Large area land cover classification with landsat ETM+ images based on decision tree

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 39, Issue , 2012, Pages 421-426

  Zhai, Liang ^a   Sun, Jinping ^a   Sang, Huiyong ^a   Yang, Gang ^a   Jia, Yi ^a  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY OF SURVEYING AND MAPPING   (China)

Author keywords

C5.0; Decision tree; Land cover classification; MLC

Indexed keywords

DECISION TREES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

C5.0; DECISION TREE CLASSIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; LAND CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFICATIONS; MLC; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 84924373183     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Liang ZHAI, Wenhan XIE, Huiyong SANG, Jinping SUN. Land cover mapping with Landsat data: The Tasmania case study. The 2011 International Symposium on Image and Data Fusion, 9-11 August 2011, Tengchong, Yunnan, China.
2. S. M. JOY, A non-parametric, supervised classification of vegetation types on the Kaibab National Forest using decision trees. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003, vol.24, NO.9, 1835-1852.
3. Perera, K. and Tsuchiya, K., 2009. Experiment for mapping land cover and it's change in southeastern Sri Lanka utilizing 250m resolution MODIS imageries. Advances in Space Research, 43 (9). pp. 1349-1355.
4. Heinl, M., Walde, J., Tappeiner, G., and Tappeiner U., 2009. Classifiers vs. input variables - The drivers in image classification for land cover mapping. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 11(6). pp. 423-430.
5. Foody, G. M., 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1). pp. 185-201.
6. Lu D. and Weng Q., 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(5). pp. 823-870.
7. Herold, M., Mayaux, P., Woodcock, C.E., Baccini, A., and Schmullius, C., 2008. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5). pp. 2538-2556.
8. Loveland, T. R., Reed, B. C., Brown, J. F., Ohlen, D. O., Zhu, Z., Yang, L., and Merchant, J. W., (2000). Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21 (6-7). pp. 1303-1330.
9. Friedl, M.A., McIver, D.K., Hodges, J. C. F., Zhang, X. Y., Muchoney, D., Strahler, A. H., et al. (2002). Global land covermapping from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1-2). pp. 287-302.
10. Hansen, M.C., DeFries, R.S., Townshend, J.R.G., and Sohlberg, R., 2000. Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6-7), 1331-1364.
11. Liu Zhongyang, Du Zixuan, Chen Huailiang. Study on the Land Use and Cover Classification of Zhengzhou Based on Decision Tree. 2010 International Conference on Remote Sensing(ICRS). Homer, Collin, Chengquan Huang, and Limin Yang.
12. DEVELOPMENT OF A CIRCA 2000 LANDCOVER DATABASE FOR THE UNITED STATES. Science for a changing world.
13. Chengquan Huang, Limin Yang, and Bruce Wylie. A STRATEGY FOR ESTIMATI NG TREE CANOPY DENSITY USING LANDSAT 7 ETM+ AND HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES OVER LARGE AREAS. Science for a changing world.
14. John R. Jensen. IntroductoryDigital image processing. Science Press. 2007: 467-491.
15. PANG Su-Lin, GONG Ji-Zhang. C5.0 classification algorithm and its application on individual credit score for banks, Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice. Dec.2009: 94-104.
16. Higher resolution Global Land Cover Mapping Project. http://www.globallandcover.com/, July, 1, 2011.
17. Changqing Zhu, Xiaomei Yang. Study of remote sensing image texture analysis and classification using wavelet. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998, VOL.19, n o.16, 319 7-3203.
18. TOM, C. H., and MILLER, L. D. An automated land use mapping comparison of the bayesian maximum likelihood and linear discriminant analysis algorithms. Photogram. Engng remote Sensing, 50, 193.
19. A. S. BELWARD, and A. de HOYOS. A comparison of supervised maximum likelihood and decision tree classification for crop cover estimation from multi temporal LANDSAT MSS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1987, VOL. 8, No.2, 229-235.