Rising CO2 can alter fodder-weed interactions and suppression of Parthenium hysterophorus

Weed Research

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 113-117

  Khan, N ^a,b   George, D ^a   Shabbir, A ^a,c   Hanif, Z ^a,d   Adkins, S W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Pakistan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB   (Pakistan)

^d Livestock and Cooperative   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Australia; Climate change; Elevated CO2; Fodder plants; Growth suppression; Parthenium weed

Indexed keywords

C4 PLANT; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DICOTYLEDON; FODDER; INVASIVE SPECIES; LEGUME; WEED;

ASTREBLA SQUARROSA; BOTHRIOCHLOA DECIPIENS; CLITORIA TERNATEA; PARTHENIUM; PARTHENIUM HYSTEROPHORUS;

EID: 84924333938     PISSN: 00431737     EISSN: 13653180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/wre.12127     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adkins SW & Shabbir A (2014) Biology, ecology and management of the invasive parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Pest Management Science 70, 1023-1029.
2. 2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2 New Phytologist 165, 351-372.
3. DAFF (2011) Available at: http://www.daff.qld.gov.au. (last accessed 13 September 2012).
4. 4 intermediates: reduced sensitivity to external bicarbonate. Photosynthetica 30, 455-463.
5. 4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 155, 56-63.
6. 2 enrichment and management. Global Change Biology 3, 149-160.
7. Houghton RA (1996) Converting terrestrial ecosystems from sources to sinks of carbon. Ambio 25, 267-272.
8. IPCC (2007) Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 104.
9. Khan N, O'Donnell C, George D & Adkins SW (2013) Suppressive ability of selected fodder plants on the growth of Parthenium hysterophorus. Weed Research 53, 61-68.
10. Khan N, Shabbir A, George D et al. (2014) Suppressive fodder plants as part of an integrated management program for Parthenium hysterophorus L. Field Crops Research 156, 172-179.
11. 2 enrichment. Acta Oecologica 18, 269-275.
12. 4 grass (Cenchrus ciliaris). Plant Protection Quarterly 20, 61-66.
13. O'Donnell C & Adkins SW (2005) Management of parthenium weed through competitive displacement with beneficial plants. Weed Biology & Management 5, 77-79.
14. Parsons WT & Cuthbertson EG (1992) Noxious Weeds of Australia. Inkata Press, Melbourne/Sydney, Australia.
15. 2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist 157, 175-198.
16. Rejmanek M, Robinson GR & Rejmankova E (1989) Weed-crop competition: experimental designs and models for data analysis. Weed Science 37, 276-284.
17. Shabbir A, Dhileepan K, O'Donnell C & Adkins SW (2013) Complementing biological control with plant suppression: Implications for improved management of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Biological Control 64, 270-275.
18. Spitters CJT (1983) An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 31, 1-11.
19. 2 in low-phosphorus-availability soil. Ecological Research 21, 664-670.
20. 2 concentration and defoliation on the growth of Themeda triandra. Grass and Forage Science 59, 215-226.