Ecosystem services-biodiversity relationships depend on land use type in floodplain agroecosystems

Land Use Policy

Volumn 46, Issue , 2015, Pages 201-210

  Felipe Lucia, María R ^a   Comín, Francisco A ^a  

^a INSTITUTO PIRENAICO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Floodplain; Land management policies; Multifunctional; Plant diversity; Riparian habitat

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEM; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FLOODPLAIN; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; RIPARIAN FOREST;

ANDALUCIA; HUELVA [ANDALUCIA]; PIEDRAS RIVER; SPAIN;

EID: 84924419497     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Agricultural Policy Perspectives Brief N° 5 Overview of CAP Reform 2014-2020 2013 December, European Commission, URL http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05_en.pdf.
2. Anton C., Young J., Harrison P.A., Musche M., Bela G., Feld C.K., Harrington R., Haslett J.R., Pataki G., Rounsevell M.D.A., Skourtos M., Sousa J.P., Sykes M.T., Tinch R., Vandewalle M., Watt A., Settele J. Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2979-2994. 10.1007/s10531-010-9853-6.
3. Balvanera P., Pfisterer A.B., Buchmann N., He J.-S., Nakashizuka T., Raffaelli D., Schmid B. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:1146-1156. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x.
4. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. R Package Version 0.999999-0 2012, http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4.
5. Bello F., de Lavorel S., Díaz S., Harrington R., Cornelissen J.H.C., Bardgett R.D., Berg M.P., Cipriotti P., Feld C.K., Hering D., Silva P.M., da Potts S.G., Sandin L., Sousa J.P., Storkey J., Wardle D.A., Harrison P.A. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2873-2893. 10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9.
6. Benayas J.M.R., Newton A.C., Diaz A., Bullock J.M. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 2009, 325:1121-1124. 10.1126/science. 1172460.
7. Bennett E.M., Balvanera P. The future of production systems in a globalized world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:191-198. 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[191:TFOPSI]2.0.CO;2.
8. Billeter R., Liira J., Bailey D., Bugter R., Arens P., Augenstein I., Aviron S., Baudry J., Bukacek R., Burel F., Cerny M., De Blust G., De Cock R., Diekötter T., Dietz H., Dirksen J., Dormann C., Durka W., Frenzel M., Hamersky R., Hendrickx F., Herzog F., Klotz S., Koolstra B., Lausch A., Le Coeur D., Maelfait J.P., Opdam P., Roubalova M., Schermann A., Schermann N., Schmidt T., Schweiger O., Smulders M.J.M., Speelmans M., Simova P., Verboom J., Van Wingerden W.K.R., Zobel E.M., Edwards P.J. Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:141-150. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01393.x.
9. Chan K.M.A., Shaw M.R., Cameron D.R., Underwood E.C., Daily G.C. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e379. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379.
10. Chan K.M.A., Hoshizaki L., Klinkenberg B. Ecosystem services in conservation planning: targeted benefits vs co-benefits or costs?. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e24378. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024378.
11. Cimon-Morin J., Darveau M., Poulin M. Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 166:144-154. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.023.
12. 2: existencias y potencialidad (estimación cuantitativa y predicciones de fijación) 2008, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain, URL http://www.aragon.es/estaticos/GobiernoAragon/Departamentos/MedioAmbiente/Areas/03_Cambio_climatico/06_Proyectos_actuaciones_Emisiones_GEI/estudio.pdf.
13. Daily G.C., Matson P.A., Vitousek P.M. Ecosystem services supplied by soil. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, 113-132. Island Press. G.C. Daily (Ed.).
14. Davies Z.G., Edmondson J.L., Heinemeyer A., Leake J.R., Gaston K.J. Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:1125-1134. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02021.x.
15. De Groot R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 75:175-186. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016.
16. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10. 006.
17. Díaz S., Fargione J., Chapin F.S., Tilman D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e277. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.
18. Dobson A., Lodge D., Alder J., Cumming G.S., Keymer J., McGlade J., Mooney H., Rusak J.A., Sala O., Wolters V., Wall D., Winfree R., Xenopoulos M.A. Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services. Ecology 2006, 87:1915-1924. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1915:HLTCAT]2.0.CO;2.
19. Dominio Público Hidráulico - BOE núm. 14 de 16 enero 2008. URL (accessed 12.11.14). http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/agua/temas/delimitacion-y-restauracion-del-dominio-publico-hidraulico/marco-legislativo/.
20. Ekroos J., Olsson O., Rundlöf M., Wätzold F., Smith H.G. Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both?. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 172:65-71. 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.013.
21. ESRI (Environmental Systems Resource Institute) ArcGIS Desktop (10.0). Redlands, CA, USA 2012.
22. Faith D.P. Common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services: the "partial protection" challenge. F1000Research 2012, 10.12688/f1000research.1-30.v1.
23. Felipe-Lucia M.R., Comín F.A., Bennett E.M. Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19. 10.5751/ES-06249-190120.
24. Fischer J., Lindenmayer D.B., Manning A.D. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4:80-86. 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0080:BEFART]2.0.CO;2.
25. Goldman R.L., Tallis H., Kareiva P., Daily G.C. Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:9445-9448. 10.1073/pnas. 0800208105.
26. González del Tánago M., García de Jalón D. Riparian quality index (RQI): a methodology for characterising and assessing the environmental conditions of riparian zones. Limnetica 2011, 30:235-254.
27. Goodall D.W. Quantitative aspects of plant distribution. Biol. Rev. 1952, 27:194-242. 10.1111/j.1469-185X 1952.tb01393.x.
28. Gottschalk T.K., Diekötter T., Ekschmitt K., Weinmann B., Kuhlmann F., Purtauf T., Dauber J., Wolters V. Impact of agricultural subsidies on biodiversity at the landscape level. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:643-656. 10.1007/s10980-006-9060-8.
29. Grant G.C., Bennett A.F. Riparian zones provide for distinct bird assemblages in forest mosaics of south-east Australia. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 130:447-457.
30. Haines-Young R. Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy Land Use Futures 2009, 26(Suppl. 1):S178-S186. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.009.
31. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology, Ecological Reviews 2010, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007.
32. Harrell F.E. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R Package Version 3.14-3 2014, http://cran.r-project.org/package=Hmisc.
33. Harrison P.A., Vandewalle M., Sykes M.T., Berry P.M., Bugter R., Bello F., de Feld C.K., Grandin U., Harrington R., Haslett J.R., Jongman R.H.G., Luck G.W., Silva P.M., da Moora M., Settele J., Sousa J.P., Zobel M. Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2791-2821. 10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x.
34. Hooper D.U., Chapin F.S., Ewel J.J., Hector A., Inchausti P., Lavorel S., Lawton J.H., Lodge D.M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setälä H., Symstad A.J., Vandermeer J., Wardle D.A. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 2005, 75:3-35. 10.1890/04-0922.
35. Hothorn T., Bretz F., Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom. J. 2008, 50(3):346-363.
36. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística), 2008 January. (accessed 30.10.12). http://www.ine.es/.
37. Isbell F., Calcagno V., Hector A., Connolly J., Harpole W.S., Reich P.B., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Schmid B., Tilman D., van Ruijven J., Weigelt A., Wilsey B.J., Zavaleta E.S., Loreau M. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 2011, 477:199-202. 10.1038/nature10282.
38. Jost L., DeVries P., Walla T., Greeney H., Chao A., Ricotta C. Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16:65-76. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00626.x.
39. Kareiva P., Marvier M. What is conservation science?. Bioscience 2012, 62:962-969. 10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5.
40. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:468-479. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x.
41. Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K., Covich A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 33:103-117. 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7.
42. Lovell S.T., Johnston D.M. Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape?. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 7:212-220. 10.1890/070178.
43. Luck G.W., Harrington R., Harrison P.A., Kremen C., Berry P.M., Bugter R., Dawson T.R., Bello F., de Díaz S., Feld C.K., Haslett J.R., Hering D., Kontogianni A., Lavorel S., Rounsevell M., Samways M.J., Sandin L., Settele J., Sykes M.T., Hove S.V.D., Vandewalle M., Zobel M. Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 2009, 59:223-235. 10.1525/bio.2009.59.3.7.
44. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Scenarios. Findings of the Scenarios Working Group 2005, vol. 2. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA. S.R. Carpenter, P.L. Pingali, E.M. Bennett, M.B. Zurek (Eds.).
45. Macfadyen S., Cunningham S.A., Costamagna A.C., Schellhorn N.A. Managing ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: are the solutions the same?. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49:690-694. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02132.x.
46. Maestre F.T., Quero J.L., Gotelli N.J., Escudero A., Ochoa V., Delgado-Baquerizo M., García-Gómez M., Bowker M.A., Soliveres S., Escolar C., García-Palacios P., Berdugo M., Valencia E., Gozalo B., Gallardo A., Aguilera L., Arredondo T., Blones J., Boeken B., Bran D., Conceição A.A., Cabrera O., Chaieb M., Derak M., Eldridge D.J., Espinosa C.I., Florentino A., Gaitán J., Gatica M.G., Ghiloufi W., Gómez-González S., Gutiérrez J.R., Hernández R.M., Huang X., Huber-Sannwald E., Jankju M., Miriti M., Monerris J., Mau R.L., Morici E., Naseri K., Ospina A., Polo V., Prina A., Pucheta E., Ramírez-Collantes D.A., Romão R., Tighe M., Torres-Díaz C., Val J., Veiga J.P., Wang D., Zaady E. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 2012, 335:214-218. 10.1126/science.1215442.
47. Mander Ü., Wiggering H., Helming K. Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, Springer.
48. MARM (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Y Medio Rural y Marino) Mapa de cultivos y aprovechamientos, actualización 2000-2009. Escala 1:50000 2009.
49. Martin T.G., McIntyre S., Catterall C.P., Possingham H.P. Is landscape context important for riparian conservation? Birds in grassy woodland. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 127:201-214.
50. Mascarenhas A., Ramos T.B., Haase D., Santos R. Integration of ecosystem services in spatial planning: a survey on regional planners' views. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29:1287-1300. 10.1007/s10980-014-0012-4.
51. Meli P., Rey Benayas J.M., Balvanera P., Martínez Ramos M. Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context-dependent: a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2014, 9:e93507. 10.1371/journal.pone.0093507.
52. Metzger M.J., Rounsevell M.D.A., Acosta-Michlik L., Leemans R., Schröter D. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114:69-85. 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025.
53. Mitchell M.G.E., Bennett E.M., Gonzalez A. Forest fragments modulate the provision of multiple ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 10.1111/1365-2664.12241.
54. 2 por los bosques españoles. Monogr. INIA: Ser. For. 2005, 13:25-38. pages 43-255.
55. Moreno-Mateos D., Power M.E., Comín F.A., Yockteng R. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001247. 10.1371/journal.pbio. 1001247.
56. Müller F., Schrautzer J., Reiche E.-W., Rinker A. Ecosystem based indicators in retrogressive successions of an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic. 2006, 6:63-82. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.017.
57. Naidoo R., Ricketts T.H. Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e360. 10.1371/journal.pbio. 0040360.
58. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R.E., Lehner B., Malcolm T.R., Ricketts T.H. Ecosystem services special feature: global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:9495-9500. 10.1073/pnas.0707823105.
59. Nelson D.W., Sommers L.E. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods 1996, 961-1010. Soil Society of America. J.M. Bartels (Ed.).
60. Nelson E., Polasky S., Lewis D.J., Plantinga A.J., Lonsdorf E., White D., Bael D., Lawler J.J. Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:9471-9476. 10.1073/pnas.0706178105.
61. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D.R., Chan K.M., Daily G.C., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Lonsdorf E., Naidoo R., Ricketts T.H., Shaw Mr. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:4-11. 10.1890/080023.
62. O'Farrell P.J., Reyers B., Le Maitre D.C., Milton S.J., Egoh B., Maherry A., Colvin C., Atkinson D., De Lange W., Blignaut J.N., Cowling R.M. Multi-functional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 2010, 25:1231-1246. 10.1007/s10980-010-9495-9.
63. Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H.H., Wagner H. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.0-7 2013, http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
64. Palumbi S.R., Sandifer P.A., Allan J.D., Beck M.W., Fautin D.G., Fogarty M.J., Halpern B.S., Incze L.S., Leong J.-A., Norse E., Stachowicz J.J., Wall D.H. Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 7:204-211. 10.1890/070135.
65. Petz K., van Oudenhoven A.P.E. Modelling land management effect on ecosystem functions and services: a study in the Netherlands. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2012, 8:135-155. 10.1080/21513732.2011.642409.
66. Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S., Sarkar D., R the Development Core Team nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-108 2013.
67. Polasky S., Nelson E., Lonsdorf E., Fackler P., Starfield A. Conserving species in a working landscape: land use with biological and economic objectives. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15:1387-1401. 10.1890/03-5423.
68. Posthumus H., Rouquette J.R., Morris J., Gowing D.J.G., Hess T.M. A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services: a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1510-1523. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.011.
69. Power A.G. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:2959-2971. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143.
70. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/.
71. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
72. Redford K.H., Adams W.M. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23:785-787. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x.
73. Reyers B., Polasky S., Tallis H., Mooney H.A., Larigauderie A. Finding common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience 2012, 62:503-507. 10.1525/bio.2012.62.5.12.
74. Sayer J., Sunderland T., Ghazoul J., Pfund J.-L., Sheil D., Meijaard E., Venter M., Boedhihartono A.K., Day M., Garcia C., Oosten C., van Buck L.E. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:8349-8356. 10.1073/pnas.1210595110.
75. Scherr S.J., McNeely J.A. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of "ecoagriculture" landscapes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:477-494. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2165.
76. Schindler S., Kropik M., Euller K., Bunting S.W., Schulz-Zunkel C., Hermann A., Hainz-Renetzeder C., Kanka R., Mauerhofer V., Gasso V., Krug A., Lauwaars S.G., Zulka K.P., Henle K., Hoffmann M., Biró M., Essl F., Jaquier S., Balázs L., Borics G., Hudin S., Damm C., Pusch M., Sluis T., van der Sebesvari Z., Wrbka T. Floodplain management in temperate regions: is multifunctionality enhancing biodiversity?. Environ. Evid. 2013, 2:10. 10.1186/2047-2382-2-10.
77. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1949, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, ISBN 0-252-72548-4.
78. Skroch M., López-Hoffman L. Saving nature under the big tent of ecosystem services: a response to Adams and Redford. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:325-327. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01416.x.
79. Srivastava D.S., Vellend M. Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation?. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36:267-294. 10.2307/30033805.
80. Sweeney B.W., Bott T.L., Jackson J.K., Kaplan L.A., Newbold J.D., Standley L.J., Hession W.C., Horwitz R.J. Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:14132-14137. 10.1073/pnas.0405895101.
81. Swinton S.M., Lupi F., Robertson G.P., Hamilton S.K. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:245-252. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.020.
82. Tallis H., Kareiva P., Marvier M., Chang A. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:9457-9464. 10.1073/pnas.0705797105.
83. Tilman D., Reich P.B., Knops J., Wedin D., Mielke T., Lehman C. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 2001, 294:843-845. 10.1126/science.1060391.
84. Tockner K., Stanford J.A. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29:308-330. 10.1017/S037689290200022X.
85. Tockner K., Uehlinger U., Robinson C.T. Rivers of Europe 2009, Academic Press.
86. Trabucchi M., O'Farrell P.J., Notivol E., Comín F.A. Mapping ecological processes and ecosystem services for prioritizing restoration efforts in a semi-arid Mediterranean River Basin. Environ. Manag. 2014, 1-14. 10.1007/s00267-014-0264-4.
87. Turner W.R., Brandon K., Brooks T.M., Costanza R., Fonseca G.A.B., da Portela R. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience 2007, 57:868-873. 10.1641/B571009.
88. Van Oudenhoven A.P.E., Petz K., Alkemade R., Hein L., de Groot R.S. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:110-122. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012.
89. Vidal-Abarca M.R., Suárez M.L. Which are, what is their status and what can we expect from ecosystem services provided by Spanish rivers and riparian areas?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2013.
90. Vidal-Abarca M.R., Suárez-Alonso M.L., Santos-Martín F., Martín-Löpez B., Benayas J., Montes C. Understanding complex links between fluvial ecosystems and social indicators in Spain: An ecosystem services approach. Ecol. Complex. 2014, 20:1-10. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.07.002.
91. Whittingham M.J. The future of agri-environment schemes: biodiversity gains and ecosystem service delivery?. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:509-513. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01987.x.
92. Willaarts B.A., Volk M., Aguilera P.A. Assessing the ecosystem services supplied by freshwater flows in Mediterranean agroecosystems. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 105:21-31. 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.12.019.
93. Zhang W., Ricketts T.H., Kremen C., Carney K., Swinton S.M. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:253-260. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024.
94. Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A., Smith G.M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R 2009, Springer.