Optimal process design of commercial-scale amine-based CO2 capture plants

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 53, Issue 38, 2014, Pages 14815-14829

  Agbonghae, E O ^a   Hughes, K J ^a   Ingham, D B ^a   Ma, L ^a   Pourkashanian, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ETHANOLAMINES; FLUE GASES; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GASES; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; PULVERIZED FUEL;

CIRCULATION RATES; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLES; OPTIMAL PROCESS DESIGN; PULVERIZED COALS; REACTIVE ABSORPTION; STRUCTURED PACKINGS; TECHNO-ECONOMICS;

NATURAL GASOLINE PLANTS;

EID: 84924065894     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie5023767     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Rochelle, G. T. Amine Scrubbing for CO2 Capture. Science 2009, 325, 1652-1654.
2. Dugas, R. E. Pilot Plant Study of Carbon Dioxide Capture by Aqueous Monoethanolamine. M. Sc. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 2006.
3. Carey, J.; Damen, K.; Fitzgerald, F. D.; Gardiner, R. A. CCPilot100+ Operating Experience and Test Results. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 6170-6178.
4. Notz, R.; Mangalapally, H. P.; Hasse, H. Post combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption: Pilot plant description and results of systematic studies with MEA. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 6, 84-112.
5. Knudsen, J. N.; Jensen, J. N.; Vilhelmsen, P.-J.; Biede, O. Experience with CO2 capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: Testing of different amine solvents. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 783-790.
6. Cottrell, A. J.; McGregor, J. M.; Jansen, J.; Artanto, Y.; Dave, N.; Morgan, S.; Pearson, P.; Attalla, M. I.; Wardhaugh, L.; Yu, H. Postcombustion capture R&D and pilot plant operation in Australia. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 1003-1010.
7. Idem, R.; Wilson, M.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P.; Chakma, A.; Veawab, A.; Aroonwilas, A.; Gelowitz, D. Pilot Plant Studies of the CO2 Capture Performance of Aqueous MEA and Mixed MEA/MDEA Solvents at the University of Regina CO2 Capture Technology Development Plant and the Boundary Dam CO2 Capture Demonstration Plant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 2414-2420.
8. Kvamsdal, H. M.; Jakobsen, J. P.; Hoff, K. A. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a CO2 absorber column for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. Process. 2009, 48, 135-144.
9. Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, C.-C.; Plaza, J. M.; Dugas, R.; Rochelle, G. T. Rate-Based Process Modeling Study of CO2 Capture with Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 9233-9246.
10. Tobiesen, F. A.; Svendsen, H. F.; Juliussen, O. Experimental validation of a rigorous absorber model for CO2 postcombustion capture. AIChE J. 2007, 53, 846-865.
11. Lawal, A.; Wang, M.; Stephenson, P.; Yeung, H. Dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post combustion capture in coalfired power plants. Fuel 2009, 88, 2455-2462.
12. Oyenekan, B. A.; Rochelle, G. T. Energy Performance of Stripper Configurations for CO2 Capture by Aqueous Amines. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 2457-2464.
13. Oyenekan, B. A.; Rochelle, G. T. Alternative stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous amines. AIChE J. 2007, 53, 3144-3154.
14. Tobiesen, F. A.; Juliussen, O.; Svendsen, H. F. Experimental validation of a rigorous desorber model for post-combustion capture. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 2641-2656.
15. Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.-C. Modeling CO2 Absorption and Desorption by Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solution with Aspen Rate-based Model. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 1584-1596.
16. Lawal, A.; Wang, M.; Stephenson, P.; Koumpouras, G.; Yeung, H. Dynamic modelling and analysis of post-combustion CO2 chemical absorption process for coal-fired power plants. Fuel 2010, 89, 2791-2801.
17. Huepen, B.; Kenig, E. Y. Rigorous Modeling and Simulation of an Absorption-Stripping Loop for the Removal of Acid Gases. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 772-779.
18. Abu-Zahra, M. R. M.; Schneiders, L. H. J.; Niederer, J. P. M.; Feron, P. H. M.; Versteeg, G. F. CO2 capture from power plants: Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1, 37-46.
19. Abu-Zahra, M. R. M.; Niederer, J. P. M.; Feron, P. H. M.; Versteeg, G. F. CO2 capture from power plants: Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1, 135-142.
20. Cifre, P. G.; Brechtel, K.; Hoch, S.; García, H.; Asprion, N.; Hasse, H.; Scheffknecht, G. Integration of a chemical process model in a power plant modelling tool for the simulation of an amine based CO2 scrubber. Fuel 2009, 88, 2481-2488.
21. Hetland, J.; Kvamsdal, H. M.; Haugen, G.; Major, F.; Kárstad, V.; Tjellander, G. Integrating a full carbon capture scheme onto a 450 MWe NGCC electric power generation hub for offshore operations: Presenting the Sevan GTW concept. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 2298-2307.
22. Kvamsdal, H. M.; Hetland, J.; Haugen, G.; Svendsen, H. F.; Major, F.; Kárstad, V.; Tjellander, G. Maintaining a neutral water balance in a 450MWe NGCC-CCS power system with postcombustion carbon dioxide capture aimed at offshore operation. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4, 613-622.
23. Sanpasertparnich, T.; Idem, R.; Bolea, I.; deMontigny, D.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P. Integration of post-combustion capture and storage into a pulverized coal-fired power plant. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4, 499-510.
24. CAESAR. European Best Practice Guidelines for Assessment of CO2 Capture Technologies, D 4. 9; CAESAR Consortium, February 2011.
25. Khalilpour, R.; Abbas, A. HEN optimization for efficient retrofitting of coal-fired power plants with post-combustion carbon capture. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5, 189-199.
26. Lawal, A.; Wang, M.; Stephenson, P.; Obi, O. Demonstrating full-scale post-combustion CO2 capture for coal-fired power plants through dynamic modelling and simulation. Fuel 2012, 101, 115-128.
27. Sipócz, N.; Tobiesen, F. A. Natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capturéOpportunities to reduce cost. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 7, 98-106.
28. Biliyok, C.; Yeung, H. Evaluation of natural gas combined cycle power plant for post-combustion CO2 capture integration. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 19, 396-405.
29. IEAGHG. Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Scale-up Study; IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, February 2013.
30. MacDowell, N.; Shah, N. Dynamic modelling and analysis of a coal-fired power plant integrated with a novel split-flow configuration post-combustion CO2 capture process. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2014, 27, 103-119.
31. Hanak, D. P.; Biliyok, C.; Yeung, H.; Biáecki, R. Heat integration and exergy analysis for a supercritical high-ash coal-fired power plant integrated with a post-combustion carbon capture process. Fuel 2014, 134, 126-139.
32. Huizeling, E.; van den Weijde, G. Non-Confidential FEED Study Report: Special Report for the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute; Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute Ltd.: Canberra, Australia, 2011.
33. Reddy, S.; Scherffius, J. R.; Yonkoski, J.; Radgen, P.; Rode, H. Initial Results from Fluor's CO2 Capture Demonstration Plant Using Econamine FG PlusSM Technology at E. ON Kraftwerke's Wilhelmshaven Power Plant. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 6216-6225.
34. Reddy, S.; Johnson, D.; Gilmartin, J. Fluor's Econamine FG PlusSM Technology For CO2 Capture at Coal-fired Power Plants. In Seventh Power Plant Air Pollutant Control "Mega" Symposium, Baltimore, Aug 25-28, 2008; Air and Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.
35. Reddy, S.; Scherffius, J.; Freguia, S.; Roberts, C. Fluor's Econamine FG PlusSM Technology: An Enhanced Amine-Based CO2 Capture Process. Presented at the Second National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, NETL/DOE, Alexandria VA, May 5-8, 2003.
36. Zhang, Y.; Que, H.; Chen, C.-C. Thermodynamic modeling for CO2 absorption in aqueous MEA solution with electrolyte NRTL model. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2011, 311, 67-75.
37. Strigle, R. F. Packed Tower Design and Applications: Random and Structured Packings, 2nd ed.; Gulf Publishing Co.: Houston, TX, 1994.
38. Kister, Z. H. Distillation Design; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1992.
39. Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 8th ed.; Green, D. W., Perry, R. H., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2007.
40. Wang, G. Q.; Yuan, X. G.; Yu, K. T. Review of Mass-Transfer Correlations for Packed Columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 8715-8729.
41. Gualito, J. J.; Cerino, F. J.; Cardenas, J. C.; Rocha, J. A. Design Method for Distillation Columns Filled with Metallic, Ceramic, or Plastic Structured Packings. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 1747-1757.
42. Aspen Technology. Aspen Icarus Reference Guide: Icarus Evaluation Engine (IEE), version 8. 0; Aspen Technology, Inc.: Burlington, MA, 2012.
43. Bravo, J. L.; Rocha, J. A.; Fair, J. R. Mass Transfer in Gauze Packings. Hydrocarbon Process. 1985, 91-95.
44. Bravo, J. L.; Rocha, J. A.; Fair, J. R. A comprehensive model for the performance of columns containing structured packings. Inst. Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser. 1992, 129, A439-657.
45. Taylor, R.; Krishna, R. Multicomponent Mass Transfer; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1993.
46. U. S. DOE. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants. Vol. 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity, revision 2; U. S. Department of Energy; Washington, DC, November 2010.
47. IEAGHG. Improvement in Power Generation with Post-Combustion Capture of CO2; International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme: Cheltenham, U. K., November 2004.
48. Rubin, E. S.; Short, C.; Booras, G.; Davison, J.; Ekstrom, C.; Matuszewski, M.; McCoy, S. A proposed methodology for CO2 capture and storage cost estimates. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 17, 488-503.
49. Aspen Technology. Aspen Physical Property System, version 7. 3; Aspen Technology, Inc.: Burlington, MA, 2011.