Erratum to Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy (JSLS, (2014) 18, 4, 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00181);Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy

Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1-

  Lee, Ted ^a   Shepherd, Jonathan P ^a   Kantartzis, Kelly L ^a   Ahn, Ki Hoon ^b   Bonidie, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b Korea University Ansan Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic assisted laparoscopy

Indexed keywords

COST; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84924119705     PISSN: 10868089     EISSN: 19383797     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00027     Document Type: Erratum

References (15)

1. National Center for Health Statistics. Number of all-listed procedures for discharges from short-stay hospitals: United States, 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhds/10Detaileddiagnosesprocedures/2010det10alllistedprocedures. pdf. Retrieved July 31, 2013.
2. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677.
3. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309:689–698.
4. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, Chavan NR, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:167–175.
5. Visco AG, Advincula AP. Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1369–1384.
6. Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:368.e1–368.e7.
7. Rosero EB, Kho KA, Joshi GP, Giesecke M, Schaffer JI. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:778–786.
8. Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:730–738.
9. Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:581–588.
10. Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS. 2012;16:519–524.
11. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:92–96.
12. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:701–704.
13. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114: 1156–1158.
14. Rhou YJ, Pather S, Loadsman JA, Campbell N, Philp S, Carter J. Direct hospital costs of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with fast-track open hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital: a retrospective case-controlled study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. In press.
15. Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17:44–49.