Assessment of the physical flood susceptibility of buildings on a large scale - Conceptual and methodological frameworks

Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2105-2117

  Blanco Vogt, A ^a   Schanze, J ^a,b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGICAL URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOOD DAMAGE; FLOODING; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; VULNERABILITY;

COLOMBIA; MAGDALENA [COLOMBIA];

EID: 84924240417     PISSN: 15618633     EISSN: 16849981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-2105-2014     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adriaans, P. and Zantinge, D.: Data Mining, Pearson Education. New Delhi, India, 1996.
2. Aglan, H., Wendt, R., and Livengood, S.: Field Testing of Energy-Efficient Flood-Damage Resistant Residential Envelope Systems Summary Report, available from: http://www.ibsadvisorsllc.com/-library/ORNL-Field- Testing-of-Energy-Efficient-Flood-Damage-Resistant-Residential-Envelope-Systems. pdf (last access: 15 August 2013), 2004.
3. Aguilar, F. J. and Mills, J. P.: Accuracy assessment of lidar-derived digital elevation models, The Photogrammetric Record, 23, 148-169, 2008. (Pubitemid 352044497)
4. Awrangjeb, M., Ravanbakhsh, M. and Fraser, C. S.: Automatic detection of residential buildings using LIDAR data and multispectral imagery, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 65, 457-467, 2010.
5. Birkmann, J.: Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions, edited by: J. Birkmann, Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards, 01, 9-54, 2006.
6. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., and Wisner, B.: At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters, Taylor & Francis, ISBN: 9780203974575, 1994.
7. Blanco-Vogt, A., Haala, N., and Schanze, J.: Building extraction from remote sensing data for parameterising a building typology: a contribution to flood vulnerability assessment, JURSE Conference Sao Paulo, 147-150, 2013.
8. BMVBS: Hochwasserschutzfibel. Bauliche Schutz- und Vorsorgemaß nahmen in hochwassergefährdeten Gebieten, available from: http://www.elementar-versichern.bayern.de/Hochwasserschutzfibel.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2006.
9. Brauch, H. G. and Oswald Spring, Ú.: Introduction: Coping with Global Environmental Change in the Anthropocene, edited by: H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, C. Mesjasz, J. Grin, P. Kameri-Mbote, B. Chourou, P. Dunay, and J. Birkmann, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 31-60, 2011.
10. Brenner, C.: Building extraction, edited by: G. Vosselman and H.-G. Maas, CRC Press, Scotland, 169-212, 2010.
11. Brzev, S., Scawthorn, C., Charleson, A. and Langenbach, R.: Proposed GEM Taxonomy: β ver. 0.1, Global Earthquake Model, http://www.nexus. globalquakemodel.org/gem-building-taxonomy/posts/updated-gem-basic-building- taxonomy-v1.0 (last access: 25 September 2013), 2011.
12. Committee and Resources: Reducing Vulnerability of Buildings to Flood Damage: Guidance on Building in Flood Prone Areas, Hawkesbury-Nepean Floodplain Management Steering and New South Wales Dept of Natural, available at: http://www.ses.nsw.gov.au/content/documents/pdf/resources/Building-Guidelines. pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2006.
13. Coppi, R., Gil, M. A., and Kiers, H. A. L.: The fuzzy approach to statistical analysis, Computat. Statist. Data Anal., 51, 1-14, available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com, 2006. (Pubitemid 44634809)
14. Escarameia, M., Karanxda, A., and Tagg, A.: Improving the flood resilience of buildings through improved materials, methods and details, report Wp5c laboratory tests interim report, http://www.ciria.org.uk/flooding/pdf/ WP5%20Lab% 20Testing%20Report.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2006.
15. Evans, E., Hall, J., Thorne, C., Penning-Rowsell, E., Watkinson, A., and Sayers, P.: Future flood risk management in the UK, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Water Management 159, issue WM1, 53-61, 2006. (Pubitemid 43385208)
16. FEMA, E. M. I.: Flood Damage-Resistant Materials Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program, (last access: 25 September 2013), 2008.
17. Fugate, D., Tarnavsky, E., and Stow, D.: A Survey of the Evolution of Remote Sensing Imaging Systems and Urban Remote Sensing Applications, edited by: T. Rashed and C. Jürgens, Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, 10(Chapter 7), 119-139, 2010.
18. Haithcoat, T., Song, W., and Hipple, J.: Building Extraction - LIDAR R&D Program for NASA/ICREST Studies, available at: http://www.grc.missouri. edu/icrestprojarchive/NASA/FeatureExtraction-Buildings/REPYear2-build- extraction.pdf (last access: 25 June 2012), 2001.
19. Hong, T.-P. and Lee, C.-Y.: Induction of fuzzy rules and membership functions from training examples, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 84, 33-47, 1996. (Pubitemid 126682899)
20. ICIS: Simple Google Earth Image Enhancement With SpaceEye, Image Processing and Intelligent Systems Laboratory, School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, China., 2009.
21. Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Apel, H., Barredo, J. I., Bates, P. D., Feyen, L., Gericke, A., Neal, J., Aerts, J. C. J. H., and Ward, P. J.: Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 3733-3752, doi:10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012, 2012.
22. Kreibich, H., Seifert, I., Merz, B., and Thieken, A. H.: Development of FLEMOcs - a new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector, Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 1302-1314, 2010.
23. Loga, T., Diefenbach, N., Dascalaki, E., and Balaras, C.: Application of Building Typologies for Modelling the Energy Balance of the Residential Building Stock: TABULA Thematic Report No 2, edited by: Diefenbach, N. and Loga, T. E., Institut Wohnen und Umwelt GmbH http://www.building-typology.eu/tabula.html (last access: 25 September 2013), 2012.
24. MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 281-297, 1967.
25. McGahey, C., Mens, M., Sayers, P., Luther, J., Petroska, M., and Schanze, J.: Methodology for a DSS to support long-term flood risk management planning, http://www.floodsite.net/html/partner-area/project-docs/T18-09-02-Methodology- DSS-D18-2-V1-1-P01.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2009.
26. Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Thieken, A., and Schmidtke, R.: Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 153-163, doi:10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004, 2004. (Pubitemid 38502908)
27. Mesev, V.: Classification of Urban Areas: Inferring Land Use from the Interpretation of Land Cover, edited by: Rashed, T., Jürgens, C., and Meer, F. D., Springer Netherlands, 141-164, 2010.
28. Messner, F., Penning-Rowsell, E., Green, C., Tunstall, S., Veen, A. V. D., Tapsell, S., Wilson, T., Krywkow, J., Logtmeijer, C., and Fernández-Bilbao, A.: Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods, Contract, 178), http://www.floodsite. net/html/partner-area/project-docs/T09-06-01-Flood-damage-guidelines-D9-1-v2-2- p44.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2007.
29. Meyer, V. and Messner, F.: National Flood Damage Evaluation Methods. A Review of Applied Methods in England, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Germany, available from: http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/45193/1/ 505414783.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2005.
30. Naumann, T., Nikolowski, J., Golz, S., and Schinke, R.: Resilience and Resistance of Buildings and Built Structures to Flood Impacts - Approaches to Analysis and Evaluation, in German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2010, edited by: Müller, B., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 89-100, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12785-4-9, 2011.
31. Navulur, K.: Multispectral image analysis using the objectoriented paradigm, Remote Sensing Applications Series, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2006.
32. Neubert, M., Naumann, T., Hennersdorf, J., and Nikolowski, J.: The Geographic Information System-based flood damage simulation model HOWAD, J. Flood Risk Manag., n/a-n/a, doi:10.1111/jfr3.12109, 2014.
33. Ochshorn, J.: Structural Elements for Architects and Builders: Design of columns, beams, and tension elements in wood, steel, and reinforced concrete, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK, 2009.
34. Rutzinger, M., Rottensteiner, F., and Pfeifer, N.: A comparison of evaluation techniques for building extraction from airborne laser scanning, in: IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2/1, 11-20, available at: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVIII/3-W8/papers/p69.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2009.
35. Samuels, P., Gouldby, B., Klijn, F., Messner, F., Van Os, A., Sayers, P., Schanze, J., and Udale-Clarke, H.: Language of Risk - Project Definitions (2nd Edn.), http://www.floodsite.net/html/partner-area/search-results3b.asp?docID=747 (last access: 25 September 2013), 2009.
36. Scawthorn, C., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, J., and Jones, C.: HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation Methodology, in: Overview and Flood Hazard Characterization, Natural Hazards Review, 7, 60, 60-71, 2006.
37. Schanze, J.: Flood Risk Management - A Basic Framework, in: Flood risk management - Hazard, vulnerability and mitigation measures, edited by: Schanze, J., Zeman, E., and Marsalek J., Springer Netherlands, 1-20, 2006.
38. Schöpfer, E., Lang, S., and Strobl, J.: Segmentation and Object-Based Image Analysis, Springer Netherlands, 141-164, 2010.
39. Sohn, G. and Dowman, I.: Data fusion of high resolution satellite imagery and LiDAR data for automatic building extraction, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 62, 43-63, 2007. (Pubitemid 46654759)
40. Thywissen, K.: Components of Risk: A Comparative Glossary, http://www.ehs.unu.edu/file/get/8335 (last access: 25 September 2013), 2006.
41. UNEP: Geo-3: global environment outlook. Chapter 3:Human Vulnerability to Environmental Change, http://www.grida.no/geo/geo3/english/pdfs/chapter3- vulnerability.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2002.
42. UNISDR, 2004: Terminology: Basic terms of disaster risk reduction. Reduction Strategy International For Disaster, www.unisdr.org/files/7817- 7819isdrterminology11.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013), 2004.
43. Vu, T. T. and Ban, Y.: Context-based mapping of damaged buildings from high-resolution optical satellite images, Internat. J. Remote Sens., 31, 3411-3425, 2010.
44. WHO: Guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould, www.euro.who.int/document/e92645.pdf (last access: 25 September 2013) 1-248, 2009.