The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research

BMC Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Moher, David ^a,b   Avey, Marc ^a   Antes, Gerd ^c   Altman, Douglas G ^d,e  

^a OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Implementation; Preclinical research; Quality of reporting; Reporting guidelines

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRECLINICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLICATION; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84924079831     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0284-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hackam DG, Redelmeier DA. Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. JAMA. 2006;296:1731-2.
2. Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MFW, Cuthill IC, Fry D, et al. Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7824.
3. Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383:166-75.
4. http://www.equator-network.org/library/.
5. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000217.
6. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11, MR000030.
7. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology. 2006;67:792-7.
8. Tunis AS, McInnes MD, Hanna R, Esmail K. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Radiology. 2013;269:413-26.
9. Bravo E, Calzolari A, De Castro P, Mabile L, Napolitani F, Rossi AM, et al. Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal article (CoBRA). BMC Med. 2015. [Ahead of print.]
10. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
11. http://www.nih.gov/about/reporting-preclinical-research.htm.
12. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:55-63.
13. Nature editorial. Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility. Nature. 2013;496:398.
14. Hooijmans CR, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M. A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies, to fully integrate the Three Rs, and to make systematic reviews more feasible. Altern Lab Anim. 2010;38:167-82.
15. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guidance for the Description of Animal Research in Scientific Publications. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. p. 1-31.
16. Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, Austin CP, Blumenstein R, Bradley EW, et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012;490:187-91.
17. Nature. Reporting Checklist for Life Sciences Articles. 2013. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/checklist.pdf. Accessed on: 01-15-2015.
18. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. The ARRIVE guidelines animal research: reporting in vivo experiments. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412.
19. Baker D, Lidster K, Sottomayor A, Amor S. Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001756.
20. Collins FS, Tabak LA. NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature. 2014;505:612-3.
21. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
22. Stevens A, Shamseer L, Weinstein E, Yazdi F, Turner L, Thielman J, et al. Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348:g3804.
23. Cobo E, Cortés J, Ribera JM, Cardellach F, Selva-O'Callaghan A, Kostov B, et al. Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial. BMJ. 2011;343:d6783.
24. Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35621.
25. Michie S, Johnston M. Theories and techniques of behaviour change: developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6:1-6.
26. French SD, Green SE, O'Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38.
27. http://www.nih.gov/about/endorsing-jounals.htm.
28. http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/.
29. https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-animal-research-reporting-vivo-experiments.
30. http://www.equator-network.org/2014/11/25/the-first-equator-reporting-guideline-development-meeting-18-20-november-2014-oxford/.