European union law in a global context: Text, cases and materials

European Union Law in a Global Context: Text, Cases and Materials

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-434

  Hartley, Trevor C ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924203282     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139171359     Document Type: Book

References (125)

1. Yearbook of the International Law Commission 104 at 108
2. Bowett Law of International Organizations (5th ed., 2001, by Philippe Sands and Pierre Klein), p. 16.
3. William Diebold, The Schuman Plan: A Study in Economic Co-Operation, 1950-1959 (Praeger, New York, and Oxford University Press, 1959).
4. Margaret Carlyle (ed.), Documents on International Affairs, 1949-1950 (Oxford University Press, London, 1953), pp. 315-317.
5. Hartley, “The Commission as Legislator under the EEC Treaty” (1988) 13 ELRev. 122.
6. Tomkins, “Responsibility and Resignation in the European Commission” (1999) 62 MLR 744.
7. Dashwood, “States in the European Union” (1998) 23 ELRev. 201 at 216.
8. Stein, “International Integration and Democracy: No Love at First Sight” (2001) 95 AJIL 489.
9. Papal Encyclical, Pacem in Terris (Pope John XXIII, 1963), para. 140.
10. Toth, “The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Maastricht Treaty” (1992) 29 CMLRev. 669 at 1091
11. Steiner, “Subsidiarity under the Maastricht Treaty” in David O’Keeffe and Patrick M Twomey (eds.), Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty (1994), p. 49 at pp. 55-58;
12. Schilling, “A New Dimension of Subsidiarity: Subsidiarity as a Rule and a Principle” (1994) 14 YEL 203 at 217 et seq. (this last analysis is probably the most closely reasoned).
13. The Principle of Subsidiarity, Com. Doc. SEC(92) 1990, 27 October 1992, p. 5.
14. The Principle of Subsidiarity, Com. Doc. SEC(92) 1990, 27 October 1992, p. 8.
15. Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 5th ed., 1998), pp. 728-730;
16. Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4th ed., 1997), p. 776.
17. WTO Secretariat, The WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd ed., 2001).
18. John H. Jackson, The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), p. 123.
19. Palmeter and Mavroidis, “The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law” (1998) 92 AJIL 398.
20. Jackson, “Editorial Comment: The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding - Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation” (1997) 91 AJIL 60;
21. John H. Jackson, The Jurisprudence of the GATT and the WTO (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), p. 162.
22. John H. Jackson, The Jurisprudence of the GATT and the WTO (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), p. 167.
23. Jackson, “Dispute Settlement and the WTO: Emerging Problems” (1998) 1 JIEL 329
24. John H. Jackson, The Jurisprudence of the GATT and the WTO (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), p. 168;
25. Hudec, “The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years” (1999) 8 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 1.
26. John Collier and Vaughan Lowe, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), p. 104.
27. Emesa Sugar (Free Zone) NV v. Aruba, Case C-17/89, [2000] ECR I-665 (Order of 4 February 2000).
28. D. W. Bowett, The Law of International Institutions (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 4th ed., 1982), pp. 263-264.
29. H. Lauterpacht, “Decisions of Municipal Courts as a Source of International Law” (1929) 10 BYIL 65 at 94-95.
30. Plender, “The European Court as an International Tribunal” [1983] CLJ 279 at 284.
31. John Collier and Vaughan Lowe, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 59-73.
32. Chimni, “The International Court and the Maintenance of Peace and Security: The Nicaragua Decision and the United States Response” (1986) 35 ICLQ 960.
33. John Dinges, Our Man in Panama: The Shrewd Rise and Brutal Fall of Manuel Noriega (Times Books/Random House, New York, rev. ed., 1991);
34. Peter Dale Scott and Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies and the CIA in Central America (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1991), Chap. 4
35. Richard Fagen, Forging Peace: The Challenge of Central America (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1987), Chap. 7;
36. Thomas M. Leonard, Central America and the United States: The Search for Stability (University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA, and London, 1991)
37. Xiaodong Yang, “Thou Shalt Not Violate Provisional Measures” (2001) 60 CLJ 441.
38. Smith, “A High Price to Pay: The Costs of the US Economic Sanctions Policy and the Need for Process Oriented Reform” (2000) 4 UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 325.
39. Lowe, “US Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The Helms-Burton and D’Amato Acts” (1997) 46 ICLQ 378;
40. Lowenfeld, “Agora: The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act: Congress and Cuba” (1996) 90 AJIL 419.
41. Van der Borght, “The EU-US Compromise of the Helms-Burton and D’Amato Acts” (1999) 93 AJIL 227.
42. Muylle, “Angry Farmers and Passive Policemen: Private Conduct and the Free Movement of Goods” (1998) 23 ELRev. 467.
43. Hartley Trevor C., Constitutional Problems of the European Union (Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, OR, 1999), pp. 112-118.
44. Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 10-11.
45. Trevor C. Hartley, Constitutional Problems of the European Union (Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, OR, 1999), pp. 53-56.
46. Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 9/75, p. 18 (1975).
47. Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 6th ed., 2003), pp. 12
48. Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 16-17.
49. “Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community”, but its name was changed by the Treaty on European Union, Art. 8 A(1) [G A(1)].
50. Hartley, “The Constitutional Foundations of the European Union” (2001) 117 LQR 225 at 226-233.
51. Hartley, “International Law and the Law of the European Union - A Reassessment” (2001) 72 BYIL 1 at 18-22.
52. Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), p. 232;
53. Ian Sinclair, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 2nd ed., 1984), p. 183.
54. Hartley, “International Law and the Law of the European Union - A Reassessment” (2001) 72 BYIL 1 at 18-21.
55. Akehurst, “The Application of General Principles of Law by the Court of Justice of the European Communities” (1981) 52 BYIL 29.
56. Dicey and Morris, The Conflict of Laws (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 13th ed. 2000), vol. 2, p. 651, rule 67(1).
57. Francis G. Jacobs and Shelly Roberts (eds.), The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1987), p. xxiv
58. Jackson, “United States” in Jacobs and Roberts, above, p. 141 at p. 145.
59. Pescatore, “The Doctrine of ‘Direct Effect’: An Infant Disease of Community Law” (1983) 8 ELRev. 155, n. 2.
60. Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 6th ed., 2003), pp. 41 et seq.
61. Stanley de Smith and Rodney Brazier, Constitutional and Administrative Law (Penguin, London, 8th ed., 1998), p. 147.
62. Jackson, The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 299-300.
63. Louis Henkin, Foreign Affairs and the US Constitution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd ed., 1996), pp. 226 et seq.
64. Jackson, The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 316-321.
65. Schermers, “The Netherlands” in Jacobs and Roberts, note 28 above, at pp. 112-114.
66. Hartley, “The European Court, Judicial Objectivity and the Constitution of the European Union” (1996)
67. Trevor C. Hartley, Constitutional Problems of the European Union (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1999), pp. 24 et seq.
68. Everling, “The Maastricht Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court and its Significance for the Development of the European Union” (1994) 14 YEL 1;
69. Foster, “The German Constitution and EC Membership” [1994] PL 392;
70. Herdegen, “Maastricht and the German Constitutional Court: Constitutional Restraints for an ‘Ever Closer Union’” (1994) 31 CMLRev. 233;
71. Kokott, “Report on Germany” in Anne-Marie Slaughter, Alec Stone Sweet and Joseph H. H. Weiler, The European Courts and National Courts - Doctrine and Jurisprudence (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998), p. 77;
72. MacCormick, “The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now” (1995) 1 ELJ 259.00
73. Trevor C. Hartley, Constitutional Problems of the European Union (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1999), Chap. 8.
74. Marshall, “Metric Measures and Martyrdom by Henry VIII Clause” (2002) 118 LQR 493;
75. Boyron “In the Name of European Law: The Metric Martyrs Case” (2002) 27 ELRev. 771.
76. Andrew Oppenheimer, The Relationship between European Community Law and National Law - The Cases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994), (p. 653).
77. Maganaris, “The Principle of Supremacy of Community Law - The Greek Challenge” (1998) 23 ELRev. 179
78. “The Principle of Supremacy of Community Law in Greece - From Direct Challenge to Non-Application” (1999) 24 ELRev. 426.
79. Tatham, “Effect of European Community Directives in France: The Development of the Cohn-Bendit Jurisprudence” (1991) 40 ICLQ 907;
80. Simon, “Le Conseil d’Etat et les directives communautaires: Du gallicanisme à l’orthodoxie” [1992] RTDE 265.
81. Weatherill, “Breach of Directives and Breach of Contract” (2001) 26 ELRev. 177.
82. Rasmussen, “The European Court’s Acte Clair Strategy in CILFIT” (1984) 9 ELRev. 242
83. Noirfalisse, “The Community System of Fisheries Management and the Factortame Case” (1992) 12 YEL 325.
84. Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), p. 74.
85. Louis Henkin, Foreign Affairs and the US Constitution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd ed., 1996), pp. 151-156
86. Alan Dashwood and Christophe Hillion (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 2000), pp. 127 et seq.
87. Kupferberg, Case 104/81, [1982] ECR 3641;
88. Michael Freeman, Human Rights (Polity Press (in association with Blackwell Publishers), Cambridge, 2002), Chaps. 2-4.
89. The Times (London), 2 December 2000.
90. Dee Brown, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An IndianHistory of the American West (Vintage, London, 1991);
91. Angie Debo, History of the Indians of the United States (Pimlico, London, 1995);
92. William T. Hagan, American Indians (University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1992);
93. James Wilson, The Earth Shall Weep: A History of Native America (Picador, London and Basingstoke, 1998).
94. Robert F. Heizer, The Destruction of California Indians (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, and London, 1993), Chap. 7;
95. Paul I. Wellman, Death in the Desert (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, and London, 1987), especially at pp. 85-86;
96. Donald E. Worcester, The Apaches (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK, and London, 1992), Chaps. 5 and 6.
97. Felix S. Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law (Michie Bobbs-Merrill, Charlottesville, VA, 1982), pp. 91-92;
98. Burke, “The Cherokee Cases: A Study in Law, Politics and Morality” (1969) 21 Stanford Law Review 500
99. Walter F. Murphy, James E. Fleming and Sotirios A. Barber, American Constitutional Interpretation (Foundation Press, Westbury, NY, 2nd ed., 1995), pp. 87-89.
100. Gearty, “Reconciling Parliamentary Democracy and Human Rights” (2002) 118 LQR 248.
101. Wade, “Horizons of Horizontality” (2000) 116 LQR 217.
102. Buxton, “The Human Rights Act and Private Law” (2000) 116 LQR 48.
103. Beyleveld and Pattinson, “Horizontal Applicability and Direct Effect” (2002) 118 LQR 623
104. J. G. Merrills, The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York, 2nd ed., 1993).
105. Francis G. Jacobs and Robin C. A. White, The European Convention on Human Rights (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2nd ed., 1996), pp. 17 et seq.
106. Amnesty International, Denial of Justice - The Russian Federation (Amnesty International, 2002), www.amnesty.org;
107. Human Rights Watch, “Welcome to Hell”- Arbitrary Detention, Torture and Extortion in Chechnya (Human Rights Watch, New York, Washington, London and Brussels, 2000), www.hrw.org
108. Human Rights Watch, Confessions at Any Cost - Torture in Russia (1999).
109. “Torture Claim Angers French Police”, The Times (London), 9 January 2003, p. 10.
110. Schermers, “The European Communities Bound by Fundamental Human Rights” (1990) 27 CMLRev. 249 at 253-255.
111. “This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain.” Lochner was overruled in Bunting v. Oregon, 243
112. William B. Lockhart, Yale Kamisar, Jesse H. Choper, Steven H. Shiffrin and Richard H. Fallon Jr, Constitutional Rights and Liberties (West Publishing Co., St Paul, MN, 8th ed., 1996), pp. 57-69.
113. Bernard Schwartz, A History of the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, New York and London, 1993), pp. 231-238.
114. Donald P. Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (Duke University Press, Durham, NC, and London, 2nd ed., 1997), pp. 336 et seq.
115. Phelan, “Right to Life of the Unborn v. Promotion of Trade in Services” (1992) 55 MLR 670.
116. Ian Sinclair, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Manchester University Press, Manchester and Dover, NH, 2nd ed., 1984), pp. 10-21;
117. Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 10-11.
118. Mus, “Conflicts Between Treaties in International Law” (1998) 45 NILR 208 at 220-222.
119. René Joliet, Le droit institutionnel des Communautés européennes: Les Institutions; Les sources; Les rapports entre ordres juridiques (Faculté de Droit, d’Economie et de Sciences Sociales, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium, 1983), pp. 75-77;
120. T. C. Hartley, The Foundations of European Community Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 5th ed., 2003), pp. 29-30.
121. Mus, “Conflicts Between Treaties in International Law” (1998) 45 NILR 208 at 217-219.
122. Handoll, “Article 48(4) EEC and Non-National Access to Public Employment” (1988) 13 ELRev.
123. Castro Oliveira, “Workers and Other Persons: Step-by-Step from Movement to Citizenship - Case Law 1995-2001” (2002) 39 CMLRev. 77 at 97-98.
124. Uberseering, Case C-208/00, 5 November 2002
125. Stephan Rammeloo, Corporations in Private International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).