Quantitative framework for prospective motion correction evaluation

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 810-816

  Pannetier, Nicolas A ^a,b   Stavrinos, Theano ^a,b   Ng, Peter ^a,b   Herbst, Michael ^c,d   Zaitsev, Maxim ^c   Young, Karl ^a,b   Matson, Gerald ^a,b   Schuff, Norbert ^a,b  

^a SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

average edge strength; haralick texture; marker fixation; motion correction; PMC; prospective motion correction

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PHANTOMS; TEXTURES;

AVERAGE EDGE STRENGTH; HARALICK TEXTURE; MARKER FIXATION; MOTION CORRECTION; MOTION TRAJECTORIES; QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON; QUANTITATIVE FRAMEWORKS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

TIME AND MOTION STUDY;

ADULT; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MOUTH PROTECTOR; NORMAL HUMAN; PHANTOM; PROSPECTIVE MOTION CORRECTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VOLUNTEER; ARTIFACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HEAD; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING PHANTOM; MOTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; FEMALE; HEAD; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84924366278     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25580     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Maclaren J, Herbst M, Speck O, Zaitsev M,. Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: a review. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 621-636.
2. Aksoy M, Forman C, Straka M, Çukur T, Hornegger J, Bammer R,. Hybrid prospective and retrospective head motion correction to mitigate cross-calibration errors. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 1237-1251.
3. Schulz J, Siegert T, Reimer E, Labadie C, Maclaren J, Herbst M, Zaitsev M, Turner R,. An embedded optical tracking system for motion-corrected magnetic resonance imaging at 7T. Magma 2012; 25: 443-453.
4. Herbst M, Maclaren J, Lovell-Smith C, Sostheim R, Egger K, Harloff A, Korvink J, Hennig J, Zaitsev M,. Reproduction of motion artifacts for performance analysis of prospective motion correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 182-190.
5. Hedley M, Yan H,. Motion artifact suppression: a review of post-processing techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 10: 627-635.
6. McGee KP, Manduca A, Felmlee JP, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL,. Image metric-based correction (autocorrection) of motion effects: analysis of image metrics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 174-181.
7. Cheng JY, Alley MT, Cunningham CH, Vasanawala SS, Pauly JM, Lustig M,. Nonrigid motion correction in 3D using autofocusing with localized linear translations. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 1785-1797.
8. Loktyushin A, Nickisch H, Pohmann R, Schölkopf B,. Blind retrospective motion correction of MR images. Magn Reson Med 2013; 70: 1608-1618.
9. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I,. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973; SMC-3: 610-621.
10. Young K, Chen Y, Kornak J, Matson GB, Schuff N,. Summarizing complexity in high dimensions. Phys Rev Lett 2005; 94: 098701.
11. Young K, Schuff N,. Measuring structural complexity in brain images. Neuroimage 2008; 39: 1721-1730.
12. Maclaren J, Armstrong BSR, Barrows RT, et al., Measurement and correction of microscopic head motion during magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. PloS One 2012; 7: e48088.
13. Zaitsev M, Dold C, Sakas G, Hennig J, Speck O,. Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 1038-1050.
14. Smith SM,. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17: 143-155.
15. Foerster BU, Tomasi D, Caparelli EC,. Magnetic field shift due to mechanical vibration in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1261-1267.
16. Canny J,. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1986; PAMI-8: 679-698.
17. Tesař L, Shimizu A, Smutek D, Kobatake H, Nawano S,. Medical image analysis of 3D CT images based on extension of Haralick texture features. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2008; 32: 513-520.
18. Singh A, Zahneisen B, Keatin B, Herbst M, Zaitsev M, Ernst T,. Optical motion tracking with two markers for robust prospective motion correction. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Milan, Italy, 2014. Abstract 891.
19. White N, Roddey C, Shankaranarayanan A, Han E, Rettmann D, Santos J, Kuperman J, Dale A,. PROMO: real-time prospective motion correction in MRI using image-based tracking. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 91-105.
20. Ooi MB, Krueger S, Muraskin J, Thomas WJ, Brown TR,. Echo-planar imaging with prospective slice-by-slice motion correction using active markers. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66: 73-81.
21. Qin L, van Gelderen P, Derbyshire JA, Jin F, Lee J, de Zwart JA, Tao Y, Duyn JH,. Prospective head-movement correction for high-resolution MRI using an in-bore optical tracking system. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 924-934.
22. Kovalev VA, Kruggel F, Gertz H-J, von Cramon DY,. Three-dimensional texture analysis of MRI brain datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 424-433.