메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-625

Australian intellectual property law

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84924016489     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750304     Document Type: Book
Times cited : (21)

References (371)
  • 4
    • 0003732343 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 4th ed, Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley, c
    • R. Cooter and T. Ulen, Law and Economics (4th ed, Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley, c. 2004).
    • (2004) Law and Economics
    • Cooter, R.1    Ulen, T.2
  • 6
    • 84887964165 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sydney: Centre for Copyright Studies Ltd
    • The Allen Consulting Group, Economic Perspectives on Copyright Law (Sydney: Centre for Copyright Studies Ltd, 2003).
    • (2003) Economic Perspectives on Copyright Law
  • 18
    • 84923993157 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shape trade marks: The role and relevance of functionality and aesthetics in determining their registrability
    • M. Davison, ‘Shape Trade Marks: The role and relevance of functionality and aesthetics in determining their registrability’ (2004) 15 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 106–11.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15 , pp. 106-111
    • Davison, M.1
  • 19
    • 84923973646 scopus 로고
    • Proof of deception and character merchandising cases
    • M. Davison and M. Kennedy, ‘Proof of Deception and Character Merchandising Cases’ (1990) 16 (1) Monash University Law Review 111.
    • (1990) Monash University Law Review , vol.16
    • Davison, M.1    Kennedy, M.2
  • 21
    • 33749682533 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Misunderstanding the internet:Howcourts areoverprotectingtrademarks used inmeta tags
    • Julie A. Rajzer, ‘Misunderstanding the Internet:How Courts are Overprotecting Trademarks used in Meta Tags’ (2001) Michigan State University Law Review 427.
    • (2001) Michigan State University Law Review
    • Rajzer, J.A.1
  • 27
    • 84923605103 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press
    • M. Davison, The Legal Protection of Databases (Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 171–89.
    • (2003) The Legal Protection of Databases , pp. 171-189
    • Davison, M.1
  • 30
    • 0040831920 scopus 로고
    • The rational basis of trade mark protection
    • Frank I. Schechter, ‘The Rational Basis of Trade Mark Protection’ (1927) 40 Harvard Law Review 813.
    • (1927) Harvard Law Review , vol.40
    • Schechter, F.I.1
  • 31
    • 85066519359 scopus 로고
    • The role of trademarks in consumer protection and development in developing countries
    • M. Gabay, ‘The Role of Trademarks in Consumer Protection and Development in Developing Countries’ [1987] Industrial Property 102 at 102–5.
    • (1987) Industrial Property
    • Gabay, M.1
  • 32
    • 84923061800 scopus 로고
    • The trouble with trademark
    • S. Carter, ‘The Trouble with Trademark’ (1990) 99 Yale LJ 759 at 759–75.
    • (1990) Yale LJ , vol.99
    • Carter, S.1
  • 36
    • 84923973639 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The concept of “sign in australian trade mark law’
    • P. Loughlan, ‘The Concept of “Sign” in Australian Trade Mark Law’ (2005) 16(2) Australian Intellectual Property Law Journal 95.
    • (2005) Australian Intellectual Property Law Journal , vol.16 , Issue.2
    • Loughlan, P.1
  • 38
    • 84923993157 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shape trade marks: The role and relevance of functionality and aesthetics in determining their registrability
    • Mark Davison, ‘Shape Trade Marks: the Role and Relevance of Functionality and Aesthetics in Determining their Registrability’ (2004) 15(2) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 231.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15 , Issue.2
    • Davison, M.1
  • 40
    • 85066579181 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Looking at smells and sounds: Graphical representation of new trade marks
    • L. Eade, ‘Looking at Smells and Sounds: Graphical Representation of New Trade Marks’ (2003) 16(3) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 33;
    • (2003) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.16 , Issue.3
    • Eade, L.1
  • 41
    • 85066532438 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How many colours in the rainbow? The registration of colour per se under australian trade mark law
    • J. McCutcheon, ‘How Many Colours in the Rainbow? The Registration of Colour per se under Australian Trade Mark Law’ (2004) 26(1) European Intellectual Property Review 27;
    • (2004) European Intellectual Property Review , vol.26 , Issue.1
    • McCutcheon, J.1
  • 42
    • 85066529211 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Puce as a trade mark: Acquired distinctiveness of colour trade marks
    • L. Eade, ‘Puce as a Trade Mark: Acquired Distinctiveness of Colour Trade Marks’ (2004) 16(8) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 121.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin , vol.16 , Issue.8
    • Eade, L.1
  • 44
    • 84891001144 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The requirement of trade mark use: Recent developments in australia
    • R. Burrell ‘The Requirement of Trade Mark Use: Recent Developments in Australia’ (2005) 16(4) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 231;
    • (2005) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.16 , Issue.4
    • Burrell, R.1
  • 50
    • 85066566493 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • When an ugg boot is no longer an ugg boot
    • S. Joseph, ‘When an Ugg Boot is no longer an Ugg Boot’ [2004] Art and Law 7.
    • (2004) Art and Law
    • Joseph, S.1
  • 52
    • 85066518160 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Well known trade marks in australia and other jurisdictions
    • K. Maharaj, ‘Well Known Trade Marks in Australia and Other Jurisdictions’ (2005) 17(9) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 147;
    • (2005) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin , vol.17 , Issue.9
    • Maharaj, K.1
  • 53
    • 85066582454 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Protecting well known trade marks in australia and other jurisdictions
    • W. Burnett, ‘Protecting Well Known Trade Marks in Australia and other Jurisdictions’ (2005) 17(9) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 155.
    • (2005) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin , vol.17 , Issue.9
    • Burnett, W.1
  • 59
    • 85066515058 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The registrability of shapes of goods as trade marks: A commentary on the part of the full federal courts judgment in philips v remington’
    • J. Luck, ‘The Registrability of Shapes of Goods as Trade Marks: A Commentary on the Part of the Full Federal Court’s Judgment in Philips v Remington’ 12(1) (2001) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 12.
    • (2001) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.12 , Issue.1
    • Luck, J.1
  • 61
    • 85066537069 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shaving the trade marks directive down to size
    • R. Burrell and H. Beverley Smith, ‘Shaving the Trade Marks Directive Down to Size’ (2000) 63(4) Modern Law Review 2000.
    • (2000) Modern Law Review , vol.63 , Issue.4
    • Burrell, R.1    Beverley Smith, H.2
  • 65
    • 84924001697 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Monopolised product shapes and factual distinctiveness unders 41(6) of the trade marks act 1995 (cth)
    • J. McCutcheon, ‘Monopolised Product Shapes and Factual Distinctiveness unders 41(6) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)’ (2004) 15(1) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 18.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15 , Issue.1
    • McCutcheon, J.1
  • 69
    • 85066545026 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Distinctiveness, deceptive and confusing marks under the trade marks act 1955
    • J. Luck, ‘Distinctiveness, Deceptive and Confusing Marks under the Trade Marks Act 1955’ (1996) 7 AIPJ 97;
    • (1996) AIPJ , vol.7
    • Luck, J.1
  • 70
    • 85066523712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Learning the lessons of history: Disputes and the olympic games
    • T. Altobelli, ‘Learning the Lessons of History: Disputes and the Olympic Games’ (1999) 22(3) University of New South Wales Law Journal 843;
    • (1999) University of New South Wales Law Journal , vol.22 , Issue.3
    • Altobelli, T.1
  • 71
    • 84923973615 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Protecting olympic gold: Ambush marketing and other threats to olympic symbols and indicia
    • J. Sebel and D. Gyngell, ‘Protecting Olympic Gold: Ambush Marketing and Other Threats to Olympic Symbols and Indicia’ (1999) 22(3) University of New South Wales Law Journal 691.
    • (1999) University of New Southwales Law Journal , vol.22 , Issue.3
    • Sebel, J.1    Gyngell, D.2
  • 75
    • 85066544831 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feta cheese: Geographical indication or genericterm’
    • C. Cheung, ‘“Feta” Cheese: Geographical Indication or Generic Term’ (2004) 16(9) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 133;
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Propertylawbulletin , vol.16 , Issue.9
    • Cheung, C.1
  • 76
    • 84923973610 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The eus geographical indications agenda and its potential impact on australia’
    • M. Handler, ‘The EU’s Geographical Indications Agenda and its Potential Impact on Australia’ (2004) 15(3) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 173;
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15 , Issue.3
    • Handler, M.1
  • 77
    • 84882989445 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The overlap between geographical indications and trade marks in australia
    • S. Stern, ‘The Overlap between Geographical Indications and Trade Marks in Australia’ (2001) 2(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law 224.
    • (2001) Melbourne Journal of International Law , vol.2 , Issue.1
    • Stern, S.1
  • 81
    • 85066584027 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘rectification of the trade marks register on grounds existing at the time of application to rectify: An analysis of sections 88(2)(a) and (c) and 89 of the trade marks act
    • J. McCutcheon, ‘Rectification of the Trade Marks Register on Grounds Existing at the Time of Application to Rectify: An Analysis of Sections 88(2)(a) and (c) and 89 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)’ (2002) 13(4) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 199.
    • (2002) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.13 , Issue.4
    • McCutcheon, J.1
  • 86
    • 85066585885 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rectification of the trade marks register on grounds existing at the time of application to rectify: An analysis of sections 88(2)(a) and (c) and 89 of the trade marks act 1995 (cth)
    • J. McCutcheon, ‘Rectification of the Trade Marks Register on Grounds Existing at the Time of Application to Rectify: An Analysis of Sections 88(2)(a) and (c) and 89 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)’ (2002) 13(4) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 199.
    • (2002) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.13 , Issue.4
    • McCutcheon, J.1
  • 89
    • 0040831920 scopus 로고
    • The rational basis of trademark protection
    • F. Schechter, ‘The Rational basis of Trademark Protection’ (1927) Harvard Law Review 813.
    • (1927) Harvard Law Review
    • Schechter, F.1
  • 90
    • 85066558856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The american experience with trademark anti-dilution law
    • J. McCarthy, ‘The American Experience with Trademark Anti-dilution Law’ (2004) 15 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 70, 73.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15 , pp. 70-73
    • McCarthy, J.1
  • 92
    • 85066536791 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dilution in new zealand: The effects of the tarnishment limb of dilution on free speech
    • A. Sims, ‘Dilution in New Zealand: the Effects of the Tarnishment Limb of Dilution on Free Speech’ (2001) 32(1) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 103.
    • (2001) Victoria University Ofwellington Law Review , vol.32 , Issue.1
    • Sims, A.1
  • 93
    • 85066558856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The american experience with trademark anti-dilution law
    • McCarthy, ‘The American Experience with Trademark Anti-dilution Law’ (2004) 15 Australian Intellectual Property Journal, 79–80.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15 , pp. 79-80
    • McCarthy1
  • 94
    • 85066537760 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trademark dilution and the commodification of information: Understanding the cultural command
    • B. Fitzgerald and E. Sheehan, ‘Trademark Dilution and the Commodification of Information: Understanding the Cultural Command’ (1999) 3 Macquarie Law Review 61.
    • (1999) Macquarie Law Review , vol.3
    • Fitzgerald, B.1    Sheehan, E.2
  • 95
    • 85066569044 scopus 로고
    • Parallel importing: Unlawful use of trade marks
    • M. J. Davison, ‘Parallel Importing: Unlawful Use of Trade Marks’ (1991) 19 Federal Law Review 420.
    • (1991) Federal Law Review , vol.19
    • Davison, M.J.1
  • 96
    • 85066569044 scopus 로고
    • Parallel importing: Unlawful use of trade marks
    • Davison, ‘Parallel Importing: Unlawful Use of Trade Marks’ (1991) 19 Federal Law Review 420.
    • (1991) Federal Law Review , vol.19
    • Davison1
  • 97
    • 85066569044 scopus 로고
    • Parallel importing: Unlawful use of trade marks
    • Davison, ‘Parallel Importing: Unlawful Use of Trade Marks’ (1991) 19 Federal Law Review 420.
    • (1991) Federal Law Review , vol.19
    • Davison1
  • 98
    • 84899658447 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Parallel importing of trade marked goods – an answer to the unasked question
    • M. J. Davison, ‘Parallel Importing of Trade Marked Goods – An Answer to the Unasked Question’ (1999) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 146.
    • (1999) Australian Intellectual Property Journal
    • Davison, M.J.1
  • 100
    • 85066597358 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Groundless threats of trade mark infringement: Howto avoid getting court’
    • N. Weston and M. Davison, ‘Groundless Threats of Trade Mark Infringement: Howto Avoid Getting Court’ (2000) AIPJ 151–61
    • (2000) AIPJ , pp. 151-161
    • Weston, N.1    Davison, M.2
  • 108
    • 85066577539 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Managing the transfer of “house brands: Licensing and trade mark splitting’
    • M. Yastreboff, ‘Managing the Transfer of “House” Brands: Licensing and Trade Mark Splitting’ (2002) 13(2) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 87.
    • (2002) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.13 , Issue.2
    • Yastreboff, M.1
  • 109
    • 85066576860 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trade mark licence or franchise agreement: How much control is too much control?
    • T. Gyopar, ‘Trade Mark Licence or Franchise Agreement: How Much Control is too Much Control?’ (2004) 17(6) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 98.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin , vol.17 , Issue.6
    • Gyopar, T.1
  • 113
    • 85066591621 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Security interests in intellectual property in australia
    • John V. Swinson, ‘Security Interests in Intellectual Property in Australia’ (2002) 14(1) Bond Law Review 86.
    • (2002) Bond Law Review , vol.14 , Issue.1
    • Swinson, J.V.1
  • 115
    • 85066525434 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Security interests in trade marks and associated business goodwill’
    • Jacqueline D. Lipton, ‘Security Interests in Trade Marks and Associated Business Goodwill’ (1999) 10(3) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 157.
    • (1999) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.10 , Issue.3
    • Lipton, J.D.1
  • 118
    • 27844481225 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Copyright and the victorian internet: Telegraphic property laws in colonial australia
    • L. Bently, ‘Copyright and the Victorian Internet: Telegraphic Property Laws in Colonial Australia’ (2004) 38 Loy LA L Rev 71;
    • (2004) Loy LA L Rev , vol.38
    • Bently, L.1
  • 119
    • 85044883570 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Copyright reform in the early twentieth century: A view from australia
    • Dec
    • R. Burrell, ‘Copyright Reform in the early Twentieth Century: A View from Australia’ (Dec 2006) 27(3) Journal of Legal History 239;
    • (2006) Journal of Legal History , vol.27 , Issue.3
    • Burrell, R.1
  • 122
    • 85066558194 scopus 로고
    • Copyright amendment act 1980, photocopying in educational institutions
    • L. Farrell, ‘Copyright Amendment Act 1980, Photocopying in educational institutions’ (1980) Australian Current Law Digest, 53, 54.
    • (1980) Australian Current Law Digest , pp. 53-54
    • Farrell, L.1
  • 123
    • 33645792390 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The united states–australia free trade agreement: The intellectual property chapter
    • C. Arup, ‘The United States–Australia Free Trade Agreement: the Intellectual Property Chapter’ (2004) 15 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 204.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15
    • Arup, C.1
  • 127
    • 84994928507 scopus 로고
    • Innovation, policy strategies and law
    • C. Arup, ‘Innovation, Policy Strategies and Law’ (1990) 12 Law and Policy, 247, 248–9.
    • (1990) Law and Policy , vol.12
    • Arup, C.1
  • 129
    • 25444461070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Bently and Sherman, Intellectual Property Law (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 33.
    • (2004) Intellectual Property Law
    • Bently1    Sherman2
  • 131
    • 0042103955 scopus 로고
    • Anoutline of a theory justifying intellectual propertyand intellectual property rights
    • H. Spector, ‘Anoutline of a theory justifying intellectual propertyand intellectual property rights’ (1989) 8 EIPR 270.
    • (1989) EIPR , vol.8
    • Spector, H.1
  • 132
    • 0001413547 scopus 로고
    • The philosophy of intellectual property
    • J. Hughes, ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’ (1988) 77 Georgetown Law Journal 287.
    • (1988) Georgetown Law Journal , vol.77
    • Hughes, J.1
  • 133
    • 67649895412 scopus 로고
    • The patent controversy in the nineteenth century
    • F. Machlup and E. Penrose, ‘The patent controversy in the nineteenth century’ (1950) 10 Journal of Economic History 11.
    • (1950) Journal of Economic History , vol.10
    • Machlup, F.1    Penrose, E.2
  • 134
    • 77949744350 scopus 로고
    • Manual of political economy
    • J. Bowring (ed)
    • J. Bentham, ‘Manual of Political Economy’ in J. Bowring (ed) The Works of Jeremy Bentham, iii (1843), 31, 71.
    • (1843) The Works of Jeremy Bentham , vol.3 , pp. 31-71
    • Bentham, J.1
  • 135
    • 25444461070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Bently and Sherman, Intellectual Property Law (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 33
    • (2004) Intellectual Property Law
    • Bently1    Sherman2
  • 137
    • 84905151337 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trips: Across the global field of intellectual property
    • C. Arup, ‘TRIPS: Across the Global Field of Intellectual Property’ (2004) 26(1) EIPR 7;
    • (2004) EIPR , vol.26 , Issue.1
    • Arup, C.1
  • 140
    • 33645792390 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The united states–australia free trade agreement: The intellectual property chapter
    • C. Arup, ‘The United States–Australia Free Trade Agreement: the Intellectual Property Chapter’ (2004) 15 Australian Intellectual Property Journal, 204.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.15
    • Arup, C.1
  • 143
    • 85066599113 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Programme formats: A further consultative document’
    • Anon, ‘Programme Formats: a Further Consultative Document’ (1996) Ent L R 216.
    • (1996) Ent L R
    • Anon1
  • 144
    • 85066538279 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Programme formats: The write-in vote
    • R. McD. Bridge and S. Lane, ‘Programme Formats: The Write-in Vote’ (1996) Ent L R 212.
    • (1996) Ent L R
    • Bridge, R.M.1    Lane, S.2
  • 147
    • 79957649874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A real pea-souper: The panel case and the development of the fair dealing defences to copyright infringement in australia’
    • M. Handler and D. Rolph, ‘“A Real Pea-Souper”: The Panel Case and the Development of the Fair Dealing Defences to Copyright Infringement in Australia’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 381, 395.
    • (2003) Melbourne University Law Review , vol.27 , pp. 381-395
    • Handler, M.1    Rolph, D.2
  • 148
    • 85066523940 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Published edition copyright: A “rather curious copyright in an age of electronic publishing’
    • J. Bannister, ‘Published Edition Copyright: a “Rather Curious Copyright” in an Age of Electronic Publishing’ (1997) 15(1) Copyright Reporter 22.
    • (1997) Copyright Reporter , vol.15 , Issue.1
    • Bannister, J.1
  • 150
  • 151
    • 27844527164 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Joint authorship in a copyright work revisited
    • T. Lauterbach, ‘Joint Authorship in a Copyright Work Revisited’ (2005) 3 EIPR 119–21;
    • (2005) EIPR , vol.3 , pp. 119-121
    • Lauterbac, T.1
  • 152
    • 47249148370 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Collaborativeauthorship of distance learning materials: Cross-border copyright and moral rights problems
    • L. Longding, ‘Collaborative Authorship of Distance Learning Materials: Cross-border Copyright and Moral Rights Problems’ (2005) EIPR 1.
    • (2005) EIPR
    • Longding, L.1
  • 156
    • 26244434691 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Who owns my research and teaching materials – my university or me?
    • A. Monotti, ‘Who Owns my Research and Teaching Materials – My University or me?’ (1997) 19(4) Sydney Law Review 425.
    • (1997) Sydney Law Review , vol.19 , Issue.4
    • Monotti, A.1
  • 157
    • 53749107800 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Canberra: AGPS
    • CLRC, Crown Copyright Report (Canberra: AGPS, 2005), 11.
    • (2005) Crown Copyright Report
  • 161
    • 85066580666 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fresh image for copyright agency
    • Sep 17–23
    • W. Osmond, ‘Fresh image for copyright agency’ (1997) Sep 17–23, Campus Review, 11.
    • (1997) Campus Review
    • Osmond, W.1
  • 167
    • 38049183365 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Restructuring the test for copyright infringement in relation to literary and dramatic plots
    • S. Rebikoff, ‘Restructuring The Test For Copyright Infringement In Relation To Literary And Dramatic Plots’ [2001] Melbourne University Law Review 12.
    • (2001) Melbourne University Law Review
    • Rebikoff, S.1
  • 168
    • 84969143453 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The panel case and television broadcast copyright
    • M. Handler, ‘The Panel Case and Television Broadcast Copyright’ (2003) 25 Sydney Law Review 391.
    • (2003) Sydney Law Review , vol.25
    • Handler, M.1
  • 169
    • 80054906493 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Inducers and authorisers: A comparison of the us supreme courts grokster decision and the australian federal court’s kazaa ruling’
    • J. Ginsburg and S. Ricketson, ‘Inducers and Authorisers: A comparison of the US Supreme Court’s Grokster Decision and the Australian Federal Court’s Ka Zaa Ruling’ (2006) 11 Media and Arts Law Review 1.
    • (2006) Media and Arts Law Review , vol.11
    • Ginsburg, J.1    Ricketson, S.2
  • 170
    • 85066533026 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kazaa and grokster across borders
    • G. Austin, ‘Kazaa and Grokster across borders’ (2006) 11 Media and Arts Law Review 355.
    • (2006) Media and Arts Law Review , vol.11
    • Austin, G.1
  • 177
    • 84969143453 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The panel case and television broadcast copyright
    • M. Handler, ‘The Panel Case and Television Broadcast Copyright’ (2003) 25 Sydney Law Review 391.
    • (2003) Sydney Law Review , vol.25
    • Handler, M.1
  • 178
    • 25444461070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Bently and Sherman, Intellectual Property Law (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 200.
    • (2004) Intellectual Property Law
    • Bently1    Sherman2
  • 179
    • 85066542124 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia and Centre for Media and Communications Law, University of Melbourne
    • Weatherall and Hudson, Response to the Issues paper: Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions (Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia and Centre for Media and Communications Law, University of Melbourne, July 2005), 11–12.
    • (2005) Response to the Issues Paper: Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions , pp. 11-12
    • Weatherall1    Hudson2
  • 180
    • 79957639002 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Copyright and parody in australia: Some thoughts on suntrust bank v houghton mifflin company
    • D. Brennan, ‘Copyright and Parody in Australia: Some thoughts on Suntrust Bank v Houghton Mifflin Company’ (2002) 13 AIPJ 161, 163.
    • (2002) AIPJ , vol.13 , pp. 161-163
    • Brennan, D.1
  • 181
    • 79959448249 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Seriously entertaining: The panel and the future of fair dealing
    • M. De Zwart, ‘Seriously entertaining: the Panel and the future of fair dealing’ (2003) 8(1) Media and Arts Law Review 1, 8.
    • (2003) Media and Arts Law Review , vol.8 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-8
    • De Zwart, M.1
  • 182
    • 79957649874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Areal pea-souper: The panel case and the development of the fair dealing defences to copyright infringement in australia’
    • M. Handler and D. Rolph, ‘“AReal Pea-Souper’: The Panel Case and the Development of the Fair Dealing Defences to Copyright Infringement in Australia’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 381–422.
    • (2003) Melbourne University Law Review , vol.27 , pp. 381-422
    • Handler, M.1    Rolph, D.2
  • 183
    • 79957639002 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Copyright and parody in australia: Some thoughts on suntrust bank v houghton mifflin company
    • D. Brennan, ‘Copyright and Parody in Australia: Some thoughts on Suntrust Bank v Houghton Mifflin Company’ (2002) 13 AIPJ 161, 163.
    • (2002) AIPJ , vol.13 , pp. 161-163
    • Brennan, D.1
  • 187
    • 85066552475 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Commonwealth of australia, parliamentary debates
    • 18 June
    • Hon Daryl Williams, Commonwealth of Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 18 June 1997, 5548.
    • (1997) House of Representatives
    • Daryl Williams, H.1
  • 190
    • 25444461070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Bently and Sherman, Intellectual Property Law (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 194–6.
    • (2004) Intellectual Property Law , pp. 194-196
    • Bently1    Sherman2
  • 191
    • 0347267362 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths Loose-leaf)
    • J. Lahore, Copyright and Designs (Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths Loose-leaf), [44, 025].
    • Copyright and Designs , pp. 44
    • Lahore, J.1
  • 192
    • 85066582292 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Copyright, contract and technology: What will remain of the public domain? is copyright a right to control access to works?
    • P. B. Hugenholtz, ‘Copyright, Contract and Technology: What will remain of the public domain? Is Copyright a right to control access to works?’ (2000) 18 Cahiers Du Centre de Recherches Informatique et Droit 77.
    • (2000) Cahiers Du Centre De Recherches Informatique Et Droit , vol.18
    • Hugenholtz, P.B.1
  • 193
    • 84881719633 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Canberra: AGPS
    • Copyright Law Review Committee, Copyright and Contract (Canberra: AGPS, 2001).
    • (2001) Copyright and Contract
  • 196
    • 85066553635 scopus 로고
    • Opinion ofaustralias obligation under the berne convention to introduce moral rights’
    • J. Crawford, ‘Opinion of Australia’s Obligation under the Berne Convention to Introduce Moral Rights’ (1989) 7 Copyright Reporter 8.
    • (1989) Copyright Reporter , vol.7
    • Crawford, J.1
  • 197
    • 84882040455 scopus 로고
    • Is australia in breach of its international obligations with respect to the protection of moral rights?
    • S. Ricketson, ‘Is Australia in Breach of its International Obligations with Respect to the Protection of Moral Rights?’ (1990) 17 Melbourne University Law Review 462.
    • (1990) Melbourne University Law Review , vol.17
    • Ricketson, S.1
  • 200
    • 85066519958 scopus 로고
    • AGPS
    • Copyright Law Review Committee(CLRC), Reporton Moral Rights (AGPS,1988).
    • (1988) Reportonmoral Rights
  • 201
    • 85066561280 scopus 로고
    • Attorney-generaland department of communications and the arts discussion paper
    • AGPS
    • Attorney-Generaland Department of Communications and the Arts discussion paper, Proposed Moral Rights Legislation for Copyright Creators (AGPS, 1994).
    • (1994) Proposed Moral Rights Legislation for Copyright Creators
  • 202
    • 84923967513 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Moral rights and substantiality: Some questions of integration
    • E. Adeney, ‘Moral Rights and Substantiality: Some Questions of Integration’, Australian Intellectual Property Journal 13 (2002), 5–20.
    • (2002) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , vol.13 , pp. 5-20
    • Adeney, E.1
  • 203
    • 80051915294 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The moral rights of integrity: The past and future of “honour
    • E. Adeney, ‘The Moral Rights of Integrity: The Past and Future of “Honour”’, (2005) 2 Intellectual Property Quarterly 111–35.
    • (2005) Intellectual Property Quarterly , vol.2 , pp. 111-135
    • Adeney, E.1
  • 204
    • 77957147354 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining the shape of australias moral rights: A review of the new laws’
    • E. Adeney, ‘Defining the Shape of Australia’s Moral Rights: A Review of the New Laws’ [2001] Intellectual Property Quarterly 291.
    • (2001) Intellectual Property Quarterly
    • Adeney, E.1
  • 206
    • 84882041664 scopus 로고
    • Moral rights in a common law system
    • J. Ginsburg, ‘Moral Rights in a Common law System’ (1990) 14 Ent. Law Review 121.
    • (1990) Ent. Law Review , vol.14
    • Ginsburg, J.1
  • 209
    • 85066545746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The new moral rights legislation
    • V. Morrison, ‘The New Moral Rights Legislation’ (2000) 18 Copyright Reporter 170, 178.
    • (2000) Copyright Reporter , vol.18 , pp. 170-178
    • Morrison, V.1
  • 211
    • 84855392108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘why moral rights matter: Recognising the intrinsic value of integrity rights
    • B. Ong, ‘Why Moral Rights Matter: Recognising the Intrinsic Value of Integrity Rights (2002) 26 Colum J L & Arts 297.
    • (2002) Colum J L & Arts , vol.26
    • Ong, B.1
  • 212
    • 32844457693 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘technological creativity and moral rights: A comparative perspective
    • I. Eagles and L. Longdin, ‘Technological creativity and moral rights: A comparative perspective (2004) 12 Int’l J L & Info Tech 209.
    • (2004) Int’l J L & Info Tech , vol.12
    • Eagles, I.1    Longdin, L.2
  • 213
    • 1842656165 scopus 로고
    • The refrigerator of bernard buffet
    • J. H. Merryman, ‘The Refrigerator of Bernard Buffet’ (1976) 27 The Hastings Law Journal 1023.
    • (1976) The Hastings Law Journal , vol.27
    • Merryman, J.H.1
  • 214
    • 84890636911 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Crystal palaces: Copyright law and public architecture
    • M. Rimmer, ‘Crystal palaces: Copyright Law and Public Architecture’ (2002) 14 Bond Law Review 320.
    • (2002) Bond Law Review , vol.14
    • Rimmer, M.1
  • 215
    • 85066537436 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Moral rights in the australian building industry: Whats been happening’
    • K. Stammer and H. Macpherson, ‘Moral Rights in the Australian Building Industry: What’s been happening’ (2006) 18(9) AIPLB 137.
    • (2006) AIPLB , vol.18 , Issue.9
    • Stammer, K.1    Macpherson, H.2
  • 217
    • 85066520525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Moral rights: Consents andwaivers
    • W. Rothnie, ‘Moral Rights: Consents and Waivers’ (2002) 20 Copyright Reporter 145.
    • (2002) Copyright Reporter , vol.20
    • Rothnie, W.1
  • 218
    • 85066595859 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Who stated on abc radio national ‘moral rights legislation question and answer’
    • 12 December, at 6 October 2004
    • Julie Rigg, who stated on ABC Radio National ‘Moral Rights Legislation Question and Answer’, Arts Today with Michael Cathcart, 12 December 2000, 2, at 6 October 2004.
    • (2000) Arts Today with Michael Cathcart
    • Rigg, J.1
  • 220
    • 85066593630 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Indigenous communal moral rights bill – a failure of language and imagination
    • J. Anderson, ‘Indigenous communal moral rights Bill – a failure of language and imagination’ (2004) 17(2) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 26.
    • (2004) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin , vol.17 , Issue.2
    • Anderson, J.1
  • 223
    • 0347267362 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths Looseleaf
    • J. Lahore, Copyright and Designs (Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths Looseleaf).
    • Copyright and Designs
    • Lahore, J.1
  • 225
    • 0008671780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 3rd ed, Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths
    • McKeough et al, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2004), 270.
    • (2004) Intellectual Property Law
    • McKeough1
  • 226
    • 0010007054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed, Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths
    • W. van Caenegem, Intellectual Property (2nd ed, Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2006), 327.
    • (2006) Intellectual Property
    • Van Caenegem, W.1
  • 227
    • 85066578213 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assisting australian authors
    • February
    • A. Jordens, ‘Assisting Australian Authors’, National Library News, February 2005 at .
    • (2005) National Library News
    • Jordens, A.1
  • 228
    • 85066581634 scopus 로고
    • Report No 74, Canberra
    • Australian Law Reform Commission, Designs (Report No 74, Canberra: 1995), 31.
    • (1995) Designs
  • 229
    • 85066545932 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rags to riches? Changes in australian and european design laws
    • J. Cooke and K. O’Connell, ‘Rags to Riches? Changes in Australian and European Design Laws’ (2003) 14 AIPJ 65.
    • (2003) AIPJ , vol.14
    • Cooke, J.1    O’Connell, K.2
  • 241
    • 84900262459 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, ch 2–4
    • Glover, Equity, restitution & fraud (Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2004), ch 2–4.
    • (2004) Equity, Restitution & Fraud
    • Glover1
  • 243
    • 84923973566 scopus 로고
    • Breach of confidence
    • P. D. Finn (ed), Sydney: Law Book Company, ch 6, 115
    • F. Gurry, ‘Breach of Confidence’, in P. D. Finn (ed), Essays in Equity (Sydney: Law Book Company 1985), ch 6, 115.
    • (1985) Essays in Equity
    • Gurry, F.1
  • 246
    • 3042905847 scopus 로고
    • The equitable action for breach of confidence: Is information ever property?
    • J. Stuckey, ‘The Equitable Action for Breach of Confidence: Is Information ever Property?’ (1981) 9 Sydney LR 402.
    • (1981) Sydney LR , vol.9
    • Stuckey, J.1
  • 247
    • 84856894560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Note: Circumstances importing an obligation of confidence
    • R. Arnold, ‘Note: Circumstances Importing an Obligation of Confidence’ (2003) 119 LQR 193.
    • (2003) LQR , vol.119
    • Arnold, R.1
  • 248
    • 84923973565 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Of shrink-wraps, ‘click-wraps and reverse engineering: Rethinking trade secret protection’
    • M. Richardson, ‘Of Shrink-Wraps, ‘Click-Wraps’ and Reverse Engineering: Rethinking Trade Secret Protection’ (2002) 25(3) UNSWLJ 748.
    • (2002) UNSWLJ , vol.25 , Issue.3
    • Richardson, M.1
  • 251
    • 67049167945 scopus 로고
    • Breach of confidence: Surreptitiously or accidentally obtained information and privacy: Theory versus law
    • M. Richardson, ‘Breach of Confidence: Surreptitiously or Accidentally Obtained Information and Privacy: Theory Versus Law’ (1994) 19 MULR 673.
    • (1994) MULR , vol.19
    • Richardson, M.1
  • 252
    • 84985330430 scopus 로고
    • Surreptitious takings of confidential information
    • G. Wei, ‘Surreptitious Takings of Confidential Information’ (1992) 12 Legal Studies 302.
    • (1992) Legal Studies , vol.12
    • Wei, G.1
  • 253
  • 256
    • 78650110245 scopus 로고
    • Ownership of property in the context of employment
    • A. Stewart, ‘Ownership of Property in the Context of Employment’ (1992) 5 Australian J of Labour L 1.
    • (1992) Australian J of Labour L , vol.5
    • Stewart, A.1
  • 260
    • 84878741406 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Drafting and enforcing post-employment restraints
    • A. Stewart, ‘Drafting and Enforcing Post-Employment Restraints’ (1997) 10 Australian J of Labour L 181.
    • (1997) Australian J of Labour L , vol.10
    • Stewart, A.1
  • 261
    • 0041310635 scopus 로고
    • Sydney: Law Book Company
    • Finn, Fiduciary Obligations (Sydney: Law Book Company 1977), 267.
    • (1977) Fiduciary Obligations
    • Finn1
  • 262
    • 0007422507 scopus 로고
    • Oxford: Clarendon Press
    • Gurry, Breach of Confidence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), 177–9.
    • (1984) Breach of Confidence , pp. 177-179
    • Gurry1
  • 266
    • 84878698245 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fidelity in the post-industrial age: Developments in case law on employee disclosure of confidential information’
    • A. Brooks, ‘“Fidelity” in the Post-Industrial Age: Developments in Case Law on Employee Disclosure of Confidential Information’ (2002) 28(1) Mon ULR 126.
    • (2002) Mon ULR , vol.28 , Issue.1
    • Brooks, A.1
  • 274
  • 275
    • 85066560214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scope of public interest defence in actions for breach of confidence
    • T. Glover, ‘Scope of Public Interest Defence in Actions for Breach of Confidence’ (1999) 6 JCULR 109.
    • (1999) JCULR , vol.6
    • Glover, T.1
  • 276
    • 85066526295 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Breach of confidence by government, smith kline and the trips agreement – public interest to the rescue
    • T. Voon, ‘Breach of confidence by Government, Smith Kline and the TRIPs agreement – Public Interest to the rescue’ (1998) 9 AIPJ 66.
    • (1998) AIPJ , vol.9
    • Voon, T.1
  • 277
    • 84891461788 scopus 로고
    • The impact of the high courts free speech cases on defamation law’
    • S. Walker, ‘The impact of the High Court’s Free Speech Cases on Defamation Law’ (1995) 17 Sydney Law Review 43.
    • (1995) Sydney Law Review , vol.17
    • Walker, S.1
  • 279
    • 0007422507 scopus 로고
    • Oxford: Clarendon Press, ch 6, 124–30
    • Gurry, Breach of Confidence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), ch 6, 124–30.
    • (1984) Breach of Confidence
    • Gurry1
  • 282
    • 67049138144 scopus 로고
    • Damages for breach of purely equitable rights: The breach of confidence example’
    • P. D. Finn
    • J. Stuckey-Clarke, ‘“Damages” for Breach of Purely Equitable Rights: The Breach of Confidence Example’ in P. D. Finn (ed), Essays on Damages (1992), 69.
    • (1992) Essays on Damages
    • Stuckey-Clarke, J.1
  • 284
    • 85066532956 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Balancing the rights of the patentee and prior user of an invention: The australian experience
    • A. L. Monotti, ‘Balancing the rights of the patentee and prior user of an invention: the Australian experience’ (1997) 19(7) EIPR 351.
    • (1997) EIPR , vol.19 , Issue.7
    • Monotti, A.L.1
  • 297
  • 298
    • 85066564728 scopus 로고
    • Minister for science and technology, second reading speech
    • 10 October
    • Hon S. Crean, Minister for Science and Technology, Second Reading Speech, House of Representatives Debates, 10 October 1990, 2565.
    • (1990) House of Representatives Debates
    • Crean, H.S.1
  • 299
    • 84922947235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Second-tier patent systems: The australian experience
    • S. L. Moritz and A. F. Christie, ‘Second-Tier Patent Systems: The Australian Experience’ [2006] EIPR 230.
    • (2006) EIPR
    • Moritz, S.L.1    Christie, A.F.2
  • 301
    • 6444237341 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods of medical treatment within australian and united kingdom patents law
    • J. Pila, ‘Methods of Medical Treatment within Australian and United Kingdom Patents Law’ (2001) 24(2) UNSW Law J 420.
    • (2001) UNSW Law J , vol.24 , Issue.2
    • Pila, J.1
  • 302
    • 0029241033 scopus 로고
    • Of patents and patients: New monopolies in medical methods
    • P. Loughlan, ‘Of Patents and Patients: New Monopolies in Medical Methods’ (1995) 6 AIPJ 5.
    • (1995) AIPJ , vol.6
    • Loughlan, P.1
  • 303
    • 84923686837 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The scope of “manner of manufacture under the patents act 1990 (Cth) after grant v commissioner of patents’
    • A. L. Monotti, ‘The scope of “manner of manufacture” under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) after Grant v Commissioner of Patents’ (2006) 34(3) Federal Law Rev 462.
    • (2006) Federal Law Rev , vol.34 , Issue.3
    • Monotti, A.L.1
  • 304
    • 84923973552 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact of the new grace period under australian patent law on universities
    • A. L. Monotti, ‘The Impact of the New Grace Period under Australian Patent Law on Universities’ [2002] 24(10) EIPR 475.
    • (2002) EIPR , vol.24 , Issue.10
    • Monotti, A.L.1
  • 305
    • 84881788357 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patent claims for analogous use and the threshold requirement of inventiveness
    • D. Brennan and A. Christie, ‘Patent Claims for Analogous Use and the Threshold Requirement of Inventiveness’ (1997) Federal Law Rev 237.
    • (1997) Federal Law Rev
    • Brennan, D.1    Christie, A.2
  • 306
    • 85066524749 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To make an article for ultimate sale: The secret use provision in the patents act 1990 (cth)
    • A. L. Monotti, ‘To make an article for ultimate sale: the secret use provision in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)’ [2005] 27(12) EIPR 446.
    • (2005) EIPR , vol.27 , Issue.12
    • Monotti, A.L.1
  • 307
    • 80052357702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The evolution of english patent claims as property definers
    • D. J. Brennan, ‘The Evolution of English Patent Claims as Property Definers’ [2005] 4 Intellectual Property Quarterly 361.
    • (2005) Intellectual Property Quarterly , vol.4
    • Brennan, D.J.1
  • 310
    • 85066525639 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sufficiency of description: At what time is adequacy to be considered?
    • A. L. Monotti, ‘Sufficiency of description: At what time is adequacy to be considered?’ (2005) 16 AIPJ 152, 153–7.
    • (2005) AIPJ , vol.16
    • Monotti, A.L.1
  • 311
    • 84923973549 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The problem child in australian patent law: “fair basing’
    • A. J. McBratney, ‘The Problem Child in Australian Patent law: “Fair” Basing’ (2001) AIPJ 21.
    • (2001) AIPJ
    • McBratney, A.J.1
  • 320
    • 67149100713 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fiduciary obligations
    • P. Parkinson, (ed), 2nd ed, Law Book Company, ch 10
    • P. Parkinson, ‘Fiduciary Obligations’ in P. Parkinson, (ed) The Principles of Equity (2nd ed, Law Book Company, 2003), ch 10.
    • (2003) The Principles of Equity
    • Parkinson, P.1
  • 324
    • 0242652698 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The australian medical biotechnology industry and access to intellectual property: Issues for patent law development
    • D. Nicol and J. Nielsen, ‘The Australian Medical Biotechnology Industry and Access to Intellectual Property: Issues for Patent Law Development’ (2001) 23 Sydney L Rev 347, 372.
    • (2001) Sydney L Rev , vol.23 , pp. 347-372
    • Nicol, D.1    Nielsen, J.2
  • 325
    • 80052357702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The evolution of english patent claims as property definers
    • D. J. Brennan, ‘The Evolution of English Patent Claims as Property Definers’ [2005] 4 IPQ 361.
    • (2005) IPQ , vol.4
    • Brennan, D.J.1
  • 326
    • 85066524749 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To make an article for ultimate sale: The secret use provision in the patents act 1990 (cth)
    • A. Monotti, ‘To make an article for ultimate sale: the secret use provision in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)’ [2005] 27(12) EIPR 446.
    • (2005) EIPR , vol.27 , Issue.12
    • Monotti, A.1
  • 327
    • 85066524749 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To make an article for ultimate sale: The secret use provision in the patents act 1990 (cth)
    • Monotti, ‘To make an article for ultimate sale: the secret use provision in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)’ [2005] 27(12) EIPR 446.
    • (2005) EIPR , vol.27 , Issue.12
    • Monotti1
  • 328
    • 85066524749 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To make an articlefor ultimate sale: The secret use provision in the patents act 1990 (cth)
    • Monotti, ‘To make an articlefor ultimate sale: the secret use provision in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)’ [2005] 27(12) EIPR 446.
    • (2005) EIPR , vol.27 , Issue.12
    • Monotti1
  • 330
    • 85066579787 scopus 로고
    • Contributory infringement of a process patent under the patents act 1990: Does it exist after rescare?
    • A. Monotti, ‘Contributory Infringement of a Process Patent under the Patents Act 1990: Does it exist after Rescare?’ (1995) 6(4) AIPJ 217.
    • (1995) AIPJ , vol.6 , Issue.4
    • Monotti, A.1
  • 332
    • 85066579787 scopus 로고
    • Contributory infringement of a process patent under the patents act 1990: Does it exist after rescare?
    • Monotti, ‘Contributory Infringement of a Process Patent under the Patents Act 1990: Does it exist after Rescare?’ (1995) 6(4) AIPJ 217.
    • (1995) AIPJ , vol.6 , Issue.4
    • Monotti1
  • 336
    • 85066579787 scopus 로고
    • Contributory infringement of a process patent under the patents act 1990: Does it exist after rescare?
    • Monotti, ‘Contributory Infringement of a Process Patent under the Patents Act 1990: Does it exist after Rescare?’ (1995) 6(4) AIPJ 217.
    • (1995) AIPJ , vol.6 , Issue.4
    • Monotti1
  • 338
    • 85066532956 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Balancing the rights of the patentee and prior user of an invention: The australian experience
    • A. L. Monotti, ‘Balancing the rights of the patentee and prior user of an invention: the Australian experience’ [1997] 19(7) EIPR 351.
    • (1997) EIPR , vol.19 , Issue.7
    • Monotti, A.L.1
  • 339
    • 85066576906 scopus 로고
    • Fourth biennial patent system ‘prior user rights’ panel discussion
    • (Ms Strobel)
    • Franklin Pierce Law Centre, Fourth Biennial Patent System ‘Prior User Rights’ Panel discussion, (1994) 34 DEA117, 118–21 (Ms Strobel).
    • (1994) DEA , vol.34
  • 340
    • 85066576906 scopus 로고
    • Fourth biennial patent system ‘prior user rights’ panel discussion
    • (Ms Strobel). 414 (Mr Griswold)
    • Franklin Pierce Law Centre, Fourth Biennial Patent System ‘Prior User Rights’ Panel discussion, (1994) 34 DEA117, 118–21 (Ms Strobel). 414 (Mr Griswold).
    • (1994) DEA , vol.34
  • 341
    • 85066532956 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Balancing the rights of the patentee and prior user of an invention: The australian experience
    • A. L. Monotti, ‘Balancing the rights of the patentee and prior user of an invention: the Australian experience’ [1997] 19(7) EIPR 351.
    • (1997) EIPR , vol.19 , Issue.7
    • Monotti, A.L.1
  • 344
    • 85066579961 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Limitations on the scope of a patentees exclusive rights in the context of third party experimental uses’
    • Monotti ‘Limitations on the scope of a patentee’s exclusive rights in the context of third party experimental uses’ (2006) 29(2) UNSWLJ 63.
    • (2006) UNSWLJ , vol.29 , Issue.2
    • Monotti1
  • 345
    • 85066579961 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Limitations on the scope, ‘limitations on the scope of a patentee’s exclusive rights in the context of third party experimental uses’
    • Monotti, ‘Limitations on the scope’, ‘Limitations on the scope of a patentee’s exclusive rights in the context of third party experimental uses’ (2006) 29(2) UNSWLJ 63.
    • (2006) UNSWLJ , vol.29 , Issue.2
    • Monotti1
  • 347
    • 85066553118 scopus 로고
    • The 1961 act
    • Anon, ‘The 1961 Act’ (1962) 1 Industrial Property 5–14.
    • (1962) Industrial Property , vol.1 , pp. 5-14
    • Anon1
  • 348
    • 85066582013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Plant breeders rights’
    • J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Sydney: Expert Panel on Breeding, Clarification of Plant Breeding Issues under the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994 December
    • N. Byrne, ‘Plant Breeder’s Rights’ in J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights Sydney: Expert Panel on Breeding, Clarification of Plant Breeding Issues under the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994 (December 2002): .
    • (2002) Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights
    • Byrne, N.1
  • 357
    • 85066582013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Plant breeders rights’
    • J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths
    • Byrne, ‘Plant Breeder’s Rights’, in J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights (Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2001).
    • (2001) Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights
    • Byrne1
  • 360
    • 85066582013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Plant breeders rights’
    • J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths
    • Byrne, ‘Plant Breeder’s Rights’, in J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights (Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2001).
    • (2001) Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights
    • Byrne1
  • 361
    • 85066582013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Plant breeders rights’
    • J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths
    • Byrne, ‘Plant Breeder’s Rights’, in J. Lahore, J. Garnsey and A. Dufty, Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights (Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2001).
    • (2001) Patents Trade Marks and Related Rights
    • Byrne1
  • 363
    • 14544284021 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Franklin barley: Patent lawand plant breeders rights’
    • Rimmer, ‘Franklin Barley: patent lawand plant breeder’s rights’ (2003) 10 Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 1.
    • (2003) Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law , vol.10
    • Rimmer1
  • 365
    • 85066590883 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stop! in the name of equity
    • G. Wilkinson, ‘Stop! In the Name of Equity’ (2006) 19 AIPBLB 37.
    • (2006) AIPBLB , vol.19
    • Wilkinson, G.1
  • 367
    • 85066597358 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Groundless threats of trade mark infringement proceedings: How to avoid getting court
    • N. Weston and M. Davison, ‘Groundless Threats of Trade Mark Infringement Proceedings: How to Avoid getting Court’ (2000) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 151–61.
    • (2000) Australian Intellectual Property Journal , pp. 151-161
    • Weston, N.1    Davison, M.2
  • 369
    • 0040290222 scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed, LBC
    • Kercher and Noone, Remedies (2nd ed, LBC, 1990), 276.
    • (1990) Remedies
    • Kercher1    Noone2
  • 370
    • 0040290222 scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed, LBC
    • Kercher and Noone, Remedies, (2nd ed, LBC, 1990), 276.
    • (1990) Remedies
    • Kercher1    Noone2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.