|
Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 15-18
|
The trouble with quality filtering based on relative Cramér-Rao lower bounds
|
Author keywords
Cram r Rao minimum variance bounds; errors; MR spectroscopy; quality control; quality filtering
|
Indexed keywords
ERRORS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;
METABOLITES;
QUALITY CONTROL;
CONCENTRATION VALUES;
EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIES (MRS);
MEAN CONCENTRATIONS;
MINIMUM VARIANCE;
MR SPECTROSCOPY;
STANDARD PRACTICES;
STATISTICAL FINDING;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE;
ARTICLE;
BRAIN LEVEL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CRAMER RAO LOWER BOUND;
CRITERION VARIABLE;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DATA COLLECTION METHOD;
HUMAN;
MEASUREMENT ERROR;
METABOLITE;
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;
QUALITY CONTROL;
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;
RELIABILITY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
STATISTICAL BIAS;
UNCERTAINTY;
ALGORITHM;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
PROCEDURES;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SIGNAL PROCESSING;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
STATISTICAL MODEL;
ALGORITHMS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;
MODELS, STATISTICAL;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
|
EID: 84924132375
PISSN: 07403194
EISSN: 15222594
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25568 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (221)
|
References (7)
|