Extraction of fluvial networks in lidar data using marked point processes

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 297-304

  Schmidt, A ^a   Rottensteiner, F ^a   Soergel, U ^b   Heipke, C ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coast; Lidar; Marked point processes; Networks; RJMCMC

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; GEOMETRY; MARKOV PROCESSES; REMOTE SENSING; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION; CONNECTED NETWORKS; FLUVIAL CHANNELS; FLUVIALS; LIDAR DATA; MARKED POINT PROCESS; NETWORK; REVERSIBLE JUMP MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATIONS; TWO-STEP APPROACH;

OPTICAL RADAR;

EID: 84924261241     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-297-2014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Ashley, G. M., Zeff, M. L., 1988. Tidal channel classification for a low-mesotidal salt marsh. Marine Geology, 82, pp. 17-32.
2. Brédif, M., Tournaire, O., 2012. Librjmcmc: An Open-source Generic C++ Library for Stochastic Optimization. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIX-B3, pp. 259-264.
3. Bresenham, J. E., 1965. Algorithm for computer control of a digital plotter. IBM Systems Journal 4 (1), pp. 25-30.
4. Chai, D., Foerstner, W., and Lafarge, F., 2013. Recovering line-networks in images by junction-point processes. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Portland.
5. Daley, D. J., Vere-Jones, D., 2003. An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes: Elementary Theory and Methods, Springer.
6. Fagherazzi, S., Bortoluzzi, A., Dietrich, W. E., Adami, A., Lanzoni, S., Marani, M., Rinaldo, A., 1999. Tidal Networks 1. Automatic network extraction and preliminary scaling features from digital terrain maps. Water Resources Research. 35, pp. 3891-3904.
7. Green, P., 1995. Reversible Jump Markov Chains Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika, Vol. 82(4), pp. 711-732.
8. Grote, A., Heipke, C., Rottensteiner, F., 2012. Road Network extraction in suburban areas, Photogrammetric Record. The Photogrammetric Record 27(137), pp. 8-28.
9. Hastings, W., 1970. Monte Carlo sampling using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, Vol. 57(1), pp. 97-109.
10. Heipke, C., Mayer, H., Wiedemann, C. and Jamet, O., 1997. Evaluation of automatic road extraction. In: Proc. ISPRS Workshop 3D Reconstruction and Modeling of Topographic Objects, Stuttgart, Germany, Sep. 17-19, Vol. XXXII/3-4W2, Int. Archives Photogrammetry Remote Sens., pp. 151-160.
11. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., Vecchi, M. P., 1983. Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science 220, pp. 671-680.
12. Lacoste, C., Descombes, X., Zerubia, J., 2005. Point processes for unsupervised line network extraction in remote sensing. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 1568-1579.
13. Lafarge, F., Descombes, X., Zerubia, J., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M., 2008. Building reconstruction from a single DEM. IEEE CVPR.
14. Lohani, B., Mason, D. C., Scott, T. R., Sreenivas, B., 2006. Identification of tidal channel networks from aerial photographs alone and fused with airborne laser altimetry. International Journal of Remote Sensing 27 (1), pp. 5-25.
15. Mallet, C., Lafarge, F., Roux, M., Soergel, U., Bretar, F. Heipke, C., 2010. A marked point process for modeling lidar waveforms, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 19 (12), pp. 3204-3221.
16. Mason, D. C., Scott, T. R. and Wang, H.-J., 2006. Extraction of tidal channel networks from airborne lidar data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammy and Remote Sensing, Vol. 61, 2, pp. 67-83.
17. Metropolis, M., Rosenbluth, A., Teller, A., and Teller, E., 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 21, pp. 1087-1092.
18. Perrin, G., Descombes, X., Zerubia, J., 2005. Adaptive simulated annealing for energy minimization problem in a marked point process application. Proc. Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, St Augustine, United States.
19. Rutzinger, M., Rottensteiner, F., Pfeifer, N., 2009. A comparison of evaluation techniques for building extraction from airborne laser scanning. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2, pp. 11-20.
20. Salamon, P., Sibani, P., Frost, R., 2002. Facts, Conjectures and Improvements for Simulated Annealing. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA.
21. Sun, K., Sang, N., Zhang, T. (2007). Marked point process for vascular tree extraction on angiogram. Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 467-478.
22. Tournaire, O., Paparoditis, N., Lafarge, F., 2007. Rectangular road marking detection with marked point processes. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36 (Part 3/W49A), pp. 73-78
23. Tournaire O., Bredif, M., Boldo D., Durupt, M., 2010. An efficient stochastic approach for building footprint extraction from digital elevation models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 65, 4, pp.317 -327.