People and boundaries: An “internationalized public law” approach

States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 298-316

  Kingsbury, Benedict ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924014448     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613937.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Hedley Bull, “The Grotian Conception of International Society,” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigations(London: Allen and Unwin, 1966).
2. Temple of Preah Vihear (Thailand v. Cambodia), 1962 International Court of Justice, Rep. 6.
3. Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Mali), 1986 International Court of Justice, Rep. 554.
4. Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras, Nicaragua Intervening), 1992 International Court of Justice, Rep. 351.
5. Territorial Dispute (Chad/Libya), 1994 International Court of Justice, Rep. 6.
6. Rann of Kutch (India/Pakistan) (1968), 50 ILR 2.
7. Dubai/Sharjah Border Arbitration (1981), 91 ILR 543.
8. Taba (Egypt/Israel) (1988), 80 ILR 244.
9. Hedley Bull, “International Law and International Order,” International Organization(1972), 583–88.
10. Hedley Bull, “International Relations as an Academic Pursuit,” Australian Outlook263, (1972)
11. Kai Alderson and Andrew Hurrell, eds., Hedley Bull on International Society(Basingstoke, U.K.: Macmillan, 2000), 246–64.
12. Charles de Visscher, Theory and Reality of Public International Law, 2nd ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968), 209.
13. A. Oye Cukwurah, The Settlement of Boundary Disputes in International Law(Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1967).
14. Richard Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and International Order from Grotius to Kant(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
15. Leslie Bethell, ed., Latin America Since 1930: Economy, Science, Politics, vol. 6 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
16. Barbara Arneil, John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
17. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Human Rights Committee’s General Comment on this; Brian Barry and Robert Goodin, eds., Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and Money(London: Harvester, 1992).
18. Henry Schermers, ed., Free Movement of Persons in Europe: Legal Problems and Experiences(Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1993).
19. Dorothy Solinger, “Human Rights Issues in China’s Internal Migration: Insights from Comparisons with Germany and Japan,” in Joanne Bauer and Daniel Bell, eds., The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 285–312.
20. Materials on the ChinaWestern Poverty Reduction Project appear on the Internet at www.worldbank.org.
21. Belgian Linguisticcase, European Court of Human Rights (1968), 1 EHRR 252.
22. Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, European Court of Human Rights (1987), 10 EHRR 1.
23. Lassa Oppenheim, International Law(London: Longmans, 1905).
24. Michael Reisman’s “Protecting Indigenous Rights in International Adjudication,” American Journal of International Law89 (1995), 350–62.
25. Hugo Grotius De Jure Belli ac Pacis(1625), Book II, Chapter 9.
26. Anne Peters, Das Gebietsreferendum im Völkerrecht: seine Bedeutung im Licht der Staatenpraxis nach1989(Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995).
27. Sarah Wambaugh, The Doctrine of National Self-Determination: A Monograph on Plebiscites(New York: Oxford University Press, 1920).
28. Sarah Wambaugh, Plebiscites Since the World War, 2 volumes (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1933).
29. Indian Association of Alberta v. Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, (1982) 2 WLR 641.
30. High Court of Australia, (1985) 57 ALR 472.
31. DeLima v. Bidwell(1901), 182 US 1
32. Balzac v. Porto Rico(1922), 288 US 298.
33. Mabo v. Queensland(No. 2), (1992) 175 CLR 1.
34. Jonathan I. Charney and J. R. V. Prescott, “Resolving Cross-Strait Relations Between China andTaiwan,” American Journal of International Law94 (2000), 453–77.