Increased perforation risk with an MRI-conditional pacing lead: A single-center study

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 334-342

  Acha, Moshe Rav ^a   Keaney, John J ^a   Lubitz, Steven A ^a   Milan, David J ^a   Mansour, Moussa ^a   E Heist, Kevin ^a   Ptaszek, Leon M ^a   Singh, Jagmeet P ^a   Blendea, Dan ^a   Mela, Theofanie ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

imaging; pacing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART PACING; HUMAN; LEAD DISLODGEMENT; LEAD PERFORATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PACEMAKER ELECTRODE; PERICARDIOCENTESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; DEVICE SAFETY; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; HEART INJURIES; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES; WOUNDS, PENETRATING;

AGED; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEMALE; HEART INJURIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES; WOUNDS, PENETRATING;

EID: 84924211358     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: 15408159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pace.12550     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Nordbeck P, Ritter O, Weiss I, Warmuth M, Gensler D, Burkard N, Herold V, et al. Impact of imaging landmark on the risk of MRI-related heating near implanted medical devices like cardiac pacemaker leads. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 44-50.
2. Roguin A, Schwitter J, Vahlhaus C, Lombardi M, Brugada J, Vardas P, Auricchio A,. Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Europace 2008; 10: 336-346.
3. Kalin R, Stanton MS,. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 326-328.
4. Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Taborsky M, Vymazal J, Kanal E, Heuer H, Hecking K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8: 65-73.
5. Gimbel JR, Bello D, Schmitt M, Merkely B, Schwitter J, Hayes DL, Sommer T, et al. Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10: 685-691.
6. Elmouchi DA, Rosema S, Vanoosterhout SM, Khan M, Davis AT, Gauri AJ, Finta B, et al. Cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement after implantation of MR-conditional pacing lead: A single-center experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014; 37: 4-10.
7. Wollmann CG, Thudt K, Vock P, Globits S, Mayr H,. Clinical routine implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker system designed for safe use with MRI: A single center, retrospective study on lead performance of Medtronic lead 5086MRI in comparison to Medtronic leads 4592-53 and 4092-58. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2011; 22: 239-242.
8. Hill PE,. Complications of permanent transvenous cardiac pacing: A 14-year review of all transvenous pacemakers at one community hospital. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1987; 10: 564-570.
9. Sterlinski M, Przybylski A, Meciag A, Syska P, Pytkowski M, Kowalik I, Firek B, et al. Subacute cardiac perforation associated with active-fixation leads. Europace 2009; 11: 206-212.
10. Pavia S, Wilkoff B,. The management of surgical complications of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Curr Opin Cardiol 2001; 16: 66-71.
11. Kiviniemi MS, Pirnes MA, Eranen HJ, Kettuman RV, Hartikainen JE, et al. Complications related to permanent pacemaker therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 711-720.
12. Aggarwal RK, Connelly DT, Ray SG, Ball J, Charles RG,. Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: No difference between dual and single chamber systems. Br Heart J 1995; 73: 571-575.
13. Sivakumaran S, Irwin ME, Gulamhusein SS, Senaratne MPJ,. Post pacemaker implant pericarditis: Incidence and outcomes with active fixation leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 833-837.
14. Mahapatra S, Bybee KA, Bunch J, Espinosa RE, Sinak LJ, McGoon MD, Hayes DL,. Incidence and predictors of cardiac perforation after implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 907-911.
15. Alla VM, Reddy YM, Abide W, Hee T, Hunter C,. Delayed lead perforation: Can we ever let the guard down? Cardiol Res Pract 2010; 2010: 1-4.
16. Forelo GB, Santini L, Della Rocca DG, Romano V, Papavasileiou LP, Magliano G, Sgueglia M, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: Early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual chamber implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm 2013; 7: 750-754.
17. Rickard J, Taborsky M, Bello D, Johnson WB, Ramza B, Yanping C, Wilkoff BL,. Short- and long-term electrical performance of the 5086 MRI pacing leads. Heart Rhythm 2013; 31: s1547-s5271.
18. Satpathy R, Hee T, Esterbrooks D, Mohiuddin S,. Delayed defibrillator lead perforation: An increasing phenomenon. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31: 10-12.
19. Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA, Shepard RK,. Delayed complications following pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 115-1158.
20. Khan MN, Joseph G, Khaykin KM, Ziada KM, Wilkoff BL,. Delayed lead perforation: A disturbing trend. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 251-253.
21. Md Azizul H, Suvanan R, Bhabatosh B,. Perforation by permanent pacemaker lead: How late can they occur? Cardiol J. 2012; 19: 326-327.
22. Akyol A, Aydin A, Erdinler I, Oguz E,. Late perforation of the heart, pericardium and diaphragm by an active-fixation lead: A case-report. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006; 29: 429-430.