On the wealth effects of the supervisory goodwill controversy

Journal of Financial Research

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 69-81

  Bierman, Leonard ^a   Fraser, Donald R ^a   Zardkoohi, Asghar ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924297910     PISSN: 02702592     EISSN: 14756803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1999.tb00715.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Boehmer, E., J. Musumeci, and A. Poulsen, 1991, Event study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance, Journal of Financial Economics 30, 253–72.
2. Brown, S. and J. Warner, 1985, Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3–31.
3. Cornett, M. and H. Tehranian, 1994, An examination of voluntary versus involuntary security issuances by commercial banks, Journal of Financial Economics 35, 99–122.
4. Fama, E., L. Fisher, M. Jensen, and R. Roll, 1969, The adjustment of stock prices to new information, International Economic Review 10, 1–21.
5. Lummer, S. and J. McConnell, 1989, Further evidence on the bank lending process and the capital-market response to bank loan agreements, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 99–122.
6. Spong, K., 1994, Banking Regulation: Its Purposes, Implementation, and Effects, 4th ed. (Federal Reserve Bank, Kansas City).
7. Sundaram, S., N. Rangan, and W. Davidson III, 1992, The market valuation effects of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Journal of Banking and Finance 16, 1097–1122.
8. Zellner, A., 1962, An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias, Journal of the American Statistical Association 298, 348–368.