin vulgaire, latin tardif IV. Actes du 4e colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Caen, 2-5 septembre 1994, Hildesheim, Zurich, New York: Olms-Weidmann, pp. 337-353.
147. Herman, Jozsef (1989) ‘Accusativus cum infinitivo et subordonnee a quod, quia en latin tardif-nouvelles remarques sur un vieux probleme’, in Gualtiero Calboli (ed.) Subordination and Other Topics in Latin. Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1-5 April 1985, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 33-153.
148. Herman, Jozsef (2000) Vulgar Latin, translated by Roger Wright, University Park (PA): Pennsylvania State University Press.
149. Hollerbach, Wolf (1994) The Syntax of Contemporary French, Lanham (MD): University Press of America.
150. Jacob, Daniel (1998) ‘A propos de la periphrase habeo + participe parfait passif’, in Louis Callebat (ed.) Latin vulgaire, latin tardif IV. Actes du 4e colloque international surle latin vulgaire et tardif. Caen, 2-5 septembre 1994, Hildesheim, Zurich, New York: Olms-Weidmann, pp. 367-381.
151. Jeanneret, Therese (1999) La coenonciation en francais: Approches discursive, conver-sationnelle et syntaxique, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
152. Jenkins, T. Atkinson (ed.) (1924) La Chanson de Roland, Boston: D. C. Heath.
153. Jones, Michael A. (1996) Foundations of French Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
154. Joran, Theodore (1928) Les manquements a la langue francaise. Tournures et locutions vicieuses methodiquement classees et redressees. 3e edition. Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne.
155. Jourda, Pierre (ed.) (1965) Conteurs francais du XVIe siecle, Paris: Bibliotheque de la Pleaide.
156. Jun, Sun-Ah and Fougeron, Cecile (1995) ‘The Accentual Phrase and the Prosodic Structure of French’, Proceedings of the ICPhS of Stockholm, vol. 2, pp. 722-725.
157. Jun, Sun-Ah and Fougeron, Cecile (2000) ‘A Phonological Model of French Intonation’, in A. Botinis (ed.) Intonation: Analysis, Modeling and Technology, Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 209-242.
158. Jun, Sun-Ah and Fougeron, Cecile (2002) ‘Realizations of Accentual Phrase in French Intonation’, Probus 14(1): Pp. 147-172.
159. Karlsson, Keith E. (1981) Syntax and Affixation. The Evolution ofMENTE in Latin and Romance, Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.
160. Kassai, Ilona (2001) ‘Fiziologiai ritmus a fonologiaban?’ [Physiological rhythm in phonology?] in M. Bakro-Nagy, E. K. Kiss, and Z. Banreti (eds.), Ujabb tanulmanyok a struktumlis magyar nyelvtan es a nyelvtortenet korebol, Budapest: Osiris, pp. 344-354.
161. Keane, Mark T. and Costello, Fintan J. (1997) ‘Where do “Soccer Moms” Come From?: Cognitive Constraints on Noun-Noun Compounding in English’, in Tony Veale (ed.), Proceedings of MIND II, http://www.cs.ucd.ie/staff/fcostello/home/papers/CostelloKeane97b.pdf
162. Kennedy, Elspeth (1972) ‘The use of Tu and Vous in the First Part of the Old French Prose Lancelot’, in F. J. Barnett, A. D. Crow, C. A. Robson, W. Rothwell, and S. Ullmann (eds.), History and Structure of French. Essays in Honour of Professor T.B.W. Reid, Totowa (NJ): Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 135-149.
163. Kibbee, Douglas (1995) ‘Assertion/attenuation, subjectivite/objectivite en anglais et en francais: ‘seem’/‘sembler”, in Michel Ballard (ed.), Relations discursives et traduction, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille, pp. 73-87.
164. King, Ruth and Nadasdy, Terry (1999) ‘The Expression of Evidentiality in French-English Bilingual Discourse’ Language in Society 28(3): Pp. 355-365.
165. Kleiber, Georges (1990) La semantique du prototype. Categories et sens lexical, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
166. Knecht, Paul and Rubattel, Christophe (1984) ‘A propos de la dimension sociolinguis-tique du francais en Suisse romande’, Le Francais moderne, 52(2): Pp. 138-150.
167. Laberge, Suzanne and Sankoff, Gillian (1979) ‘Anything you can do’, in G. Sankoff (ed.) The Social Life of Language, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 271-293.
168. Labov, William (2001) Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors, Oxford: Blackwell.
169. Lacheret-Dujour, Anne and Beaugendre, Frederique (1999) La Prosodie du francais, Paris: CNRS Editions.
170. Ladefoged, Peter (ed.) (1999) The Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian (1996) The Sounds of the World's Languages, Oxford: Blackwell.
172. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (2003) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
173. Lambert, Wallace E. (1967) ‘The Use of tu and vous as Forms of Address in French Canada, a Pilot Study’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6: Pp. 614-617.
174. Landick, Marie (1995) ‘The Mid-Vowels in Figures: Hard Facts’, The French Review 69(1): Pp. 88-102.
175. Landick, Marie (2004) Enquete surlaprononciation du francais de reference, Collection Espaces Discursifs, Paris: L‘Harmattan.
176. Langlois, Ernest (ed.) (1965) Le couronnement de Louis, Chanson degeste duXIIsi‘ecle, Paris: H. Champion.
177. Leech, Geoff, N. (1983) Principles ofPragmatics, London: Longman.
178. Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne (1990) Le nom: Droit et histoire, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
179. Le Gal, Etienne (1932) Cent manieres d'accommoder le franpais, Paris: Nouvelle librairie francaise.
180. Lehmann, Alise and Martin-Berthet, Francoise (2000) Introduction a la lexicologie. Semantique et morphologie, Paris: Nathan.
181. Lehmann, Gun (1959) ‘L‘emploi moderne de l‘adverbe francais tellement, compare a celui du si et du tant d'intensite’, Lund: CWK Gleerup.
182. Lennig, Matthew (1978) ‘Acoustic Measurement of Linguistic Change: The Modern Paris Vowel System’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
183. Leon, Pierre (1973) ‘Reflexions idiomatologiques sur l‘accent en tant que metaphore sociolinguistique’, The French Review 46, pp. 783-789.
184. Leon, Pierre (1992) Phonetisme et prononciation du francais, Paris: Nathan Universite.
185. Leon, Pierre (1993) Precis de phonostylistique: Parole et expressivite, Paris: Nathan Universite.
186. Leon, Pierre and Carton, Fernand (1983) Les accents des francais, Paris: Hachette. http://accentsdefrance.free.fr/
187. Lepoutre, David (1997) Coeurde banlieue: Codes, rites, et langages, Paris: Odile Jacob.
188. Lieberman, Philip and Crelin, E. S. (1971) ‘On the Speech of Neanderthal Man’, Lin-guistic Inquiry 2: Pp. 203-222.
189. Littre, Emile (1878) Dictionnaire de la langue francaise, Paris: Hachette.
190. Lodge, R. Anthony (2004) A Sociolinguistic History of Parisian French, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
191. Ludwig, Pascal (1997) Le Langage: Textes choisis et presentes, Paris: GF Flammarion.
192. Luzzati, Daniel (1982) ‘Ben appui du discours’, Le Francais Moderne 50: Pp. 193207.
193. Mackenzie, Fraser (1939) Les relations de l‘Angleterre etde la France d'apmsle vocab-ulaire, Paris: E. Droz.
194. Maddieson, Ian (1984) Patterns ofSounds, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
195. Malderez, Isabelle (1991) ‘Tendance de neutralisation des oppositions entre voyelles nasales dans laparoledesjeunes gens d'Ile-de-France’, inActesduXIIeme Congres international des sciencesphonetiques: 19-24 aout 1991 Aix-en-Provence, France, Aix-en-Provence: Universite de Provence, vol. 2, pp. 174-177.
196. Malecot, Andre and Paul Lindsay (1976) ‘The Neutralization of /as/-e/in French’, Phonetica 33(1): Pp. 45-61.
197. Maley, Catherine A. (1974) The Pronouns of Address in Modern Standard French, University (MS): Romance Monographs, Inc.
198. Mamavi, Gina, Depecker, Lo‘ic, and Chansou, Michel (1997) La mesure des mots: Cinq etudes d'implantation terminologique, Rouen: Publications de l‘Universite de Rouen.
199. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane (1979) Histoire de la langue francaise aux XlVe et XVe siecles, Paris: Bordas.
200. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane (1999) Lefrancais en diachronie, Gap: Ophrys.
201. Marguerite de Navarre (ca.1546 [1999]) Heptameron, Edition critique par Renja Salminen, Geneve: Droz.
202. Martin, Elizabeth (2006) Marketing Identities Through Language: English and Global Imagery in French Advertising, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
203. Martin, James, G. and Bunnell, Timothy H. (1981) ‘Perception of Anticipatory Coartic-ulation Effects’, Journal of Acoustical Society of America 69: Pp. 559-567.
204. Martin, Pierre (2002) ‘Le systeme vocalique du francais du Quebec: De l‘acoustique a la phonologie’, La Linguistique 38(2): pp. 71-88.
205. Martineau, France and Mougeon, Raymond (2003) ‘A sociolinguistic study of the Origins of ne Deletion in European and Quebec French’. Language 79(1): Pp. 118-152.
206. Martinet, Andre (1969) ‘De l‘economie des formes du verbe en francais parle’, in Le francais sansfard, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 91-120.
207. Martinon, Philippe (1927) Comment on parle en francais, La langue parlee correcte comparee avec la langue litteraire et la langue familiere, Paris: Larousse.
208. Marty, Fernand (1975) Elements for Self-Instruction in French, Champaign (IL): Audio-Visual Publications.
209. Marty, Fernand (2001) ‘Les signaux morphologiques du francais parle’, Le Francais Moderne 69(2): Pp. 211-240.
210. McCool, George J. (1994) ‘Teaching the Formation of Questions: Lessons from New French’, Modern Language Journal 78: Pp. 56-60.
211. Meigret, Louis (1550) Trette de la grammere francoeze, Paris: Chrestien Wechel.
212. Merle, Pierre (2000) Argot, verlan et tchatches, Paris: Les Essentiels de Milan.
213. Mettas, Odette (1979) La prononciation parisienne: Aspects phonique d'un sociolecte parisien (du Faubourg Saint-Germain a laMuette), Paris: Conseil International de la Langue Francaise et Laboratoire des Langues et Civilisations a Tradition Orale du CNRS.
214. Miller, Jessica S. and Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2005) ‘Phonetic Cues to Common and Special Cases of Liaison: Looking for a Prosodic Domain’, in Gess, Randall S. and Rubin, Edward J. (eds.) (2005) Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics (LSRL) Salt Lake City, Utah, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 179-196.
215. Miller, Philippe, A. and Sag, Ivan A. (1997) ‘French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15(5): Pp. 573-639.
216. Mills, Sarah (2003) Gender and Politeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
217. Milroy, James and Milroy, Leslie (1985) Authority in Language. Investigating standard English, London: Routledge.
218. Moisset, Christine (1996) ‘The Status of h-aspire in French Today’, in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 3(1): Pp. 223-236.
219. Moisset, Christine (2000) ‘Variable Liaison in Parisian French’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
220. Molinelli, Piera (1989) ‘Double Negation from Latin to Italian’, in Gualtiero Balboli (ed.) Subordination and Other Topics in Latin. Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1-5 April 1985, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 611-633.
221. Molinier, Christian and Francoise Levrier (2000) Grammaire des adverbes, Description des formes en-ment, Geneve-Paris: Droz.
222. Montagu, Julie (2004) ‘Les sons sous-jacents aux voyelles nasales en francais parisien’, in Actes des XXVe Journees d'Etudes sur la Parole, Fes (Maroc), Aix-en-Provence: Universite de Provence, pp. 385-388.
223. Montreuil, Jean-Pierre (2002) ‘Vestigial Feet in French’, in Proceedings of the 2002 Texas Linguistic Society Conference on Stress in Optimality Theory, The University of Texas at Austin, http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~tls/2002tls/Jean-Pierre_Montreuil.pdf
224. Moreau, Marie-Louise (1986) ‘Les sequences preformees: Entre les combinaisons libres et les idiomatismes. Le cas de la negation avec ou sans ne’, Le Francais Moderne 54: pp. 137-160.
225. Morel, Mary-Annick and Danon-Boileau, Laurent (1998) Grammaire de l‘intonation: L‘exemple dufrancais, Paris: Ophrys.
226. Morford, Janet (1997) ‘Social Indexicality in French Pronominal Address’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1): Pp. 3-37.
227. Morin, Yves-Charles (1994) ‘Quelques reflexions sur la formation des voyelles nasales en francais’, Communication and Cognition 27: Pp. 27-110.
228. Mufwene, Salikoko (2001) The Ecology of Language Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
229. Muller, Claude (1984) ‘L‘association negative’, Languefrancaise 62: Pp. 59-94.
230. Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene (1986) Prosodic Phonology, Dordrecht: Foris.
231. Nguyen, Noel and Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (in press) ‘Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French’, Journal of Phonetics.
232. Noailly, Michele (1990) Le substantif epithete, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
233. Nunn, H. P. V. (1963) An Introduction to the Study of Ecclesiastical Latin, third edition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
234. Nye, Edward (2000) Literary and Linguistic Theories in Eighteenth-Century France. From Nuances to Impertinence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
235. Nyembwe, Ntita (1995) Le francais au Zaire ou le francais zairois. Considerations lexicales, in M. Francard and D. Latin (eds.) Le regionalisme lexical, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, pp. 111-118.
236. Nyrop, Kristoffer (1914) Grammaire historique de la langue francaise, Copenhague: Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Forlag.
237. Office de la langue francaise (1986) Titres et fonctions aufeminin: Essai d'orientation de l‘usage, Quebec: Office de la langue francaise.
238. Olcott, George N. (1898) Studies in the Word Formation of the Latin Inscriptions. Substantives and Adjectives. With Special Reference to the Latin Sermo Vulgaris, Rome: Sallustian Typography.
239. Oukada, Larbi (1982) ‘On On’, The French Review, 56(1): Pp. 93-105.
240. Palsgrave, Jehan (1530) Lesclarcissment de la langue Francoyse, London: R. Pynson.
241. Papen, Robert and Rottet, Kevin (1997) ‘A Structural Sketch of the Cajun French Spoken in Lafourche and Terrebonne Parishes’, in Albert Valdman (ed.) French and Creole in Louisiana, New York: Plenum, pp. 71-108.
242. Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-Francois (2000) ‘Nasal Vowels as Two Segments: Evidence from Borrowings’, Language 76(2): Pp. 324-357.
243. Pasquier, Estienne (1596) Les recherches de la France, Paris: G. de Luyne.
244. Peeters, Bert (2004) ‘Tu ou vous?’, Zeitschrift fur franzosische Sprache und Literatur 114: Pp. 1-17.
245. Peterson, Axel (1929) Le passage populaire des noms de personne a l‘etat de noms communs dans les langues romanes et particulierement en francais. Etude de semantique, Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckereri Aktiebolag.
246. PHONO (1998). ‘Principales caracteristiques phonetiques du francais quebecois’, web page maintained by the Phonetics Laboratory of Laval University, Quebec: Http://www.ciral.ulaval.ca/phonetique/phono/
247. Picone, Michael D. (1996) Anglicisms, Neologisms and Dynamic French, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
248. Platt de Concarneau (1835) Dictionnaire critique et raisonne du langage vicieux ou repute vicieux, Paris: A. Andre.
249. Plenat, Marc (1985) ‘Morphologiedulargonji des loucherbem’, Langages 78: Pp. 73-95.
250. Poirier, Claude (1995) ‘Les variantes topolectales du lexique francais: Propositions de classement a partir d'exemples quebecois’, in M. Francard and D. Latin (eds.) Le regionalisme lexical, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, pp. 13-56.
251. Poll, Bernhard (2001) ‘Francais de reference et pluralite identitaire: Un antagonisme inconciliable?’, in M. Francard, G. Geron, and R. Wilmet (eds.) Le francais de reference. Constructions et appropriations d'un concept, Louvain:VALIBEL, Vol. 2, pp. 141-151.
252. Pooley, Timothy (1996) Chtimi: The Urban Vernaculars of Northern France, Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
253. Pope, Mildred K. (1934) From Latin to Modern French with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Phonology and Morphology, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
254. Posner, Rebecca (1997) Linguistic Change in French, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
255. Post, Brechtje (2000) ‘Pitch accents, Liaison and the Phonological Phrase in French’, Probus 12: Pp. 127-164.
256. Price, Glanville (1993) ‘Pas (point) Without ne in Interrogative Clauses’, Journal of French Language Studies 3: Pp. 191-195.
257. Price, Joseph Edward (1998) ‘Motivations for Pronominal alteros-affixation in Proto-Romance and the Development of vous autres in French’, unpublished MA thesis, University of South Carolina.
258. Priss, Uta (1996) ‘Classification of Meronymy by Methods of Relational Concept Analy-sis’, Online Proceedings of the 1996 Midwest Artificial Intelligence Conference, Bloomington (IN): Indiana University.
259. Pruvost, Jean (2003) ‘La traque des mots “neologisme” et “neologie” dans les dic-tionnaires monolingues monovolumaires francais de la fin du XVIIIe s. jusqu‘au debut du XXIe s.’, in Jean-Francois Sablayrolles (ed.) L‘innovation lexicale, Paris: Honore Champion, pp. 181-205.
260. Rezeav, Pierre (2001) Dictionnaire des regionalismes de France: Geographie et histoire d'unpatrimoine linguistique, Bruxelles: De Boeck/Duculot.
261. Riallanu, Annie (1988) ‘Review of Encreve, Pierre, “Liaison avec et sans enchainement: Phonologie multidimensionelle et usage du francais”’. Language 66: Pp. 134-138.
262. Rialland, Annie (1994) ‘The Phonology and Phonetics of Extrasyllabicity in French’, in Patricia A. Keating (ed.) Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Vol.3, pp.136-159.
263. Richelet, Pierre (1680) Dictionnairefrancois: Contenant les mots et les choses, plusieurs nouvelles remarques sur la langue francoise: ses expressions propres, figurees ' burlesques, la prononciation des mots difficiles, le genre de noms, le regime des verbes, avec les termes les plus connus des arts ' des sciences: le tout tire de l‘usage et des bons auteurs de la langue francoise, Geneve: J.-H. Widerhold.
264. Rigault, Andre (1971) La grammaire du francais parle, Paris: Hachette.
265. Rigault, Lucien (1888) Dictionnaire d'argot moderne, Paris: P. Ollendorff.
266. Roques, Mario (ed.) (1970) Les Romans de Chretien de Troyes, edites d'apres la copie de Guiot (Bibl. Nat., fr. 794), lErec et Enide, Paris: H. Champion.
267. Roulet, Eddy (1995) ‘Geneva School’, in Jef Ver schuren, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 319-323.
268. Roulet, Eddy, Auchlin, Antoine, Rubattel, Christian, and Schelling, Marianne (1985) L'articulation du discours en francais contemporain, Berne: Peter Lang.
269. Rouquier, Magali (2003) ‘La sequence est-ce dans les interrogatives en qui/que en ancien etenmoyen francais’, Journal of French Language Studies 13: Pp. 339-362.
270. Rychner, Jean (ed.) (1967) Les XV. Joies de Mariage, Geneve: Droz.
271. Sacks, Harvey (1992) Lectures on Conversation, Oxford: Blackwell.
272. Sankoff, Gillian, Blondeau, Helene, and Charity, Anne (2001) ‘Individual Roles in a Real-time Change: Montreal (rR) 1947-1995’, Etudes and Travaux, Universite Libre de Bruxelles 4: Pp. 141-157.
273. Sankoff, Gillian and Vincent, Dianne (1977) ‘L‘emploi productif du ne dans le francais parle a Montreal’, Le Francais Moderne 45: Pp. 243-256.
274. Sauger-Preneuf, Francois (1843) Des locutions vicieuses, les plus repandues dans la societe, considerees sous le rapport de la Syntaxe et de la Prononciation, avec leur correction, d'apres le Dictionnaire de l‘Academie, 3e edition, Limoges: Martial Ardant freres.
275. Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916) Cours de linguistique generale, Paris: Payot.
276. Schiffrin, Deborah (1987) Discourse Markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
277. Schliebitz, Victor (1886) Die Person derAnrede in derfranzosischen Sprache, Breslau: Jungfer.
278. Scollon, Ronald, and Scollon, Suzanne W. (1995) Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach, Oxford: Blackwell.
279. Scullen, Mary Ellen (1997) French Prosodic Morphology: A Unified Account, Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Linguistics Club.
280. Searle, John (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
281. Searle, John (1975) ‘Indirect Speech Acts’, in Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 59-82.
282. Seguin, Jean-Pierre (1972) La langue francaise au XVIIIe siecle, Paris, Bruxelles, Montreal: Bordas.
283. Seguin, Jean-Pierre, Bouverot, D., Caron, Philippe, Fournier, Nathalie, and Landy-Houillon, Isabelle (1990) ‘Les marqueurs du mauvais usage dans le Dictionaire critique de la langue francaise de l‘abbe Jean-Francois Feraud’, Lexique, 9: Pp. 129-151.
284. Selkirk, Elizabeth (1978) ‘The French Foot: On the Status of French Mute e’, Studies in French Linguistics 1: Pp. 141-150.
285. Selkirk, Elizabeth (1986) ‘On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology’, Phonology Yearbook, 3: Pp. 371-405.
286. Sifianou, Maria (1992) Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece, Oxford: Clarendon.
287. Signol, Christian (1984) Les cailloux bleus, Paris: Robert Laffont.
288. Silverman, David and Sacks, Harvey (1998) Social Science and Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Polity Press.
289. Singy, Pascal (1996) L‘lmage dufrancais en Suisse Romande: Une enquete sociolin-guistique en Pays de Vaud, Paris: L‘Harmattan.
290. Smedley-Weill, Anette and Geoffroy-Poisson, Simone (2001). ‘Les assembles d'etats et la mise en forme du droit. Comparaisons et analyses formelles des coutumes redigees et reformees d'Auxerre, de Sens et de Touraine’, Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques 26 pp. 13-92.
291. Smith, Caroline (2003) ‘Vowel Devoicing in Contemporary French’, Journal of French Linguistic Studies 13(2): Pp. 177-194.
292. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, London: Continuum.
293. Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deidre (1986) ‘Precis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: Pp. 697-699.
294. Steriade, Donca (1999) ‘Lexical Conservatism in French Adjectival Liaison’, Formal Perspectives in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 28th LSRL, University Park: Pennsylvania State University, pp. 243-270.
295. Streicher, Jeanne (1936) Commentaires surles remarques de Vaugelas par La Mothe le Vayer, Scipion Dupleix, Menage, Bouhours, Conrart, Chapeliain, Patru, Thomas Corneille, Cassagne, Andry de Boisregard et l‘Academie Francaise. Paris: E. Droz.
296. Stenstrom, Anna-Brita, Andersen, Gisle, and Hasund, Kristine I. (2002) Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
297. Tannen, Deborah (1990) You Just Don‘t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, New York: William Morrow.
298. Teibeiriene, Nijole R. (2004) ‘Les particularites morphosyntaxiques du francais quebecois’, Kalbotyra 54(3): Pp. 1-8.
299. Temple, Martine (1996) Pour une semantique des mots construits, Villeneuve d'Ascq: Les Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
300. Thibault, Linda and Ouellet, Marise (1996) ‘Tonal Distinctions Between Emphatic Stress and Pretonic Lengthening in Quebec French’, 4th International Conference of Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), vol. 2, pp. 638-641.
301. Thiele, Johannes (1987). La formation des mots enfrancais moderne, translated by Andre Clas, Montreal: Presses de l‘Universite de Montreal.
302. Thiesse, Anne-Marie (1991) Ecrire la France. Le mouvement litteraire regionaliste de langue francaise entre la Belle Epoque et la Liberation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
303. Thurot, Charles (1881-1883) De la prononciation francaise depuis le commencement du XVIe siecle, d'apres les temoignages des grammairiens, Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
304. Toolan, Michael, J. (1996) Total Speech: An Integrational Linguistic Approach to Language, Durham, London: Duke University Press.
305. Touratier, Christian (1998) ‘Le mot, unite linguistique?’ Langues et Langage 7: Pp. 41-53.
306. Tranel, Bernard (1987) The Sounds ofFrench, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
307. Tranel, Bernard (1996) ‘French Liaison and Elision Revisited: A Unified Account within Optimality Theory’, in Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli, and Maria-Louisa Zubizarreta (eds.) Aspects of Romance Linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 433-455.
308. Trask, R. L. (1996) A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology, London, New York: Routledge.
309. Trubetzkoy, Nicholas (1939[1969]). Principles of Phonology, translated by Christiane Baltaxe, Berkeley: University of California Press.
310. Truchot, Claude (1990) L‘anglais dans le monde contemporain, Paris: Le Robert.
311. Universite du Quebec French language examination criteria for entrance into the Universite du Quebec en Outaouais (http://www.uqo.ca/7etudiants-actuels/guichet-etudiant/guide-francais.asp).
312. Vaananen, Veikko (1981) Introduction au latin vulgaire. Troisieme edition revue et augmentee, Paris: Editions Klincksieck.
313. Valdman, Albert (1993) Bien entendu! Introduction a la prononciation francaise, Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
314. Valdman, Albert and Iskrova, Iskra (2003) ‘A New Look at Nasalization in Haitian Creole’, in Ingo Plag (ed.) The Phonology and Morphology of Creole Languages, Tubigen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 25-41.
315. Van den Berghe, Christian L. (1976) La phonostylistique dufrancais, The Hague, Paris: Mouton.
316. Vaudelin, Giles (1713) Nouvelle Maniere d'ecrire comme on parle en France, Paris: Veuve Jean Cot.
317. Vaugelas, Claude Favre de (1647 [1934]) Remarques sur la langue francoise. Introduction, bibliographie, index par Jeanne Streicher, Paris: Droz.
318. Vincent, Diane (1995) ‘Remarques sur par exemple en francais quebecois’, Le Francais Moderne 63: Pp. 55-71.
319. Vincent, Diane (2001) ‘Remarques sur le tutoiement et le vouvoiement en francais parle au Quebec’, in Actes du colloque “La journee du Quebec”, Copenhague: Institut d'etudes romanes, Universite de Copenhague, pp. 11-22.
320. Walker, Douglas C. (1984) The Pronunciation of Canadian French, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
321. Walker, Douglas C. (2001) French Sound Structure, Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
322. Walter, Henriette (1977) La phonologie du francais, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
323. Walter, Henriette (1983) ‘La nasal velaire /q/: Un phoneme du francais?’, Langue francaise 60: pp. 14-29.
324. Walter, Henriette (1994) ‘Varietes actuelles des voyelles nasales du francais’, Communication and Cognition 27: Pp. 223-235.
325. Walter, Henriette (2002) ‘La dynamique phonologique peut-elle dependre de la dynamique lexicale?’, La Linguistique, 38(2): Pp. 133-137.
326. Watson, Keith (1997) ‘French Complement Clitic Sequences: A Template Approach’, Journal of French Language Studies 7(1): Pp. 69-89.
327. Wierzbicka, Anna (1980) Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language, Sydney: Academic Press.
328. Wierzbicka, Anna (1996) Semantics, Primes and Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
329. Wionet, Chantal (2004) ‘Les marques d'usage dans la premiere edition du Dictionnaire de l‘Academie Franqaise (1694)’, contribution a une histoire des marques d'usage, Cahiers de Lexicologie, 84(1): 55-67.
330. Wisniewski, Edward (1995) ‘Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21: Pp. 449-468.
331. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (2002) ‘Register and Prosodic Variation, a Cross Language Comparison’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: Pp. 1495-1536.
332. Yaguello, Marina (1991) ‘Les geminees de M. Rocard’, in En ecoutant parlerla langue, Paris: Seuil, pp. 64-70.
333. Zeliqzon, L. (ed.) (1986) Lafamille ridicule, Comedie messine en vers patois, Metz: Verlag der Gesellschaft.
334. Zink, Gaston (1986 [1991]) Phonetique historique du francais (3rd edn.), Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
335. Zink, Gaston (1992) Morphologie du francais medieval, 2e edition mise a jour, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.