Patients’ use of a home-based virtual reality system to provide rehabilitation of the upper limb following stroke

Physical Therapy

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 350-359

  Standen, Penny J ^a   Threapleton, Kate ^a   Connell, Louise ^b   Richardson, Andy ^c   Brown, David J ^d   Battersby, Steven ^d   Sutton, Catherine Jane ^a   Platts, Fran ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS FT   (United Kingdom)

^d NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e SHERWOOD FOREST HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECREATION; STROKE; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84924274642     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130564     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Feys HM, de Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:785-792.
2. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35:2529-2539.
3. van Peppen R, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphiné S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833-862.
4. van der Lee JH, Snels IA, Beckerman H, et al. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:20-31.
5. Han C, Wang O, Meng P, Qi M. Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;27:75-81.
6. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. 4th ed. London, United Kingdom: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
7. Royal College of Physicians. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP). Clinical audit first pilot public report. National results. August 2013. Available at: https://www.strokeaudit.org?results/national-results.aspx. Accessed September 2014.
8. Kaur G, English C, Hillier S. How physically active are people with stroke in therapy sessions aimed at improving motor function? A systematic review. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:820673.
9. Carter S, Taylor D, Levenson R. A Question of Choice: Compliance in Medicine Taking. London, United Kingdom: Medicines Partnership: 2003.
10. Clay DL, Hopps JA. Treatment adherence in rehabilitation: the role of treatment accommodation. Rehabil Psychol. 2003; 48:215-219.
11. Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2011;9: CD008349.
12. Merians AS, Fluet GG, Qiu Q, et al. Integrated arm and hand training using adaptive robotics and virtual reality simulations. In: Sharkey PM, Sańchez J, Brooks T, eds. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies With ArtAbilitation; August 31-September 2, 2010; Vinã del Mar/Valparaiso, Chile. 2010:123-130.
13. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22: 111-121.
14. Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010;41:1477-1484.
15. Standen PJ, Brown DJ, Battersby S, et al. Study to evaluate a low cost virtual reality system for home-based rehabilitation of the upper limb following stroke. In: Sharkey PM, Sańchez J, Brooks T, eds. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies With ArtAbilitation; August 31-September 2, 2010; Vin˜a del Mar/Valparaiso, Chile. 2010:139-146.
16. Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance.2008. Available at: http:/?www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/complexinterventions-guidance/. Accessed September 2014.
17. Nudo RJ. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:887.
18. Woldag H, Stupka K, Hummelsheim H. Repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements with shaping is beneficial for motor improvement in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:582-587.
19. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125-132.
20. Kellor M, Frost J, Silberberg N, et al. Hand strength and dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1971;25:77-83.
21. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
22. Nouri FM, Lincoln N. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:301-305.
23. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3: 77-101.
24. Bonis J. Acute Wiiitis [letter]. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2431-2432.
25. Jones F, Riazi A, Norris M. Selfmanagement after stroke: time for some more questions? Disabil Rehabil. 2013; 35:257-264.
26. Corti M, McGuirk TE, Wu SS, Patten C. Differential effects of power training versus functional task practice on compensation and restoration of arm function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:842-854.